In an article posted today :

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/07/AR2007090702050_pf.html

Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, former chairman and vice chairman of the 9/11 commission complain that "The terrible losses our country suffered on 9/11 should have catalyzed efforts to create an America that is safer, stronger and wiser. We still have a long way to go.
"

"Should have catalyzed?" Interesting word, catalyzed. When did we last hear that one?

Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor.

Sept 2000 PNAC
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton seem to be saying that 9/11 did not work as well for the NWO as they had originally hoped it would. Is this a signal to go ahead with their next false flag event? Something even more "catalyzing" that Pearl Harbor and 9/11?

Or is this simply an admission that the 9/11 Truth Movement is having an effect?