Alex Jones speech at Webster Hall - 9/9/07

Alex Jones gives a fiery rant just prior to the New York City premiere of his latest documentary "Endgame". Delivered at Webster Hall in the East Village on 9/9/2007 as part of the benefit for the first responders.

Alex Jones = Right winger

Make no mistake, Alex Jones is way, way right-wing. "Endgame" is scary. For one thing, it tries to claim that the enviromental movement and pro-choice advocates are fronts intent on killing off 80 percent of the world's population.

This is no help for 9/11 Truth. I'm very sorry to see Loose Change and We Are Change NYC teaming up with Alex Jones. I hope we can stay focused on bringing the 9/11 criminals to light and to justice. Alex Jones may uncover useful facts now and then, but his overview interpretation of world politics is downright scary. Stay away.

I agree...

One thing that bothers me about seeing all these truth video's on the street is the approach many are taking. The Truther will shout something like, "Investigate 911...Truth NOW!" This strategy extremely ineffective. Imagine driving by a group and seeing bunch of signs that say, "Free Jumilla!" and shouting. You drive/walk right by.

First off, you have to have your facts straight. You need to have 5 top key points ready to discuss and another 100 on tap. Then, you need to start the conversation with something important and engaging like, "Excuse me sir, do you know what Thermate is? Well, it brought down the WTC's..."

Second, you need to engage everyone you know. You already have credibility with them. You don't have a huge obstacle to hurdle. Shouting on a street corner is useless. Once your friends and family know, it will ultimately become viral. I had a movie night where I told them we were gonna sip a little wine and watch "Jerry Maguire"...then I popped in Loosechange. It blew their minds. This tactic was surprisingly successful.

If you are a good enough speaker and an expert...well, then you can join the circuit with DRG and Gage.

I think the point of street

I think the point of street demonstration is to give permission to the pedestrians walking by rahter than to give information. That is, those who demonstrate are showing their willingness to exhibit their unorthodox and heretical beliefs about 9/11. These are not meant to convince those who are unconvinced, but give permission to those who are already questioning the oct.

As to Alex Jones, he is a paleoconvservative and quite up front about it. Sometimes he presents very valuable information, but the ideology he's pushing, the conspiracy theory version of history for instance, or the fundamentalist Christianity, is a retrograde ideology.

Alex understands the big picture...

Downright scary....but 90% of it is dead on true.

The left does not have a monopoly on the 911 truth movement... Years ago, I considered myself "right wing". Now, I know that the entire left/right paradigm is B.S. I am for small government and national sovereignty because centralization of power makes it easier for ruthless evil men to take over. That's part of why they want a world government, via regional bureaucratic boards with supra-governmental power (ala North American Union organizations)

The true and sad fact of the matter is...

Can you put anything past the scumbag murderers and liars.

As to what they have planned, I have no idea but I would not consider ANYTHING is beyond them.

Endgame is reality. Nothing

Endgame is reality. Nothing less and nothing more. It is not "his view of world politics". He is only basing what he is saying based off of factual and documented writings and words.

The left/right paradigm is nothing but an illusion. It's the ultimate divide and conquer technique.

Yes, Endgame is "scary", but the reality is that it is documented that there are people out there whose goal is to reduce the word's population by 80-90% and these people have the power and the means to do so. Almost every single thing around us is put there to poison us. Why do you think that is?

jfal, your admitting that

jfal, your admitting that you found AJ's "interpretation of world politics is downright scary", that's right it is scary, but it cowardice on your part to attack him for having the guts and mental strength to expose such an horrific notion. Frankly if people vote this blog down it's out of them being overloaded with the idea that these completely megalomaniac elite actually want to seek a world population reduction which means murdering billions of people. It’s a completely insane concept. Hopefully it'll never come to that and the saner people in the elite, prompted by the resistance we all make to this overall agenda, will help to derail such utterly bizarre madness.

This is something to take seriously and something that we do need to talk about and expose. Also if you know about AJ he's not "right wing" he's a genuine conservative. He completely rejects that "left-right paradigm" as a false load of divide and conquer distraction garbage. You jfal by identifying AJ as "right wing" have clearly fallen for the "left-right paradigm". It's freedom or slavery that represents the true paradigm and if you don’t recognize that and recognize that environmental issues like the "man-made global warming" theory are also used to manipulate people in exactly the same way "terrorism" is, then you've still got a quite bit of waking up to do.

I was on the fence on global warming...

until I heard that EVERY major ESTABLISHMENT organization and person, including a Rothschild, was behind it. I found it suspicious that simple problems like air pollution was shoved aside and the one-sided incredible emphasis on carbon dioxide was shown to the world..

scary off the mark

Endgame is scary because it's so way off the mark. I support the environmental movement. I support a woman's right to choose. I don't support Alex Jones. It's a real mistake for "9/11 truth" to allign itself with Alex Jones and his fantasy worldview.

the debate is far from over...

Alex is not saying that being an environmentalist is bad. He is saying that the environmental movement is coopted by the globalists.

I just don't want to be taxed on my "carbon footprint". I don't want to be taxed to have more than 1 child.

I have always suspected the Sierra Club

and others were co opted. But the right to have children? Pretend ten of us live on an island. There is enough food for 10. You, however, decide you can have as many children as you choose. You ignore the entreaties from the original 10. You have a couple kids. We shoot you and your children. Do your rights to have children supercede our rights to live? Don't think so.

Many people don't like to talk about peak oil. For one or another silly false beliefs. But here is the deal. It is peaking. It is .. and all the peaking natural resources comprise.... much of the underlying reason for 9/11. Read a recent report on the peaking of the natural phosphates. You know. The stuff you put in dirt to make plants grow.

Insecticides come from oil. Fertilizers from oil/natural gas. Energy to run farm equipment, to make farm equipment, from oil. With all of that stuff, a hectare of land can produce enough food to support say, 40 souls. You take all of that away and how many can you support? 10. Think of that globally. Three quarters of the population.

You are witnessing, probably, the beginning of the final global resource wars right now. Worse yet to come. Who gets to eat. Who dies.

just some random thoughts.....

Alex Jones Is a Left-Wing Liberal

The terms "left" and "right" in the political sense go back to 1789 in France. When the French Estates-General (États-Généraux) met on May 6, 1789, the Third Estate commoners, who wanted less taxes and government control (i.e., "laissez-faire"), were seated on the left side of King Louis XVI, and the Second Estate nobles and First Estate clergy, who were the conservatives and wanted to maintain the government's power, sat on his right. (Prior to the May 1789 convention of the French Estates-General [the first meeting of which was on May 5, 1789], the last time the Estates-General had met was under King Louis XIII from October 27, 1614 to February 23, 1615.)

Also, "liberal" originally meant what we would call today (at least in the U.S. and Canada) "libertarian," i.e., laissez-faire free market, less taxes, less regulation, and gun ownership by the common people. Thus, in the original sense of the words, someone who wanted no taxes, all drugs to be legal, a free market, and armament of the common people would be a left-wing liberal.

The term "liberal" as it is commonly used today is purely and simply a misnomer meaning the opposite of what it originally meant, as those commonly called "liberals" today are about giving government more power, not in stripping government of power. Those commonly called "liberals" today are in fact *right-wing conservatives* in the original sense of that political term. So also, socialism and communism are exceedingly *right-wing* and *conservative* political philosophies, as they put all power into the hands of government, rather than strip government of power.

Of course, this change in the meaning of liberalism (such that today it means the opposite of what it originally meant) was by no accident. Authentic liberalism represents the only genuine threat to statism (i.e., right-wing conservatism, in the original sense of the term), and due to liberalism's triumphs in gaining the intellectual high-ground during the 19th century, it was necessary for the ruling elite to subvert the liberal agenda if they were to survive. The ruling elite did this by sabotaging the very meaning of the terms "liberalism" and "left-wing"--such that these terms now popularly mean the opposite of what they once did--via bankrolling and promoting self-termed "liberal" court intellectuals who in fact promote the right-wing, conservative agenda, i.e., statism, i.e., collectivism. Thus, in doing this, the ruling elite succeeded in changing the meaning of their oppositional philosophy to a philosophy that supports their empowerment! That is, the ruling elite created another branch of right-wing conservatism, nowadays called by the misnomer "liberalism," so also by the names of socialism and Communism.

For the history on how the "capitalist" (i.e., mercantilist) elite in the West bankrolled Communism (as well as National Socialism), see the below scholarly books by Antony C. Sutton, Ph.D.:

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Antony C. Sutton, Ph.D. (New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House Publishers, 1974)

(Note: Chapter I of the above book refers to a 1911 St. Louis Post-Dispatch cartoon illustration by Robert Minor. This can be viewed here: .)

Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Antony C. Sutton, Ph.D. (Suffolk, England: Bloomfield Books, 1976)

The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, Antony C. Sutton, Ph.D. (Billings, M.T.: Liberty House Press, 1986)

Bush, Jr., like all modern U.S. presidents, is simply a puppet of his ruling elite backers. As President Franklin D. Roosevelt noted:

The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson--and I am not wholly excepting the Administration of W.W. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States--only on a far bigger and broader basis.

(From President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, November 21, 1933; contained in F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1928-1945, edited by Elliott Roosevelt [New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1950], pg. 373.)

Roosevelt in the above letter mentioned President Woodrow Wilson ("W.W."). Below is what Woodrow Wilson himself wrote concerning this same matter:

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.


[A]nd we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world--no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.

(From Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People [New York and Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Company, 1913] .)

For the Marxian Trotskyist background of the neo-conservatives, see the below scholarly speech by Dr. Ron Paul, Republican Congressman from Texas. It gives many references and direct quotes from neo-conservative works, and so it's a valuable resource for further research.

"Neo-Conned!," Hon. Ron Paul of Texas (Republican), In the House of Representatives, July 10, 2003

Here's some choice quotes from David Rockefeller:

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."--David Rockefeller, Memoirs (Random House, 2002), pg. 405

"One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony. ... There is a very real and pervasive dedication to Chairman Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive. ... The enormous social advances of China have benefitted greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose. ... The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history"--David Rockefeller, in his article "From a China Traveler," New York Times, August 10, 1973, pg. 31

For more on the New World Order, in the words of the globalists themselves, see the below page:

"Quotes on the New World Order," State-Terror Archive:

It's also important to note that among many other Marxist planks that have fully or partially been implemented in the U.S., plank No. 5 of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels's Communist Manifesto is "Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly." (See Manifesto of the Communist Party by Marx and Engels, English edition of 1888 .)


More than six times the amount of noncombatants have been systematically murdered for purely ideological reasons by their own governments within the past century than were killed in that same time-span from wars. From 1900 to 1923, various Turkish regimes murdered from 3.5 million to over 4.3 million of its own Armenians, Greeks, Nestorians, and other Christians. The Soviet government murdered over 61 million of its own non-combatant subjects. The communist Chinese government murdered over 76 million of it own subjects. And Germany murdered some 16 million of it own subjects in the past century. And that's only a sampling of governments mass-murdering their own noncombatant subjects within the past century. (The preceding figures are from Prof. Rudolph Joseph Rummel's website at .)

All totaled, neither the private-sector crime which government is largely responsible for promoting and causing or even the wars committed by governments upon the subjects of other governments come anywhere close to the crimes government is directly responsible for committing against its own citizens--certainly not in amount of numbers. Without a doubt, the most dangerous presence to ever exist throughout history has always been the people's very own government.

Not only were all of these government mass-slaughters conspiracies--massive conspiracies, at that--but they were conspiracies of which the 9/11 attacks are quite insignificant by comparison.

For more on the globalist elite's misanthropic, Malthusian New World Order population reduction agenda (using the globalist elite's "Peak Oil" and "Global Warming" [or is it "Global Cooling"?] scams as pretexts), see the below articles:

"Forrest Mims did not Misrepresent Prof. Eric Pianka's Statements," James Redford, expanded edition, April 13, 2006

"Top Scientist Advocates Mass Culling 90% Of Human Population--Fellow professors and scientists applause and roar approval at elite's twisted and genocidal population control agenda," Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones,, April 3, 2006

"Burnet's solution: The plan to poison S-E Asia," Brendan Nicholson, The Age, March 10, 2002

"Kissinger's 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide," Joseph Brewda, December 8, 1995

"National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," National Security Council, Washington, D.C., April 24, 1974

"China trades prisoners' organs," video report by Rupert Wingfield-Hayes, BBC News, September 27, 2006

Below is a BBC News article on the above BBC News video report:

"Organ sales 'thriving' in China," BBC News, September 27, 2006

Below is a partial transcript of the above BBC News video report:

"Evidence of Chinese organ harvesting," transcript of a BBC News video by reporter Rupert Wingfield-Hayes, broadcasted September 28, 2006 on Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)

And the below article concerns the Communist Chinese government's response to the above BBC News video report wherein the Communist Chinese government lies about not selling executed prisoners' organs:

"China denies death-row organ sale," BBC News, September 28, 2006

"Bloody Harvest: Revised Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China," David Matas, Esq. and Hon. David Kilgour, Esq., January 31, 2007

"A legacy of tainted blood," Steve Sternberg, USA Today, July 11, 2006

"France Approved Use of AIDS-Tainted Blood," Alan Riding, New York Times, October 20, 1991

"Bayer Documents: AIDS Tainted Blood Killed Thousands of Hemophiliacs," Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), May 22, 2003

"2 Paths of Bayer Drug in 80's: Riskier Type Went Overseas," Walt Bogdanich and Eric Koli, New York Times, May 22, 2003

"Selling Medicine In Spite of Danger," New York Times, May 21, 2003

Page One, Sheryl WuDunn, Discovery Times (Discovery Channel and New York Times), May 22, 2003

"Bayer Sold HIV-Risky Meds: Says Can't Judge Mid 80s Actions By 2003 Standards And Knowledge," David McHugh, Associated Press (AP), May 22, 2003

"Thousands Contracted HIV Using Tainted Bayer Drug," Charles Joseph Scarborough, Scarborough Country (MSNBC), August 23, 2003:

"Government knew of HIV risk from imported blood: Expert panel decided against import ban--since then 1,757 have died," Sarah Hall, Guardian (U.K.), May 25, 2007,,2087945,00.html

"Terrorism is the health of the State."--James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," June 1, 2006

Very nice review

Generally, I found your review coherent and not much is there with which we might disagree. Although I do disagree about Peak Oil. You take the 'scam' side, I take the other. After much review of the material. Peak Oil (and peaking other resources) a discussion which has yet to conclude and given the elites' control of the media, it is hard to determine what is real and what is not. (although the current geopolitical maneuverings are clearly, and at least in a big part, concerned about resource control.) For a very nice essay on the media control go here: [ ] For a look at original documentation of 1972 1974 world population reports where the intent to decrease the world population by 3 billion or so is documented - they are available at the same site (follow the links)

Personally, I find Alex Jone's work mostly credible and am looking forward to seeing his group's new movie, 'Endgame'. For me, I'd bet this will be a more enlightening movie than will be 'Loose Change, Final Cut" (though I am not disparaging the latter). I, strangely, find myself warming to Jones, warts and all. The main issues are preservation of the Republic and the necessary distruction of the elites and all they represent.

I do, however, believe burgeoning population vs earth resources available to sustain all the people to be the crucial issue. While others may disagree, I find the evidence supporting this issue as crucial to be overwhelming. The question of how the balance between population and the earth's viability as a biosphere is to be achieved is the very big elephant in the room. The elites' solution (benefitting them of course) is to cull billions of souls from the planet. (and make the rest serfs). I hope the earth's peoples rise up in revolution against these powerful manipulators and destroyers of life. How to constrain the biological imperative to procreate in a manner that is just to all and without recourse (intentional or inadvertent) to the time-tested methods of starvation, disease and war is the question.

I am not optimisitic.

"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)


The world isn't so-called "overpopulated" nor becoming so. The more people there are the more resources and wealth there are per capita, because people create resources and wealth, and the more people there are the more opportunities there are for efficient divisions of labor, hence obtaining a more efficient economic system.

In short, the more people there are on Earth, the more wealthy people become per capita (and hence, the more wealth there is in the world in total). Thus, the rational thing to do is to eagerly welcome increasing world populations, since it makes people per capita better off.

For more on this, see the below:

"The Doomslayer: The environment is going to hell, and human life is doomed to only get worse, right? Wrong. Conventional wisdom, meet Julian Simon, the Doomslayer.," Ed Regis, Wired, Issue 5.02, February 1997

The Ultimate Resource 2 by Prof. Julian L. Simon (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, revised edition, 1998)

Of course, the governmental ruling elites are murderously against this, because they fear losing their power to increased populations which they can no longer control and to ever-increasing wealth in the hands of the common masses which makes the common masses more powerful and independent. This is the real reason behind all the governmental school and mass media indoctrination and propaganda which seeks to scare the masses to no end about so-called "overpopulation" and to provide justifications for mass-slaughter in order to reduce the world's population. It has nothing to do with helping the common masses, and everything to do with the governmental ruling elites setting forth an agenda to justify murderously slaughtering large portions of the world's population in order so that they can maintain their power.


The originator of the peak oil theory, Marion King Hubbert, was a geophysicist for Royal Dutch Shell (at the time owned in large part by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, now owned in large part by his daughter, Queen Beatrix) at a research lab in Houston, Texas. Prince Bernhard was one of the founders of the Bilderberg group and the World Wildlife Fund (later renamed World Wide Fund for Nature). Queen Beatrix has been a long-time member of the Bilderberg group and the Malthusian Club of Rome.

There are more *proven* oil reserves than the world knows what to do with. By *proven* oil reserves it is meant reserves that are known to be economically viable to bring to market with current technology; which is to say, the oil reserves are actually larger, as advancing technology makes bringing to market previously economically unviable oil reserves profitable.

As Leonardo Maugeri notes in Science (Vol. 304, Issue 5674, May 21, 2004, pp. 1114-1115 ):

All these factors partly explain why the life-index of world reserves (gauged as the ratio between proven oil reserves and current production) has constantly improved, passing from 20 years in 1948 to 35 years in 1972 and reaching about 40 years in 2003. Today, all major sources estimate that proven world oil reserves exceed 1 trillion (10^12) barrels, while yearly consumption is about 28 billion barrels (10-13). Overall, the world retains more than 3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil resources (14).

So one can know with certainty that the world is in absolutely no danger of running out of oil anytime soon. Indeed, the more time goes on the greater the life-index of proven world oil reserves increases.

Definitely read the below David McGowan article, which gets into the globalist elite's agenda to reduce most of the world's population (i.e., quite literally murdering off most people on the Earth) using the "Peak Oil" scam as one of the pretexts--an elitist, misanthropic, Malthusian agenda promoted by population reductionists like Michael Ruppert:

"Beware the 'Peak Oil' Agenda," David McGowan, Center for an Informed America, Newsletter #70, October 12, 2004:

"I advocate an immediate convening of political, economic, spiritual and scientific leaders from all nations to address the issue of Peak Oil (and Gas) and its immediate implications for economic collapse, massive famine and climate destruction (partially as a result of reversion to coal plants which accelerate global warming). This would, scientifically speaking, include immediate steps to arrive at a crash program – agreed to by all nations and in accordance with the highest spiritual and ethical principles – to stop global population growth and to arrive at the best possible and most ethical program of population reduction as a painful choice made by all of humanity."--Michael C. Ruppert, in a March 2004 email to David McGowan, "Ruppert Responds!," David McGowan, Center for an Informed America, Newsletter #54, March 18, 2004

For much, much more on this, see my below page:

"The 'Peak Oil' Scam," TetrahedronOmega, December 5, 2005-March 25, 2006

"Terrorism is the health of the State."--James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," June 1, 2006