Tom Tancredo Meets the Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth

GOP '08 Presidential Candidate Tom Tancredo discusses 9/11 and Oklahoma city with Eric Jackman from Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth

this is the guy who says

this is the guy who says illegal aliens are going to take over our country right? didnt he also advocate bombing Mecca after the next "terrorist attack"? cant say im surprised that he would be open to OKC "conspiracy theories" seeing as how its obvious that Iraqis were supposed to be the patsies in that "attack". hes still trying to pin that one on Iraq. it was the Feds you dummy.......

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Republican Tancredo's

Republican Tancredo's Foreign Policy: Bomb Mecca

And now, Tancredo's doing it again. (via TPM)

"If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina," the GOP presidential candidate said. "That is the only thing I can think of that might deter somebody from doing what they would otherwise do. If I am wrong fine, tell me, and I would be happy to do something else. But you had better find a deterrent or you will find an attack. There is no other way around it. There have to be negative consequences for the actions they take. That's the most negative I can think of."

its pretty safe to say that if you're talking about bombing Mecca then you buy into the entire "war on terror" and all of its lies in a very big(and disturbing) way. nice effort, but i personally would have been tougher on him.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

OKC was the first thing he could think of... a diversion away from subject of 9/11 itself. He's seen tons of evidence/material but, nothing that would suggetst that the OTC is concocted? I wonder if there is anything in what he has seen that the public hasn't been privy to? Amazing that he believes there is evidence of international involvement in OKC that would warrant a new investigation but, not 9/11.

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)

Good work.

Good confrontation. I appreciate the efforts at getting this guy to discuss the things he doesn't want to discuss. We Are Change has a "scum chart" of people they have yet to confront and those that they already have. The progress being made in this regard is staggering. You never know when we'll get a lucky larry silverstein moment on video either. Tancredo is a poor leader to say the least, but we all already know that. Let's keep confronting all these guys in positions of leadership.

Hats off to Eric Jackman!

Eric Jackman deserves kudos! In the interview, Tancredo displays impoverished thought and employs typical dismissive statements such as, "....I have seen things to was concocted...but I don't buy it," as many Washington politicians seem to resort. Can't politicians follow up with at least one or two supporting concrete factual statements anymore? These guys on Capitol Hill have seriously fuzzy minds? Is it practiced so in the end they can't be cornered, because what they did offer lacks any substance? Or, is it just their hair transplant roots have grown a little too deep?

Tancredo offers in his presentation there are classified and unclassified versions of the National Security Estimate and according to even the unclassified ones there are people who want to do very bad things and big things in our country, or something to that effect. He seems halting and almost choking on his words. What does it mean? We should expect bad things to happen in our country? He can't even identify who are the suspected perps? He should be able to offer Al Qaida since a non-existing entity can't sue or defend themselves?

You wonder how deep and how many levels of betrayal are there? Is Trancredo backed to run as a candidate to divert extremist votes by some other interest? Is he running a campaign to break up voting blocks of Republicans who still believe in a nation's sovereignty? At any rate, Trancredo didn't impress that he was personally invested in his opinions and beliefs. He seems to be serving some other purpose than our country!

...don't believe them!