9/11 families criticized for 'silent' settlement in negligence case

I would really like to know what these people were told not to tell.

Five Maryland families, all of whom agreed to an out-of-court settlement with the airline industry over their loved ones' deaths on Sept. 11, are drawing some pointed criticism for agreeing to keep silent about what they learned during the course of the lawsuit.

The families, who chose not to receive money through the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund, say they pursued a legal route in hopes that their suits would give them a better understanding of the security breakdowns that allowed the tragedy to occur.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/911_families_criticized_for_silent_settlement_1008.html

9/11 families criticized for 'silent' settlement in negligence case
Jason Rhyne
Published: Monday October 8, 2007

Five Maryland families, all of whom agreed to an out-of-court settlement with the airline industry over their loved ones' deaths on Sept. 11, are drawing some pointed criticism for agreeing to keep silent about what they learned during the course of the lawsuit.

The families, who chose not to receive money through the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund, say they pursued a legal route in hopes that their suits would give them a better understanding of the security breakdowns that allowed the tragedy to occur.

But whatever knowledge they gained, they're not allowed to talk about it.

In accordance with the agreement, which includes an undisclosed but substantial financial payment from American Airlines and security screening companies at Dulles International Airport, the families are barred from disclosing anything they have learned about airline-related failures and lapses on Sept. 11. The deal also allows the companies to dodge any admission to negligence.

"This bothers me more than most settlements of this nature," writes conservative blogger Edward Morrissey, who calls the deal "inimical to the plaintiffs' stated motives."

"The families who sued, who opted out of the VCF to do so, insisted that the money was not important to them," Morrissey continues. "They wanted answers to how the failures occurred, and decided that their separate lawsuits could provide more answers than government investigations. Apparently they have somehow been satisfied as a result of that process — but can’t tell us why."

"If truth was that important to them," he asks, then "why do they now choose silence and a payoff instead of revealing the deficiencies of the system that led to the deaths of almost 3,000 people?"

Shaun Mullen, of the blog The Moderate Voice, says he is with Morrissey in "having problems with the hold-out families, who to put the most charitable face on their litigation saw their seemingly altruistic intentions undercut by their not being able to get paid if they talked."

"I really didn't go into it for the money," Irene Golinski, one of the litigants whose husband was killed at the Pentagon, told the Washington Post. "I went into it for the answers."

Christine Fisher, however, another plaintiff in the suit, said in the Post that part of the reason she had chosen to eschew an award from the Victim Compensation Fund was the possibility of receiving a larger amount through the legal system.

"It was a financial decision, but it was also an emotional and accountability decision," she told told the paper.

According to the Baltimore Sun, the money will be used by the families to establish foundations in their lost loved ones' names.

The group's lead attorney, Keith Franz said in a press release that the fundamental goal of the lawsuit was to gain "answers as to how 9/11 was allowed to happen," continuing that his clients wanted "the airlines and security companies responsible for protecting the public to step up and share responsibility."

Writing at Captain's Quarters, Morrissey said the information gleaned from the lawsuits should be made public.

"These particular families are not the only people with standing on 9/11, he said. "If the depositions revealed failures, we should all know about them, if the truth really does mean more than the money."

Precise information about was found may never be released, but the Post did try to ascertain a rough estimate by asking Christine Fisher to grade "how much she has learned about the private companies' actions" on Sept. 11 on a scale from one to ten.

"Seven to eight," Fisher responded.

The following video clips are from CBS News, broadcast on October 3, 2007.

I guess they wanted more hush/blood money than the victim's

compensation fund was going to pay them to shut-up about 9/11 being an inside job!

Maybe they were told how Osama bin-Forgotten made our air defenses stand down, or was that Cheney's doing?

Come on, how the hell could a "hijacked" airliner slam into the world's most defended building, 45 minutes after the WTC towers where struck by "hijacked" airliners, without it being intercepted, chased, approached, or even seen by FAA, military, etc.???

Apparently

the fact that the planes were 'hijacked' threw them off their game..... Because they were all over Payne Stewart's plane within minutes. Something around 600% reduction in response-time efficiency--actually it could be considered infinite since they never did respond. What a joke. Curiosity is killing me. What was their price for complicit silence?

Well, Here's Something We Agree About

The information on the security lapses should be made public.

I must admit, I had never

I must admit, I had never heard of the three hijackers who set off metal detectors. What were their alleged names and which flight was this?

hijackers

Hani Hanjour, Nawaf Alhazmi, Salem Alhazmi, Majed Moqed, and Khalid Almihdhar were the flight 77 hijackers.... I assume that is the flight that was addressed since they mentioned Dulles Airport and the pentagon attack. I don't know which 3 set off the md's -- I'd never heard that before either.

treason?

If crimes were committed and we know there were numerous crimes committed, then these people are guilty of a cover-up. If the victim's families are now sitting on a hoard of hush-money, then I think we in the truth movement should start calling them on it. The whole think stinks. Are there any family members left that are still holding out for the truth? Are they all sell-outs to greenbacks? How does a body of law (called the gag rule) exist that allows criminal activity to be silenced? I just don't believe how the citizens of this country have become so corrupted by money.

They could have told them anything

Since it's secret, there is a tendency to think they learned of a smoking gun that would convince even debunkers that 9/11 didn't go down as claimed by the 9/11 Commission.

Sorry. Too cynical these days. It was probably something like a watchlist breakdown or baggage check breakdown. Something that is in line with the official account.

There has been too much secrecy and coverup to expect the truth come out in a civil suit settlement agreement.

Typical

Could an attorney reading here speak to the question of at what point does the public good override any agreed to silence about the court case? And, since it is all done in the public court system, how much can we find out about what went on? How much can they keep private? How much can we force the courts to tell us? Etc.

----
Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

This could......

apply to Sibel Edmonds as well. She has proof of treason by high government officials, yet is gaged .........
This is BULLS**T !