Support 911Blogger


Outcompete the Bad Guys

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/10/outcompete-bad-guys.html

The bottom line about disinformation is simple: Those fighting for truth have to outcompete those fighting to supress it. It is a good old-fashioned competition.

Understanding the tactics and styles of people spreading disinformation is helpful to minimize the effectiveness of those trying to disrupt the truth movement. But even more important is our ability to simply spread more information, more persuasively, than those spreading lies. If we spend more time discussing disinfo than putting out important info ourselves, we've lost.

The good news is that those who use brute force to obtain imperial control are not very creative. They are using the same false flag terror playbook they've been using for thousands of years. They're trotting out the same old "great leader will protect us from the bad guys" script they've been recycling again and again ever since the days of Caesar.

WE'VE got truth, creativity, passion, brains and justice on our side. Plus, we are defending our own own country, our homes and our families from people who have no loyalty to America or the Constitution.

WE CAN outsmart them and out-create them.

The Web and the Street

We all know the power of the Internet to spread truth. We thought that we would have years to harness the Net for good purposes, and hopefully we will. But the powers-that-be are trying to shut it down pronto or -- at the least -- tame it into a whimpering poodle, a sitcom-level boob-tube like media toy to spoon-feed comforting mush to the sheeple.

The net is now under massive attack by the government and corporate America. For example, the BBC revealed that the U.S. military views the internet as an enemy which should be fought (see also this article for further detail). And the big telecom companies are trying to erect virtual "toll booths" on the net which would limit access to the well-to-do, and make it much more difficult for people to access content which has not been pre-approved by the media conglomerates. See this article.

So download and save all information which you absolutely must have to continue to do your truthtelling and justice-seeking work. This article explains how to do it. Save the information to your computer or CDs. That way, even if they take down the Net, you will still have the most important information for yourself and to share with others.

More importantly, redouble your efforts to take information on the Net and convert it to something physical you can use out in the world to reach people who are not as web-savvy as you. Make flyers, posters, bumper stickers, pamphlets, CDs, DVDs, etc. Put the info on your car, on the street. Paint 9/11 messages in chalk on the sidewalk, and affixed to helium balloons released indoors. Make freeway blogs. Think of new ways to spread truth.

As a well-known 9/11 activist said a year ago "We've already won on the Web ... now we have to go out and conquer the street" with truth.

Can We Win?

Its carpe diem time, folks. There really is is an "info war" being waged against people's hearts and minds. And the stakes are high. The bad guys want to suppress the truth, spread myths, and take away people's freedom, power and options.

Alot of us are very creative, smart or passionate people. Engage that passion, intelligence and creativity to implement RIGHT NOW the highest possible leverage to spread the truth. Let's all work harder and work smarter.

If we outcompete the bad guys, we will win. It won't be easy, but no one ever said it would be. This is what we were born to do. This is why we're here. This is our calling and our destiny. And when we put everything we have into winning the competition for truth, our victory will be a shining legacy we leave for future generations.

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by masters who rule them with lies. They feed them on falsehoods till wrong looks like right in their eyes."
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"Ye shall know the truth, and the truth will make you mad."
- Aldous Huxley

"There's really five companies that control 90 percent of what we read, see and hear."
- Ted Turner

"We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.... Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain."
- Dr. Jose Delgado (U.S. government mind-control experimenter associated with the "MKULTRA" program who demonstrated a radio controlled bull on CNN in 1985)

"In March 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press ...They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."
- U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the Journalist is to destroy truth; To lie outright; To pervert; To vilify; To fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
- John Swinton, the former chief of staff of the New York Times, called by his peers, "The Dean of his profession," in a speech at the New York Press Club.

"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have."
– Richard Salant, former President of CBS News

"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one. Especially if it is repeated over and over."
- Adolph Hitler

"The victor will never be asked if he told the truth"
- Adolph Hitler

"All propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt its spiritual level to the perception of the least intelligent of those towards whom it intends to direct itself."
- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

"It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion."
- Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
- Goebbels

"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
- Goebbels

"Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool"
- Plato

"The real mass media are basically trying to divert people." ... "Let everybody be crazed about professional sports or sex scandals"
– Noam Chomsky

"As long as each individual is facing the television tube alone, formal freedom poses no threat to privilege"
– Noam Chomsky

"Where once the student was taught that the unexamined life was not worth living, he is now taught that the profitably lived life is not worth examining."
– Benjamin Barber

"The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking."
– J. K. Galbraith

"The world's press is losing its ability to keep power in check"
– Frank Vogl

"The New York Times is for us what Pravda was for the Soviets"
– Gore Vidal

"The mass media is itself part of the same power structure that plunders the planet and inflicts human rights abuses on a massive scale"
– David Cromwell

"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic."
- Dresden James

"The real advantage which truth has, consists in this, that when an opinion is true, it may be extinguished once, twice, or many times, but in the course of ages there will generally be found persons to rediscover it, until some one of its reappearances falls on a time when from favorable circumstances it escapes persecution until it has made such head as to withstand all subsequent attempts to suppress it."
-John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)"

"They bought the politicians and the news
They've got all the weapons (which they like to use)

But they are few and we're billions strong
We are the giant ... been sleeping for too long
Time to wake up and sing our victory song"
- The Voice

GW on a Roll

It's true these anti-American shills involved in the cover- up of the massacre of 9/11 are not that talented. They simply have power and wealth. Let's not kid ourselves, power and wealth is quite handy, it assures that the pen is in your hands - as the old saying says, "the pen is mightier than the sword" and the modern day pen is still mostly television news and entertainment programs. But pure talent has the ability to simply rise above everything in it's way, including money and power. Think of Mozart, if he were raised on a farm and had never been exposed to a piano, I'm certain that that 5 year old kid would have been playing cow bells like no one else. The best thing about talent is that it is not contained behind racial or economic divisions. Talent is a human trait, though some possess more than others. So we have the numbers in our favor as far as everyday people making up a larger number than those in the elite, which means we have more opportunities for talent in our ranks. But going beyond the fact that talent is on our side, the most important element to winning over the hearts and minds of everyday Americans and people around the world, the fact is that the Truth is on our side.

actually all they have

IS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA which is the real problem we have, even more so than Bush & the Neofascist because without the clear and blatant cover up of the MSM these treasonous bastards would have had no chance at all to get away with what they have.

I have given the so called 911 debunkers a new name "reskunkers"

I have been taking Mark Roberts to task over on the JREF forum for not having his papers peer reviewed in light of the fact that he is always ridiculing the Journal of 911 Studies peer review system.

I just found out that neither he nor Ryan Mackey ever submitted their respective papers to the Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories, where they are prominently displayed with a caption that they have been peer reviewed. Both Mackey and Roberts said that the site managers there simply put the papers on the site. I asked how it can be said that they were peer reviewed if there was never any feedback from reviewers and editors to the authors, with no possible corrections made. No answer on that yet.

In light of all this I was wondering to myself why we needed to be totally polite with these people, who call anyone questioning the Bush administration story of 911 "twoofers". I felt we needed to return the favor and the word "RESKUNKERS" came to mind. I think it really fits as the Bush administration version of the events of 911 smells to high heaven.

To me now anyone trying to prop up the Bush administration's version of the events of 911 is to be termed a "911 reskunker" as they are continuing to keep it smelly, instead of letting it get cleaned up as it should. As their facts don't wash it seems appropriate. Maybe their papers are rear reviewed.

Correct

If we spend more time discussing disinfo than putting out important info ourselves, we've lost.

EXACTLY correct, that and accusing anyone and everyone like Carol Brouillet of disinfo or spreading anti-semitism or whatever other utter BS everyone has been harping on the past month or more is ridiculous to the extreme and needs to stop NOW.
If all you got to say is accusing someone of disinfo or some BS anti semitism then just STFU.

Show "too much time spent on countering disinfo" by alllans2k7

"disinfo" is the most

"disinfo" is the most over-used term in the 9/11 truth movement. and again, im not acusing GW of anything here, but im most suspicious of the people who endlessly harp on "disinfo" and consider themselves experts on the subject. yes, there has been a huge uptick in disinfo policing around here and its not been pretty. true disinfo artists sit back and laugh at us while we eat our own and go in circles.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

The 9/11 official story is disinfo

Therefore, we should all be "experts" on disinfo.

It's not a 9/11 truth movement if it's not true. Anyone who says I don't have a right to voice my opinion by giving me a divisive and inaccurate/offensive label is disinfo. That's like going around from thread to thread calling me a conspiracy theorist. Why shouldn't I have a right to voice my views? Who are you, the opinion police? A 9/11 truth gatekeeper?

I don't have a problem with hearing your opinion. I have a problem with you calling me names.

If you want my opinion, the people who do nothing but bait fights with name calling on 911blogger are the worst disinfo out there. That's one of the main goals of disinformation--to disrupt activist movements. What better way than to have people do nothing but start fights with people. They want divisiveness, and the way to do that is with divisive labels, name-calling and ad-hominem. These are all techniques of disinformation.

If you have a problem with me expressing my opinions on this site, do yourself a favor. Disconnect your internet and find a new hobby besides starting fights with people.

Yep that's right

I'm disinfo now....which proves my point so well that it hilarious.

You see when EVERYBODY is called "disinfo" for whatever BS reason some paranoid loon can dream up then whomever the real disinfo freaks are they are patting themselves on the back for a job well done.

"Name calling and ad hominem" are also the last resort of someone that is sick and damn tired of hearing a bunch loons call everybody that disagrees with them "disinfo".

Basically who is left? are we ALL disinfo now? ROTFL

guilty conscience Arabesque?

guilty conscience Arabesque? that wasnt directed at you but its funny how you felt the need to respond. or telling.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

wow.

Arabesque called me disinfo. does that mean ive made it?(isnt that bannable? i guess not for some...) oh, by the way, most of the techniques of disinfo you mention, divisiveness, in-fighting, name calling, etc. are exactly what you yourself are guilty of and exactly what i speak out against. you give true disinfo more airtime and more play than Fox News does. i know your game Arabesque, you gotta build up that credibility by going after "disinfo" constantly. its like a security blanket that keeps people from suspecting that you yourself are disinfo. its wearing thin:

http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/423#comments

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

Misrepresentation

A number of people - myself included - have asked Carol to please not give a platform to someone who writes about "the Jewish media", whose work was directly involved with having a DRG talk in Ireland cancelled and who has gone on record accusing activists from truthaction.org of being "trained cointelpro professionals". No one has accused her of anything but you seem to have a strong interest in portraying it as such, having repeated it in several places.

That's dishonest.

The Eleventh Day of Every Month

..

"While I have consistently received 10s on my postings- this post which miraculously appeared on page one (usually they are ignored and stay on my remote blog unread) got a "one" and now has hardly moved up to a "three" but brought me down in blogger ratings substantially while being identified as a target and labelled "anti-Jewish" or "anti-Semitic." Carol Bruillet

More on Captain May and when Prophecy Fails

At Portland Indy Media:

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/10/366899.shtml?discuss

______________________________________
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/

I found this recent article by Karen Kwiatkowski

It is worth reading. Both Powerful and Profound

September 29, 2007

Living in an Imperial World
by Karen Kwiatkowski

The republic is dead. Not sick, not dying, not failing, or in a gradual decline, not
waiting to be resuscitated, but already stone cold dead.

This death probably occurred as we began to win the Cold War, but long before we
realized we had prevailed. The professionalization of politics, of military and
bureaucratic service to the state, of foreign policy making, and of business seems to
have completely done in the old ideas. Simply federated, decentralized,
self-depreciating government that once feared the people has self-actualized into a
contemptuous, rapacious and iron-fisted murderer of freedom, and murderer of men.

Perhaps the 1989 movie Weekend at Bernie's was really the American political saga, and
we never knew.

The founders worried that subsequent elites and factions would take over the republic
they had birthed with every aspect of their power, as the gifted political elites of
their time. Yet, as the 19th century dawned, even the most pro-state among them loved
freedom and hated tyranny.

They were right about government power and human nature, and their predictions true. New
elites and government-dependen t factions have ascended. Unfortunately, these political
elites hate freedom and love the tyranny of government solutions.

One of many truths Ron Paul's campaign is revealing is how hated real liberty is among
the powers that be, how despised the individual, and how all-encompassing the contempt
with which modern power brokers in Washington and New York hold the principles of the
founders.

Americans who care about the existence of an American republic are many, and those who
love freedom are many more. Again, the fantastic and political wisdom-slashing adventure
of the Ron Paul campaign stands witness to the fact that sheer passion for liberty
remains a vibrant force in American life. But this passion, this life, is nowhere to be
found in American government, nowhere to be found in the state, or in the empire.

There seems to be no effective way to save or restore the republic, no way for any
individual to even begin to solve the problem of our late 20th and early 21st century
imperialism. I tend to agree, and the wisest observers in these pages warn, as Chris
Floyd does, "It is pointless - and counterproductive - to simply throw yourself under
the wheels of such a monstrous machine in futile spasms of rage and despair. The machine
doesn't care. It will gladly chew up your life and move on."

All this presumes that an American republic is still viable - not really dead, just
severely weakened and in need of strong salts and a booster shot.

A book I read a few years ago, entitled Deep Survival, by Laurence Gonzales, offers a
helpful perspective on our current condition. In studying the question of who lives and
who dies in extreme survival conditions, Gonzales found that survivors shared a sense
that, in fact, they were not going to live. While they wanted to live, to go home again,
and to be secure - they recognized that they were so royally and absolutely FUBAR'ed
that they would die, probably quickly and perhaps horribly.
Now, obviously those who actually died in these disasters could not be interviewed, but
the behaviors and actions of those who lived and those who died were measurably
different. The survivors recognized the ugly truth of their own imminent death quickly -
and this early recognition of reality - however harsh and frightful and depressing it
may have been - was also at once incredibly liberating, in some ways exhilarating.

The survivors tended to reach this point of reality sooner than did the victims. They
grieved for themselves, their hoped-for futures, their now impossible dreams. Then they
rolled up their sleeves and got started on the hard, and very likely pointless, work of
survival.

Rules were abandoned - what could be eaten, what could learned, what could be done, and
what could be considered. Old ideas of personal capabilities and limitations were
gradually discarded. Prayer became real and palpable rather than formalized and pious.

The idea of "living each day as if it were the last" is sometimes suggested to remind us
to be loving and kind, yet it also hints at the value of self-indulgence, impulsivity
and risk-taking. But when each day really might be your last - the behavior of survivors
seems to be far more practical, far more thoughtful for the future, far more truthful
about what one really needs, and quietly courageous without flamboyant risk-seeking.

Recognition of reality is liberating. When Jesus said, "the Truth will set you free,"
I'm not sure he was directly speaking of the governments of men. But recognizing the
unreality of a once treasured concept - in our American case, a vibrant past and future
republic, may in fact free us to do what we need to do.

"And what is that, exactly?" you ask.

Recognize that the republic is dead, and that we owe its rotting bloated corpse no
loyalty whatsoever.
This done, act accordingly. Publicly and privately, we should observe the corpse as a
public nuisance, a pollutant both aesthetically and materially. When the yellow brick
road leads us to the grand doors of government services, we should not avert our gaze
but instead pull back the curtain, grandly, loudly, with the contagious laughter of a
child, or the righteous anger of a soldier back in pieces from a war, like most wars,
that was from the beginning a brutal political lie.

Will we insult a federal or state employee, a law enforcer or judge? Will we anger a
politician, a lobbyist, a corporatist employer, or a government news organ for stealing
our lives, our freedom of movement and thought, our productivity? We should certainly
aspire to do so, with the zeal of missionaries.

To live in an imperial world, we must first, as survivors, recognize that it is an
imperial world. History is filled with imperial/totalitari an states, as global
graveyards are filled with those who were too late in recognizing what had already
happened.

It's over. The faithful and the hopeful may carry the corpse of the American republic,
hoping that it can be brought back into normality, into life, and into power. I am
afraid these nurturers will not survive the present reality of imperialism.

But some of us will look directly at the ugly, dangerous and very real empire. We will
stare - with little hope but also with little fear - into the face of the FUBAR nation,
and then roll up our sleeves and get started on the only life we may honestly live, as
internal dissidents. We will no longer pledge allegiance, we will not obey old rules, we
will make do and make it up as we go along. Our minds focused on surviving the empire,
our talents and creativity unleashed against the state and its fantasist faithful, we
will live as if we are free.

This simple prescription will not only make us survivors, but it will gradually
cultivate a political landscape for a future of free republics where today we see
nascent totalitarianism and bankrupt empire. This prescription was written for us in
1809 by revolutionary war general John Stark. He advised, "Live free or die. Death is
not the worst of evils."

We face a modern American state more overweening and dictatorial than even King George
III could imagine, yet we have no declaration of independence, no privileged elite to
demand it, no interested population to read and debate it. This time, our declaration
will be made individually, every day, in calm desperate fearlessness, as we simply live
free.

Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on defense
issues for MilitaryWeek. com. While her military reputation is tarnished by involvement
in the Iraq occupation, her genuine service to her country since then ranks along side
that of Gen. Sanchez, as the equal of any American soldier you can name short of
Washington and Jackson.

I just re-wrote my version, and

it quotes Kwiatkowski:

America is Dead: Long Live America!.

A Stunning Piece Of Writing

Artful and stunning....thanks for posting it.

Story about Naomi Klein (Shock Doctrine) by Peter Zaza

another piece of writing that came my way.

Peter Zaza
October 12, 2007

Not sure if that's a clue for a cryptic crossword, or I'm about to tell you
a story.

I went to see Naomi Klein a few nights ago here in Victoria BC Canada. She
was finishing up a book tour for her recently released "The Shock Doctrine:
The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" before heading abroad for the next stage of
her promotional tour. In this excellent book Klein exposes how catastrophic
events become extremely profitable for corporations while enabling
governments to further an agenda of "disaster capitalism". As a speaker she
brings together an aspect that at once encompasses her excellent research
abilities while showing a personal warmth that enhances the impact of her
arguments. I found her to be both very informative and engaging with the
audience. She took a few questions afterwards and it was then I found myself
questioning some of her views. The second speaker up to the microphone was a
gentleman here in Victoria whom I happen to know named Hal Sisson.

Let me tell you something about Hal Sisson. This man is a noted author with
10 books published, he is a life-long social activist, spent 40 years as a
lawyer, he's been a stand-up comic, and a few other vestments and layers
I've yet to delve into. He's also 86 years old and a rare sort of individual
who retains a sharp mental faculty despite their age. Most times I'm with
him I forget that this icon is almost twice as old as myself. I'm heartened
to think that it is possible for some of us to keep it so together despite
the ravages of time, but usually it's about then I lose my thought and start
looking for my keys only to find them in my own pocket. Hal is also a
prominent member of the Victoria 9/11 Truth organization - amongst my
friends in this group we share a quiet reverence for this man, as well as an
appreciation for being able to benefit from his wisdom and experience.

Hal Sisson's question was, "In view of your remarks relating to events which
create economic emergencies and subsequent capitalistic opportunities and
predations - disaster capitalism - do you have any comment or opinion in
regard to the fact that many of them may well be covert false-flag
operations by rogue elements of western government or intelligence agencies
- events such as 9/11, the Gulf of Tonkin or the Madrid and British
bombings?" This was exactly what I kept thinking about all evening while she
described events like Katrina, the tsunami that devastated the coasts of
Southeast Asia, or the fires in Greece. In many instances governments will
clearly manipulate people's misfortune to push through repressive laws and
gross examples of economic opportunism after such events, but I was also
interested in her thoughts on how some of these events are purposely created
within the Hegelian dialectic. Although she is clearly willing to unveil
post 9/11 misdeeds such as the out-sourcing of war operations to Halliburton
and Blackwater, it is the event itself and the forces behind it to which Hal
Sisson's interrogative bespeaks. Her answer started out all right - she
said, "First of all, I'm not so sure I would put anything past these people.
It's just that with these conspiracy theories I feel that we're taking away
all this energy that could be going toward other issues that are so
important right now". Alarm bells started ringing in my head, I immediately
thought to myself "female Chomsky". I've actually seen and read interviews
where Noam Chomsky comes right out and says, "It's not important who is
behind 9/11, there are so many other things these people are guilty
of...other things are more important." or "it's just an Internet thing".
Sorry Noam - I believe it is THE most important thing. My blood boils every
day when I read a news piece about the War of Terror or anything to do with
the Department of Homeland Criminals, or especially the frequent reports
about another one or two hundred Iraqis dead or wounded.

You have the unmitigated gall to insinuate that it is not important when our
own soldiers are giving their lives away based on this horrible lie? I'm
sickened to think that some people can be so callously indifferent or
morally bankrupt not to connect the obvious dots in this situation.
Moreover, why should it be such a mental stretch for anyone to even imagine
that the US government was complicit in 9/11 when we have so much
declassified material showing their guilt in perpetrating such acts. That's
why Hal Sisson's question is so relevant - because we know as a matter of
historical fact that the Gulf of Tonkin and many others were false-flag
operations, self-inflicted wounds - we know they are more than capable of it
and it is a technique used by military powers since ancient times. This is
not some ludicrous idea, and to pull out the old utility-knife catch phrase
"conspiracy theory" and smear anybody who questions the official doctrine is
not only offensive - it represents the shoddiest form of logic I can
imagine.

"*Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance*" - Einstein

You should have heard the crowd at that precise moment. As soon as she said
"conspiracy theories" there was a murmur of disapproval toward the
questioner, *it was like a bunch of trained monkeys who stand up all at once
when the buzzer goes off* - and when she wrapped all of us independently
thinking individuals into a neat ball and drop-kicked us in the gonads with
the following summation, "It's just that with these conspiracy theories I
feel that we're taking away all this energy that could be going toward other
issues that are so important right now" - the audience burst into applause.
The mood was something like, "There, that should put to rest you 9/11 truth
idiots, way to go Naomi - we are cognitively dissonant en masse". I was
crestfallen at that moment when I saw first hand the results of some studies
that show greater than 80% of the public are too apathetic and will just as
soon swallow up the government's propaganda as think for themselves. Sure,
we've got our Naomi Kleins and Noam Chomskys to stand just a little on one
side of the gate while many followers believe they lead the vanguard against
the controllers - but no way will they go that extra step and take a peek
over that wall. I'm not saying she is employed by them or even necessarily
conscious of it - perhaps within her own paradigm she resembles many who
just can't imagine our leaders murdering some of us on purpose to further
their agenda, and yet that's what war is all about. That's the part that is
puzzling - she has no trouble expounding on the methodologies of torture and
crisis manipulation by these people, but her natural curiosity and
professional assiduousness stop short at the root causes of 9/11. Maybe she
feels that if she touches that truth her days flying about doing book tours
are over.

Naomi's worried about how much energy I've got. Little does she know I'm a
seething mass of thermo-nuclear potential. I've got enough in me to listen
to her build her arguments, present her thorough research, and draw together
elements for her theories. And whoa - look at that, I've still got plenty
left over to examine the various aspects of 9/11 - who da thunk? As well,
since when is it up to you to decide what subject is deserving of my energy?
How would you feel if someone just wrote off your entire theory by smearing
it with a brush and saying, "it's just not important"?

Sorry Naomi, I'm disappointed - I still think you are great author with
important, well presented information that everyone should be made aware of,
but your inability to step over that line and deal with 9/11 is problematic
to myself and others - this is precisely the difficulty we face when it
comes to the wider population's suspension of disbelief regarding this
issue. The reaction of that audience demonstrates so poignantly the struggle
we face in bringing forth the truth about 9/11. Thanks for not tasing Hal.

A similar situation...

Just yesterday my wife and I drove up to Columbus Ohio to hear John Judge give a speech regarding "The Hidden History of the U.S." In the speech Judge spoke about WWII, the influx of 'imported nazis' into our new CIA intelligence services, Operation Northwoods, the JFK assassination, the war on terror and also 9/11. BUT... Mr. Judge quickly admitted that although he questioned where the U.S. air defense was on 9/11 he was also quick to assure us the Flight 77 did indeed strike the Pentagon and that WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 all fell due to fire. He stated the he had spoken to 'experts and eyewitnesses' and that an engineer assured him that the impact of the planes and the construction of the two twin towers is what led to their collapse and the collapse of WTC 7 was due to 'poor construction' and the diesel tanks below it. He said absolutely nothing about the 100's of eyewitnesses who heard/saw explosions, Prof. Jones' research and test involving Thermate or the molten metal found in the debris of all three buildings.

One good thing: at lease Mr. Judge does believe we need a new 9/11 investigation though.

We and many others left there shaking our heads in disbelief.

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves" – Edward R. Murrow

(Sigh....)

'It's just that with these conspiracy theories I feel that we're taking away
all this energy that could be going toward other issues that are so
important right now". '

No, no, nooooooooooo!!! Not you too, Naomi!

I know what to expect re Cockburn, Chomsky on 9/11 and the whole seemingly never-ending list of progressive luminaries who keep following in their wake like lemmings. The fact is, I have no right to be 'disappointed' in any of them at this point. I'm a fool to get my hopes up with regard to any of them. And yet, somehow I hoped that Naomi Klein might be someone who'd be at least a little open-minded about 9/11.

But no: like the others, 'mene, mene, tekel, upharsin'--weighed in the balance and found wanting.

Not only does she dismiss us, she does so with maybe the lamest, most robotic line of rhetoric there is: the 'distraction,' 'diversion of energies' argument.

Lots of luck trying to reverse the prevailing post-9/11 political winds without reexamining what really happened that day--as should be obvious to anyone who gives a damn six years on.

Maybe the audience's reaction to her comments is the biggest disappointment of all.

Agree with Karen Kwiatkowski

I agree with Karen Kwiatkowski, and must say - much to the chagrin of Ron Paul supporters, even though I am one of them - that Ron Paul will probably not become President. That is, not that there will be enough support or votes for him, I do believe his campaign will continue to grow exponentially. But the current way the Republic functions, is that it is intimately intertwined with massive corruption, conspiracy and lobbyism going on by the elites in the backrground. There is no way that a new figurehead will be able to "fix" this. The only practical way to do it is to dump the entire system and rebuild it anew. The growth of the Ron Paul campaign and the resistance of the establishment to the prospect of him becoming President will bring this to light.

Why his campaign is so

Why his campaign is so interesting. Even with him distancing himself from 9/11 Truth the PTB vehemetly oppose him at every turn.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
--
Truth Revolution: The Eleventh of Every Month

Average American Sports Fan.

While watching some football I realized the average sports fan will spend numerous amounts of time and energy to debate whether a wide receiver made a reception and was inbounds or out-of-bounds, whether the ground caused a fumble, whether a football crossed the line of scrimmage or broke the plane of the end zone etc etc. The coaches challenge the plays. The tape is reviewed and millions of audience members try to determine whether or not a certain play should be ruled a certain way.

Why won't these same people take a fraction of that time to investigate and look into the obvious anomalies of 9/11, this country's and century's biggest event or "play"

If we could only translate this level of inquiry into skepticism and research of the 9/11 Truth movement. Why won't those same "Monday morning quarterbacks" and numerous "sideline" coaches review and investigate 9/11?

Somehow we need more of these people to get past the emotional hurdle of discussing 9/11. These fans are scared to be called traitorous I guess. It's too bad. Because there are millions of these people. The CSI television drama nuts etc. People are capable of figuring this out. Most are just scared and don't think others are willing to tolerate it. We need to get our message out and connect with the millions who already know 9/11 was an inside job. That Zogby poll confirms this. Our country has approximately 300 million people. I'd like to know how many the polls say believe 9/11 was an inside job. Then minus children. Figure out how many voters we have. How many actually vote, etc. The message needs to get out. There are a lot of us questioning. The media blackout is what is hurting us the most. The internet reaches only so many people and prevents it from reaching the mainstream "acceptance" level. Damn.

"There's really five companies that control 90 percent of what we read, see and hear."
- Ted Turner