Marketing Strategy - Need Help

Everyone, go to yahoo on Tuesday (today) and search for "9/11 Controlled Demolition." If we all do this, it will cause a spike and hopefully get some yahoo homepage traction...which is the single most viewed page on the net. Guaranteed to draw some attention. It is also important to click on one of the more relevant links (not dis info) and close the window. Only choose links from the good guys so they get ranking bump.

We should do this every Tuesday and pick a variation search term. It is best if we all attack it at once.

On a side note, having relative/timely news on this site would get a bump in traffic too.

I did it.

I also did it on Google. The second ranked page to come up was this one:

"WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory
Indications of the Imminent Collapse
of the World Trade Center Buildings
Disprove Explosives Theory"

http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/ExplosivesDebunked.html

I believe the author is sincere, and firmly believes the blowback hypothesis.

Because of several sources claiming inward bowing, he believes this is inconsistent with the standard controlled demolition scenario where all the charges go off in short duration.

He doesn't seem to understand that numerous witnesses observed bombs going off from before the plane impacts, all through and up to the total failures.

My response:

Bowing does NOT disprove controlled demolition.

Because of several sources claiming inward bowing, you believe this is inconsistent with the standard controlled demolition scenario where all the charges go off in short duration.

You don't seem to understand that numerous witnesses observed bombs going off from seconds before the plane impacts (William Rodriguez and Anthony Saltalamacia in the basement levels) , all through and up to the total failures (Fire Captain Karin Deshore being the most explicit eyewitness). More than 118 witnesses are documented here.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_World...

Far from "debunking" controlled demolition, you have simply pointed out a weak section of the outer building, near the impacts. This is not proof, this is a local observation, with no bearing on the core structure support columns located well inside and nowhere near this bowing.

As for your presumed intense fire melting the structure, there was a much larger fire in the mid 1970s inside the WTC. It burned twice as long (2 hours) and travelled up to another level. No serious damage to the support structure was suffered, at all. The steel performed as expected, and continued to be in place until 9/11.

Read what the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth are doing, and see their video presentations -- if you really want to know.

http://www.ae911truth.org/

PS

Barry Jenkins also described bombs going off inside of building 7, early in the day, well before the demolition sequence at 5:20.

I "searched " for it about 30 times

I "searched " for it about 30 times