Loose Change Final Cut Release Date Announced
Loose Change Final Cut Release Date Announced
Internet phenomenon to arrive November 11th, features all-new material and interviews
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, October 22, 2007
After many months of anticipation, a release date has finally been announced for Loose Change Final Cut, the pre-eminent 9/11 truth documentary. The film, which features all-new material and interviews, will hit the web on November 11th and be available on DVD shortly after.
The original Loose Change and Loose Change 2nd Edition have been viewed millions of times over the Internet, making it one of the most watched movies in history, but the Final Cut goes above and beyond, making it not simply the third in a trilogy but a completely new film with oodles of unseen footage, commentary, interviews and eyewitness testimony.
The film will first be available online as a digital media download at PrisonPlanet.com, Infowars.com and LooseChange911.com on November 11th, before orders will be taken for the DVD a week later and shipped out on November 26th.
Loose Change Final Cut Release Date Announced
Internet phenomenon to arrive November 11th, features all-new material and interviews
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, October 22, 2007
After many months of anticipation, a release date has finally been announced for Loose Change Final Cut, the pre-eminent 9/11 truth documentary. The film, which features all-new material and interviews, will hit the web on November 11th and be available on DVD shortly after.
The original Loose Change and Loose Change 2nd Edition have been viewed millions of times over the Internet, making it one of the most watched movies in history, but the Final Cut goes above and beyond, making it not simply the third in a trilogy but a completely new film with oodles of unseen footage, commentary, interviews and eyewitness testimony.
The film will first be available online as a digital media download at PrisonPlanet.com, Infowars.com and LooseChange911.com on November 11th, before orders will be taken for the DVD a week later and shipped out on November 26th.
Part of the revenue from the sales will be donated to 9/11 victim's charities such as The Feal Good Foundation and WTC Families for Proper Burial.
The film will not be subject to cinematic release, but many grassroots theatres are expected to pick up the movie from December onwards and the Loose Change team are encouraging activists to ask that their local theatre screen the documentary.
"Many of you have asked us about a mainstream theater release and are aware that we spent considerable time in Hollywood negotiating with different producers," reads the Loose Change press release. "After many weeks of consideration, we decided that a Hollywood release just isn't right for Loose Change. In order to access the normal "big movie" distribution channels, we would have to relinquish editorial control of the film. This just wasn't an option for us, as the integrity of our message is ultimately all that we have, and we feared that "the machine" would corrupt or squash our film and its movement."
"We have decided to challenge the traditional marketing channels and reinvent the way that films are distributed," it adds.
After a great deal of speculation about whether Charlie Sheen will narrate the movie, the actor decided to refrain from doing so in order to concentrate on his grueling work schedule and his well publicized family issues.
When this was first mooted several months ago, The New York Post, Fox News and others attempted to spin this decision and claim that Sheen had recanted and completely backed away from the 9/11 truth movement.
In reality, Sheen had done nothing of the sort, and immediately issued a statement re-affirming his commitment to 9/11 truth, resolving that his "Views and convictions regarding the events of 9/11 have not wavered."
Loose Change Final Cut will feature new and exclusive interviews with firefighters, EMT's, first responders and other officials who were all eyewitnesses to multiple secondary explosions in the twin towers and around the ground zero area.
Most notably, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings speaks for the first time on camera about how he discovered the bomb damaged lobby of WTC Building 7 before either of the twin towers had even collapsed.
The release of Final Cut will no doubt be met with a fresh offensive of Neo-Con attack propaganda and attempted debunking, but with polls showing an increasing amount of people having grave concerns about the official 9/11 story, its arrival will herald a new leap forward for the 9/11 truth movement and signify the next step in educating the world about what really happened on September 11, 2001.
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/221007_loose_change.htm
- zombie bill hicks's blog
- Login to post comments
Times A-Coming.
EndGame is scheduled to be released on the web Oct. 26th as well. Stay healthy. http://endgamethemovie.com/
"many grassroots theatres are expected to pick up the movie from December onwards and the Loose Change team are encouraging activists to ask that their local theatre screen the documentary."
This shouldn't be too hard.
...
deleted
--
Truth Revolution: The Eleventh of Every Month
FYI, Barry Jennings is NOT
FYI, Barry Jennings is NOT in the Final Cut.
Really ?
I thought that was going to be a real boost. I wonder if Jennings got cold feet.... I hope they at least release that interview in its entirety for everyone.
Yeah, because THAT would
Yeah, because THAT would stop people from harassing him...
That's a shame
that people had to call him at work... It sounded like it would have been worth the wait. The calls would have come for sure when the movie came out anyway, but I respect the man's privacy. I still think if he were to come out publicly it would quell people's interest in his story--given how unique it is...
But I think there are more Barry Jennings out there, and if they see you have a reputation for protecting your sources--to the degree you can--maybe that will help you or others get more information in the future.
Good luck with the movie. I'm looking forward to it.
It sounds like he is...
... based on what Avery/Bermas says in this interview:
http://www.alexjonesfan58.com/mp3/20071022_alexjones_loosechange.mp3
that was posted elswhere in these comments.
Considering... enigs = Dylan Avery
I would say the above statement is pretty authoritative !!!
---
It is sad that Barry Jenning's testimony is not being fully documented in the final cut, I hope that the LTW crew will put together a text based timeline, based on his interview(s) and make several backup copies of his FULL interview and just maybe publish it for the record in the near future.
I'm also VERY happy to know that both Prof Jones and Gordon Ross have a say in the WTC section.
The Shanksville info sounds interesting too... 'spose we'll have to wait and see !!!
---
Hope this explains
Best wishes
OOPs
I listened to the clip again, Barry is in the film from the 9/11 TV news footage, but not the new footage.
I regret the error.
I think we can trust the LC
I think we can trust the LC crew for quality. For the budget they had on their first 2 films they put together some great pieces of work.
I cannot wait for LC Final Cut. I may have to call in sick the day it comes out. I have a feeling this will be the final say on 9/11.
Trust with what?We've had
Trust with what?
We've had pods, missles, Silverstein and Bush did it, fake phone calls, Bogus Let's Roll, voice morphing, cordite, bombs @ 9:32, the mysterious blue tarp, no plane at shanksville, switched planes, landed in cleveland, Osama can't wear gold, Osama can't be ambidexterous, fake Osama, ad infinitum.
Can we really TRUST LCFC to be the "Final Say" on 9/11? If so, then I'm afraid the final say will not be one I want to hear.
/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info
What I would like to know
What I would like to know is why is Dylan Avery misrepresenting what happened at the Pentagon?
He refuses to acknowledge that the plane was on the north side of the Citgo & pulled up and he has misrepresented the stories of Lloyd England and Stephen McGraw and has not analyzed their accounts in regards to all the details and circumstances surrounding them.
In fact, he and his followers try to insinuate we are recklessly calling Lloyd an accomplice to mass murder, when in fact we pose it as a question- whether he is witting or unwitting the evidence speaks for itself.
But what doesn't make sense is it is apparently ok for Dylan Avery to decide Lloyd is a liar when it comes to which pole he CLAIMS he removed from his cab, and instead Dylan decided to make up his own story to now explain Lloyd's ludicrous account. Which by the way, I am the one who suggested that the scene would have made a little more sense if he were to claim he was hit with a piece of pole 2. Russell Pickering praised me for it and latched onto it as "what actually happened", Nevermind what Lloyd told us and the rest of the world for the past 5 yrs- that it was the large base piece of "pole 1".
We are talking about the truth. Evidence. A crime. A crime that for years he was convinced was caused by a global hawk/A3 sky warrior/missile. Ask yourself why he did an about face and presents evidence trying to support a 757 impact when we have in fact found overwhelming evidence against it.
Let's see if Dylan can respond to this without making it personal.
[yawn]
Aldo, how are you reviewing a movie you've never seen?
I'm not supporting anything at the Pentagon. I'm presenting both sides and letting people make up their own mind.
And don't try and play coy about Lloyd. If you're not so sure about Lloyd, how come you said the following in the TruthNetRadio chat:
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: I ALMOST ASK MYSELF
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: WHAT AM I DOING THIS FOR
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:54 PM: I CAN SAY I'VE SPOKEN DIRECTLY TO OPERATIVES FROM THE PENTAGON ATTACK
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:55 PM: I HAVE LOOKED THE DEVIL IN THE EYE
Aldo Marquis CIT 11:55 PM: AND THE FACT THAT PEOPLE AREN'T RESEARCHED ENOUGH TO KNOW WHAT WE HAVE GIVEN THEM IS FRUSTRATING TO SAY THE LEAST
To you guys, everyone is an agent, and everything is planted. Add to that your tirades on this website and others, and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
nonsense
>>>>To you guys, everyone is an agent, and everything is planted.
We have presented and spoken with A LOT more witnesses who we believe to be 100% genuine.
Why are you lying about our position?
I know you have seen our latest release:
"Flight 77" The White Plane
All genuine witnesses. Same with the PentaCon Smoking Gun Version.
So please stop misrepresenting our beliefs.
Aldo is talking about FC based on the information I have given him.
I did see it.
The way it was on 9/10 you straight up misrepresented evidence by editing out critical information from our interviews.
Is that still the case or have you changed it since then?
Craig, don't play dumb.
Craig, don't play dumb. Anyone who's watched your behavior on our forum knows exactly where you stand.
"The generator damage? It was faked! The light poles? They were faked! These eyewitnesses? They're lying or agents! Bla bla bla..."
Aldo's tirade in the TNR pretty much seals the deal. You think Lloyd England is a government operative, "THE DEVIL" as Aldo put it.
I have a limited amount of screen time to work with, and the last thing I'm going to waste time on is accusing Lloyd and McGraw of being "in on it" just because you and Aldo demand it.
Let me make my film, and I'll let you make yours. You sure can dish it out, but you can't take it yourself.
wrong again.
Nowhere in your quote from the private chatroom is Aldo directly referring to Lloyd England.
We have spoken with more than one individual who has been caught in numerous lies and is implicated by the evidence has having been involved.
In fact you and I both had dinner with one.
If "demon" isn't a fitting description for someone willingly involved what is?
Are you suggesting that nobody was involved?
But we have NEVER said that "everyone" is a plant and as I said most of the witnesses we have spoken with and presented are 100% genuine. You know this so you are lying about our position when you suggest that we claim that all the witnesses are liars.
For years you have been telling literally millions of people that a Boeing did not hit the Pentagon which means that at least some of the physical damage would have been staged.
An A3-sky warrior could not have downed the poles.
If you have completely changed your position and now believe that a 757 hit the building in light of the incredible evidence that has been discovered showing otherwise that is certainly your right but to condemn others in the movement for accepting the evidence seems rather hypocritical of you.
Especially since you still sell 2nd edition to this day.
You do not have to accuse anyone of being "in on it" and we did no such thing either.
But if you are going to present the evidence you most certainly ARE expected to NOT edit out the most relevant and dubious details while creating an animation to depict something completely different from what the witness reports.
That is deceptive.
Having "limited screen time" does not mean you have to be deceptive with the evidence.
I looked many other people
I looked many other people in the eye ,Dylan.
But the fact remains the plane was on the north side and didn't hit any poles. Why are you protecting Lloyd?
>>>>"The generator damage? It was faked! The light poles? They were faked! These eyewitnesses? They're lying or agents! Bla bla bla..."
What a lazy, generalized statement. Did you forget the part where we actually provide evidence to back it up?
Did you ever measure the wing/engine against the generator trailer Dylan? Of course you didn't.
Did you ever measure the wing span of a 757 approaching from the north side of the Citgo in relation to the downed light poles? Of course you didn't.
We have Dylan.
If you bothered to listen to us and PFT your Pentagon section would have had much more impact AND truth to it.
Regarding Barry Jennings
Dear Dylan,
I commend you for all your effeorts, regarding Barry Jennings , may I ask why the material was NOT included?
Will we EVER KNOW what really happened at WTC 7 early in the morning?
Where there explosions going off early in the morning even before or just after before the plane strikes?
I do hope we can get to the bottom of this.
Frankly, WTC7 is the key, the most obvious anamoly in the whole operation.
I do hope LC FC will cover this, if not some other documentary in the near future will light the spark focusing on WTC 7 and all its anamolies.
This one thing alone can tear the fabric of lies spun by the MSM once and for all.
Any way, your work is done, now it is up to us to support you and start the firestorm of activisim to renew calls for a NEW INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION even of those COMPLICIT IN COVER UPs.
LC FC is a RENEWED CALL FOR ACTIVISM.
I hope all of us ANSWER THAT CALL.
We pray and we hope.
Don't forget the death toll is ACTUALLY in the tens of thousands once we factor in the betrayed and neglected 1st responders.
We may be their last chance for justice and restitution.
2008 is a critical year. Presidential elections, National ID card and war / wars with Iran-Syria-Shiite Iraq.
Maybe even Russia-China.
And by the way, according to antiwar.com Blackwater is "leaving Iraq"
http://www.gulf-news.com/region/Iraq/10161929.html
Some of them may be coming back "HOME" to roost.
Those 200 over FEMA "CAMPS" have to be manned by someone right?
It is make or break.
They are going to try again.
It is up to us.
What did Mel Gibson say in Braveheart- "Every man dies one day, not every man has lived."
It is up to us.
Scores killed in US Iraq raid: Women and children among victims of air strike targeting "criminals" in Sadr City
http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m37424&hd=&size=1&l=e
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at
Barry was dropped from the
Barry was dropped from the Final Cut because, despite our requests from the public, people started calling him at his job and harassing him.
All the More Reason to Keep him!
If he is being harrassed about his interview, giving him a full public profile would be helpful I would think. It would provide some cover for him. Did he insist on not being included or did you? This seems like a very important piece of evidence to really drive home the purposeful demoliton of Bld. 7.
I just hate to see people cave in to pressure. I hate to see the neocons getting what they want, which was "no Charlie Sheen" and no "theater release." Now they won't vicioulsy attack the film and create more publicity, they'll try to ignore it. We must all do our part now to promote it!
Look, the Loose Change guys
Look, the Loose Change guys have already made the most amazing 9/11 film (although Zeitgeist seems to charging into the top tier).
They can always add the Barry Jennings stuff back in later if something can work out.
What's more important is that a significant number of independent theatres around the nation play it.
Then 9/11 Truth Activists (& Ron Paulites) can hand out DVDs and people will be lined up blockes to see the film.
Then, just maybe, the revolution will start.
Will His Account Be Somehow Told?
Would hate to see that get lost.
Ah, there goes Dylan making
Ah, there goes Dylan making it personal again.
>>>"I'm not supporting anything at the Pentagon. I'm presenting both sides and letting people make up their own mind."
You are letting people make up their own mind???
THEN HOW COME YOU DIDN'T GIVE THEM ALL THE FACTS?!
How come you lied about Lloyd's pole? How come you omitted the inconsistencies in McGraw's account? How come you didn't explain Edward's flight path? How come you didn't include the part where Mcgraw said he DEDUCED the pole and cab interaction? How come you didn't present the North side?
Don't give us that nonsense. You are scrambling, trying to put together a hodge podge of "acceptable" information. Mainstream conspiracy theories. You don't care what the information presents, you simply want a sleek presentation that will be eaten up simply because of the hoopla you've already caused.
You screwed everybody. You didn't do your homework. You made a movie that got heavily debunked and yet you CONTINUED TO SELL IT!!!!! You should be ashamed of yourself. Now you are releasing watered down version which now makes you and everybody who supported you look like fools.
Do you understand how accurate and streamlined the "TM" "evidence" has to be? What makes you think showing multiple sides and theories is going to help? What is the purpose of your black shirts that say "Investigate 9/11"? Why did we go out to Arlington? Do you understand how confusing AND cowardly it is for you to make a movie with bogus info at the Pentagon about missiles, then to change it with more wrong information, then to change it again with evidence that makes you look as if you WERE wrong? You are trying to play both sides of the fence, you are trying to make it appear as if you are just trying to present all the facts while you escape the embarrassement of your last two efforsts at the Pentagon...but you still keep it ambiguous so you can still appeal to all the markets...inside job and non-inside job minded
You can leave people to decide for themselves when they have all the facts. You can say that when all you are doing is theorizing from Oneonta behind a computer. But the theorizing ended when we went to Arlington. We went there to see if a large American Airlines 757 flew on the south side of the Citgo, over the bridge/overpass, through 5 light poles, low and level into the first floor. But it didn't. We have confirmed this several times over. So what do you do? You keep your mouth shut publically about the evidence we obtained, then turn on us. Then show everyone this bogus "evidence" supporting an impact of a 757 in your Final Cut while maintaining, "they can make up their own mind".
FYI, I didn't need to see your movie. Craig saw it and told me all about the Pentagon section, RIGHT AFTER he saw it.
I actually back up my accusations with facts, research, evidence, and logic Dylan. That's not your department.
I KNOW I have spoken with operatives, just like I KNOW I have spoken with genuine witnesses. I have made my opinion clear about Lloyd, but I have also given the benefit of the doubt in that he may not know what happened to him. You just walk around being wishy washy accusing some people some of the time, then taking it back, then changing it, then changing it again for the 7th Final Cut Edition. Using certain parts to bolster controversy while falling back on the safety of your slogans like "I'm just asking questions" and "letting people decide for themselves". Just out of curiosity, what were the witnesses back when you were implying it was a missile? Operatives? What about the parts? Planted?
You really going to make me pull out the chat comments regarding what you said about Mike Walter big guy? How you wanted us to go after him. Remember that?
Dude, you know people take us seriously. YOU took me so seriously, you asked to move in on our first research trip so I can act as a consultant and researcher for your Pentagon section. In fact, YOU eventually took us so seriously that you had to ban us and throw dirt on our names, to make sure your movie wasn't eclipsed in regards to the evidence. Whether you like me or not is irrelevant, whether or not you liked the infighting was irrelevant. You needed to man up, see who was REALLY causing the problems, understand that the evidence from the FDR and the Citgo witnesses was major enough that we needed 100% support from you and your forum. But instead, you let Russell whisper in your ear and make everyone think Rob Balsamo and I were out to get you and your success or something.
You actually have slowed the wheels of progress for the "truth movement". PFT and CIT have actually had to work harder to get our information seen and valued by many because you went out of your way to blacklist us and suppress the evidence.
Maybe because actual evidence requires actual action. It requires getting in the face of the gov't and showing them what you have. That might mean that people have to stop selling DVD's, T-shirts and theories. And we don't want that do we? We don't want anything to stop premiers and all our bull horning & sign holding. Why would we want the gov't to answer for the plane being on the north side of the Citgo?
The sad thing is you *have to* imply that people don't take us seriously in hopes that they won't.
You were part of the discovery of the north side. Imagine that. You were walking around "looks like a flyover". You were there. You were invited on the second trip so you can be part of the interviews we were more than willing to hook you up with. Then you turned and accepted the relentless attacks from Russell Pickering against us.
How many times have we shown you or your followers you were wrong in debate?
Listen you yourself,. You made a movie saying it was a missile..then it was an A3 Skywarrior, even after I told you were wrong about the ENGINE CASING parts...YOU STILL PUT IT IN!!!!!!!!!!
The fact is...you are not qualified for anyone to come to for information in order that they "make up their own mind" on the Pentagon. You have made that abundantly clear.
So don't belittle my efforts. You were loving me on your forum. You loved me enough to OFFER to fly me out to Arlington to help you with your movie. I just like everyone else you deal with...was disposable.
Tell everyone the whole story.
hmmm
For your next post would you just make your points succinctly without all those sour grapes? I can tell you are upset but it is hard to see through all your rage and figure out what are your main issues.
I know this is useless but
I know this is useless but do you know how much film they had to edit to get a 2 hour movie? And you're complaining there's not enough of you and your friends in it?
Why are you telling someone else (especially makers of the biggest internet movie of all time) how they should make their movie? YOU make your Pentagon movie and do it exactly how you feel it should be done.
Criticism is always accepted, but when you start telling the film maker that YOUR parts should of been included and DEMAND them to appear in the movie or else you'll reject the entire product, you seem more like a disgruntled B-movie actor than a sincere critic.
it's about the evidence.
Not about a "movie" or ego or anybody being in a film.
Dylan made a conscious decision about how to present the Pentagon attack regardless of the evidence.
Love it or hate it LC has impact on people's beliefs.
Accuracy and honesty is important in the name of truth and justice.
Our concern is for the future of this nation and the innocent people dying every day in this fraudulent war on terror.
That is why we may seem passionate and/or upset at times.
We have uncovered literal PROOF of a military deception.
We're not done yet either.
We don't beat around the bush, sugarcoat, or kiss ass for "movement politics".
You get nothing but the cold hard truth from CIT regardless of how difficult it is to accept.
I think we've spoken our mind here in regards to LC enough but we will not stop when it comes to exposing the perpetrators of 9/11.
The time for "asking questions" is over.
We do not need a new investigation into "if" 9/11 was an inside job or exactly what happened on 9/11.
We need an investigation into WHO the perpetrators really are.
The work of CIT is going to help us skip right up to that.
all i'm saying is your
all i'm saying is your attack on LC isn't good for the movement.
I'm with you on everything you said but you gotta realize you can't make everyone happy. I'm sure there will be some things I object about the movie as well. There always will be.
Many people don't think the Pentagon is the most essential key to understanding 9/11. Many do.
I suggest you make a movie focusing only on the Pentagon. Perhaps work with Dylan to get some footage he didn't use instead of yelling at him.
Just my opinion...
it's cool man.
We know a lot of people don't want to hear anything bad about LC.
But when it comes to the evidence we simply can't hold our tongues.
Dylan already gave us the footage we were part of and we have already released shorts depicting the critical information that he has edited out.
But naturally his movie will be seen by many more people and we simply won't be able to stay quiet about the evidence for the sake of accuracy, truth, and justice.
We do plan on releasing a comprehensive documentary focusing on the Pentagon early 2008 and with the additional information we have obtained and are obtaining in our continued investigation....we are quite certain that it will get significant attention.
Please don't take our frustration the wrong way.
It's all for the right reasons.
Peace!
Both of you go back and re-read (Romill and card).
This was about his Pentagon section. This is about the evidence obtained regarding the Pentagon attack. This was not about us.
He misrepresented the information in his film.
Stop for a minute and think about it.
Movies don't save countries.
Audio Clip - Jason/Dylan and Alex Jones Today!
http://www.alexjonesfan.com/loosechange911/
I'm lookng forward to
Loose Change Final Cut, Dylan.
At the end of the day, you guys can say you did your best for truth and justice. Whatever people think of the final cut, you put in one hell of an effort as an unintentional revolutionary. You deserve credit for that.
All of the smack talking here is a waste of energy.
I had just turned on Tucker...
....on MSNBC a little while ago and they were talking about a straw poll in Iowa that had asked "Who was responsible for the 911 attacks?" along with other questions about candidates, etc.
I turned it on mid-way through the brief discussion so I didn't catch the whole thing. Tucker was saying "That's why I never talk about this subject on this show...because it creeps me out too much".
He made a comment that he "didn't like to think about " how the country operated or something to that effect. Did anyone else see that? It would be a good quick clip to post on 911blogger.
Did a straw poll in Iowa really ask that question? Man, that would be cool!
If true, I wonder what their results were?
Sorry...I caught only a brief snatch of what was going on.
David Ray Griffin
Not related but related:
David Ray Griffin's name no longer shows up on the member list at Scholars for 9/11 Truth. See the list here: http://twilightpines.com//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&I...
He is still a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice.
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/
Life of Brian
My understanding is that although he supports the "Front of Judean Peoples", he would never support the "Judean People's Front".
;>)
That's the...
People's Front of Judea and the Judean People's Front.
Bitter enemies.
And both against the empire.
:-)
Monty Python
I agree with you about Monty Python. I've seen enough of the Flying Circus, already.
9/11 Truth and Division: Disinformation, Agent Provocateurs, and False Adversaries
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/10/911-truth-and-division-disinfor...
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/
Analogy
People's Front of Judea = Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Judean People's Front = Scholar's for 9/11 Truth & Justice
Roman Empire = United States Empire
About Barry
Barry Jennings....a man who possesses KEY testimony about a KEY anomaly to millions of us around the world regarding 9/11. every man makes his own choices in life so I'm no one to tell Barry what I think is "appropriate" for the good of mankind and all that jazz. Could use some silencing words from him though to counter the "Damage from debris + gouge was created +"raging inferno +built over blah blah and built in a special way blah blah+ they expected it to come down" OCT. Take the Queen off of the board I guess, and hope for better luck next game?
CIT team, good work on the ground investigation. There is no substitute for knocking on doors and hitting the streets. Not a fan of references to "his wife was ex FBI so.....". That's my only criticism.
"Loose change is one of the best 9/1 films of all time along with possibly Zeitgeist".
1) Loose Change was THE biggest film in regards to letting people open their minds to the theory that something didn't add up. Does not equal a great film. In fact after a thorough debunking by peers, and numerous revamps and reassertions.....if it were a car.....there would be a factory recall. Or one would think.
2) Zeitgeist= Where to start with that one? I won't. Let's just say sticking to the SCOPE of an argument or theory goes a long way, less is more.
In the end, when you make a film that literally millions will see, and use as a basis for civil disobedience, accusations of complicity in a crime all the way to the Federal level, meet-ups and "actions",protests and boycotts. You had better be DAMN sure you know what you're saying and can prove it. Otherwise, you are yelling fire in a crowded theater and selling water to the people running away.