9/11 Poll for Scientists, Engineers and Architects
Please answer the following very simple poll, in order to help people understand the events of 9/11. People without a scientific background sometimes have trouble understanding which theories are likely to be true and which are not. This poll is not intended to reach a preconceived result. Instead, I am just trying to get a sense of what the scientific, engineering and architectural community believes.
Please give your honest opinion, based upon your scientific, engineering or architecture knowledge and experience.
For each theory listed below, state whether you think -- given the available evidence and the laws of science -- such a theory is likely or unlikely to be true:
1. World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and/or 7 were intentionally
2. The demolition was accomplished using conventional explosives, thermite or thermate.
3. The demolition was accomplished using directed energy weapons.
4. The demolition was accomplished using nuclear weapons.
5. Boeing airplanes crashed into the Twin Towers on 9/11, as the government claims.
6. The video and photographs of Boeing airplanes crashing into the Twin Towers on 9/11 were faked, and no airplane crashed into the buildings.
7. The video and photographs of Boeing airplanes crashing into the Twin Towers on 9/11 were faked, and aircraft other than Boeing planes crashed into the buildings.
Please post your answers -- including your name and background (so that we can assess your credibility) here.
Postscript: Someone asked my view of the above-described questions. My view is not particularly important, as I am not a scientist, engineer or architect. However, I have compiled the views of many highly-credible scientists, engineers and architects who question the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Centers. For anyone who believes the government's version of events, I invite you to see what these world-class scientists say.