Go And Support Sander Hicks Wednesday, Nov. 7 At 8PM

Tomorrow, at the basement level of Lolita Bar at 266 Broome St. at the corner of Allen St. on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, one block south and three west of the Delancey St. F, J, M, Z subway stop, Sander Hicks will be debating Karol Sheinin.

The topic of the debate? Did the Government Know in Advance About 9/11?

Please go and show support for Sander.

Good luck...

Karol. You're going to need it.

Who Is? Archives

Would love to see it.

Please set up a camera and tape this. If you can.

I'll be taping it. I really

I'll be taping it. I really don't see how this can be even considered a debate anymore. The facts are in. The official story is a lie. There's not much more to say but I guess we'll see what happens.

Thanks for taping this ...

Good GB, glad to see you will be taping and making a vid for the rest of us around the world. I have the feeling this will be legendary.

Thanks Greenback

Thank you for taking the effort to tape it.

Pls contact me if you can. I am from Malaysia, my name is Vincent and you can reach me at vsp_my2006@yahoo.com

Pls give my regards to ALL the 911 Truthers in NYC, the WeAreChange crew etc.

You are doing some very important work for the future of ALL humanity.

Perhaps we can work together.

Regards and God Bless.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Go Sander!!!

I was trying to get a friend of mine from NY to attend this event but he had to work. Now it looks like my brother from Boston is not going to make it. And I'm in Texas so . . .

Glad to know someone will be on hand to ensure the rest of us get to soon see the debate online!



Any updates?

Didn't find anything yet on http://SanderHicks.com except this:

"Hicks to Debate NeoCon Karol Sheinin on 9/11"

Many hands make light work!
RRREMA=research, realize, react, educate, motivate, activate


Did this info haaave to get posted again?
Now it's going to be super crowded. It is just a bar, not an auditorium. I might not even get a seat and have to stand throughout!

Ah well, at least there will be drinks...
Should be some 'class A' entertainment.

Let's go Sander!

I expect a whole crowd of people to back Sander up. He's done a lot for 9/11 truth. Let's be there for him.

And the question is phrased to be a "soft" topic. Sander does not need to score a touchdown. All he needs to do is get to the 50 yard line. Maybe kick a field goal while he is at it.

Be prepared for the naysayers there

Strongly urge any activists attending to pls bring relevant material by Richard Gage- www.ae911truth.org.

There might be a post-debate discussion among the crowd and it may be a good time to put some ROCK SOLD INFORMATION IN FRONT OF ANY NE-CON POSTER BOY OR GIRL OUT THERE.

Flyers, DVD's etc.


We CAN WIN any debate.

Mention the desire of Family Members doubting the official story and demanding a new TRUE investigation.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth can break this wall of lies.

At the time of this writing,

211 architectural and engineering professionals (Certified & Credentialed)
and 503 other supporters including A/E students have joined us in demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.


To those who don't believe 110 storey towers can be wired with explosives, yes they can, with advanced wireless explosive munitions.

Ask Richard Gage if this is possible.

You can sure BLACK-OPS units will have access to them.


Americans are NOT FOOLS.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Hope Karol brings a set of

Hope Karol brings a set of crutches with her, because with Sander and and the facts ... she won't have a leg to stand on when he's finished.

PR consultant for right-leaning politicians and causes



Karol Sheinin in her own words.

I used to blog using the name Kashei, which is a play on my first and last name, but then I came out of the closet. My name is Karol. Yes, with a 'K'. I have a brother named after Ronald Reagan.

I am a PR consultant for right-leaning politicians and causes. My disclaimer statement appears in my sidebar. I maintain a calendar of events for Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, or any other sort of non-liberal person in New York, at RightEvents.com. I also co-write a poker blog called I Had Outs. I have a Wikipedia entry here.

I was born in Russia and became a US citizen when I was still a kid. Here's a picture of that glorious day. I grew up in Brooklyn

I went to high school at Adelphi Academy in Brooklyn and loved it. I went to college at Northeastern University in Boston. I lived in Scotland twice for a total of about three years. The first time, I spent four months at the Findhorn Foundation, a commune in Forres. Yes, really. The second time around, I lived mostly in Aberdeen. Cafe Drummond on Belmont Street was my favorite bar. I would sit in a booth all day and write in my notebook. I no longer keep a notebook. I loved and still love Scotland as my second home. I live in Manhattan now.

I am single.

I am addicted to My Space. Add me.

I went to NYU Graduate School of Arts and Sciences and got my Master's Degree in Political Campaign Management. While I was on the phone learning I got accepted, the lights went out all over much of the East Coast. I was the only Republican in my program. That was interesting.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

I, ME, and MY's

After reading her writing, noticed way to many " I, ME, and MY's , egocentric and amateurish.

On second glance it appears she has a physical resemblance to Kissinger.

Good work c911.


Many of these naysayers are most likely complicit in the cover-up possibly for financial reasons.

Her" PR" work is possibly contractually obligated to support the OCT.


Not a co-incidence supporting OCT (when the TRUTH IS OBVIOUS), and HAVING TIES TO KISSINGER (a wanted war criminal in some countries in Europe)


Pls see: http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/04/23/britain.kissinger/index....

MADRID, Spain -- Britain has refused a Spanish judge's request for permission to question Henry Kissinger during the former U.S. secretary of state's visit to London this week

Judge Baltasar Garzon, who is investigating crimes committed during military dictatorships in South America, asked the British authorities to allow him to question Kissinger, who is due to attend a convention on Wednesday.

A Home Office spokeswoman in London told CNN on Tuesday that the request had been denied.

Joan Garces, a Madrid-based lawyer involved in the investigation of former Chilean leader Gen. Augusto Pinochet, said the British authorities were told by the U.S. State Department that Garzon should send his request to interview Kissinger to Washington.

The U.S state department's response "can only raise questions about what Mr. Kissinger has to hide," Garces said in a statement....................



Kissinger's scheduled visit to London later this week is the subject of two legal bids

UK bid to arrest Kissinger fails

LONDON, England -- An attempt to have former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger arrested in Britain for alleged war crimes has failed.

British human Rights campaigner Peter Tatchell applied to London's Bow Street Magistrates' Court on Monday for a warrant for the arrest of Kissinger under the Geneva Conventions Act.

Tatchell alleges that Kissinger's direction of the Vietnam War of the 1960s and 1970s amounted to a breach of British laws requiring people of all nationalities to observe the Geneva Conventions on the conduct of war.

It is the latest legal bid made against Kissinger.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

So how did it go?

Please, somebody post at least some of the results. I don't think I can wait for the video.

As for today. GOOD HUNTING, KEVIN!!!

Yes, what happened?

No video, no comments... How did Sander do?

Show "Sander lost the audience vote." by MikeyMetz

I thought...

That "Al-Qaeda" was responsible for a long time. And then I saw elected officials in my Government begin to conceal things about the attacks. Then I saw elected officials in my Government fight against people like the family members for a real criminal investigation into the attacks. Then I saw elected officials create an investigation that had limitations no investigation should have had. Then I saw that these elected officials stacked the deck within the 9/11 Commission in their favor. I saw that these very same elected officials wanted to do things for years that wouldn't have been possible without an event like 9/11, and I saw that they knew this. I saw that after 9/11, they did exactly what they wanted to do in the years prior. I saw and continue to see that the attacks themselves are being used to do things that are detrimental to everyone in this country, and everyone on this planet. When you take into account that those in power are capable of such atrocious things in this world. Things beyond the scope of 9/11 like the deaths of over 1,000,000 Iraqis, you begin to understand that they would have been more than capable of something like the 9/11 attacks. When the things our Government is concealing and lying about point in that direction, you can come to only one conclusion. That elements within our Government may have been complicit in the attacks, and have earned the title of suspects for the crimes of 9/11. From their actions before, during, and after the attacks. Because of that, we need a new investigation. I know you will come up with every excuse in the book as to why we shouldn't have a new investigation, but I suggest you take a moment to ask yourself this question. If your closest loved one was murdered, would you accept an investigation like the ones the 9/11 family members, and the people of the world already had to endure for the 9/11 attacks, or would you want a real one?

From what I heard Sander did well. Audience vote or not. Congratulations Sander.

Who Is? Archives

Dear Jon, do you know if anyone has a video

It will be helpful if someone has the video and full details on the approximate size and composition of the audience.

Votes can be fixed. The 2000 & 2004 Presidential elections is a Perfect example. Those who don't believe this pls research it.

Now regarding how people REALLY feel.

Pls see :

Released: August 30, 2004

Half of New Yorkers Believe US Leaders Had Foreknowledge of Impending 9-11 Attacks and “Consciously Failed” To Act; 66% Call For New Probe of Unanswered Questions by Congress or New York’s Attorney General, New Zogby International Poll Reveals

Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story
Only 16% now believe official fable according to New York Times/CBS News poll

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Any more updates?

Voted down due to:

-preconceived notions
-strawmen: "outrageous theories" - like the official conspiracy theory?

Relevant historical quotes:

"Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it." - JFK

"Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices." - Voltaire

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

"Information is the currency of democracy." - Thomas Jefferson

"Those who have the privilege to know have the duty to act." - Albert Einstein

"...it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams

"There comes a time when silence is betrayal." - MLK jr.

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth" - Einstein

"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Einstein

"None are so blind as those who will NOT see" - Goethe

"Truth is the 1st casualty of war." - ?

"A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny." - Alexander S.

"If we do not act we are acted upon" - ?

"It is not the answer that enlightens but the question" - ?

"Dissent is patriotic and necessary to protect our freedoms and Constitution, for it is how we achieved these" - ?

"I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs"...."i think the puppet on the left is more to my liking"...."HEY! wait a minute, theres one guy holding up both puppets"
- Bill Hicks

"Educated criminals work within the law" -Morrissey

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
-Aldous Huxley

""The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." ~ J. Edgar Hoover"

"They must find it difficult... those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority."
- G. Massey

"Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all."
- Dale Carnegie

"The important thing is to not stop questioning" - Einstein
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Einstein
Many hands make light work!
RRREMA=realize, recognize, reconcile, educate, motivate, activate

I'm not going to vote or trash you down....

I simply want to know, regarding this comment: ...." just remember that the overwhelming majority of people out there can look at both sides of the argument, and simply disagree with your outrageous theories."

Please provide your empirical justification for the following the propositions you state/imply:
1. that you have data regarding the 'overwhelming majority of people' (really?)
2. that any 'majority' of folks actually look at both sides of any argument and/or that they actually do look at both sides of *this* argument. All psychological theory and data strongly suggest otherwise.
3. And please support the contention that they "disagree" after actually having looked at both sides of the argument....
4. you assert that the 'theories' are "outrageous". This is just your bias. But if you are to support it, you must define what you regard as outrageous and demonstrate convincingly why theories presented on this site meet those criteria.

Personally, I do not believe you can support any one of the four.


"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)

The 9/11 official story is the outrageous conspiracy theory

The 9/11 official story is the outrageous conspiracy theory. It has not been proven. There is no paper trail. There is no hard evidence connecting Osama B. to the attack.

The 9/11 commission report is an exercise in disinformation.
The 9/11 cover-up is unbelievable
The 9/11 family members have a huge list of outrageous unanswered questions
Standard FAA procedures should have made the attack impossible
Wargames closely predicted and enabled the attack to take place
Insider Trading
NIST admits it can not explain ANY of of the collapses!
Building 7 is the most perfect controlled demolition I've ever seen
Last time I checked, conservation of momentum was a law of physics--not an "outrageous theory".
Hanni Hanjour flying into the ground floor of the Pentagon without hitting the lawn? Now that's an outrageous theory.

I've barely started

I'm not going to vote you down . . .

I just want to know what happened (more details, please).

Can you give me a basic run down? Was it a landslide loss for our side? We're there a lot of people in attendance? And just because Sander lost the audience vote doesn't mean he lost the debate. In your opinion, did he? I'm sure I'm not the only person here at 911Blogger that wants to know.

Anyway, thanks for giving us a brief heads up!