The Professional Cover-Up Artists
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/cover-up-pros.html
The same professional cover-up artists are brought in again and again to cover up self-inflicted terror attacks, military stand downs, and other acts acts of deception and false flag terror.
For example:
- The same political hack who whitewashed Iran-Contra also made sure that the 9/11 Commission found only that "innocent mistakes were made"*
- The same expert on myth-making who has helped to cover up the likelihood that Japan was allowed to attack Pearl Harbor was also instrumental in covering up the fact that 9/11 was allowed to happen
- The same scientists who covered up the anomolies surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing are covering up the truth of what happened on 9/11.
* He later admitted that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials lied to the Commission, and considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn't bother to tell the American people; that the 9/11 Commission largely operated based upon political considerations; that "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only "the first draft" of history (see this). However, when he was in his role as co-chair of the Commission, he promoted the whitewash.
Of course, the White House tried to bring in perhaps the greatest cover up artist of all time, Henry Kissinger, to chair the 9/11 Commission. However, Mr. Kissinger's reputation was too well-known, and the families of the 9/11 victims objected to his nomination. So cover-up professionals with slightly lower profiles had to be brought in.
- GeorgeWashington's blog
- Login to post comments


I'm sure some will say
the presence of these people does not necessarily mean a crime was covered up.
I look at it the other way: If they were not present, we would have fewer reasons to be suspicious.
Same goes for the dozens of other so-called coincidences.
But circumstantial
evidence can be part of a criminal case, can it not? And in the court of persuasion.... people put a lot of credence all of the time upon circumstantial .. and less.... evidence. We simply have to present the persuasive argument . GW did a nice job.
==================================================================
"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)
The argument for 9/11 complicity is a total case
The argument for 9/11 complicity is a total case based on all of the verifiable and incriminating evidence
Disinformation and the Misleading and False LIHOP/MIHOP Dichotomy
______________________________
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com