9/11: Impossible Speed & Impact -- Busted!
mikezimmer Tue, 11/27/2007 - 4:06pm
From Anthony Lawson, of "This is an Orange" fame.
This video demonstrates that the speed of the aircraft which hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center, on 9/11, did not exceed the design limitations of its airframe or engines, and that the way in which the aircraft breached the wall of the building was feasible. For details on FAA permissible airspeeds: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/57AFAC2D9E97066D8625731E00694575?OpenDocument&Highlig...
Added: November 26, 2007
- mikezimmer's blog
- Login to post comments
First off, let me say that I
First off, let me say that I am a complete Mihoper...I think that elements in the gov't planted explosives in wtc 1, 2, 7 and flew a military plane into the Pentagon (well, at least it wasn't AA 77).
With that said, head on over to www.911myths.com. I don't care who you are, that site will debunk most of the "loose" 9/11 stories that are out there. For instance, there is a new section of about 15 videos showing a plane hitting the south tower (is it a UA plane? I don't know). But, there are videos that I have never ever seen and some show crystal clear a plane hitting. Also, having been on that site, they debunk a lot of David Ray Griffin stuff, such as that none of the hi-jackers were on the flight manifests. That just isn't true. Of course, they try to debunk things like WTC 7 et al, to which we KNOW was a controlled demolition.
So, if you want to have a 360 view of 9/11 facts, go to that site and check out some of the stuff...you'll be surprised at what you thought was true but isn't.
"they debunk a lot of David
"they debunk a lot of David Ray Griffin stuff, such as that none of the hi-jackers were on the flight manifests"
those "manifests" only came to light recently (after David Ray Griffin and others wrote about it) and they do not contain the complete list of passengers, i think the date is even incorrect on the document, there is no proof these are the original manifests, they did not come from the airlines, the site claims they came from an 'author'. why did media outlets all have different information to each other (even disregarding the hijackers names) and why did some of these names given out suddenly disappear from the official lists? the truth is probably that the press did not have any flight manifests, the press had "lists" given to them by the FBI.
"there is a new section of about 15 videos showing a plane hitting the south tower....some show crystal clear a plane hitting"
does the site have video showing the buildings were real too?
there are so many lies and distortions on that 911myths site, where they are not lying they speculate scenarios to bolster the official story, it does not care to find the truth, only close down discussion and promote the official story.
http://911myths.com/index.php
http://911myths.com/index.php/No_hijackers_on_the_passenger_manifests
Passenger Lists
Passenger Lists
Victims Lists, Passenger Manifests, and the Alleged Hijackers
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.html
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth
Disinfo = Pwnt.
Disinfo = Pwnt.