Saudi Arabia's Interior Minister Prince Nayef said,"Bin Laden was a "tool" of others rather than the mastermind of 9/11"
An article from USA Today dated 2/06/2002, contains compelling statements made by Saudi Arabia's Interior Minister Prince Nayef. He said, Bin Laden was a "tool" of others rather than the mastermind of the attacks against the World Trade Center, Pentagon and in Pennsylvania. He did not say who he thought was the mastermind."
Interestingly enough, I came across this article cited by a debunking website as proof all the 9/11 hi-jackers are dead. Prince Nayef alleges that Saudi leaders were shocked to learn 15 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. "The names that we got confirmed that," Nayef said in an interview. "Their families have been notified." However, the most interesting thing about this article was apparently not noticed by our OCT clinger and instead a rather vague remark about contacting the family members of the 15 Saudi hi-jackers is cited as proof positive they are all dead.
Be that as it may, this does bring up a pertinent point. I think the claim that some of the hi-jackers are "alive and well" in some other country needs to be better established. And just as I do not see this article as hard evidence the hi-jackers are dead on the other hand I also do not see the few obscure BBC articles as hard evidence they are still alive. Why haven't these guys been interviewed or why haven't they written emails, or made phone calls, anything? And aren't there any other sources out there to back up the claim that they are still alive.
Either way, I find it ironic that this debunker chose an article that while hardly proving his point, had a tantalizing bit of conjecture by a Saudi official with inside information. I think it is pretty clear which is the more interesting piece of information.
Full Article: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002/02/06/saudi.htm
- The ICONOCLAST's blog
- Login to post comments
In the USAToday piece...
It says "He did not say who he thought was the mastermind", yet, in December 2002, the Associated Press reported Nayef as saying the culprits were "the Jews", or in Ain al Yaqeen's English version, "the Zionists." However, in November 2002, Nayef was named as a defendent in the lawsuit against Saudi Arabia for the 9/11 attacks so it kind of makes sense that he would try to place the blame elsewhere. Yet, in November 2003, he was dismissed from the suit because of diplomatic immunity. I don't see Osama Bin Laden and "Al-Qaeda" as being a "tool" used by Israel, but moreso, a "tool" used through the Pakistani ISI by America, Britain, AND Israel.
Who Is? Archives
"I don't see Osama Bin Laden
"I don't see Osama Bin Laden and "Al-Qaeda" as being a "tool" used by Israel, but moreso, a "tool" used through the Pakistani ISI by America, Britain, AND Israel."
The bottom line is that we don't know squat about any of this stuff. The ISI stuff is based on a Times Of India article and some internet chatter about how the CIA controlled the ISI and all this other spooky shit. Same goes for the dancing Israeli weirdos for those who believe in the Mossad did it angle. We know squat about any of these freaks. Just internet rumors and the oh so reputable.... "main stream media sources".
It's a funny thing the main stream media. Alex Jones, for example, will say something like: "all our sources are taken from the main stream media". But ten minutes later he'll tell you how the main stream media is a psyop.
But...we do know that 3 buildings were demolished that day. It wasn't airplanes. So....the hijackers were patsies.
I just want everyone to always remember....
SOMEONE WIRED THE WTC TRADE CENTER COMPLEX WITH EXPLOSIVES....AND I DOUBT IT WAS ATTA
Can't Stop 9/11 Fever
There is no doubt there were
There is no doubt there were five Israelis who were documenting the event. And taking into consideration the fact the Mohammed atta was wired 100,000k from Mamoud Ahmed of the ISI it would make sense that the CIA and ISI are at some level working together
Could you be...
Anymore dishonest in your assessment as to why people see the Pakistani ISI and Al-Qaeda as one and the same? "The ISI stuff is based on a Times Of India article and some internet chatter about how the CIA controlled the ISI and all this other spooky shit." That's it, huh? That's all there is, huh? What about the alleged ties between the ISI and the 7/7 bombings? What about the alleged ties between the ISI and the 7/11 Mumbai bombings? How about the report that, "accuses Pakistan's intelligence agency of indirectly supporting terrorist groups including al-Qaida?" You may not know "squat" about this stuff, but please don't include me, and everyone else in your ignorance.
Who Is? Archives
I agree, Al Qaeda was
I agree, Al Qaeda was originally a joint CIA/ISI database of all the Mujahadeen fighters from the 80s