One Scene From "In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11 Families"

9/11 - The Failure to Defend the Skies

Part I

Part II

Part III


Needs to see this film.

Who Is? Archives


How can we find the complete version? Is buying the DVD from the Press for Truth website the only way? Other options?

watch here

maybe the best?...

...take on 9/11. Thanks Jon for bringing this to my attention. I've watched quite a few videos, at ths point, I almost feel another may be repetitious? This is not the case here. Thanks for the link alexjonesfan. I guess, I'm thankful, I had to watch the entire film!

I believe, this the most professionally done film on 9/11, the production values are excellent. "Press for Truth" has not gotten its due! I feel the pain of the relatives. It comes through.

The 9/11 commission is such a shameful episode in American History! One relative said it best, "I'm so pissed off at this government." Bush and Cheney are such disorganized racketeering gangsters mentally that they can't keep their stories straight unless they appear together! It's so worthy of ridicule!

It's so obvious, you..

...can't believe them!

As of right now...

Buying the DVD is your only option, other than maybe meeting Betsy and I in Wayne on a Saturday.

Who Is? Archives

We'll see about

We'll see about that.


What is wrong with....

just spending the $15 and support the producers??? It's 15 bucks, if I can afford it, so can you!

I need to check in for a widows video every now and then

to remind me who I'm working for.

There's a lot of 9/11 bullshit around. They are the real thing.
Paul Thompson is the real thing.

Has anyone not seen the list of the widows' 300 questions,
and the ratings showing they got just 27 answers?

Sign the Petition of Solidarity!

Then get busy!

Nearly Forgot

Nearly forgot how convincing/professional the Jersey girls were.
Great clips, undeniable facts.


August 2nd, 2006, the Washington Post reported that "the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public" and that "the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation."

Now, whether you think it was because of confusion from "the fog of events" on that day, or whether you think it was the result of "inadequate forensic capabilities", and "poor record-keeping", or whether you think it was blatant criminality (which I do)...


William P. Goehring, a spokesman for the Inspector General's office, said that "the question of whether military commanders intentionally withheld the truth from the commission would be addressed in a separate report that is still in preparation."

Where's that report? Does it exist? If so, please show it to me. Why didn't the media make a HUGE stink about the original Post story? Why didn't the media make a HUGE stink about the fact that the Inspector General's report created on "May 27, 2005" wasn't released until after the story of the Commissioner's suspicions came out? Why did the complicit in the cover up Commissioners wait until August 2006 to break this news to everyone?

Why aren't Americans jumping up and down, stomping their feet, and DEMANDING accountability for this, and MANY other "problems" with regard to the official account?

Who Is? Archives


Outstanding. I'm definitely going to include some of these videos in my pieces in the future.

Cui Bono?  The 9/11 Promotions

"Senator Mark Dayton claimed that NORAD officials “lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they lied to your 9/11 commission to create a false impression of competence, communication and protection of the American people."
Arabesque: 911 Truth


So much more. Wait until you see the Put Options, the identities of the hijackers, the PNAC, and yes, EVEN the Pentagon all narrated by the families.

Who Is? Archives

This film...

Is an excellent companion to 9/11: Press For Truth. In Their Own Words and it's predecessor are the only films that, in my opinion, are truly in touch with the dissatisfaction expressed by the 9/11 family members with the Senate Joint Inquiry into 9/11 and the 9/11 Commission. Don't get me wrong, Loose Change 1, 2, and 3, 9/11 Mysteries, Improbable Collapse, and others are great films, but this movie and 9/11: Press For Truth are the first films that should be shown to those beginning to question the official account of 9/11. The other films I listed are excellent resources if that person wants to continue their research. Tired of people saying, "I don't know, it seems kind of far fetched" after you give them a copy of 9/11 Mysteries or another more popular documentary? Give them a copy of this film and you'll probably get a completely different response and that viewer will probably be more apt to get involved.

Justin A. Martell

In a soldier's stance, I aimed my hand at the mongrel dogs who teach! Fearing not that I'd become my enemy in the instant that I preach! My pathway led by confusion boats...mutiny from stern to bow!

Kudos Justin

Right on Justin !
And keep up the good work !
I disagree about '9/11 Mysteries' though. Showed it to a lawyer friend - one showing - convinced.
And I've always liked 'Improbable Collapse'. I think that was the one to 'turn' me, not that long ago.
(I've found people, friends, and family will not believe this shit until they sit down, and - maybe even forcibly - see the evidence.)
And Justin, you and your crew, -make sure you follow up with those pricks you've spoken the Truth to.

It Has the Human Interest Story

I agree, Justin-- this film is a fantastic place to start someone on their truth journey. I've often pondered exactly which film is best to lead with, and I think that Press For Truth and In Their Own Words might well be the best. It has the human interest story of people who were directly affected and involved. And the way they were systematically denied answers to their questions will inspire others to fight for justice, as opposed to leaving them "blown away." They will want to learn more and can then flow right into "Blueprint For Truth" by Richard Gage!

This is especially the best lead off for connecting to Democrats because it helps them "save face" about being wrong. All staffers should be presented with this at local offices.

Let me ask the obvious.....

Why was this segment removed from the Film in the first place, when Press For Truth is considered by some to be a subjective argument for an inside job? This segment was extremely strong and convincing in itself for the need for a criminal investigation into norad-faa-wargames alone, not to mention everything else. So why was it omitted?

Because 9/11: Press For Truth...

Was about the families, Paul Thompson's work, the media's failings, and it had several interviews with people that weren't family members. With all of the available footage (3-4 hours worth) from the families, they had to be picky with what they included. I assure you that the reason was not because they wanted to keep this information from the public. Which is why it is now available on DVD.

Who Is? Archives