Denmark Goes Mainstream

From the Loose Change Forums, thanks to Phaedrus for sending this in. Any translators in the house?:

http://avisen.dk/tema-911-031207.aspx

Nyhedsavisen har i en række artikler fortalt historierne om de mange teorier, der er kommet i kølvandet på begivenhederne den 11. september 2001. Læs alle artikler her.

Den officielle forklaring på
terrorangrebet den 11.september 2001 er under stadig mere intens kritik fra
verdensomspændende netværk af såkaldt 9/11-skeptikere.

Også Danmark har fået sin
egen gruppe, der på baggrund af adskillige indicier, forlanger nye undersøgelser
af, hvad der egentlig skete den dag World Trade Center faldt og Pentagon blev
ramt.

Stod USA’s regering bag? Så de blot passivt til? Og i så fald - hvorfor i
alverden icenesætter man et mord på sin egen befolkning?


416) { this.style.height = (this.height / (this.width/416)) + 'px'; this.style.width = '416px'; }" align="left" height="130" src="http://avisen.dk/photos/angaaende-11-september-2001-021207/images/369036/435x450.aspx" width="217" />Angående 11. september 2001

Millioner af mennesker tror ikke på den officielle forklaring. At det kunne lade sig gøre for
et kapret fly at ramme Pentagon. Men hvad skete der så, da verdens mest
sikre bygning blev angrebet?

(Bragt i Nyhedsavisen 4. december 2007) 


416) { this.style.height = (this.height / (this.width/416)) + 'px'; this.style.width = '416px'; }" align="left" height="145" src="http://avisen.dk/photos/argumenter-bare-afvise-021207/images/369053/610x410.aspx" width="218" />Argumenter, man ikke bare kan afvise

Danske Jakob Hede Madsen, manden bag et dansk 9/11-site, undrer sig over, at offentligheden ikke må optagelserne fra de mange kameraer, der
overvåger USA militære hovedkvarter, Pentagon. (Bragt i Nyhedsavisen 4. december 2007) 


416) { this.style.height = (this.height / (this.width/416)) + 'px'; this.style.width = '416px'; }" align="left" height="138" src="http://avisen.dk/photos/vaeltede-world-trade-center-241007/images/315180/435x450.aspx" width="218" />Dansk forsker sår tvivl om 9/11

Lektor i kemi ved
Københavns Universitet Niels Harrit mener, der er stærke indicier for, at World Trade Center ikke faldt sammen på grund af terror-angrebet -
de blev revet ned med vilje.

(Bragt i Nyhedsavisen den 23. oktober 2007)


416) { this.style.height = (this.height / (this.width/416)) + 'px'; this.style.width = '416px'; }" align="left" height="138" src="http://avisen.dk/photos/11september-world-tradetaarnene-faldt-indlysende-maade-dtuekspert-251007/images/316566/435x450.aspx" width="217" />Ingen grund til skepsis

DTU-ekspert i brandpåvirkede konstruktioner mener, at World Trade Center-tårnenes fald har en naturlig forklaring. Kristian Hertz kaldet det 'indlysende' at det første tårn falder symmetrisk til jorden.

(Bragt i Nyhedsavisen 24. oktober 2007)

 


416) { this.style.height = (this.height / (this.width/416)) + 'px'; this.style.width = '416px'; }" align="left" height="159" src="http://avisen.dk/photos/rygende-pistoler-261007/images/320205/435x450.aspx" width="218" />Fire danskere i kamp for sandheden

Danmark har fået sit
første organiserede netværk af 9/11-skeptikere. Men trods kilovis af
dokumentation for, at det var et såkaldt 'inside job',
bliver man betragtet som gakket, hvis man peger fingre ad de vedtagne
sandheder.

(Bragt i Nyhedsavisen 26. oktober 2007) 

9/11 på internettet

Undersøg selv sagen på et af de mange hundrede internetsites. Vi anbefaler:
pilotsfor911truth.org
- skeptiske piloter

stj911.org
- skeptiske videnskabsmænd

911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html
- skeptiker-site med argumenter for at det faktisk var et fly, der ramte
Pentagon

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12818225
- frigivet video af angrebet på Pentagon

www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf
- den officielle rapport

www.popularmechanics.com
- søg på 'debunking' og læs, hvordan skeptikernes argumenter bliver
modbevist

www.loosechange911.com
- se en af de mest kendte, kritiske film om 9/11

 

 

 

 

I think you got the header wrong

I think the header should read "DK Goes Mainstream", shoulden't it?

SwinG

The best solution depends on it's lack of drawbacks

fixing layout

Thanks to Joint Plays

Actually I found it on the Lose Change forum here. This explains it better.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=20184

Just for laffs you can translate here.
http://www.tranexp.com:2000/Translate/result.shtml

What are these

What are these articles?

What hit the Pentagon and Controlled Demolition?

Is that what they are talking about?

This is positive?

/////////////////////
http://www.swatcash.com/dhs

MP3 Audio Clip - Randi Rhodes

Wednesday December 12, 2007
Caller Asks Air America's Randi Rhodes "Where's The Terrorists" And She Says There Are None

* source = http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/live/
-----------------------------------

Monday December 3, 2007
ABC Good Morning America Finds Out That Pakistani Kids Believe Osama Works For The CIA

* source = http://abcnews.go.com/gma
-----------------------------------

More MP3 Audio Clips >

Translation

Here's a quick translation. (UK is obviously wrong in the title. I think "Denmark" would be better than "DK")

In a series of articles, Nyhedsavisen [a free daily in Denmark] has told the stories of the many theories that have followed in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001. Read the stories here.

The official explanation of the terror attacks on September 11, 2001 are being subjected to increasingly intense criticism from a world-wide network of so-called 9/11-skeptics.

Denmark, too, has gotten its own group. On the background of numerous pieces of evidence, it is demanding an investigation of what really happened the day the World Trade Center collapsed and the Pentagon was hit.

Was the US government behind it? Did they just passively watch it happen? And if so, why in the world does one stage a murder of one's own population?

(Picture of Pentagon, appeared in Nyhedsavisen Dec 4, 2007) About September 11, 2000: Millions of people do not believe the official explanation. That it was possible for a hijacked plane to hit the Pentagon. But then what did happen when the most secured building in the world was attacked?

(Picture of Pentagon, appeared in Nyhedsavisen Dec 4, 2007) Arguments one can't just dismiss: Jakob Hede Madsen, the man behind a Danish 9/11 site, wonders why the public is not allowed to see the footage from the many cameras that have the headquarters of the American military under surveillance.

(Picture of WTC, appeared in Nyhedsavisen, Oct. 23. 2007) Danish researcher plants doubts about 9/11: University of Copenhagen chemistry professor, Niels Harrit believes that there is strong evidence that the WTC did not collapse because of the terror attack: it was torn down on purpose.

(Picture of WTC, appeared in Nyhedsavisen, Oct. 24, 2007) No basis for doubt: An expert in the effects of fires on structures believes that the collapse of the World Trade Center towers has a natural explanation. Kristian Hertz says it is "obvious" that the first tower falls symmetrically to the ground.

More debate in Denmark

I'm not sure this counts as "going mainstream", however. 9/11 Truth has pretty much the same status in Denmark as it has in the US, as far as I can tell.

There has also been a little (very little) debate in a high-brow weekly (Weekendavisen). A cultural anthropologist from a nearby Swedish university (Lund), Steven Sampson, wrote a piece of commentary/reportage on a talk held by Niels Harrit in Copenhagen. He used the opportunity to characterize Harrit's work as "junk science", and offered some standard debunking of it. Weekendavisen published two short letters that took issue with Sampson's arguably mean-spirited article. It also published a longer response by Harrit in which he called for more discussion of these topics among scientists and objected to the mudslinging in Sampson's article. Sampson responded by suggesting that Harrit was simply being "politely" ignored by his peers.

As I recall, Weekendavisen also published an op/ed piece when David Ray Griffin visited. It suggested that Griffin was sick in the head and that the Royal Library, whose auditorium had been rented for the occasion by a 9/11 group, was irresponsible. Something along those lines. There has also been some standard coverage of "conspiracy theories" during 9/11 anniversaries.

interesting... but Holland

interesting... but Holland had this in 2006, remember the tv progaram "Zembla" with demolition expert Danny Jowenco:

the Zembla clip;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI

see his work here;
http://www.noticias.info/video/video_play_ES.asp?Id=74Dqz_9oKZQ

now after it all aired here in Holland there was a small buzz but after a few weeks it was all gone.. if Scandinavia does it any better i'm very surprised What we had was a load of disinformation and official BS and very litle truth.