"Most questions will be answered by phone. To guarantee you get a response, please provide a phone number."

Is anyone on from Iowa? It would appear that John Edwards is taking questions from the public there. I think this is a good time for us to determine the status of the WTC7 investigation, which, as we all know, John Edwards promised to look into. 9/11 truth questions need to be asked now while the opportunity is available!

Secondary source:


Deborah Johnson

John Ewards has just announced his new unprecedented "Ask John" Program. you can find it here: will also be in sioux city for those of you in or near sioux city that still have questions you would like to ask in is that information: "America Rising" Rally with John Edwards
Dec 30, 2007
7:30 p.m.
Senator Edwards to hold an "America Rising" rally
Convention Center
801 4th Street
Sioux City, is a link to a site that i think is awesome! you can see first hand everything about the candidates..a great site to be well informed!please check it out today!.......
Dec 28, 2007 - 13:12:36

Here's a link for those who didn't see his first response.

Strap a TV to yourself and broadcast WTC7 collapsing


I'll have to get me one of them DVD screens...
It's a great way to confront politicians. See this building collapsing
on itself? It's WTC 7 and it's a controlled demolition.

how much does it cost one of these DVD screens ?

Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

how much does it cost one of these DVD screens ?

Yours John

DVD player

Your cell phone can do it.
I have a nokia N-Gage QD (crappy phone, but it has a memory card).

The cell phone companies are listening o you and preventing you from using your cell phone via lack of I/O options (see

There is a good company out there called Credo Mobile. They won't sell you out to Bush.

Any phone that has I/O can do it.

anyway what ever phone you have it can probably do it
get a video player "lonely cat games", or email me at
vidphone (dot) 20 (dot) zdux0012 (at) xoxy (dot) net

Edwards is deceptive making false promises

I remember him promising to look into WTC7. Just shows what liars we have in Capitol Hill.

We should also use the same yardstick on ALL the other Candidates.

It seems a favourite candidate for the 911 Truth movement, Ron Paul does not seem to have hard questions asked.

How about bringing up WTC7, William Rodriguez, the Jersey Girls and Richard Gage's into RP's campaign and getting him - (a darling of the 911 Truth Movement - see Alex Jones organizations, GCN affliates, WTPRN etc), to start speaking the truth about 911.

Ron Paul is an official "blowback supporter" - he stands on the official theory that 19 Men defeated Norad and brought those 3 towers down. Obviously some serious education of this candidate is required. It seems all those people in GCN, Alex Jones, Kevin Smith from WTPRN have been unable to educate Ron Paul on the science and facts about 911.

So either due to ignorance or "other reasons" he is a "blowback" theory believer. His believes on Impeachment are just as disturbing.

Check pls, RP's response to Impeachment. His recent words at a lodge were ample proof.Just do some research.

"Paul told the LVN earlier that the decision to invade Iraq in 2003 without a declaration of war by Congress was the most egregious violation of the Constitution in the last 20 years. But when asked why he hasn't supported the impeachment of President Bush, Paul responded that impeachment is the duty of the opposing party, and he would have to consider if a president willfully or ignorantly deserved impeachment before making a decision."

According to RP, impeachment is the duty of the opposing party.

Is that true? Is that what the Constitution says? Does the Constitution say, only the opposing party has the DUTY to impeach?

He also says he would have to consider if a president willfully or ignorantly deserved impeachment before making a decision.

Can you believe that? Research it for yourself. I used to be a RP supporter. Not after these words.

He is a party loyalist. Republicans 1st before the Republic.

The same standards we use on Edwards,Clinton, Giuliani, McCain, Thompson etc, we have to use on RP or we are selling the Truth and the Republic short.

This is NOT RP Bashing. Just being vigilant. Accountability should be across the board.

I sincerely hope RP turns around and wakes up before it is too late. The same applies to his 911 Truth supporters which are formidable.

Jason Bermas says 911 Truthers form the base of the support for Ron Paul. If that is the case, the movement is doomed if this candidate does not progress on his viewpoints from "blowback" to treason and cannot see the wisdom of impeachment.

Republic or Republican? 911 Truthers pls decide.

Edwards is not the only man that we need to expose.

911 Truth = Federal Reserve / Military Industrial Media Financial Complex Exposed. Real Hope for America and fulfillment of RP's campaign promises.

911 Blowback = More of the same obsfucations. RP's Campaign Promises most likely not fulfilled.

It is time for the Dr to make the right diagnosis. RP has a good chance of taking the Presidency especially with his momentum. But with current stands on 911 and Impeachment, very low chance of Restoring the Republic and dealing with the Traitors in Congress, the Pentagon & the Media.

I sincerely hope people will see how vital it is to awaken his campaign to the importance of 911 Truth, Impeachment.

Bush & Co, will be more dangerous OUT of public office and the scrutiny that comes with it. They have made their plans and the wheels of govt can be controlled OUTSIDE, from private, "retired" interests. Just look into Haliburton operating from Dubai.

This is not over by a longshot. We should impeach while there is still a chance. B4, they either leave the country, or further destroy-ransack what's left.

Don't settle for comprimises, and less than total truth. From ANY candidate.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Ask Ron Paul about WTC 7 !

Right you are... Personally I believe that much of the truth movement is controlled, anybody who does any serious research about Ron Paul quickly understand that he is not as ''pure'' as some pretend. Ron Paul is just a neocon wannabe, in many ways he is even more extreme than they are.

Ron Paul is a libertarian...

and he has no aspiration to become a neo-conservative. Neo-conservatism is actually a philosophy that was created by Leo Strauss, and Paul doesn't think very highly of it.

Regarding him being more extreme in some ways than the Neo-cons--I agree. He is much more extreme in his defense of liberty than they are.

And yes someone should ask him about WTC 7! He referred to it before on the Pat Gormann show as "the third tower." A follow-up on that would be good.

Youtube: Neocons Are Socialists by Theodore Terbolizard.
Terbo for Congress '08!

Birth of the Libertarian "Movement"

You might want to do a bit more research on the the ''Libertarian Movement'' who created it and for what will find it's always the same elite interests pushing this ''neocon'' agenda, it doesn't matter what they call it to mislead us, it's always the same BS.

Birth of the Libertarian "Movement"

Screw Ron Paul and the spooks who promote him !
You might also want to look into the CIA ''Bin Laden expert '' Michael Scheuer and his link to RP ;-)


I took a look at the article you linked from

But I didn't see any evidence to substantiate your claim that the same elite interests that are pushing the neo-conservative agenda also created the Libertarian movement.

Other than that I didn't really get much out of that article. It seemed have been written with a lot of ego, which I don't think a good technique to try and convert someone to another viewpoint.


Geez, that's a very weak justification on impeachment. The duty of the opposing party...haha.
I'd like to see the exact quote of that to see how he worded it.

I wonder if he is holding off for strategical reasons. I wonder how the media would spin that if he was for impeaching a member of his own party.

It would be rather difficult to impeach a Republican president

when the Democrats are telling us that, "Impeachment is off the table", don't you think?

Yep it for sure would be...

even though they (the Democrats) are too incompetent to get it "on" the table, it would still be nice to see Paul helping out!

I really don't think Ron Paul or any other candidate would win

the presidency on a "9/11 was an inside job" platform, at this point in time.

I also don't think Paul should get himself bogged down in impeachment proceedings. The Chimp has less than a year in office, impeachment hearings could be very lengthy, and then who would replace him if he were impeached anyway?

Furthermore, it was Congress who abdicated their duty in letting the Chimp declare war. Now you expect that same crooked Congress to impeach him?

Lastly, I agree that we should ask Ron Paul & all the candidates as many 9/11 questions as possible!

I don't Know if this blog is satirical or sincere, but if it is

the latter, the author and the readers should know that Edwards is a Bilderberger, which means his promises are as phony as his accent.


The Bilderberger's are the most sinister group of people on the planet. They are evil beyond our understanding. I don't know if Edwards is one of them but if he is he is nothing more than a fancy dressed gangster. Don't waste your time with this thug if that is what he is.

Evil beyond our understanding?

You really think so?
I think they believe that they are doing good, just like virtually everyone does.

I think that quote about the road to hell being paved with good intentions is very appropriate here.



Got a call back!

I received a call back for Ted. Ted? Forgot I used a fake name. I called the woman back at 641 423 5880

Ted: I'd like to know what the official opinion of the John Edwards Campaign on what force brought the towers down.

JE: "uhhh". I

Ted: What force in physics.


Ted: Because MIT, Cornell U, BYU are saying that the forensic evidence is undeniable.


Ted: How many buildings were destroyed in NYC on that day?

JE: 3?

Ted: They all fell at the fastest speed allowed on this planet Earth. That tells me that explosives did it.

JE: Huh,,,

Ted: Listen I understand that you know nothing about it, I did 2 hours of research on the internet and discovered a scientific journal on it. Do not call your self an american, don't look at the flag and feel proud. You know nothing about your country and you are calling up people and telling them why you can lead this country better than anyone else?

I won't vote for JE, and shame on you

Vote forTed

Good job Ted. I think I'd vote for Ted.
That's the problem with the Ron Paul Movement.
It's diverting money, effort, and attention from people who would actually say and do something.
Where's a Third party - Truth alternative ?
And maybe some of RP's supporters could explain " Evolution" to him, after straighting him out on 9/11.
Not withstanding - He'd be a great candidate if it was ....say 1850 .

John Edwards

The only way for John Edwards to ever get my vote would be to do the following:

State that 9/11 was an inside job meaning that parts of our government were involved.
State that the 93 bombing and OKC bombings were also run by our government.
State that the Bin Laden tape (now tapes) are fake.
State that the reason for the three collapses were due to explosives, not planes not fuel and not the combination of the two.
State that the other planes of the same day also seem like strange events and should be investigated, and investigated by a 3rd party.
State that the 9/11 commission was a complete cover up.
State that everyone involved in the studies of NIST, 9/11 commission should be fired, their assets frozen, and prevented from leaving the country.
Explain his ties to any secret organizations, explain his every meeting with them, explain every conversation that ever took place at these meetings.
I forget the name of the bill, but there is a bill that prevents members of congress from meeting political figures, Hillary has broken this in Bilderburd meetings, he must state if he broke this law and accept punishment for it before running.
Explain why he did not get back to the truthers about wtc7 when he was asked to do so, (what was more important for months in a row?)
Apologize for not caring enough about his country to do the 2 hour internet search it would take to determined what happened on this day.
Have a independent 3rd party make a no holds barred investigation with more resources than that given to Clinton's penis.
Promise to move America on to the gold standard.
Promise to get out of Iraq in 3 months or less.
Promise not to pardon any one invloved in 9/11 and or any other illegal event.
Explain our drug ties to Central America and Afghanistan.
Stop all government sponsored drug runs.

If JE can complete this list he would be 1/2 the way towards getting my vote.

Dr. Paul likely knows far more about 9/11 than he reveals so far

There is a time and place for everything.

Ted: did you speak to John Edwards himself?

If so, that's pretty funny!

RE: Got a call back!

Sorry JE was not John Edwards, a female representative, give her a call and ask her for yourself ;)

I am for Ron Paul. Edwards is in some secret groups, I do not trust him.

I am voting for Ron Paul because it is apparent to me that the governments roots run too deep. CNN isn't talking about the Journal of 9/11 studies. The local stations are too scared to say anything. The powers that be went to far and the year is 1776.

Ron Paul on the Issues

You should take a look at Ron Paul's voting record -- he protects the oil companies, just as Bush does.

Ron Paul on the Issues

* Property rights are the foundation of all rights. (Sep 2007)
* Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
* Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
* Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
* Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer
* Voted NO on increasing AMTRAK funding by adding $214M to $900M. (Jun 2006)
* Unlimited campaign contributions; with full disclosure. (Dec 2000)
* Voted NO on requiring lobbyist disclosure of bundled donations. (May 2007)
* Voted NO on granting Washington DC an Electoral vote & vote in Congress. (Apr 2007)
* Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)
* Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)
* Voted NO on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox. (May 1999)
* Abolish the federal Department of Education. (Dec 2000)
* 'Take marching orders from Constitution; not from al Qaeda.' (Sep 2007)

All the D's and Rs are not worth voting for -- they have agreed to play the game of selling out to corporations for power and are part of the problem by thinking that will solve anything. As soon as they break free from the corporations their own party will crucify them.

Blacks didn't get the right to vote by voting.

We won't change this country by voting in a Rethug or a Dem who are beholden to the corporations -- they are lost.

Ron Paul is getting a lot of individual support, but mainly from white homeowners and Libertarians, not from the broad spectrum of Americans, because he is extremely harsh on policies in the lives of low-income people, disabled people, immigrants, etc. -- anyone currently dependent on things like public transportation, public schools, welfare, medicaid, etc., would be lost under a Libertarian government of Paul.

Paul votes against funding a basic TRAIN system for the US! He protects the oil companies instead. Who needs the oil companies? Those who can afford a car. It's a world for the rich and property owners, the rest be damned.