Osama and the CIA sponsored "War on Terrorism": Americans are being killed by American trained Islamists

Osama and the CIA sponsored "War on Terrorism": Americans are being killed by American trained Islamists

by Peter Chamberlin, Global Research, January 6, 2008

Apparently, Osama bin Laden and former CIA agent Michael Scheuer have a mutual respect for each other's intellect. In one of bin Laden's latest videos, he said,

"If you would like to get to know some of the reasons for your losing of your war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer in this regard."

Here is Scheuer's take on Osama:

"For nearly a decade now, bin Laden demonstrated patience, brilliant planning, managerial expertise, sound strategic and tactical sense, admirable character traits, eloquence, and focused, limited war aims. He has never, to my knowledge, behaved or spoken in a way that could be described as irrational in the extreme."

Here we have a "former" CIA man, claiming to be an opponent of administration war policies, speaking as a foremost expert on bin Laden, because of his position on the "bin Laden unit." He validates the latest bin Laden videos with his expertise, without ever acknowledging facts about al Qaida and their leader – the nature of the real threat vs. the created perception, the death of bin Laden, al Qaida the database, the builders and instructors of the Pakistani/Afghani insurgent training camps. In his book Imperial Hubris, written under the penname "Anonymous," Scheuer paints a shocking portrait of camps that he claims were built by bin Laden, when, in truth, he knows that these are all CIA built facilities, including the notorious Tora Bora (where bin Laden is allegedly buried), the camps in the Swat Valley in Northwest Pakistan, the scene of ongoing confrontations and under the watchful eyes of a new American super base which is under construction near there...


Bin Laden is DEAD

this is propaganda.. OBL is dead and has been dead for years..don't try to snow us ok

Excellent! Also from Global Resarch--ISI Ahmad sends Atta $100K

then Ahmad meets & eats with top U.S. officials!!!???

Summer 2001: ISI Chief Lt. General Mahmoud Ahmad transfers $100,000 to 9-11 Ringleader Mohamed Atta.

4 September 2001: Ahmad arrives in the US on an official visit.

4-9 September: He meets his US counterparts including CIA Head George Tenet.

9 September: Assassination of General Massood, leader of the Northern Alliance. Official statement by Northern Alliance points to involvement of the ISI-Osama-Taliban axis.

11 September: Terrorist Attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. At the time of the attacks, Lt General Ahmad was at a breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss. Also present at the meeting were Sen. John Kyl and the Pakistani ambassador to the U.S., Maleeha Lodhi.

12-13 September: Meetings between Lt. General Ahmad and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. Agreement on Pakistan's collaboration negotiated between Ahmad and Armitage. Meeting between General Ahmad and Secretary of State Colin Powell

13 September: Ahmad meets Senator Joseph Biden, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.


Condoleezza Rice's Press Conference:

In the course of Condoleezza Rice's May 16 press conference (which took place barely a few hours after the publication of the "Bush Knew" headlines in The New York Post), an accredited Indian journalist asked a question on the role of General Mahmoud Ahmad:


Q: Dr. Rice?

Ms RICE: Yes?

Q: Are you aware of the reports at the time that the ISI chief was in Washington on September 11th, and on September 10th $100,000 was wired from Pakistan to these groups here in this area? And why was he here? Was he meeting with you or anybody in the Administration?

Ms RICE: I have not seen that report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.13


Although there is no official confirmation, in all likelihood General Mahmoud Ahmad met Dr. Rice during the course of his official visit. Moreover, she must have been fully aware of the $100,000 transfer to Mohammed Atta, which had been confirmed by the FBI.

Much more here: http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html

Ron Paul and Michael Scheuer ...

Ron Paul has rejected those ''crazy 911 conspiracy theories'' and has instead adopted Michael Scheuer 's Blowback explanation (lies) for 911. In fact both appeared together in a news conference to ''educate'' Rudy Giuliani, remember that one.

Here is a simple question, why does a high ranking CIA spook whose specialty is promoting the lies about Bin Laden and Al Qaida, come out of nowhere to support a presidential candidate ?

Here is a better question, why does the ''911 Truth movement'' support a candidate who promotes lies about that event ?

My best guess is that Ron Paul is using caution & strategy on

how & when he should broach into 9/11 truth.

I don't think it would be in our best interests for Dr. Paul to run for president on a "911 was an inside job" platform at this point in time.

Furthermore, Paul can't stop certain people from supporting him, whatever their motives or backgrounds may be.

Two points

(1) I think Ron Paul could have simply made statements questioning 9/11, like "I want to know why Building 7 collapsed", without jeopardizing his campaign.

(2) Since the likelihood that Ron Paul will actually win the Republican nomination is practically zero, it seems to me that in the long run his popularity would have been better used to promote 9/11 Truth, otherwise his campaign will have little historical meaning.

Good call,

Good call,

All the LIHOP disinfo in the world won't alter what I know that WTC-7 was blown up with explosives in a classic CD manner as seen on video. This could not have been done by Osama's minions and could only have been carried out by someone who can control security in WTC 7 so that the whole building can be wired with demo charges.

Michael Shauer and other "ex government insiders" who want to keep on insisting that Osama was anything more than a patsy in the demolition of WTC is a liar or knows only part of the truth on the matter.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

I vote

... Liars, all

"There are none so hoplessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." (Goethe)

A take on Scheuer

he as the head of one of the intelligence units who knew all along all infos about "al ciada" and Bin laden together with the Squad I-49, he is truly some kind of fishy.


BTW: the myth of the "wall" was put to rest:

After 9/11, the “wall” between intelligence collection and criminal prosecution will often be cited for the failure to stop the 9/11 attacks. But as author Peter Lance will later note, “Little more than ten months after the issuance of Jamie Gorelick’s ‘wall memo,’ Fitzgerald and company were apparently disregarding her mandate that criminal investigation should be segregated from intelligence threat prevention. Squad I-49… was actively working both jobs.” Thanks to Coleman’s involvement in both I-49 and the CIA’s Alec Station, I-49 effectively avoids the so-called “wall” problem.