Interrogation of Japanese PM for 30 minutes about the truth concerning 9/11

This is very SERIOUS. I do hope 911 Bloggers proficient in Japanese will provide a Full and Accurate Transcript. Taken from a Prisonplanet forum and YouTube Websites.

Pls watch the videos in full even if you do not understand Japansese. Some of the footage is self-evident. Note this is the opposition party of the 2nd most powerful economy talking.;topicseen#msg84189

"Was Al-Qaeda the real suspect?" :

Fujita Yukihisa,DPJ,asked the question to the current prime minister Fukuda regarding the truth of 9.11. He was arguing whether Terrorism is crime or war. Some Japanese people were killed, so he believes this was a crime, so Japanese police should investigate the real suspect even though Japanese government assumed that the suspect was Al-Queda since Bush told Koizumi so and sent the self-defense force to Iraq. Can Japanese police arrest president Bush if he was one of the suspects? (less)

"Why the WTC towers collapsed?" :

Fujita Yukihisa,DPJ, asked the question regarding the truth of 9.11 to the current Prime Minister Fukuda. With the panel,he explained the conspiracy theory and made the pants of prime minister sweaty because he was the Chief Cabinet Secretary under Koizumi cabinet in 2001. He pointed out the fact that the 7th tower collapsed even though air plane did not hit it and there was the suspect of insider dealing that people benefit by using the Put Option.

If the attack was not done by Al-Qaeda,then the Iraq war cannnot be justified, so the decision of sending the Japanese self-defense force to Iraq cannot be justified as well. Thefore, the self-defense force does not need to provide the oil to the American military in order to support the operation in Iraq. It is China and Japan buying the large share of American Treasury bond,so if China and Japan stop buying the bond, America cannnot finance the war in Iraq anymore whoever become the President after Bush. Hopefully, Ron Paul will become the President and bring peace to the world.

"How could terrorists attacked the Pentagon?" :

Fujita Yukihisa,DPJ, asked the question regarding the truth of 9.11 to the current Prime Minister Fukuda. With the panel,he explained the conspiracy theory and made the pants of prime minister sweaty because he was the Chief Cabinet Secretary under Koizumi cabinet in 2001. He pointed out the inconvinience facts showing the pannel. If the attack was not done by Al-Qaeda,then the Iraq war cannnot be justified, so the decision of sending the Japanese self-defense force to Iraq cannot be justified as well. Thefore, the self-defense force does not need to provide the oil to the American military in order to support the operation in Iraq.


I'll see what I can do. Based on what you describe, I agree: this raises very serious issues of international law, described by Elias Davidsson here:


"(d) Does the duty to protect the right to life under the ICCPR, which the US has ratified, extend to the obligation of the contracting parties to "adequately investigate" the arbitrary deprivation of life within their own jurisdictions? If so, what is the exact content and scope of such an obligation? Did regional human rights courts identify and define an obligation to investigate the violation of the right to life?"

I'm not sure whether the Japanese police should investigate. It's more an issue of whether the Japanese government should demand that the United States government conduct an open investigation and criminal trial. (Update: Japanese police would have a role and duty in determining whether their counterparts in the United States adequately investigated the deaths of Japanese citizens.)

Perhaps we need an international tribunal. That was proposed by international law scholars early on:

See also Davidsson's article "The Right to the Truth and the Events of 9/11" for more extended analysis under the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

I've been hoping to write about this here, but will say now that I have come to strongly disagree with the argument that the legal burden of proof is on those who doubt the official story of 9/11. The state, which has control over all the information, has the burden of proving what happened, both because people were murdered and because this event has been used to justify the invasion of our and civil liberties and invasion of other countries' sovereignty.

Davidsson states:

"The right to truth regarding the circumstances in which offenses against the public order and human rights have been committed is linked to the principle of democracy. The fact that a modern state possesses vast powers, including a monopoly on the use of force to repress crime and enforce the law, requires the existence of effective safeguards against the potential abuse of state power. Accountability, of which the transparency of official conduct is an essential feature, aims to safeguard the public against arbitrary rule and the potential for corrupt and unlawful practices by public officials. Thus, the right to truth, along [with] the right to public trials and the right to access to government information, may be regarded as three types of accountability rights in a democratic society."

I would like to know more . . .

about the politics of what's going on here. From what I can tell this may be part of a power struggle between the Japanese Democratic Party and the Liberal Democratic Party, the latter being considered a tool of the U.S.

The first blog listed contains the statement:

"The Liberal Democratic Party has become a tool of the Jewish world financial-military empire."

(or is now under the control of that empire - rough translation)

The "Jewish" part bothers me. Constitutional911, could we get an explanation of why this was posted and who wrote it?

But the Democratic Party of Japan's platform looks great, and not right-wing nationalist as I expected:

But definitely seeking a more independent foreign policy role for Japan:

"Regarding the DPJ proposal, Ozawa said, “the government’s so-called bill for providing refuelling assistance to the US military, and the DPJ bill proposing that we should provide public welfare assistance to the people of Afghanistan within the framework of United Nations activities; these two [proposals] are now on the table. It should be easier for the Japanese people to understand now.”

Regardless, the questions being asked about 9/11 are quite valid and should have been asked from the beginning:

Japanese citizens died in criminal acts; what has the government done about it? How has the government determined that the crimes were committed by "Al Qaeda" or only "Al Qaeda"?

I'm hoping a transcript becomes available -- that would be much easier to translate and more accurate.

The external links to the

The external links to the other blog sites come from the About this Video section of this url :

I just copied and pasted it for information purpose only. In fact, I did not look at all the links, only the videos and summary which are from the respective YouTube Urls. Please refer to them for more info.

We need to get a proper transcript. As I speak little or no Japanese, valued help from fellow 911 Bloggers is needed.

Whoever posted this on Youtube may have added his/ her own blog lists regarding the "Jewish" issue.

That is NOT from me. I just transfered what was on the YouTube links in order for 911 Bloggers to start digging further.

You input, critique and analysis will be much appreciated.

I don't support Anti-Semitism of any sort. That includes the Palestinians who are also Semites.

Thank You.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it


I see what you mean -- it was the person at YouTube that posted the link and many others. I would say that the only relevant link for our purposes is to Fujita's website.

It looks like a summary of his questions is posted here, assuming that the date he asked these questions was November 28, 2007.

It doesn't have the answers of the cabinet officials, but the questions are excelllent and I will translate as time allows. (Update: it looks like this is an earlier set of questions.)

Sorry, but I don't agree with the "Arabs are Semites, too" line. Yes, I know they are, but the term "antisemitism" means prejudice against Jews.

Prejudice against Arabs and Muslims is just as bad, but it's separate.

Thank you! This is a great post.

LDP,The Liberal Democratic

LDP,The Liberal Democratic Party is the main conservative party in Japan. They have been in power since 1955. CIA gave them massive funding from the mid 50's, this was revealed in the mid 90's. They are most certainly a tool of the American empire.

DPJ,Democratic Party of Japan are the main opposition, a fairly new party, formed in 1998. They won a great victory in the 2007 election. I guess they are trying out their new muscles...

Anyway, this is great news.


"The "Jewish" part bothers me. Constitutional911, could we get an explanation of why this was posted and who wrote it?"
ehrm.. could it be because there IS a "jewish" angle to all this ? what bothers you about that, don't you want the truth ?
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

Whatever, Peter

I have no problem with responsibility being assigned wherever it belongs. But Fujita said nothing about "Jewish financial military empire," and I was wondering why that link was included.

It also looks like

the opposition party is questioning the premise of the government's new anti-terrorism bill.
Very interesting.

International what?

When's the last time you can remember the leaders of any American administration recognizing international law when it's not in their interest, and their interest alone?

I don't want to downplay the significance of this. Japan is currently a very strong ally in most American's perspectives.

I do however caution against getting too excited just because another world leader is willing to discuss that which ours are not.

He's certainly not the first.

I heard Benjamin Fulford mention this story on

the Alex Jones show today. Great interview, the show should be refeeding right now at Also check out:
Benjamin Fulford interviews David Rockefeller about illuminati, asian opposition

The begining

THIS is the beginning of global awareness of 9/11 truth. It will take the support of the world outside the USA for us to succeed. Thanks, Japan!

I look forward to the day when every US citizen who comes in contact with the rest of the world is confronted by 9/11 truth. This is not just about the USA, but the future of humanity.

I wish

I could share your optimism. But do you really think that any mainstream media in the west will report this? Don't hold your breath.

It will not even be reported in the Japanese mainstream press, despite the fact it was televised. The sad fact is that corporate media has almost total control.

MP3 Audio Clip - Alex Jones & Benjamin Fulford

Friday January 11, 2008
Former Forbes Writer Benjamin Fulford Speaks With Alex Jones From Japan About The Recent Airing Of 9/11 Facts By The Japanese Opposition Party.

* source =

More MP3 Audio Clips >

Awesome buddy

Thanks a lot. I was looking for this.

If what's happening in Japan is the real thing, we have to fully mobilize media resources and start duplicating similar things in the US Congress.

Why shouldn't politicians question 911 and DEMAND the TRUTH.

The real conspiracy "theory" is the 19 Hijacker theory.

It is time for us to regain the moral and scientific high ground.

It is ironic, 911 WAS the NEW Pearl Harbour and Japan may be the 1st developed country to seriously tackle the issue.

We should seriously support the 911 Truth Movement in Japan, especially the politicians IF they are sincere, serious and determined to see Justice done and Truth revealed.

For all mankind. This is bigger than all of us.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

The questioner's homepage, Official video archive

The questioner Fujita Yukihisa's homepage(Japanese only)
Tel: +81-03-3508-8205
Fax: +81-03-5512-2205

House of Councilors

Index page(Japanese only)

Direct link to Windows Media Player streaming. (Full Version)
Total Time 3h 22m 51 s
Evidences will be shown at 18m 14s.

Yet another YouTube URL

Earlier questions by Fujita

Benjamin Fulford said he will be working on a translation of the videos this weekend, and I think he can do a better job than me, so I just translated the first of Fujita's questions of 11/28/2007. It's just background and here, he is more questioning 9/11 as a premise for war than questioning who did 9/11. I think he refers to this prior question, about whether terrorism is 'crime" or "war," at the very beginning of the first video, where he talks about having asked questions earlier to the Prime Minister.

I am Yukihisa Fujita of the Democratic Party of Japan.* I will now ask questions about the new anti-terrorism law (bill), from a standpoint of opposition to that bill, and my questions are primarily addressed to Prime Minister Fukuda, who is the commander-in-chief of the Self-Defense Forces.

1. The justifiability of the “War on Terror”

Concerning the definition of terror:
Prime Minister, is terrorism a crime, or is it war? In other words, is it armed conflict?* The answer to this question is the major premise at the very core of this anti-terrorism bill, so please answer without being evasive. If you consider terrorism to be a crime, are you allowing that a country may overthrow by military force the government of another country where criminals lurk [that is harboring terrorism]?

And even if you think of terrorism as “war,” doesn’t America’s recent preemptive attack show the danger of allowing a country to attack another country without evidence and with whatever excuse it wants to use?

Assessing and reconsidering the “War on Terror”

Prime Minister, when we talk about the fight against terror, who is it that is fighting, and who are they fighting against? Do you not agree that because this is unclear, “Operation Enduring Freedom” became indiscriminate and retaliatory, and a war of mass destruction against civilians? U.N. Resolution No. 1368, adopted just after the 9/11 attacks, recognized a resolution by the turning over of terrorist suspects, and recognized the right of self-defense of the United States, but did not recognize war for the purpose of regime change. What is the Prime Minister’s position on this matter? The recent military activities of Operation Enduring Freedom for sweeping up terrorists has instead invited terrorism, and led to a cycle of hate.

I think we need to assess and reconsider the War on Terror. What is your position?

*He also names his group with the party, “New Green Wind.” I think these are policy research groups. I couldn’t find it in the factions listed here:

** The United Nations Charter does not contain the word “war” except in the preamble, and as a legal term only uses “armed conflict.”


This is obviously someone who has heard these words before.


" I think we need to assess and reconsider the War on Terror. What is your position?"

This is a question every World Leader will have to answer sooner or later.

Thanks for the translation efforts. Pls keep it up.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Benjamin Fulford

I hope we can get a translation from someone else as well. I don't know much about Benjamin Fulford, but his website has some weird stuff on it:

In the article called "Secret Government Promies Big Changes" he writes "At the same time, an anti-Rothschild alliance has been formed in Tokyo. They warn that the entire Bush regime was probably set up as a “bad cop” to scare people in the arms of the EU “good cop.” They say there may be other surprises, possibly including a fake UFO invasion that Henry Kissinger hinted at during the 1991 Bilderberg meeting."

and the entirety of an article called "Anti-Semitism is anti-Satanism":

"For millennia the ancient Babylonian secret slave driving cults have used the Jews like a matadors’ cape, to distract people from the real source of their anger. When the Jews are attacked, they are forced to huddle around the slave drivers for protection. Later, the cultists appeal to good heart of the people by making them feel guilty about their attacks on the Jews. In Europe and North America, humanity’s natural kindness has been used to brainwash us into a knee-jerk reaction against anything that is labeled Anti-Semitism. The way to remove this brainwash is to compile a database of everything that is called Anti-Semitic and remove from that database anything that is anti-Jew. The remaining body of knowledge can be renamed anti-Satanism. It will be useful in identifying the real villains and the things they are trying to hide."

That's not to say I think that he'd deliberately mistranslate it, but his beliefs may color his translation, so it would be good to have another source.


Thanks for that background Scott

the 'anti-Rothchild alliance' - that must mean the 1936 Anti-Commintern Pact. Woao, what a crude and shameless re-writing of history these Rightists are engaged in, trying to shoehorn history into a pair of well worn-out (Jack) boots.


Benjamin Fulford is a murky character with a strange tale. We have to verify all our facts and details on this highly precedent setting matter that has just occured in Japan.

Inititally I myself suspected a hoax of some sort, but it looks real and authentic at least for now.


Too many world leaders have danced to the tune of the neo-cons in D.C and it is high time the World starts speaking up. It is good to see the Japs exhibit some independent thinking on this matter.

Fulford has some weird theories of his dead relative communicating via some dream etc.. and other bizarre personal anectodes / tales which I don't put much credence to.

The credibility lies now in Japan's Political Machinery. If Indeed the Opposition is raising some sort of ruckus in Parliament, we should be inspired by such action and run with this ball to the finish line best we can.

I am sure the OFFICIALS in Tokyo will try to bury, cover and ignore 911 Truth.

But I think this train is too big for anyone to stop.

At ther same let us all be wary of any disinfo - intentional or unintentional.

Fulford may just be eccentric or there could be a hidden agenda. We have to do due dillegence. The more of us working on this, the better a job we can do together.

We have to separate the wheat from the chaff.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

I will check

I share your concerns, Scott, but he appears to be quite fluent in Japanese, and he said on Alex Jones that he is going to translate. Let's see what he comes up with.

I prefer the videos here:

They appear to come directly from NHK, and include different content, especially the third in the series. On the other hand, it looks like they leave out some of the content in the first video above.

They also don't carry the baggage of the links to anti-Jewish websites. None of this information is relevant to the videos. Enough said.

Best is to get a full Japanese transcript and translate it. Actually, best is to pay a neutral professional translator to translate and certifiy an official transcript. Can anyone afford that?

Very quickly

in the first video, he is saying this was a crime needing investigation, asking whether this was crime by Al Qaeda or by Al Qaeda only, asking whether the Japanese government did its own investigation given that it was a crime, asking about identification of the bodies of Japanese victims, and stating that this crime is the premise of the war and terror and if we don't know who did it how can we justify the war on terror. He didn't get much in the way of answers -- just statements that they relied on U.S. government reports and/or don't have the exact answers at hand. The Prime Minister answers first, basically just saying they relied on U.S. reports, then the Minister of Foreign Affairs answers about Japanese victims. A bureaucrat in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs answers about the bodies, not saying much other than they got reports from the U.S. Gov't about DNA identification. Fujita then questions whether that is enough, given that this is a crime, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs gets up and basically says they were satisfied with the information received, and I think he says they assisted with cremation. Fujita ends by saying that throughout the world there is much information being presented that raises doubts about 9/11, including by eminent people, and if the Japanese government is going to take responsibilty for the victims, and if it has any doubt about its prior determination that Al Qaeda was involved, then they need to act resolutely with integrity, and need to reconsider the premise of the fight against terrorism.

This is very rough and incomplete and maybe inaccurate, but it should do for now.

Order of videos

I think the third video should be second, and the second third.

Very quickly and roughly:

In the third video (really the second) he asks about the Pentagon - whether a plane could so that damage, why the plane followed such an unusual course to the other side of the Pentagon, and why the air force couldn't react quicker. The Minister of Defense gets up and mostly talks about why its hard to shoot down an airliner (I think - hard to follow.) In the middle video (really the last), Fujita talks about material being expelled so far from the Twin Towers, about Building 7 falling down hours later even though no plane hit, and about Building 7 not being mentioned at all in the 9/11 Commission report. He then talks about the put options on airline stock, and questions whether a group in Afghanistan could have done that. The Minister of Finance gets up and gives a general answer about the need for international cooperation to halt financing of terrorism. Then Fujita asks his fellow party member Keiichiro Asao to explain, as he has expertise in finance, and Asao explains explain why the put options imply prior knowledge.

This guy Asao is a real kook -- Tokyo law, Stanford MBA.

Japanese Press Coverage?

Is there any press coverage of this exchange in Japan? I can not seem to find any.

If not, is the suppression of 9/11 Truth by the Japanese press similiar to that in the US?

Newspapers ignored

Although this interrogation was aired by state run TV station NHK in live. No major newspaper reported that.

"Although this interrogation

"Although this interrogation was aired by state run TV station NHK in live.No major newspaper reported that"

This is very very important news and wonderful to have it confirmed. I still almost cannot believe it was aired live by a state run national TV Station.

Isn't there lots we can do to get WORLDWIDE FULL COVERAGE from as many media sources as possible, both MSM and Alternative Media on this Critical Turning Point in Japanese Politics with regards to 911.

Now if anyone call us kooks, we can bring up this FACT as part of our arsenal in rebuttal and education.

I sincerely believe our work has just began and we need to spread news of this to as many news sources- Alternative AND MSM. Even if the gatekeeping MSM may choose to ignore, spin or belittle this news, we have to raise public awareness. I myself am stil stunned by the news and its geo-strategic implications especially in ASIA with regards to Japan-US relations.

Put Options? Questioned In the JAP Parliament?!!. My God this is a Breakthrough that we the Global 911 Truth Movement have to fully harvest to its full potential.

Pls fellow Truthers, regardless of any differences we may have on various 911 theories, favourite 911 Political Candidate for President etc, this is a powerful turning point with INTERNATIONAL AND HISTORICAL IMPLICATIONS.



William Rodriguez's trip(s) to Japan were certainly NOT Wasted and I am sure he deserves credit for behind the scenes work as well as many others I guess, including the Loose Change Crew for their terrific docs- translated into Japanese.


We are winning this and just like Kissinger can barely travel without getting arrested or charged, the same may soon apply to Bush, Chenney & Co.

A G7 nation has taken 911 Truth by the horns, albeit the Opposition has done it.

Imagine what can be done if we can BUILD ON THIS MOMENTUM.


Let's sound the Trumpet for 911 Truth. For Tokyo to Tel-Aviv lets finally geth the Truth out.

We will save lives and perhaps even prevent a global war.

One man CAN make a difference.

This is one fine example.

Japan's 9/11 Truth Conference a huge success!!
October 2006 (Personal thanks to Yumi Kikuchi and Gen Morita)

To all the 911 Truth Activistsd out there, from the Deception Dollar to Debunking 911 Debunking, every single positive thing we have done is bearing fruit and the Truth will one day SHINE as BRIGHT as the LIBERTY TORCH on Ellis Island.

Our efforts are NOT in vain. On the contrary the Patience of the Righteous and Just will Bear Great Fruit.

We owe it to the memories of those who perished and are still perishing.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Loose Change 2 E (dubbed in Japanese)

Loose Change 2 E (dubbed in Japanese)in Google Video Japan TOP 5 all last year. Currently #1

862155 views until Jan.5. 2008 261702 downloads until Jan.7, 2008 US-documentary 2nd Edition Japanese dubbing Dylan Avery, Korey Rowe, ... all » and Jason Bermas bring you the most powerful 9/11 Documentary Download:

This just in from Another Insightful Analysis

Member of Japanese Diet Doubts Official 9/11 Fairy Tale

Kurt Nimmo
Truth News
January 12, 2008

Don’t expect the New York Times or CNN to report on Fujita Yukihisa’s grilling of Japanese PM Fukuda over the official 9/11 fairy tale.

Yukihisa is a member of the House of Councillors in the Diet, that is to say the national legislature of Japan, and his questions about the transparent sham that is the official version of events is indeed a big deal — but not as important in America as the travails of Britney. Yukihisa’s presentation was all the more important due to the fact he was the Chief Cabinet Secretary under former PM Junichiro Koizumi in 2001.

Although we don’t yet have an English translation of the video — taped from Japanese television — now appearing on YouTube, the site posted the following, apparently a translation from Japanese:

On January 11th 2008 member of Parliament Yukihisa Fujita of the Japan Democratic party, made a 20 minute long statement at the House of Councillors, the upper house of the Diet (parliament) of Japan. He questioned the official version of 9/11 presented to the Japanese government and the public by the US administration in a session of the defense commission.

He asked the current Prime Minister Fukuda who was the Chief Cabinet Secretary under Koizumi cabinet in 2001.

“How could terrorists attacked the Pentagon?”

He asked whether Terrorism is crime or war. Some Japanese people were killed, so he believes this was a crime, so Japanese police should investigate the real suspect even though Japanese government assumed that the suspect was Al-Queda since Bush told Koizumi so and sent the self-defense force to Iraq. Can Japanese police arrest president Bush if he was one of the suspects?

The statement was made in connection with the discussion about the renewal of the Japanese logistic assistance program for the US navy in the “fight against terrorism”.

US President George W Bush has recently pressed Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda to ensure Tokyo resumes crucial naval operations to support the war in Afghanistan. The Japan Democratic party which is in the opposition is blocking the resumption of the mission,which supplies fuel and water to US-led forces operating in the Indian Ocean.

The government wants to continue and to be part of the fight against terrorism. The opposition argues that the operation has not been approved formally by the United Nations. It claims that oil supplied by Japanese ships has been diverted for use in operations in Iraq, an accusation the Americans deny.

The government has made changes to the legislation which authorizes the mission. It has to be renewed every year after approval by parliament. The new law says Japanese ships can only refuel and supply water to vessels on anti-terrorism patrols. Ships involved in military operations — whether they be attacks, rescue operations or humanitarian relief — will not receive Japanese supplies.

Yukihisa Fujita did question Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Minister of Finance Fukushiro Nukaga about the way in which the US government did inform the Japanese government about the people responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

Mr.Yukihisa Fujita stressed that of the 24 people that died on 9/11 only 13 were identified and 11 bodies remain unaccounted for. He pointed out that there was never an official police investigation into the deaths of these japanese nationals.

He then explained that in the USA many people doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous websites and scientists have collected evidence that contradicts the governments version..

He presented several largescale photographs of:
a) the Pentagon entry and exit hole
b) the flight path towards the Pentagon
c) the exploding WTC towers
d) the WTC 7 collapse.

He concluded that the japanese governments support of the “war against terror” is solely based on information provided by the US-administration. He demanded further investigation in the face of the governments drive to support the war more actively.

Yukihisa Fujita was elected to the House of Councillors for the first time in 2007

The Democratic Party of Japan (Minshinto) is a social liberal political party founded in 1998 by the merger of several smaller parties.

It is the second-largest party in the House of Representatives and the largest party in the House of Councillors, and it constitutes the primary opposition to the long-dominant Liberal Democratic Party.

Here we have a respected Japanese politician asking on public television if Bush can be arrested in connection with events of September 11, 2001, and the corporate media finds this unworthy of publication or even mention in passing.

But then, of course, the neocon corporate media, snugly in bed with the “defense” industry and long ago sold down the river by the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird, has ignored the coming out of former Italian president Francesco Cossiga, who declared the attack was a CIA and Mossad operation. As well, they have ignored former German Intelligence Minister Andreas von Bülow, who stated his informed belief that 9/11 was orchestrated at the highest level of the U.S. government.

Once again, another important news story is relegated to the memory hole.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it


日本や中国が、アメリカの発行する国債を大量に購入しているから、財政赤字のアメリカでもイラク戦争を続ける事ができている。言い換えると、日本人や中国人のお金が間接的にイラクの人を殺すのに使われている。だから、もし日本や中国がアメリカの国債を購入しないなら、大統領選挙でヒラリーやオバマのどちらが勝とうが、アメリカはイラク戦争 を続ける事ができない。お金を有意義に使うべきだと思う

It does not mention Ron Paul. It mentions Hillary and Obama. That regardless of who wins America cannot continue the War if they do not buy the bonds. You can check it here

Truth is most important to me or all is discredited. Do you think Dr. Paul would support this...I think not.

Link, please

You seem to be asking people to use a translation program at How about a link to the original source. Who wrote it?

Here's what it, whoever wrote it, says:

"America, which has a fiscal deficit, is able to continue the Iraq War because Japan and China are purchasing U.S. Treasury Bonds in large amounts. In other words, the money of Japanese and Chinese people is indirectly being used to killed Iraqi people. Therefore, if Japan and China don't purchase U.S. Treasury Bonds, America cannot continue the Iraq War, regardless of whether Hilary or Obama wins the election. I think money should be used in a significant way."

Questions and comments

1. Who cares if it mentions Ron Paul? The writer seems to be following the Democratic primary, and assuming that a Democrat will take the presidency. Whether you like it or not, that is a reasonable assessment. The Japanese press follows U.S. politics closely and Japanese people are interested in and well informed about U.S. politics. (Though a quick Google suggests Ron Paul doesn't get much coverage there -- in which case why blame the writer for not knowing about Paul?)

2. Why would Ron Paul oppose this? He's a proponent of national sovereignty and an opponent of the Iraq War. If he opposes it, he is a hypocrite. And the same would apply if Ron Paul was elected and chose to continue the war, so what's the problem?

3. This appears to me to be a Japanese citizen troubled over the fact that money from his country is being used to kill people in Iraq.

4. Even if a Diet member said this, so what? Whether or not you and Ron Paul like it, and whether or not you support the war, it's important that this is being said in Japan. It happened and the American people should be aware of it.

WOW Squared

I really hope someone can do a subtitled version of this. And due to the language barrier, someone needs to transcribe all the most recent research into Japanese and get it to these guys, because they may be a little behind on what is confirmed and debunked.

Here's a cleaner version of the videos

No links to other websites.

These videos also look more like what was broadcast on NHK, live. I'm not sure yet whether the content and order are the same.

(Update: the third in this series is new content, and very signficant. Fujita aquestions the premise of the war on terror, the Prime Minister responds, and the president of the party, Ichiro Ozawa, gets up and calls for human development in Afghanistan, which is the party's alternative anti-terrorism proposal. He is very charsimatic and applause follows his speech.)

Show "Oi, Dwight--bit off topic..." by olduser_01

Leave me alone, please

So what is it, moderators? Going to allow harassment again, then blame me for the harassment?

Show "What are you on about?" by olduser_01

Nine days ago

And you still haven't answered Casseia's question at Truth Action: are you associated with the other cartoon character that is posting Google Earths of people's locations, including my office, on the Internet?

"Lookout" for what? Did you come here to threaten that you are going to make a video about me?

I thought Truth Move, 9/11 Blogger, and Truth Action all supported civility. I've not strayed from the orthodoxy since returning here, and it's clear that this person is instigating conflict with me.

Let's look at the 2008 Declaration: Standards and Strategies for 9/11 Truth

We aim to foster reason and responsibility within the global movement for truth. We base this in the following values:

4. A dedication to rational, respectful, and nonviolent debate and activism. Fundamental respect in discourse with all individuals, including those within the government and military, journalists, and supposed “opponents.”

Conversely, we seek to counteract and minimize:

3. "Disruptive, divisive, diversionary, and aggressive behavior."

We will engage others in the movement who break these guidelines with constructive dialog, raising awareness of these issues. Those who are unresponsive to reason and have a clear history of disruption, combativeness, or excessively poor judgment will not be engaged.


2. Critique and ignore unnecessary and unproductive antagonism (i.e. infighting, personal attacks, gossip, etc.) that wastes time and causes divisiveness.

One would think that the behavior of "Colonel Jenny Sparks" would be frowned upon here and at other websites that promote these guidelines.

Ahhh, but as we apply these "guidelines," we see that they are impossible to apply.

First, should I "critique" this person's behavior, or should I "ignore" it? I'm writing a critique, so I guess I should have ignored it. I guess it is me that is violating the standards by writing this. So my mere presence here is disruptive, and I should be "counteracted and minimized."

We then see that Jenny's crusade also meets other parts of these standardless guidelines.

Heroically, though anonymously, she is seeking to "counteract and minimize":

1. Promotion of speculative and unsubstantiated claims.

3. Damaging and marginalizing associations.

Because, you see, I am known to be in agreement on some issues with disfavored persons. Therefore, I must be counteracted and minimized. Even if I am respecting the wishes of the proprieters by not raising these issues, I am tainted, and who knows when I might spit them out, at the choice moment to cause maximum discrediting to the movement? (And of course my translations are not to be trusted. I'm just waiting to be asked to translate something into Japanese so I can insert my ideas into Japanese minds. It's not going to be easy, though, since educated Japanese people read English and don't need American thought police to tell them what is and is not disinformation. But I will try.)

Therefore, it seems that guideline #5 does not apply to Jenny, and I would be wrong to argue that she "continually, and despite consultation, act[s] in word and deed in the manner of agent provocateurs," and should be treated as such. (Has she been consulted on her behavior?)

So we see that these guidelines can be applied to justify attacks against anyone, and to defend the actions of anyone. I hope this is just the result of poor drafting.

Dwight Van Winkle

Well, 9 days ago is hardly harrasing you constantly ;-)

My mistake--it seemed like weeks.

As for that link, I'm not sure what you're on about. You mean a couple of posts on the second page--where you assume I know something, but won't tell me what it is?

You know, there is a contact form.

The rest of it sounds confused....sorry, I have enough weirdness to deal with.

Oh my god -- you think this is productive?

You want to harass a fluent Japanese speaker with extensive knowledge of international law in a thread about one of the most interesting news items in a while -- when we are all completely dependent on translation -- because you disagree with him on something else? Do you think this is productive and good for 9/11 Truth?

I hope others will join me in complaining to the mods.


We need to get it transcribed from multiple reliable sources. Fulford can be easily discredited due to some bizarre statements he has made about talking to a ghost relative etc.. I believe he mentioned it on a Rense radio broadcast some mths or weeks ago.

It is best we get our own independent translation(s) from contacts / people we know personally and compare them to any inevitable translations that come out from other sources.

What is important to me personally is what is the PM of Japan saying to all of this?

How is he rebutting or answering any of this serious questions? What type of gatekeeping operation will the "Official" Government of Japan carry out.

The lessons we learn on this could be applied on a global basis and more discussion should be carried out in the corridors of power the world over.

911 Truth should be a MAIN topic in every Parliament, Congress, Palace etc on Earth.

If ever this Planet is to achieve True and Lasting Peace and a dismantling of this horrible INTERNATIONAL MILITARY WAR MACHINE THAT HAS HIJACKED THE USA, we need MORE of what has just happened in Japan.

The Japanese 911 Truth Movement has fired a critical shot into the heart of the Neo-Con Energy Globalists Cabal.

We have to rally to their call.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Apologies- Double Post

Since there is space, here is another Bush "Ally" with some serious misgivings.

Pakistan president tells US to stay out

Pakistan's President Tells US It Is Not Welcome to Join Fight Against al-Qaida

........Musharraf warned in an interview published Friday that Pakistan would resist any unilateral military action by the United States against militants sheltering in its lawless, tribal regions close to the Afghan border.

"I challenge anybody coming into our mountains," he told Singapore's The Straits Times in the interview notable for its unusually strident language. "They would regret that day."......

It looks like this Coalition on this "War on Terror" may be unravelling sooner than the Neo-Cons expect.
This looks like it is going to be a very serious year with regards to the War on Terror. I mean Freedom.

It looks like the "Puppets" are talking back to their masters...... is this a trend.......?
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Absurd logic:

? Who is saying this:

"If the attack was not done by Al-Qaeda,then the Iraq war cannnot be justified, so the decision of sending the Japanese self-defense force to Iraq cannot be justified as well."

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 whatsoever. Bush himself was asked what Iraq had to do with the attacks. He said: "Nothing."

Iraq and "Al Qaeda" were enemies. There is no "justification" whatsoever for the invasion.

The excerpt above is absurd because even if the 9/11 attacks WERE done by Al Qaeda, this still has nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq.

Are the Japanese still laboring under this fraud? Who said the quote?

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog

johndoraemi --at--

That's how the war was sold

I don't know if Fujita actually said that and am not going to check now. I did rough translations above and he was talking about the "fight against terrorism" in general, though I may have missed reference to specificially Iraq.

The bigger point he is raising, though, is that there is not sufficient evidence that the attack was by Al Qaeda, and that this was a crime that should be investigated.

Bush still claimed that the invasion was justified to prevent terrorism, even if Iraq was not involved in 9/11, and still used 9/11 to justify that.

The president of the American Society of International Law, Ann-Marie Slaughter, quite disgracefully supported that argument, here:

(page 2, first full paragraph)

This was after she supported the U.S. going in to find WMD, calling the invasion "formally illegal" but "legitimate." Again, a disgrace to her profession and specialty of international law.

These were arguments made to allies and to the UN. We don't know what arguments were made to the Japanese government and people to support the participation. Easy claims that this logic is absurd misses the bigger point. And again, he may not have said this - I recall him talking about the fight aganst terror.

The text is a summary

not a translation. Fujita didn't mention Ron Paul.

"providing oil" by the way, refers to refueling operations by the Self-Defense Forces, not the oil itself.


John, straight after 9-11, the first target to be chosen WAS Iraq:

3. Invading Iraq to Avenge 9/11

Possible Undeclared Motives for the Invasion of Iraq

We now know that such sentiment existed and still exists in the US.

As already discussed, the main thrust of the drive following 9/11 was the war on world terrorism and, to some extent, Islamic fundamentalism. Despite all claims and half-baked affirmations, neither was present in significant force in Iraq either after 9/11 or immediately before the invasion.

We know now that the tragic events of 9/11 were effectively employed to manipulate American public opinion to support the invasion of Iraq. 9/11 is an important parameter only within this context. It created a mood that made large segments of the US public susceptible to that manipulation!

Impotrant point

'Fujita Yukihisa,DPJ,asked the question to the current prime minister Fukuda regarding the truth of 9.11. He was arguing whether Terrorism is crime or war.'

This is an important point. Have governments deliberately turned crimes into military matters? Because then that allows them to invoke 'national security', with its dark entourage of secret prions, torture, renditions etc. It allows far right groups to appear in a beneficial light to the public. Just as in the movies, where the thuggish hero has his methods justified by the nastiness of the villain, and ordinary procedures are seen as dangerously inadequate....'Now we will do it my way'...says the thuggish hero, while the film manipulates the audience to accepting what they would reject in real life.
Acts of 'terror' must be treated as any crime, and those in power should be held to account when they create thuggish laws or go beyond normal laws, and try to get the people to support them.

well named!

'The president of the American Society of International Law, Ann-Marie Slaughter, quite disgracefully supported that argument, '...

That woman is well named!!!

How Ron Paul entered the discussion


your legitimate question, "Who cares if it mentions Ron Paul?" has a legitimate answer:

the blurb attached to two out of three of the YouTube videos ends with the sentence "Hopefully, Ron Paul will become the President and bring peace to the world."

Perhaps that was the source that IggyD was taking issue with?

— e sono tanto semplice, li uomini ...

That makes sense

Thanks for the suggestion, and sorry if I overreacted. I agree that Ron Paul's name, or anything extra, should not be connected to the Diet member's speech. I still don't know where IggyD got the Japanese text he posted. All this is why I prefer the other set of videos, which appear straight from Japanese television NHK, and don't come with any links.

Political hackery

There is a concerted effort by some Ron Paul supporters to infer that he will investigate who was responsible 911.


There is NO reason for the opposition leader to mention RP in a presentation about 911.


Please remove this political misinformation from your post.

Fujita didn't mention Paul

Nor did Asao or Ozawa, the president of the party, who speaks in the third of the other set of videos.

I'm not sure if you mean that, but the Ron Paul mention is in the text with the videos.

i agree it doesn't belong here, and it would be nice if some editing was done.

Who wrote the text in the first place?

The statement about Ron Paul

The statement about Ron Paul is from the About This Video Section from this url :

It is posted by user : jazzdicekey.

I only copied and pasted this information for review purposes with as little / no editing possible.

In fact, I think comments were actually posted on the viewpoints of the YouTube user himself, but I did not want to edit his comments, hence my posting / duplicaiton of his entry in order to maintain accuracy.

This was for record purposes. In no way am I endorsing the Ron Paul campaign or the statement for obvious reasons made clear in my comments here :

I don't think the "political misinformation" should be removed because I do not want to edit the statements made by the YouTube user at this url :

The purpose of my entry / posting is too keep an Accurate record of what was posted on YouTube for all of us to examine, analyze and critique. I agree it is most likely some error or maybe even disinfo or distortion as Ron Paul apparently is not mentioned by the Japanese politician(s).

However, for the purpose of Record, the posting should remain unedited (as long as the urls are there for us to see for ourselves).

When the transcripts are out (hopefully soon) we will have a clearer picture of what was said and how (if any) rebuttals were handled.

Thanks for your comments and vigilance.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Maybe I'll get it the third time :-)

I see what you mean. This is just the beginning, and you got the material out. Thanks very much..

Ron Paul and 911 investigation

But Ron Paul said very carefuly something - I think - in sense that the 911 needs further investigation - after the last debate in SC:
I was myself quite surprised - It was first time I've heard something like that from him.

Check out Yukihisa Fujita's blog

Check out Yukihisa Fujita's blog. There is a photo of him asking his questions, and a colleague or staffer holding up a large aerial photo of the Pentagon and surrounding area with a diagram of Flight 77's corkscrew descending path before it crashes into Pentagon. Stunning. Not only questions about 9/11 but he has the diagrams of the flight. He came loaded for bear!

Image path if link below doesn't work

Also, for those wanting to do some of their own investigation, use Altavista's Babel Fish Translation to read Yukihisa Fujita's website and blog for yourselves.

Here is the link to his blog

and here is a link to his blog with Altavista's url so it is in translated English:

Note that his blog has a comments link so lets tell him we appreciate his questions and provide him with all the information he needs to keep asking the questions.

BTW, his blog has a link to a news story about the questions translated from Japanese. It doesn't say anything about his 9/11 questions.

Flight path map

Pentagon Flight map is completely wrong.

It looks like it is based on Koeppel's map, but even he has admitted his map is mistaken.

"Wow! Last time I Googled my own name (six years ago) there were zero references. Now a diagram I drew in early 2002and posted on Democratic Underground asking for help has become some sort of Urban Legend..."

Hopefully his controlled demolition presentation was more factually accurate than his Pentagon one.
Arabesque: 911 Truth


I still think it should go but WTF, I appreciate you reply if not your decision.

Franky I agree with you

However, I am only the messenger.

I just wanted to relay Accurately what was posted on the original YouTube Url links. So we have a proper Record.

Bloggers have to decide how to separate the information from fact and opinion.

By the way, pls chceck out the Fulford translation of this at link:

I cannot verify this translation nor speak for Benjamin Fulford as I feel he at the very least he has areas in his testimony regarding Rockefeller and his dead "ghost" relative that can be easily discredited.

Is it eccentricity or some other agenda? Time and Vigilance will tell.

Hence we need to compare as many different translations from multiple sources to get a more accurate understanding of what was said.

We can never rely on just one source. Always best to verify.
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it