Olmert And Bush—Leader And Vassal

By Paul Craig Roberts


After pandering to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s right-wing government last week, US president George W. Bush carried the Israeli/neoconservative campaign against Iran to Arab countries. Sounding as authentic as the "Filipino Monkey," Bush told the Arab countries that "Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terror," and that "Iran’s actions threaten the security of nations everywhere."

To no effect. Every country in the world, except America, knows by now that the US is the world’s leading state sponsor of terror and that the neoconservative drive for US hegemony over the world threatens the security of nations everywhere.

But before we get into this, let’s first see what Bush means by "terrorist" and Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism.

Bush considers Iran to be the leading state sponsor of terror, because Iran is believed to fund Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian ghetto. Hezbollah and Hamas are two organizations that exist because of Israeli aggression against Palestine and Lebanon. The two organizations are branded "terrorist" because they resist Israel’s theft of Palestine and Israel’s designs on southern Lebanon. Both organizations are resistance organizations. They resist Israel’s territorial expansion and this makes them "terrorist."

They are terrorists because they don’t receive billions in US military aid and cannot put armies in the field with tanks, fighter jets and helicopter gunships, backed up by US spy satellites and Israel’s nuclear weapons—although Hezbollah, a small militia, has twice defeated the Israeli army. However, Palestine is so thoroughly under the Israeli heel that Hamas can resist only with suicide bombers and obsolete rockets. It is dishonest to damn the terrorist response but not the policies that provoke the response.

The US is at war in Iraq, because the neoconservatives want to rid Israel of the Muslim governments—Iraq, Iran and Syria—that are not American surrogates and, therefore, are willing to fund Palestinian and Lebanese resistance to Israeli aggression. Israel, protected by the US, has disobeyed UN resolutions for four decades and has been methodically squeezing Palestinians out of Palestine.

Americans do not think of themselves or of Israel as terrorist states, but the evidence is complete and overwhelming. Thanks to the power of the Israel Lobby, Americans only know the Israeli side of the story, which is that evil anti-Semite Palestinians will not let blameless Israelis live in peace and persist in their unjustified terror attacks on an innocent Israeli state.

The facts differ remarkably from Israel Lobby propaganda. Israel illegally occupies Palestine. Israel sends bulldozers into Palestinian villages and knocks down Palestinian houses, occasionally killing an American protester in the process, and uproots Palestinian olive groves. Israel cuts Palestinian villages off from water, hospitals, farmlands, employment and schools. Israel builds special roads through Palestine on which only Israelis can travel. Israel establishes checkpoints everywhere to hinder Palestinian movement to hospitals, schools and from one enclave or ghetto to another. Many Palestinians die from the inability to get through checkpoints to medical care. Israel builds illegal settlements on Palestinian lands. Israeli Zionist "settlers" take it upon themselves to evict Palestinians from their villages and towns in order to convert them into Israeli settlements. A huge wall has been built to wall off the stolen Palestinian lands from the remaining isolated ghettos. Israeli soldiers shoot down Palestinian children in the streets. So do Israeli Zionist "settlers."

All of this has been documented so many times by so many organizations that it is pathetic that Americans are so ignorant. For example, Israeli peace groups such as Gush Shalom or Jeff Halper’s Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions provide abundant documentation of Israel’s theft of Palestine and persecution of Palestinians.

Every time the UN passes a resolution condemning Israel for its crimes, the US vetoes it.

The Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committees’ film, "The Iron Wall", reveals the enormity of Israel’s crimes against Palestine.

President Jimmy Carter, Israel’s friend, tried to bring peace to the Middle East but was frustrated by Israel. Carter was demonized by the Israel Lobby for calling, truthfully, the situation that Israel has created "apartheid."

Historians, including Israel’s finest, such as Ilan Pappe, have documented The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, the title of Pappe’s book published in 2006.

Israelis, such as Uri Avnery, a former member of Israel’s Knesset, are stronger critics of Israel’s policies toward Palestine than can be found in America. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz is more outspoken in its criticism of Israeli policies than any newspaper would dare to be in North America or Europe.

But it is all to no avail in brainwashed America where Israelis wear white hats and Arabs wear black hats.

The ignorance of Americans commits US foreign policy to the service of Israel. As Uri Avnery wrote in CounterPunch (January 14, 2008), a visitor from another planet, attending the recent press conference in Jerusalem, would conclude that Olmert is the leader of the superpower and that Bush is his vassal.

Americans don’t know what terror is. To know terror, you have to be a Palestinian, an Iraqi, or an Afghan.

Layla Anwar, an Iraqi Internet blogger, describes what terror is like. Terror is families attending a wedding being blown to pieces by an American missile or bomb and the survivors being blown to pieces at the funeral of the newlyweds. Terror is troops breaking down your door in the middle of the night, putting guns to your heads, and carrying off brothers, sons, and husbands with bags over their heads and returning to rape the unprotected women. Terror is being waterboarded in one of America’s torture dungeons. Terror is "when you run from hospital ward to hospital ward, from prison to prison, from militia to militia looking for your loved one only to recognize them from their teeth fillings in some morgue." [Stress..., by Layla Anwar, January 14, 2008]

For people targeted by American hegemony, terror is realizing that Americans have no moral conscience. Terror is the lack of medicines from American embargoes that led to the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children. When asked by Lesley Stahl if the American policy was worth the children’s deaths, Madeleine Albright, President Bill Clinton’s secretary of state, said "we think the price is worth it."

In the feeble minds of the White House Moron and his immoral supporters, the massive deaths for which America is responsible, including those inflicted by Israel, have nothing to do with Muslim enmity toward America. Instead, Muslims hate us for our "freedom and democracy," the real threat to which comes from Bush’s police state measures and stolen elections.

There is dispute over the number of Iraqis killed or murdered by Bush’s illegal invasion, a war crime under the Nuremberg standard, but everyone agrees the number is very large. Many deaths result from American bombing of civilian populations as the Israelis did in Lebanon and do in Gaza. There is nothing new about these bombings. President Clinton bombed civilians in Serbia in order to dictate policy to Serbia. But when Americans and Israelis bomb other peoples, it is not terror. It is only terror when the US or Israel is attacked in retaliation.

The Israeli assault from the air on Beirut apartment houses is not terror. But when a Palestinian puts on a suicide belt and blows himself up in an Israeli cafe, that’s terror. When Clinton bombs a Serbian passenger train, that’s not terror, but when a buried explosive takes out an American tank somewhere in Iraq, that’s terror.

Aggressors always have excuses for their aggression. Hitler was an expert at this. So are the US and Israel.

Unfortunately for the world, there’s little chance for change in America or Israel. The presidential candidates (Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich) who would bring change in Washington, without which there will be no change in Israel, are not in the running for their party’s nomination. As John J. Mearsheimer noted on January 12, the candidates in the running are as much under the thumb of the Israel Lobby as Bush. The candidates are Bush clones as strongly committed as Bush to hegemony, war, Israel and executive power.

The possible exception is Obama. If he is an exception, that makes him a threat to the powers that be, and, as we might have witnessed in the NH primary, the Republican- supplied, Republican-programmed Diebold electronic voting machines can easily be rigged to deny him the Democratic nomination. Hillary will not resist Israel’s wishes, and her husband’s presidency bombed at will his demonized victims.

There is no essential difference between the candidates or between the candidates and George W. Bush. Alabama Governor George Wallace, a surprisingly successful third party candidate for the presidency, said as long ago as 1968, "There’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties."

Today, four decades later, there’s not a penny’s worth of difference, not an ounce of difference. Both parties have revealed themselves to be warmonger police state parties. The US Constitution has few friends in the capital city.

Israel & the NeoCons are diabolical partners in crime!

Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

Show "Paul Harvey please..." by darchangel

Wow, either you are

Wow, either you are absolutely clueless or you are a shill pretending to be naive. If Muslim terrorists were responsible for 9-11 how come WTC building 7 came down as a controlled demolition would. Would the terrorists have inside access to that building at all? I suggest you find out who the the building's lease holder is and how much money he made out of the insurance. Then find out who his buddies are. The trail inevitably entangles Israeli Zionists and their partners the Neocons.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

Why do you post so many links to that site?

That site claims that 911Blogger is some kind of Jewish controlled psyop. Since you are posting here are you a part of the plot too? I don't think that is a good source for credible information.

If you are referring to

If you are referring to wtcdemolition.com , it has been the site that most consistently analyzed the events of 9-11 to my satisfaction. It may not always be first with the news but when I look for deeper analysis of 911 related events wtcdemolition.com makes the most sense to me.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

well put statement and defense of wtcdemo

right on the money, Juan. how are you?


Holocaust revision and moon landing hoax

and Jewish conspiracies about 911Blogger and any other site that the cult leader is not welcome on... if this is your idea of credible then we just have to disagree. It is sites like that which end up smearing the other site you link to which is a good one, ae911truth.org - I don't think it is smart to post it here.

Too right

And they cheerfully mix discussions with the "moon hoax" and other shite that has no business being near 911Truth. *roll eyes*

Any time now more will show up to defend how their site is managed....can't wait.

I don't think it needs

I don't think it needs defending, everyone can look at the website and decide for themselves.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

Oh dear, you don't want to tell people that

They'll find stuff like this:


By all means, read through the rubbish and decide for yourselves.

The silver lining is this site is well on the way to becoming so obviously un-credible that, like Nico's 911Bloglines, nothing they say about anything or anyone can be taken seriously .

You wish.

Perhaps that's the impression you're getting at your newly renovated echo chamber, Truthaction. Perhaps it's wishful thinking, since nothing you say about anyone or anything has been taken seriously for a while. Why don't you put down the dictionary of British slang and do something for 9/11 Truth? (And don't give *me* that crap about Brit raised Yankee.)


Exibit A

Moving from selectively telling bits of stories guaranteed to cause drama, to outright saying things known not to be true.

Oh, no I'm not going to have a melt down and shout all over the internet about how I know you know this. See, I'm not the person who posts personal shite about people, true or otherwise, like a disturbed 7th grader all over the internet just because I'm not getting on with someone.

That's you.

My mates know I can be trusted even if we part ways.

Is that an acknowledgment

that you are, in fact, not "a Brit raised Yankee" as you have been telling people? Sounds like it.

"Oh, no I'm not going to have a melt down and shout all over the internet about how I know you know this. See, I'm not the person who posts personal shite about people, true or otherwise, like a disturbed 7th grader all over the internet just because I'm not getting on with someone."

I know you are, but what am I? Do you have any links to this disturbed shite? I think what you might be referring to are places where Petros and I acknowledged that we know you in real life, which complicated things like your effort to link a Canadian anti-war activist's identity to your user name.

Anyway, I'll stop there.


Exibit B

Still trying to stir up shite--instead of doing the slow fade which would be the smartest move for someone whats been outflanked.

The jew/moon hoax site you help administrate takes the mickey out of anything you have to say. Don't have to take anything you say as fact--I mean look at the stuff you make up about Jon Gold.

Clearly there is a history of needing to make up things about people to get a feeling of being in control. Have fun with that. ;-)


Again, no links?

No links to the "personal shite [sic]" so you fall back on "stuff I make up about Jon Gold"?

Clearly, there is a history of not feeling in control that motivates much of what you do, in real life and online.

"Jew/moon hoax site" -- did you make that up or was it suggested by one of your handlers? In what way is it a "Jew" site? BTW, it's spelled 'exhibit.'


Exhibit C

Which is mostly time wasting rubbish, but--

Can't stay away, even when that would be in her best interests.

Maybe this link will sort everything out:


Start comparing notes, everyone--you'll be glad you did.

And cheers for the spelling tip. ;-)

Yes, by all means check out that link to Truthaction

in which two sad souls take me to task for not being 'Truthy' enough because I've mixed my 9/11 Truth activities with my anti-war activities. This is in real-life, mind. (Do you think that link makes you look good, Jen? You're further gone than I thought.)

Any comments should be posted at the wtcdemolition site, however, since a bunch of us were banned from Truthaction without explanation, but evidently to make the site safer for the thin-skinned.


Exhibit D

More attempts to wind people up.

Hope it's all been worth it for you--because you've no one to blame but yourself from here on out. ;-)


Why don't you guys just get along?

I remember you used to get along, or perhaps my memory disserves me.

Now, instead of arguing, there's important stuff to do, such as helping me here:


Be happy to help

I'll take a peek in a mo. Currently I'm loading 911Revisited. ;-)

Ok, thanks...

... I need to go to bed, so I hope you can go on from where I left there... :) casseia is also welcome to participate.

Hey Col. Bogus, why not quit while you're behind?


Hey Col. Bogus, why not quit while you're behind?

Col. Bogus says: "you've no one to blame but yourself from here on out. ;-)"

Translation: Col Bogus promises to continue relentlessly making an ass out of herself from here on out, not matter how big of an assclown she's become with this petty, mean-spirited, childish, pathetic behavior.

Problem with you, Col. Bogus and your posse, is that you are all chiefs and no Indians.

Grow up and do some Real activism in the Real World for a change, rather than spiraling down into this comic book caricature of your fake Brit Authority figure video game online persona, why don't ya?

thanks for the links, col.

now brush up on your sophomoric persona here.

Yes, by all means please go

Yes, by all means please go and check out the site and read through every thread that you find interesting. I do advise that you go there with an open yet critical mind. Wtcdemolition.com can stand on its own.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

wow, such a prescient statement, Col.

there i was!!!

personally, i despise the animosity between the sites, yet i do understand some of the reasons for ideological polarization.
it's a shame, shame.

let's move on.

Just remember the first rule

Just remember the first rule of holes...if you're in one, stop digging.

"let's move on."

Agreed. ;-)


Some of what Mr. Roberts says is absolutely true...and the rest is absolute crap...nice mix.

"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." H.L. Mencken

This is exactly why

"Today, four decades later, there’s not a penny’s worth of difference, not an ounce of difference. Both parties have revealed themselves to be warmonger police state parties. The US Constitution has few friends in the capital city. "

Anyone with any sense should be voting for Green Party candidates, if just every 9/11 truther voted Green they would win by a landslide.
As a 9/11 truther if you vote for anyone other than Cynthia McKinney for Pres and whatever other Green Party candidates for other positions then you should be ashamed.

Its some rather ridiculous

Its some rather ridiculous that the biggest superpower USA, and fourth Israel Picks on a group people that are essentially nomads with no real country. Al qaeda, Taliban, Ha mas and Hezbollah who actually could never pose a threat to the United States. Webster dictionary defines War as : A threat of Conquest . The 64000 dollar question is who do they threaten to conquer The Racist Policy of a Jew only State of Israel, who stole the land from the muslems, or a Country like the USA That has 4 million Muslims living in it

NH vote fraud? Accurate voting needs to be secured...

before voting for the Green Party or anyone else.

See Brad Friedman's (Bradblog.com) breaking news: 1/16/08 Latest out of NH recount

as gore vidal said manyyears ago ;

"the united states has one political party with two right wings.......the democrats and the republicans"

the depth of ignorance about the modern world,politics ,powerstruggles,assassination goals,
power, and crimes to gain greater power, and the citizens place in that world .
,the efforts of a cia, psyop devoted, media to maintaining that ignorance
the mental and physical lazyness of the average american citizen
and well timed dollops of false flag terror
are a well thought out synergistic effort that is sucessfully used by fascists in america to continue their treasonist
activities unimpeded

Bush is full of it!

What countries class Hezbollah as a terrorist group?America,Israel,UK,Canada,Australia and Holland.Yes that is it.Why is that?because of the laws of the Geneva conventions on resistance groups Hezbollah tick all the right boxes as being a legal freedom fighting force.The Sheba Farms are still occupied by Israel so Lebanon are officially under occupation and have been for over 20 years.Hezbollah are the moral equivolent of the French resistance to Nazi Germany.

Hamas are recognized as a terrorist group by Australia, Canada, the European Union, Israel, and the United States,are under occupation so are in the same category.When you analyze the last few hundred years of history and pick out acts of genocide the UK,Israel,Australia,Canada and the US are top of the tree.It is patently obvious who the worlds worst terrorists are and they are not muslim.If your confused by that statement think of the genocide of ethnic Indians in Canada and America,think of the ethnic Tazmanians completely wiped out by the British colonists in Australia,Israel does not need any explanations,a country founded by terrorism and run by known terrorists since its conception.

America are the only country to ever have been labelled a terrorist country by the World Court for the actions in Nicaragua.Bush is in no position to lecture anybody on how to behave.

Right on.

Well stated Robby. Although we'd have a hard time convincing the brainwashed citizens of these dominant nations, I agree with your characterization.

Sylvester Stallone:

Stallone gently puts things into perspective, "The phrase ‘politically correct’ is basically a euphemism for bold face lying because unfortunately, lies keep society functioning." That is what is going on in America today, and Stallone goes even further, "The day we have our politicians actually tell us the real truth, we’d have anarchy in the streets. So we’re told what they think will pacify the masses." That is a powerful statement from Stallone, loaded with truth about what is really going on, could all these years of playing John Rambo taught him about the military industrial complex and the plans of the New World Order?


Rambo to the rescue!

Thanks Joe for posting the Stallone link. It's good to see another celebrity speak some truth. Problem is if the politicians did tell the truth most people wouldn't care. I hate to say it but most Americans just don't care. Until it hits them in the pocket book, nothing will change.

A great write up. It took

A great write up. It took me a long time to consider Israel, actually the pro Israel Zionists as the main suspects in 9-11 (together with the neocons). At first I could not bring myself to imagine how much power they wielded in the US and how diabolical they could be. It took a lot of reading and research to find out how downright evil the Zionists have been through history. Their influence on US media and politics is not well understood by the average person, they are very powerful because of this.

I agree with most of what Paul Craig Roberts said above except for his endorsement of Obama. If Obama cannot make a stand for 9-11 truth I would not put my faith in him to resist the Israeli lobby in defining US policy.

WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-

The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

Show "Except for odd story of the" by Jimbo.

Zionist-Neocon complicity

If you take everything in isolation, you won't get too far. That is the nature of a secret conspiracy, incriminating evidence are hidden as well as possible.

The demolition of WTC-7 is rather hard to come by in mainstream media, why is that? It shows WTC was demolished using explosives - why should that be a secret? From there it can be deduced that insiders brought the building down - not Al Quaeda. Who were inside that building - a lot of Federal offices and the crisis command center of the NY Mayor, all sensitive offices that they would have good security for sure. Who else is inside the building? Building managers and staff employed by the WTC lease holder Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu. What happened after 9-11, the US exploited the 9-11 attacks for propaganda then went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq (even though the president later admited Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11). Who wanted to go to Iraq all along? You can read it yourself in "Rebuilding America's Defenses," published by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) in 2000. The document was patterned from an earlier blueprint called "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," drafted for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in 1996. So you see, the Neocons and the Zionists had the motives all along and now they are linked to persons at the scene of the crime.

The buildings came down - that is a fact - now who could have done it? Not AlQuaeda (WTC7 makes sure of that ), who do you think?

It would be best if you read this:


Perhaps you trust only Fox News, watch who were arrested by FBI on 9-11 here:


WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy-
Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-

I agree Spoopy !

So you're saying extradite Dominic Suter and the 'Urban Moving Systems' boys. I agree.
Let's get rid of any confusion or bias.
Maybe we should ask them about the van full of explosives, and the dressing up as Arabs thing.
And the guy flicking his lighter in front of the ruins. Maybe bring in that guy as well. I agree Spoopy ! Rock on !

Apparently, you've never heard of Dov Zakheim

Dov Zakheim was the Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004.

Zakheim is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses.

Zakheim is a dual Israeli/American citizen and an ordained rabbi and had been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr.

But no, there is any zionist influence in the DOD or WH.

That's if you also exclude Richard Perle, Donald Feith, Paul Wolfowitz.....

Learn from history or continue to make the same mistakes.

International Jews.
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
Terrorist Jews.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek -- all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

Winston Churchill 1920.

The entire article.


Note that Churchill (as late as 1954) considered himself a Zionist.


In the very article you quote from, he makes an argument for Zionism, and even eretz Israel;

"Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jew a national idea of a commanding character. it has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jewish race all over the world a home and centre of national life. The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have now been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project. backed by many of the most prominent British Jews, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.

Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jewish race, nor do the majority of national Jews wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people."

Churchill was arguing against Bolshevism, ultimately Communism. A Balfour man.

Yes Churchill was a zionist

Yes Churchill was a zionist but whereas he points out the obvious virtues of Jews he also warns of the International Jew who has rejected Judaism,full stop.These atheists gained extraordinary powers in Russia and France and attempt in Germany.They have caused havoc everywhere they have gone and are the nemesis of true Zionism.So Churchill is praising Zionism and jews but criticising the International Jew and in doing so is warning of the strangely powerful influence these people have on America today.Ask yourself how this cadre of Jews have become so malevolent in America.The Parralels between the Bolsheviks and the Neocons is there for all to see.They are systematically destroying America the same as they did in Russia.Thats the way i perceive his words because Jews are an extraordinary people but the battle that was going on ,the struggle for the soul of Jewish people,is still going on today.Thats why so many jews reject Zionism.They do not reject the concept of Zionism or Churchills aspirations for what zionism could be.They reject it because atheist international jews,as Churchill calls them,have turned what was supposed to be a virtuous adventure into a clear abomination.They are also turning America into a totalitarian state,don,t ever say you were not warned..


Churchill was also a depressed drunk behind the ill fated Gallipoli campaign in WWI (lost his cabinet position too). He also smoked cigars and had an American mother who neglected him. No one's perfect - even Churchill. We don't need more of his kind to spread war misery across the planet. At least he could speak with eloquence when drunk!

Gallipoli |gəˈlipəlē|
a major campaign of World War I that took place on the Gallipoli peninsula, on the European side of the Dardanelles in 1915–16. The Allies (with heavy involvement of troops from Australia and New Zealand) hoped to gain control of the strait, but the campaign reached stalemate after each side suffered heavy casualties.


Comments are closed on this thread.