Oswald's Ghost

Disinfo Desperation.

Oswald's Ghost talked about how conspiracy are formed and why and how it was
formed about the Kennedy assassination what an interesting field of research
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/oswald/

Conspiracy! Fact and fiction are closer than we think

15 Jan 2008

Conspiracy theories which claim to shed more light on the 2001 twin towers
disaster in New York are often closer to official versions than first
thought - according to new research.

http://www.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/news/display/index.htm?id=130015

http://www2.winchester.ac.uk/ccc/affiliates/peterknight.htm

Dr Peter Knight from The University of Manchester who conducted the first
academic study of 9/11 conspiracy theories says they are more popular today
than ever before.

He also lists all major existing conspiracy theories in his report
'Outrageous Conspiracy Theories: Popular and Official Responses to 9/11 in
Germany and the United States'.

The findings come as the "final cut" of Loose Change - the internet video
which has been the most influential source of 9/11 conspiracy theories - is
now having its first screenings at 9/11 events in the UK.

He said: "Official explanations see America as an innocent victim of a
catastrophic event that came out of the blue, explained by an all-powerful
conspiracy motivated by Bin Laden's evil lust for power.

"The problem is, this has strong similarities to the conspiracy theories
which argue that Bush is himself head of an all-powerful conspiracy.

"The Bush administration also claimed that a highly organized and centrally
controlled conspiracy of terrorists carried out 9/11.

"But that too bears strong resemblance to the highly organized and centrally
controlled cabal of government and intelligence agents featuring in many
conspiracy theories.

"In fact, the above is a reworking of a CIA disinformation campaign
developed during President Reagan's administration about the role of the
Soviets as puppet masters behind a vast, conspiratorial terror network."

He added: "All 9/11 conspiracy theories are an inevitable counter-reaction -
however misguided - to distorted official explanations which seek to find a
direct connection between al Qaeda and the Axis of Evil.

"By insisting on a black-and-white version of events, the Bush
administration from the outset forcefully rejected any suggestion of the
culpability- even through negligence -of his own or even Clinton's
administration.

"The lack of transparency and honesty in official explanations also induces
counter-reaction: they draw on the rhetoric of paranoia.

"But we are more likely to die by being kicked by a donkey than die in a
terrorist atrocity."

Dr Knight lists the most popular conspiracy theories and classifies them
into 'Letting it Happen on Purpose' (LIHOP) and 'Making it Happen on
Purpose' (MIHOP).

LIHOP argues the Bush administration allowed 9/11 to happen despite warnings
whereas MIHOP claims that elements of the US government and its intelligence
agencies conspired proactively to make the events happen.

Dr Knight said: "There are many reasons why conspiracy theories in general
are more popular now than ever before - and polls in America and the UK back
this up.

"Depicted usually as a form of popular paranoia, they give an insight into
how we make sense of the world - which is why we take them more seriously.

"The internet which is a rumour mill has played a major role in promoting a
lot of weird and wonderful ideas.

"But also, we are a lot less likely to believe in authority than in times
gone by.

"Especially as some contemporary theories such as Watergate, and the absence
of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq have turned out to be true."

NOTES FOR EDITORS
Major conspiracy theories outlined in 'Outrageous Conspiracy Theories:
Popular and Official Responses to 9/11 in Germany and the United States' by
Dr Peter Knight:

1. The Bush administration and/or oil corporations had much to gain from the
subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and were looking for - perhaps
even willing to engineer - a modern-day Pearl Harbor in order to gain
support for their pre-existing war plans.
2. Plans for an Afghanistan invasion were laid in advance.
3. Small but troubling inconsistencies, such as lampposts which appear to be
intact in photos of the Pentagon crash site, despite the plane supposedly
flying just above the ground.
4. Mobile phones seemed to have worked on board some of the planes at an
altitude that official reports deem impossible.
5. Jet fuel burns at a temperature lower than the melting point of steel
leaving many puzzled about the cause of the Twin Towers collapse.
6. The crash hole in the Pentagon was not big enough to have been caused by
a Boeing 757. It was more likely to be a missile rather than a plane and
consequently that the actual plane and its passengers must have been
secretly taken away.
7. The Twin Towers were not brought down by the planes crashing into them
but by controlled demolition.
8. The military could have shot down the planes once it was known that they
had been hijacked.
9. The hijackers' flying skills were not good enough to fly a plane into the
twin towers.
10. The hijackers had connections with the Pakistani intelligence services.
11. Some of the hijackers are still alive.

A January article published in the journal New German Critique is available.

Dr Knight is available for interview

For media enquiries contact:
Mike Addelman
Media Relations Officer
Faculty of Humanities
The University of Manchester
0161 275 0790
07717 881 567
michael.addelman@ manchester. ac.uk

EVIDENCE OF REVISION Part 1 1hr 40 min

EVIDENCE OF REVISION Part 1 1hr 40 min
one of five, eight hours total

Part 1 settles the "debate".

http://wingtv.net/evidenceofrevision.html

Driver shot jfk

http://www.blinkx.com/burl?v=ve7dmhWHplEx7KVpPNEOBhzYz3-bpnYAIOhN9w

Like 9/11, we must fear our protectors the most. The Secret Service driver shot JFK.

...

No, the driver did not shoot JFK and the wounds to JFK's head as described by the civilians present prove that,
as does the fact that it's "back and to left" .
These are Zapruder-frames 312 and 313 (rescaled and re-compressed, originals are much larger) :
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
It's pretty obvious that the driver does not shoot JFK or have a weapon in his hand . Keep in mind that this is the SECOND time
that the driver turns around to look at JFK. Not until AFTER the headshot does he get "the Client" out of the kill-zone.
If you see both the Nix and the Muchmoore films you see how he speeds violently away instants after the headshot(s),
it almost looks as if he's trying to escape the SS-agent Jackie helps in to the limo .

The full Zapruder-film is available as .jpg's of each frame here :
http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/ (120MB zip-file for all 486 frames)

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
JFK's Press Secretary Malcolm Kilduff indicating on 11/22/1963 how the fatal shot was inflicted.
Besides, don't you think Jackie would have noticed ?

What the driver probably did do was slow down the limo so the shooter, either on the grassy
knoll or in the sewer, got a sitting duck as target. Strangely this is not obvious in the Zapruder-film but is in the Nix
and Muchmoore films .
If you get a good quality copy of the Zapruder-film, f.eks from the documentary "Images of an Assassination"
about the National Archives restoration and digitalization of the Zapruder-film it is quite obvious that the driver did NOT shoot JFK .
Obviously the problem here is that we can establish a chain of custody regarding the Zapruder-film :
It was locked away and hidden from the public by the same group of people who iced JFK so they could have doctored it ..

But THIS proves to me beyond any doubt that JFK's assassination was a conspiracy :

How the hell did Osvald do that ?

EDIT : Sorry for posting such low-quality video to make a point .
I have a much better quality clip of the SS stand-down somewhere ..
You-tube quality is more or less useless as documentation .
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

Stand downs are where you understand the inside job

Lee Harvey Oswald stood down the Secret Service, both in terms of on the back of the limo and in terms of the open window in the Book Depository, needed for the cover story, like Osama Bin Oswald, effectively stood down NORAD and the SS down in Florida.

Many similarities-the patsy cover story ready to go and released around the world very soon after-problems with too early, a story with the infamous LHO picture in an Australian newspaper and the CNN/BBC announcing of WTC 7 demise

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush

...

Similarities ? how about this then :


..and then came war and nice profits.. Now as then you have a Bush in the center of everything.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

you didn't get the memo?

That was the other George Bush from the CIA, lol.

I'm starting to think that George W. really is the anti-christ grandson of Aleister Crowley, lol. Barbara does look like "Most Evil man alive" you know. And her mother was in "those (satanic) circles."

At this point, reality is weirder than any B-Scifi movie.

Wouldn't it be incredible if H.W. was tried for his role in the assassination of JFK before he left physical form?

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush

remember this Bill Hicks classic

http://media.putfile.com/Bill-Hicks-on--The-Elite-
or try
Click here to watch 'Bill-Hicks-on--The-Elite-'

Now, with the spawn of the assassins in power, they didn't even have to do that. In fact every president since JFK, maybe excpet for maybe Carter and/or Reagan (but who knows there) at least knew the deal if not involved in the cover-up, until Clinton, but he did his Mena cocaine thing and his Bilderberg dirt, so no need for the briefing there either.

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush