FBI "Covers Up" File Exposing Theft Of Nuclear Secrets

The FBI has been accused of covering up a case file detailing government officials' dealings with a network stealing nuclear secrets

Source: timesonline.co.uk

January 20, 2008

THE FBI has been accused of covering up a key case file detailing evidence against corrupt government officials and their dealings with a network stealing nuclear secrets.

The assertion follows allegations made in The Sunday Times two weeks ago by Sibel Edmonds, an FBI whistleblower, who worked on the agency’s investigation of the network.

Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency’s Washington field office.

She says the FBI was investigating a Turkish and Israeli-run network that paid high-ranking American officials to steal nuclear weapons secrets. These were then sold on the international black market to countries such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

One of the documents relating to the case was marked 203A-WF-210023. Last week, however, the FBI responded to a freedom of information request for a file of exactly the same number by claiming that it did not exist. But The Sunday Times has obtained a document signed by an FBI official showing the existence of the file.

Edmonds believes the crucial file is being deliberately covered up by the FBI because its contents are explosive. She accuses the agency of an “outright lie”.

“I can tell you that that file and the operations it refers to did exist from 1996 to February 2002. The file refers to the counterintelligence programme that the Department of Justice has declared to be a state secret to protect sensitive diplomatic relations,” she said.

The freedom of information request had not been initiated by Edmonds. It was made quite separately by an American human rights group called the Liberty Coalition, acting on a tip-off it received from an anonymous correspondent.

The letter says: “You may wish to request pertinent audio tapes and documents under FOIA from the Department of Justice, FBI-HQ and the FBI Washington field office.”

It then makes a series of allegations about the contents of the file – many of which corroborate the information that Edmonds later made public.

Edmonds had told this newspaper that members of the Turkish political and diplomatic community in the US had been actively acquiring nuclear secrets. They often acted as a conduit, she said, for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, because they attracted less suspicion.

She claimed corrupt government officials helped the network, and venues such as the American-Turkish Council (ATC) in Washington were used as drop-off points.

The anonymous letter names a high-level government official who was allegedly secretly recorded speaking to an official at the Turkish embassy between August and December 2001.

It claims the government official warned a Turkish member of the network that they should not deal with a company called Brewster Jennings because it was a CIA front company investigating the nuclear black market. The official’s warning came two years before Brewster Jennings was publicly outed when one of its staff, Valerie Plame, was revealed to be a CIA agent in a case that became a cause célèbre in the US.

The letter also makes reference to wiretaps of Turkish “targets” talking to ISI intelligence agents at the Pakistani embassy in Washington and recordings of “operatives” at the ATC.

Edmonds is the subject of a number of state secret gags preventing her from talking further about the investigation she witnessed.

“I cannot discuss the details considering the gag orders,” she said, “but I reported all these activities to the US Congress, the inspector general of the justice department and the 9/11 commission. I told them all about what was contained in this case file number, which the FBI is now denying exists.

“This gag was invoked not to protect sensitive diplomatic relations but criminal activities involving US officials who were endangering US national security.”

Insight: Chris Gourlay, Jonathan Calvert and Joe Lauria

Hello, American Press

Are you still there?

Scary, isn't it?

How controlled the media is. The 9/11 Truth Movement has been promoting Sibel Edmonds for as long as I can remember, and yet supposedly, we have no credibility whatsoever. We've promoted a lot of things for as long as I can remember that give us enormous amounts of credibility, yet our enemies treat us as if we're "nutty, wacky, crazy, lunatics", and we have absolutely nothing legitimate to say. I hope if you're new to all of this, you take that into consideration. Things like this should speak volumes to you.

Who Is? Archives

American Press: Nope n/t


I trust you'll write about this on DailyKos. Let us know when your diary is published.

here you go


What about cancelling newspaper subscriptions?

If mass protesting is out of the question for today's Americans, would terminating newspaper subscriptions be within the realm of possibility?

More than a third of the Americans evidently do not believe the official story of 9/11. One would expect them to demand that the newspapers do their job in investigating the worst terrorist attack in the world. If that doesn't happen, one would expect them to cancel their subscriptions and let the papers know why they are cancelling their subscriptions.

Has such a campaign been attempted yet? Wouldn't that be easier than having a general strike, which was attempted with poor results?

By the way, this, too, will probably be hush-hushed:


Fourth Estate: SOS SOS SOS

Fourth Estate: SOS SOS SOS . . .


Brewster Jennings

I've always wondered what Brewster Jennings actually did. I think this quote:

"It claims the government official warned a Turkish member of the network that they should not deal with a company called Brewster Jennings because it was a CIA front company investigating the nuclear black market."

tells us a lot. To me, this indicates that Brewster Jennings was actually selling nuclear secrets, in an attempt to penetrate the network, presumably to later roll it up. The Turkish proliferator was told not to "deal" with Brewster Jennings, that means Brewster Jennings was in business, not just a front for Plame to travel the world and hang out at conferences. This would explain why Edmonds knew of Brewster Jennings before she left the FBI. It seems fairly clear to me that the CIA was conducting such a program (for example based on comments in At the Center of the Storm) - how else could the CIA have known more about the Libyan nuclear program than the Libyans themselves, which is what Tenet claims.

btw, this is about the worst crime you could imagine.

Now THAT's interesting...

It appears the Sunday Times has changed the title of this story from, "FBI "Covers Up" File Exposing Theft Of Nuclear Secrets" to "FBI Denies File Exposing Nuclear Secrets Theft". I wonder if Rupert himself made that call.

Who Is? Archives

Crooks & Liars...

Faux News...


To my knowledge, the first mainstream "news" outlet to cover this.

Who Is? Archives

They're "point"

On the spin machine that is. And it gives them the "see, we covered it you can't say we censor" excuse, when the let the story die.

Guess we'll see.