Here is an action which I encourage other individuals to perform:
Do a mailout to architects and engineers in your area promoting ae911truth.org.
I personally have mailed out over 100 pieces to the Dallas-Ft Worth area architects and engineers listed in the Yellow pages. On most of the pieces, it included flyers and ae911truth.org info cards along with several DVDs. However, due to personal funds (I am a college student), the other pieces were just flyers promoting ae911truth.org. [These flyers I made to be 3 sheets of paper, utilizing front and back...with graphics in black and white.]
The powerful dynamics of a thousand architects and engineers calling for 911 TRUTH can not be undermined. The media and mainstream public would have to strain in order to discount its relevance.
As individual truthers, we can do something...anything, any minor actions is helpful...to help promote this goal.
Anyway, there are actions that each one of us can take as individuals in order to assist in this endeavor.
"It is only the citizen which can raise freedom and liberty in this land." --William Pepper
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
Wednesday October 24, 2007 Richard Gage AIA, Founder of Architects For 911 Truth, Talks Truth on Drive Time Radio About Vaporizing Steel Framed Buildings
There are already about 250 architects and engineers! In my view it is easiest for qualified architects and engineers themselves to convince other professionals about the problems in the official investigations. If every one of the current members can convince just one or two others more to join, and if the new recruits in turn convince just one or two more, close to 1000 professionals have been gathered.
250+ Architects and Engineers is ALREADY media worthy!!
Why will 1,000 make the difference if the MSM is going to ignore it anyway. It isn't a question of media discounting the relevance of this, it's a question of getting them to report the damn story!
What's the media strategy? Will NBC suddenly decide to tell America when the total is 1,000 (as opposed to 500?)
There has to be civil disobedience and disruption and marches and actually getting thousands of people on the National Mall. This is MLK Jr. day.. What would Martin do?
The goals of ae911truth are excellent goals towards achieving a viable movement. I propose that we assist in achieving these goals in any possible support that we can.
The credibility factor of such a movement growing to a member list of 1,000 brings it beyond reproach. The momentum of our movement will increase exponentially as we help to implement this target program.
Richard Gage has an outstanding plan and he has really sacrificed a lot to bring this to the forefront. His sight also validates the achievements of many Scientists and Engineers (such as Prof Jones and Kevin Ryan and many others).
So, I intend to continue to get the word out about ae911truth.org
I encourage others to do the same, or to contribute towards this group.
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
The significance of numbers as such should not be overestimated. It is even more important to think about the media strategy than it is to get more professionals on board.
I'm wondering if the group should approach the various science journals.
After all, some journal is going to publish this (or some version of it) soon:
That is the paper that the MSM referred to last September (!) as an article that will validate the official story.
A Finnish Doctor of Engineering concluded that the article is highly deceptive. For example, it seems to be based on the premises that the upper blocks of the twin towers fell as intact wholes and that all the debris remained within the system and contributed to the collapse. He suspects that Seffen's model is not intended to actually model the real collapses, but that it may be nevertheless used by the media to butress the official story.
Reed Elsevier Publications is currently buying up all the "Scientific Journals". I know about this because in my studies as an Environmental Scientist at college, a research librarian pointed this out...and I followed the trail. Reed Elsevier is a multi-billion dollar arms dealer and they now control most of the scientific journals. Libraries are forced to now pay huge, unaffordable fees for access to these journals. This has an effect of limiting all types of access and scrutiny to different studies. And, we all know that 'he who controls the purse strings, controls the topic.'
We in the 911 TRUTH movement are faced with one of our greatest enemies: Mainstream Mediums of Communication, aka mainstream media.
I used to own a big chain of bookstores and wholesale outlet of books. I know first-hand that there were only a few big boys at the top of all the major publishing houses, which also jeopardized the smaller publishers in the marketplace.
6 Global corporations control mainstream media. It is often said to be 5, but one can say 6 if the European Publisher is included. This is cable & direct TV, books & magazines, internet providers, the movie industry and DVD distribution and retail outlets, the music industry (this is why so many musicians can not loudly oppose the war and such), news outlets, etc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WILLIAM PEPPER has some beautiful quotes from some of his talks in the 911 TRUTH movement.
“Is it thinkable that the American Government would kill its own citizens?
“That is the question which becomes most difficult for average mainstream people to accept.”
"It is only the citizen which can raise freedom and liberty in this land."
"Reed Elsevier is a multi-billion dollar arms dealer and they now control most of the scientific journals. Libraries are forced to now pay huge, unaffordable fees for access to these journals."
How can that happen? I guess there are, then, no safeguards aimed at guaranteeing any independence for science journals.
Earlier I'd also have thought there are some mechanisms preventing too much media concentration. Apparently there aren't any.
According to Wikipedia (for what its worth) Reed Elsevier is not exactly an arms dealer but organizes Defense Exhibits.
"...Defense Exhibitions
Members of the medical and scientific communities, which purchase and use many journals published by Reed Elsevier, have agitated for the company to cut its links to the arms trade. Two UK academics, Dr. Tom Stafford of Sheffield University and Dr Nick Gill, have launched petitions calling on Reed Elsevier to stop organising arms fairs. [1][2]. A subsidiary, Spearhead, organizes defence shows, including a recent event where it was reported that cluster bombs and extremely powerful riot control equipment were offered for sale.[7][8]
In February 2007, Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal, published an editorial in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, arguing that Reed Elsevier's involvement in both the arms trade and medical publishing constituted a conflict of interest.[9] He suggested that if academics began to disengage with Reed Elsevier, the company would be likely to end their arms fairs, as arms fairs only comprise a small proportion of their business.
On June 1, 2007, Reed Elsevier announced that they would be exiting the Defense Exhibition business during the second half of 2007.[10]
This means that the company will no longer organise arms fairs around the world. The decision follows a high-profile campaign, coordinated by CAAT, which highlighted the incompatibility of Reed's involvement in the arms trade and their position as the number one publisher of medical and science journals and other publications. CAAT welcomes the decision and applauds the board of Reed Elsevier for recognising the concerns of its stakeholders.[11]..."
'On June 1, 2007, Reed Elsevier announced that they would be exiting the Defense Exhibition business during the second half of 2007.'
It is, nontheless, revealing that this is his background. It speaks volumes about the kinds of interests who have been (and may continue to be) Elsevier's friends and associates.
I am baffled as to why this post didn't receive a solid 10. Is there a jrefer amongst us? What gives folks? Why don't you just come out and state your reasons for the low mark?
There is still a "no money dealings with 9/11 Truth" attitude that some people have. (which I think is finally going away as Reality sets in)
They think everything should be free, and no money should ever change hands — for anything or at any time.
Which is clueless and misguided, to be nice about it.
As AE911Truth and others have pointed out (as I did last year), ALL nonprofit organizations need money to survive. It's simply the way the world works. From humane societies to environmental groups to the Red Cross, etc., etc., etc. It's like someone saying, "You shouldn't donate money to animal orgs". If you said that to someone who supports the work of those orgs, they would look at you like you were crazy. Because they know that without those donations, the org ceases to exist, and cannot function without them. (and they are ALWAYS underfunded)
As we all know, without money, not much happens. Which is why EVERYONE should donate something to AE911Truth (and/or other groups) to help further the cause.
Take a look at these sites and you may get a better understanding. (see how their sites deal with donations, and learn from them)
----------
The person who sees absolutes and exhibits certitude, where a thoughtful person sees nuanced shades of meaning
and exhibits open-minded objectivity, should be questioned as to agenda and state of mind.
I am sure these are paid "professional" visitors to this site just doing their "job".
If you know what I mean.
Just another days work for the trolls and shills.
Just like the many posts in the MSM blogs.
History is going to shame them all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it
MAILOUT & PROMOTION of ae911truth.org
Here is an action which I encourage other individuals to perform:
Do a mailout to architects and engineers in your area promoting ae911truth.org.
I personally have mailed out over 100 pieces to the Dallas-Ft Worth area architects and engineers listed in the Yellow pages. On most of the pieces, it included flyers and ae911truth.org info cards along with several DVDs. However, due to personal funds (I am a college student), the other pieces were just flyers promoting ae911truth.org. [These flyers I made to be 3 sheets of paper, utilizing front and back...with graphics in black and white.]
The powerful dynamics of a thousand architects and engineers calling for 911 TRUTH can not be undermined. The media and mainstream public would have to strain in order to discount its relevance.
As individual truthers, we can do something...anything, any minor actions is helpful...to help promote this goal.
Anyway, there are actions that each one of us can take as individuals in order to assist in this endeavor.
"It is only the citizen which can raise freedom and liberty in this land." --William Pepper
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
MP3 Audio Clip - Richard Gage
Wednesday December 19, 2007
Richard Gage AIA Comments As Part Of NIST NCST Committee Meeting On WTC7 Report
* source = http://www.ae911truth.org
-----------------------------------
Wednesday October 24, 2007
Richard Gage AIA, Founder of Architects For 911 Truth, Talks Truth on Drive Time Radio About Vaporizing Steel Framed Buildings
* source = http://www.wtic.com/
-----------------------------------
Monday November 26, 2007
Richard Gage on the Jeff Farias Show, NovaM Radio Network
* source = http://www.novamradio.com/
-----------------------------------
More MP3 Audio Clips >
This is a valuable and important cause.
There are already about 250 architects and engineers! In my view it is easiest for qualified architects and engineers themselves to convince other professionals about the problems in the official investigations. If every one of the current members can convince just one or two others more to join, and if the new recruits in turn convince just one or two more, close to 1000 professionals have been gathered.
What's the Media Strategy?
250+ Architects and Engineers is ALREADY media worthy!!
Why will 1,000 make the difference if the MSM is going to ignore it anyway. It isn't a question of media discounting the relevance of this, it's a question of getting them to report the damn story!
What's the media strategy? Will NBC suddenly decide to tell America when the total is 1,000 (as opposed to 500?)
There has to be civil disobedience and disruption and marches and actually getting thousands of people on the National Mall. This is MLK Jr. day.. What would Martin do?
Let's work together towards achieving the goals of ae911truth
The goals of ae911truth are excellent goals towards achieving a viable movement. I propose that we assist in achieving these goals in any possible support that we can.
The credibility factor of such a movement growing to a member list of 1,000 brings it beyond reproach. The momentum of our movement will increase exponentially as we help to implement this target program.
Richard Gage has an outstanding plan and he has really sacrificed a lot to bring this to the forefront. His sight also validates the achievements of many Scientists and Engineers (such as Prof Jones and Kevin Ryan and many others).
So, I intend to continue to get the word out about ae911truth.org
I encourage others to do the same, or to contribute towards this group.
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
Good point
The significance of numbers as such should not be overestimated. It is even more important to think about the media strategy than it is to get more professionals on board.
I'm wondering if the group should approach the various science journals.
After all, some journal is going to publish this (or some version of it) soon:
http://winterpatriot.pbwiki.com/f/seffen_simple_analysis.pdf
That is the paper that the MSM referred to last September (!) as an article that will validate the official story.
A Finnish Doctor of Engineering concluded that the article is highly deceptive. For example, it seems to be based on the premises that the upper blocks of the twin towers fell as intact wholes and that all the debris remained within the system and contributed to the collapse. He suspects that Seffen's model is not intended to actually model the real collapses, but that it may be nevertheless used by the media to butress the official story.
Here is some data on "Science Journals" being bought up.
Reed Elsevier Publications is currently buying up all the "Scientific Journals". I know about this because in my studies as an Environmental Scientist at college, a research librarian pointed this out...and I followed the trail. Reed Elsevier is a multi-billion dollar arms dealer and they now control most of the scientific journals. Libraries are forced to now pay huge, unaffordable fees for access to these journals. This has an effect of limiting all types of access and scrutiny to different studies. And, we all know that 'he who controls the purse strings, controls the topic.'
We in the 911 TRUTH movement are faced with one of our greatest enemies: Mainstream Mediums of Communication, aka mainstream media.
I used to own a big chain of bookstores and wholesale outlet of books. I know first-hand that there were only a few big boys at the top of all the major publishing houses, which also jeopardized the smaller publishers in the marketplace.
6 Global corporations control mainstream media. It is often said to be 5, but one can say 6 if the European Publisher is included. This is cable & direct TV, books & magazines, internet providers, the movie industry and DVD distribution and retail outlets, the music industry (this is why so many musicians can not loudly oppose the war and such), news outlets, etc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If one does not thoroughly LOOK, the TRUTH is not visible.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WILLIAM PEPPER has some beautiful quotes from some of his talks in the 911 TRUTH movement.
“Is it thinkable that the American Government would kill its own citizens?
“That is the question which becomes most difficult for average mainstream people to accept.”
"It is only the citizen which can raise freedom and liberty in this land."
Looks bleak
"Reed Elsevier is a multi-billion dollar arms dealer and they now control most of the scientific journals. Libraries are forced to now pay huge, unaffordable fees for access to these journals."
How can that happen? I guess there are, then, no safeguards aimed at guaranteeing any independence for science journals.
Earlier I'd also have thought there are some mechanisms preventing too much media concentration. Apparently there aren't any.
Reed Elsevier
According to Wikipedia (for what its worth) Reed Elsevier is not exactly an arms dealer but organizes Defense Exhibits.
"...Defense Exhibitions
Members of the medical and scientific communities, which purchase and use many journals published by Reed Elsevier, have agitated for the company to cut its links to the arms trade. Two UK academics, Dr. Tom Stafford of Sheffield University and Dr Nick Gill, have launched petitions calling on Reed Elsevier to stop organising arms fairs. [1][2]. A subsidiary, Spearhead, organizes defence shows, including a recent event where it was reported that cluster bombs and extremely powerful riot control equipment were offered for sale.[7][8]
In February 2007, Richard Smith, former editor of the British Medical Journal, published an editorial in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, arguing that Reed Elsevier's involvement in both the arms trade and medical publishing constituted a conflict of interest.[9] He suggested that if academics began to disengage with Reed Elsevier, the company would be likely to end their arms fairs, as arms fairs only comprise a small proportion of their business.
On June 1, 2007, Reed Elsevier announced that they would be exiting the Defense Exhibition business during the second half of 2007.[10]
This means that the company will no longer organise arms fairs around the world. The decision follows a high-profile campaign, coordinated by CAAT, which highlighted the incompatibility of Reed's involvement in the arms trade and their position as the number one publisher of medical and science journals and other publications. CAAT welcomes the decision and applauds the board of Reed Elsevier for recognising the concerns of its stakeholders.[11]..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Elsevier
--------------------------------------------
WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy,
but Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8914#comment-174921
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-
http://www.ae911truth.org
Can't change his past
'On June 1, 2007, Reed Elsevier announced that they would be exiting the Defense Exhibition business during the second half of 2007.'
It is, nontheless, revealing that this is his background. It speaks volumes about the kinds of interests who have been (and may continue to be) Elsevier's friends and associates.
Hi Vesa,
Hi Vesa,
Where can I find the Finnish Engineer's critique of the Seffen analysis. Is it on the web too?
--------------------------------------------
WTC 9-11-2001 was a Neocon-Zionist conspiracy,
but Jews DID NOT do 9-11 -
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8914#comment-174921
The WTC was destroyed by controlled demo-
http://www.ae911truth.org
Not yet
He is still working on it. I'll let you know when it's ready.
why not a 10?
I am baffled as to why this post didn't receive a solid 10. Is there a jrefer amongst us? What gives folks? Why don't you just come out and state your reasons for the low mark?
Because some people are clueless and misguided
There is still a "no money dealings with 9/11 Truth" attitude that some people have. (which I think is finally going away as Reality sets in)
They think everything should be free, and no money should ever change hands — for anything or at any time.
Which is clueless and misguided, to be nice about it.
As AE911Truth and others have pointed out (as I did last year), ALL nonprofit organizations need money to survive. It's simply the way the world works. From humane societies to environmental groups to the Red Cross, etc., etc., etc. It's like someone saying, "You shouldn't donate money to animal orgs". If you said that to someone who supports the work of those orgs, they would look at you like you were crazy. Because they know that without those donations, the org ceases to exist, and cannot function without them. (and they are ALWAYS underfunded)
As we all know, without money, not much happens. Which is why EVERYONE should donate something to AE911Truth (and/or other groups) to help further the cause.
Take a look at these sites and you may get a better understanding. (see how their sites deal with donations, and learn from them)
http://www.hsus.org/
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/
http://www.redcross.org/
http://www.sierraclub.org/
http://www.alfranken.com/
http://www.aclu.org/
http://www.peta.org/
----------
The person who sees absolutes and exhibits certitude, where a thoughtful person sees nuanced shades of meaning
and exhibits open-minded objectivity, should be questioned as to agenda and state of mind.
I was thinking the same thing
I am sure these are paid "professional" visitors to this site just doing their "job".
If you know what I mean.
Just another days work for the trolls and shills.
Just like the many posts in the MSM blogs.
History is going to shame them all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it