When The Media Attacks...

This is nothing new to those of us that have been doing this a while, but I wanted to point it out nevertheless. It's happened to Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell, and Willie Nelson. When someone that has celebrity status questions the official account, the media attacks them. Charlie, Rosie, and Willie haven't issued statements of "regret" through their lawyers though. Why is it blasphemy to question the official account? Doesn't this just seem wrong to you? It certainly does to me.

First we had this...

Marion Cotillard's 9/11 conspiracy theory

Source: telegraph.com

By Peter Allen in Paris
Last Updated: 8:50pm GMT 01/03/2008

Oscar-winning Marion Cotillard was facing embarrasment with her new American public last night after it emerged that she doubted the official account of the September 11 attacks.

The 32-year-old French star has swept this year’s best actress awards, also receiving a Bafta, Golden Globe and a César for her performance as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose.

Miss Cotillard, who earned under £1 million in 2007, could expect her Oscar success to significantly increase her earning power. She is due to start filming Public Enemies with Johnny Depp.

But the actress faces a potential backlash in the US over comments she made in an interview in France. Footage which surfaced on the internet showed her questioning the New York terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the 1969 moon landing.

"I think we’re lied to about a number of things," she said, singling out September 11.

Referring to the two passenger jets flown into the World Trade Centre, Miss Cotillard said: "We see other towers of the same kind being hit by planes, are they burned? There was a tower, I believe it was in Spain, which burned for 24 hours.

It never collapsed. None of these towers collapsed. And there [New York], in a few minutes, the whole thing collapsed."

Miss Cotillard suggested that the towers, planned in the early 1960s, were an outdated "money sucker" which would have cost so much to modernise that it was easier to destroy them.

Turning to America’s space programme, she said: "Did a man really walk on the moon? I saw plenty of documentaries on it, and I really wondered. And in any case I don’t believe all they tell me, that’s for sure."

Miss Cotillard, who was born and brought up in Paris, made the comments on Paris Première – Paris Dernière (Paris First – Paris Last), a programme first broadcast a year ago.

They were largely ignored at the time, but appeared yesterday on a French website. Miss Cotillard’s film career began in Luc Besson’s 1998 film Taxi. She is an environmental activist, who once worked as a spokeswoman for Greenpeace.

News of Miss Cotillard’s comments comes at a time when Franco-American relations appear to be thawing, following Paris’s refusal to support the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

President Nicolas Sarkozy insists that he is pro-American, supporting so-called Anglo-Saxon economic reforms and going on holiday to America.

Followed by all of these, and more...


Resulting in this...

Marion Cotillard 'regrets' her 9/11 remarks

Source: news.com.au

March 03, 2008 12:00am

OSCAR-winning actress Marion Cotillard has been "taken out context" with her stunning comments about the September 11 attacks, it was claimed today.

The French star's lawyer steeped in after footage was aired of her admitting to doubts about the official version of the 2001 attacks in the US.

"I think we're lied to about a lot of things," she said during a television program first broadcast last year which has resurfaced on the internet.

The actress, who picked up the award for playing Edith Piaf in the French film La Vie En Rose, cited the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001 as one example, adding: "I tend to believe in the conspiracy theory."

Do you agree with Cotillard? Share your views below.

Cotillard could not be reached today but her lawyer, Vincent Toledano, said she had "never intended to contest nor question the attacks of September 11, 2001, and regrets the way old remarks have been taken out of context."

In the video, the 32-year-old Parisian talks about watching films on the internet challenging the official version of the September 11 attacks, saying "its fascinating, even addictive".

She continues: "Did man really walk on the moon? Me, I've seen a fair few documentaries on the subject. That, really, I question. In any case I don't believe everything people tell me, that's for sure."

Let's face up to it...

In the moment she spoke, she was being a lightweight, a dilettante. She didn't advance a case but jumped around a lot of things (the moon landing? the many buildings hit by planes in the past?) without really thinking about it. She wasn't trying to make a difference in the debate, or conscious of the fact that she could, so she didn't prepare accordingly.

And yes, it's a witchhunt - all the media coverage focuses not on what she said but on how she's "damaged her career."

The big problem of course is the media who cover 9/11 skeptics only if they're tabloid-ready celebrities (or Muslim targets), and rarely give space to the people who are grounded in the material as scholars, activists or whistleblowers.

Celebrities who are going to do this should not only know what they're getting into and be ready for a fight, but prepare themselves and master the material they need to make a real impact when they speak. These one-off comments in passing only serve as fodder for trivialization and media delivery of "lessons."

I'm rooting for Johnny Depp to do it right. ;)

"Truth is not measured in mass appeal."

The thing...

I think is funny is how "news" outlets like FOX continue to try and brainwash people into the thinking the word "Conspiracy" means something other than what it does by releasing stories titled like this one, "Report: Oscar-Winner Marion Cotillard Thinks 9/11 Was a Conspiracy".

If you completely believe the official account from top to bottom, you think that 9/11 was a "conspiracy" devised by Osama, Khalid, and 19 hijackers.

I would love for Jack Sparrow to come out for 9/11... however, his career would probably be over. Because, as I said, it's BLASPHEMY to question anything having to do with the attacks. The myth of 9/11 is the new religion, or God. Don't question it because you'll go straight to hell.

Edit: It appears that Marion "will not apologise over remarks she made describing the 9/11 attacks".


Who Is? Archives

Just a thought

I don't know Jon, its not rocket science, but maby the CEO or owners of the MSM have something in common with the culprits of who did 911. Just a thought . Jon Check this article out israelenews



It's a shame though that we don't know exactly who the "culprits who did 9/11" are. Which is why we need a real investigation. Incidentally, can I ask why you're singling me out for your Israeli/Jew information? This is the second blog you've done that in.

Edit: Still waiting for an answer.

Who Is? Archives

URGENT 9/11 ACTION: AOL is running the French Actress story on 9




AOL wiped Ms. Cotillard's page into the memory hole...?

I followed the link and was abhorred by the abusive language directed at Ms. Cotillard. Shocking really, when all she did was point out that the official story we were fed cannot be true.
Anyway, I tried unsuccessfully to post for about two hours while working on something else. The site kept replying that it was "unable to save" my "post at this time and to try later" while I used Firefox. Meanwhile I saw other hateful posts being added. I guess if you hate strongly enough, your voice will be heard.
Finally, the page (which had accrued 4615 comments in 12 hours) mysteriously disappeared when I tried to open it in a different browser, once I was logged in: "unable to find page". AOL's on-site search has no reference to it. Completely dumped down the memory hole? No comments were to be made by me, anyway. Anyone else have luck?

"Anyone else have luck?"


I was able to post from work, but not from my home computer. When I enter the text and click "Add", nothing happens. Anyone?

Latest news:

Some interesting statements from her agent:


Cotillard isn't apologising for her remarks as we were led to believe.

Well sorta . . .

I have only seen what has been reported . . . she said this stuff a year ago and she was responding to a question about the moon landings . . . .this was a set-up.

She is gorgeous and she got the thought "9/11 Inside Job" to people through the mass media. Each one of these events is another nail in the official story's coffin.

Meanwhile over at aisle 6 at Wal-mart, Joe and Silvia are arguing over which HD TV to buy.

I agree

I agree with what Jon said, and also Nicholas. The media are out for blood, and she was too loose with her words. That allowed them to distort her intent, particularly with the heading of the Telegraph piece, which implied that she was saying nothing at all happened on 9/11. It was obvious to me that she was saying the powers that be helped the buildings to come down, but if you look at some of the responses in the Telegraph, people thought she was saying the whole event was just a bad dream.


The Fox & Friends (AKA the 3 stooges) snickered and snorted ad infinitum over this story this morning.

They started by putting down actors, saying that all actors only wanted fame and money and that was all they were interested in.
Then they had an eye-rolling guffaw over the fact that she had received her information over the internet.
We are truly living in an upside-down world when bozos like these command the airwaves and are able to demonize the only source of real news left to the citizens of this country.

I applaud Ms. Cotillard for her honesty and it seems she has gotten her first lesson in the glare of the media spotlight. I certainly don't fault her for her lack of facts and trouble with a second language. We need as many bodies behind us as we can get, and it won't be long before another well-known truther comes out of the closet to speak eloquently and knowledgeably about our cause.

I do wish she hadn't lumped the moon landing in with 9/11 truth, however.

what moon landing? the one

what moon landing?

the one that Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins looked SOOOOO excited about in the after flight press conference?

the one that NASA footage leaked out showing Armstrong and Aldrin using camera trickery to mislead the viewers about their position as far away from Earth - but when the camera shot is over and still filming, the window insert is removed and the Earth suddenly appears much closer than before - what was that Warp Speed?

the one the Armstrong admitted was a great truth to be exposed at the Anniversary speech at the White House event? Read between the lines at what he really says.


Yes, the one where the reflections in the helmets show a different shadow configuration...and the one that although a lot of dust was kicked up when it landed, the pod feet are cleanly pristine in later shots.

I don't really know if we made it to the moon or not...those are questions for another time.
But for now, our main focus is 9/11 and the many implications for a totalitarian world.
To mix in questions about the moon landing with 9/11 just gives those who want to cover or deny all the ammunition they need for dismissal.

One day all questions will be answered, but for now, let's concentrate on the most crucial.


"One day all questions will be answered, but for now, let's concentrate on the most crucial."

Well said, zonk.

Oh jeez, a negative hit on a

Oh jeez, a negative hit on a reply? A valid reply?

Perhaps this thread can be also listed as when compatriots attack each other.

I keep saying

The MSM is our worst enemy. They are bought and paid for. God damn, Fox would do Hitler proud. When the day of reckoning comes they should be hung for high treason and mass murder along with the NWO boys.

URGENT 9/11 ACTION: AOL is running the French Actress story on 9





OMG....I just went to this thread and made a few posts.

But I can't believe the horrible, hateful vile venom being slung there.

They called this woman every vile name in the book and even suggested that she be killed.

A proud day for America

We have a helluva lot of work to do, friends.

We MUST keep defending her

So everyone PLEASE register (it's quick) and post something. This also given us an opportunity to spread information.

Media As Co-Conspirator

Unless you believe one person was responsible for 9/11, then you believe in a conspiracy. It was a criminal conspiracy no matter what, but one that could not have succeeded without media collusion. In a sense, this is more disturbing (at least as disturbing) as 9/11 itself! Most people can't wrap their heads around the notion that our media is so controlled that they are literally Weapons of Mass Deception, still believing that the Nightly News would have told them if the official story was a fraud. It is therefore a necessity to expose the media in tandem with exposing 9/11.

Millions of Americans are well aware of the threat to democracy posed by corporate media. Five corporations now control the vast majority of broadcast and print media assets in this country, and corporations are run by CEO's at the top. This means that five men now have enormous power to determine what information (or disinformation) the American people are exposed to. Combine that with Project Mockingbird (CIA control of MSM for the purpose of spreading propoganda and disinformation) and you have a recipe for brainwashing. What gets lost in this? It's a little concept called THE TRUTH. With this set-up even an audacious conspiracy like 9/11 can be "managed" and spun to make those who ask rational questions seem paranoid and unpatriotic. It is therefore vital that we expose the corporate media monopolies and the CIA-owned talking heads spreading us lies and disinfo, as we bring out truthful information to others. It is an essential step.

Consider these 2 quotes by former Directors of the CIA:

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false," Willian Casey said at his first staff meeting in 1981.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media," William Colby said.

Add to that the fact that the CIA obstructed the 9/11 Commission, which already was a whitewash with many conflicts of interest in the first place! "The CIA made a conscious decision to impede the panel's inquiry" according to the Co-Chairs themselves.

This is in itself grounds for a new investigation.

The "Media" are full of BS .

Just watch this "documentary" : Dark side of the Moon
The basic premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo 11 Moon landing was faked
and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help from director Stanley Kubrick.

Cast :
Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, Buzz Aldrin, Lawrence Eagleburger, Richard Helms, Stanley Kubrick's widow,
Christiane Kubrick and many more .

"I don't know what the facts are but somebody's certainly going to sit down with him and find out what he knows that they may not know,
and make sure he knows what they know that he may not know."

"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

poll time

yet another poll http://www.winnipegsun.com/Entertainment/home.html

What's your take on best-actress Oscar winner Marion Cotillard's notion that the 9/11 attacks were 'an inside job?'
She's right
She's a fool
She's an actress
She's French
2,3, & 4

The poll is going fairly well

46 percent say she's right.

Comments removed

All the comments have been removed from the AOL site:


Apparently, too many of them were pro-truth.