Bill Clinton Evades Questions About WTC7 Countdown Witness, We Are Change Kentucky Confronts Former President
constitutional911 Thu, 03/27/2008 - 5:04am
Bill Clinton Evades Questions About WTC7 Countdown Witness
We Are Change Kentucky Confronts Former President
JonesReport.com | March 26, 2008
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/03_08/26clinton_wtc7.html
- constitutional911's blog
- Login to post comments
It's sickening how masses of sheeple adulate boldfaced liars &
criminals like Slick Willie Clinton!
What is the depth of the sheeple's reasoning: Bushes are bad, so Clintons must be good??? That's about the sum total of all their research too.
Slick Willie even has the audacity to claim Hillary had basically saved the day for the First Responders (at about 6:59).
Outspoken Clinton suddenly became mute when asked about Kevin McPadden hearing a countdown prior to the WTC-7 implosion!
Watch McPadden here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbD9XMCOho
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321
Righteous Anger man.
I share it with you.
I am sure you noticed him trying to capitalize on how his dear wife "helped" the 1st Responders.
This master of spin is trying to pre-empt 911 Truth by addressing his wife's efforts to help the 1st Responders and win sympathy points.
Considering how involved he is in killing & covering up the murder of people who may have even voted for him before is outrageous.
Matt Kazee was brilliant just brilliant.
Imagine the 42nd President of the United States unable to say anything.
Truth AND JUSTICE is hounding at your heels Mr President.
THE REPUBLIC IS FAR FAR FROM DEAD.
AND THE SPIRIT OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION STILL LIVES ON.
REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY SECRET SERVICE HIRED HANDS YOU HAVE.
(I am sure you noticed the creepy guy in the background).
We WILL NOT BACK DOWN.
WE WILL NOT BE INTIMIDATED.
WE WILL NOT BE PRE-EMPTED BY THOSE WHO TRY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF 911 FOR THEIR POLITICAL GAIN.
EXEMPLARY GRASSROOTS ACTIONS.
I SALUTE WEARECHANGE KENTUCKY.
Bill Clinton Says 9/11 "Hecklers" Are "Afraid of the Truth" -
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/02_08/280208_clinton_911.html
"As mobs of people in the crowd shouted for the sign to be put down-- and still others tore the 9/11 sign away-- Clinton told the crowd, "It's an honor to be heckled by people who are afraid of the truth"
Really Bill? Then why are you SILENT ON WTC7?
AFRAID OF 1ST RESPONDERS TESTIMONY?
MAYBE THAT'S WHY THEY HAVE BEEN MARGINALIZED, NEGLECTED AND IGNORED ALL THESE YEARS!!!
SOMEBODY DOES NOT WANT THEM TO TALK.
THAT'S 50-70 THOUSAND PEOPLE!!!!!!
MR PRESIDENT, YOU ARE AT THE VERY LEAST ACCESSORY TO MASS MURDER AFTER THE FACT.
WHO IS AFRAID OF THE TRUTH?
YOUR SILENCE IS DEAFENING.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it
Great job. "Dynastic Duo" is very creative, I will remember
that one. These actions create paranoia in insecure pols like Clinton by telling him that no matter how big a crowd of adoring, mindless sheeple are before him, there might be at least one informed truth-seeker out in the crowd who might ask him a question that will make him squirm. See, one person CAN make a difference!
In the future, I would recommend not putting such a long Clinton speech/stand-up comedy routine in the video. Listening to him, I was starting to feel sick, and was tempted to not to watch the video all the way to the end.
Clinton Speechless a Priceless Moment....
...it does take something to stop Bill Clinton from running on and on. Kevin McPadden's testimony as an eyewitness to an actual countdown gets overlooked. It's a great moment caught on video here.
It's important to note the people have little choice at this point and either brand is equally bad! Pelosi's House is a testament in support of this statement.
...don't believe them!
HELP Please
I have don't have much time to research and think about this much because of my job right now, so I need your help.
Tomorrow (fri. night) Hillary will be in town and I am able to go. Because of my job, I can't wear or hold up any signs that have anything on them, BUT I can ask a question. Because my reputation means everything in my career, I can't afford to heckle her. However, I can ask a well thought out question(and hopefully yell out a follow up question that begs to be answered!). I need somethinbg she can't easily duck. A real zinger.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. While we are at it, one for Obama would be good too. He is expected to be all over my state (Indiana) soon too.
There is a very good chance this will not be a question and answer session but a canned speech. Just in case, I'd like to be prepaired.
Thanks everyone!!!
Tonya in Muncie, IN
"Mrs. Clinton, do you support the 9/11 victims' family members'
call for a new 9/11 investigation, yes or no?" (Don't be offended if she ignores you, she has done that before (just like her husband)).
I would definately specify INDEPENDENT investigation
thanks
" Mrs. Clinton, do you support the 9/11 victims' family members'
I see only 3 possible answers to this question:
1) She ignores it (most probable)
2) She says: " there was an investigation already" (technicallly, nobody can deny that)
3) She says something along these lines : " Yes I agree, the Bush administration didnt tell the whole truth. In fact the Bush administration has been remarquably incompetent with regard to the Al Qaeda threat. So lets have a new investigation to uncover their incompetence and how best to fight the war on islamic terrorism which under my watch will been done much more effectively" etc...
That is what usually comes out of calls for a "new investigation". Or do you really believe she would say: " You know have always felt their was something strange with the official story. If I am elected I promise we will get at the bottom of that"..
I believe only a direct, frontal attack with specific and undeniable facts can have any real effect, like this one:
" Mrs Clinton, what do you think of the 9/11 victims' family members who have publicliy stated their conviction that the 9/11 attacks where orchestrated not by islamic terrorists but by elements in and around our own governement?"
Follow up: "..and this view has been confirmed by high-profile scientific experts, such as prof. Jones of bringham young university who found definite evidence of explosives in the towers remains.."
And it doesnt really matter what she answers then.