FREEDOM SPEAKS. Letter Detail: WTC 7 Not Mentioned In Official 9-11 Report

Pls comment on this at the actual website also.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter Detail: WTC 7 Not Mentioned In Official 9-11 Report

http://freedomspeaks.com/letter/87661/wtc-7-not-mentioned-in-official-9-11-report

Related Issues: Intelligence

Tags: calling for a scientific 911 investigation

Thursday, 03/20/2008 @ 07:03 PM

To whom it may concern:

Please carefully consider that WTC 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft on 9-11, was NOT attacked by terrorists, only SMALL FIRES that were NOT spreading and confined mostly to only one side of the building on the 12th floor, YET the entire 47 story tall concrete and steel skyscraper "BUCKLED" in the center, "penthouse" first, then came straight down very quickly in a mere 6.5 seconds at free fall, not impeded in any manner whatsoever by any of the numerous floors below, "imploding" from within precisely into it's own footprints, concrete pulverized and vaporized into toxic dust and powder, resulting in huge, billowing, pyroclastic clouds, the massive steel core columns (18) cut and hurled horizontally, a truly perfect, classic example of a building brought down with deliberate purpose, and with a very high degree of advanced professional skills and substantial expert experience, in a controlled fashion.

The Twin Towers also were brought straight down into their own footprints very quickly in less than 12 seconds each in a similar controlled fashion.

In view of this information, kindly commence investigations and hold hearings regarding the irrefutable, proven and available scientific facts surrounding the probable "implosion" of WTC 7.

Please, once again, carefully consider that scientific facts, once officially revealed to the nation, can FREE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, their Congress, and their President, from the constant and unrelenting "fear and terror" generated by and since 9-11.

References:

1. EXCLUSIVE INN WORLD REPORT INTERVIEWS with Physics Professor Crockett Grabbe and Dr David Ray Griffin, "INN Takes On The History Channel", www.innworldreport.net CLICK on TUE SEPTEMBER 04 for their complete interviews regarding 9-11.

2. Noted Architect Richard Gage - WTC 7 Controlled Demolition - Video http://www.stoplying.ca/video/richard_gage_wtc7.htm

3. Massive steel core columns CUT with molten steel present http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/thermiteonwtccolumns.jpg

Sincerely,
LanceCiepiela

Letter Comments
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write your own comment on this letter!

BennyBoy, on 03/21/2008 @ 02:29 PM wrote:
Kinda sounds like conspiracy theory stuff to me. Seems like a lot of trouble and for what benefit vs. the cost that has been incurred on America.

JM4Change, on 03/22/2008 @ 05:44 PM wrote:

At this point, I can't agree with you fully, but I absolutely believe there is enough suspicion to warrant a serious independent investigation. Your letter got me to look into 911truth.org, which has some interesting assertions with huge ramifications if substantiated. With respect to your letter, I read this report : http://www.911readingroom.org/jones/why_indeed_v3.html, which I found fascinating, but I need to read opposing scientific viewpoints before I could make up my mind on this issue. Nevertheless, I think it is unwise to simply dismiss this as a paranoid fringe idea without reading the evidence. Incredulity may be the factor that protects guilty parties the most in this matter.

JM4Change, on 03/23/2008 @ 01:36 PM wrote:

After further review, there is enough rationale IMO to refute the conspiracy arguments with respect to the building collapses. The area that I think should be investigated is how much information the government had before the attacks, what was done with it, and how the terrorist plot was so quickly uncovered after the attacks.

BennyBoy, on 03/23/2008 @ 11:02 PM wrote:

Agreed JM, starting with the hamstringing of the intelligence agencies through the Clinton years through who knew what when...

ryan, on 03/26/2008 @ 10:05 AM wrote:

Do you believe every conspiracy theory you read on the internet. Please do some homework and cite references from an architect who ACTUALLY built the towers, not one that worked on a few strip malls. Discovery Channel did a piece titled "World Trade Center: Anatomy of a Collapse" which interviews the architect and engineer for the Towers. They clearly state why the towers fell several tens of minutes after the planes hit them. In fact, the architect and engineer stated the Towers lasted longer than they would have anticipated in such a situation (buildings were not designed for the specific purpose to withstand a 767 impact, fully loaded with fuel). Stop the inquiries into 9/11 and move on.

Please note: 7 WTC is mentioned in The 9/11 Commission Report...

Please search the 9/11 CR for 7 WTC and 7 World Trade Center, you will find it mentioned, so your point is not strictly true.

For example, there is something in there about evacuating the building at around 9:30 am.

What is not mentioned in the 9/11 CR is that 7 WTC fell cleanly into its footprint at 5:20 pm. So your point is valid: the collapse is not mentioned. But keep the details straight. Thanks.

---
"Truth is not measured in mass appeal."
summeroftruth.org