Obama downplays his involvement in The Council On Foreign Relations


Obama: I don't carry a Council on Foreign Relations card or know any 'special handshake'
David Edwards and Eric Mayes
Published: Monday March 31, 2008

Worries about One World Order and a North American Union have been "ginned up by the blogs and the Internet," Sen. Barack Obama told a Lancaster, Pennsylvania audience in a stump speech as he continued his tour through the battleground state.

The Illinois senator also defended the recently re-authorized Patriot Act.

Responding to a question from the audience, asking whether he was a member for the Council on Foreign Relations, a group many allege is leading a move toward one world government, Obama said:

"I don’t know if I’m an official member. I’ve spoken there before. It basically is a forum where people talk about foreign policy. There is no official membership. I don’t have a card, or you know a special handshake or anything like that."

Sen. Hillary Clinton has spoken several times to the club. Comments she made today against NAFTA, were posted on the group's website.

Often, because the council has served as lightning rod for conspiracy theorists, candidates shy away from listing their affiliation with the group.

Vice President Dick Cheney is a former director but has taken pains not to publicize the fact.

"I’ve been a member for long and was actually a director for some period of time," he told members in a speech broadcast on C-Span and now on YouTube, adding, "I never mentioned that when I was running for re-election back home in Wyoming."

The council has been at the center of several One World Order conspiracies with theorists contending that the group is conspiring to bring about one world government and a North American Union similar to the European Union.

Obama dismissed those notions.

"I see no evidence of this actually taking place," he said. "I think this is something that has been ginned up on certain blogs and the Internet. It was based mostly on the fact that there is this highway being built in Texas that will facilitate transportation more transportation between Mexico and the intercontinental United States and Canada...NAFTA helped to break down barriers, but I don’t think there is some conspiracy to create this one continental government."

Defends portions of Patriot Act

Obama said he opposed NAFTA because it didn’t offer enough protections to American workers but he defended portions of the Patriot Act which he said he worked on to cut out some of the most objectionable portions.

Free trade has been an issue across the nation in this campaign particularly as many once prosperous industrial states struggle with ways to cope with the changing global economy. It was a critical issue for voters in Ohio where Clinton managed to beat Obama. Pennsylvania voters have expressed similar concerns.

Obama said he did not support NAFTA.

"I was opposed to NAFTA because I thought that it didn’t have the labor and environmental standards and the safety standards that would look out for US workers," replied Obama.

Clinton’s husband oversaw passage of NAFTA but today she called for parts of it to be renegotiated.

"I spoke out against it starting in 1992 -- the president made a different decision," Clinton said. "I think now with 14 years of experience under our belt, we can see that in some parts of our country there have been, perhaps, some economic advantages, but in other parts of our country, like where we are right here in northwest Indiana, it hasn't worked as it was promised, and therefore I think we need to renegotiate it," she told an Indiana audience today.

Obama also spoke about the Patriot Act, which he voted to re-authorize.

The Patriot Act is not the problem, he said. A series of executive orders is what has really eroded civil liberties.

"Most of the problem that we have had in civil liberties were not done in the Patriot Act they were done in executive order by George W. Bush...I will reverse them with the stroke of a pen," he said, listing the establishment of Guantanamo Bay, warrantless wiretaps and the suspension of Habeas Corpus.

Other parts of the law were valid, he said.

"There were some provisions in the Patriot Act that did address changes that needed to take place," said Obama, citing as an example a clause that now allows the government to tap cellular phones.

His work he said, kept many of the worst portions of the law from being re-enacted.

"We instituted a series of amendments that changed some of the worst excesses of the previous law," he said.

If Mr. Obama wishes to be the President of the United States, he

damn well better figure out if he is or isn't a member of the treasonous Council on Foreign Relations!!!

Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

Obama Owes His Quick Rise To Elite Endorsement

Obama is where he is because his elitist packagers realize he takes a good picture and delivers a good speech.

The elites sensed that public cynicism regarding government is at an all time high, so they manufactured a JFK/MLK cult of personality to regain our faith.

An Insider who looks like an Outsider.

Most senators and governors and all major presidential candidates are controlled by elite financial/industrial/corporate interests.

Major political figures are simply mid-upper level managers who implement policies formed by others.

The political game is and has been rigged for a long time.

The only hope for the future seems to be a 3rd party that can break the grip of the 2 controlled parties we now have.

still corruptable - and working within a corrupt system

Need for a 3rd party - a fair point, however, the third party would easily be infiltrated and or bought out like the other parties were long ago. A party would need money - lots of it - and the old guard have a lot to throw around

and if that wasn't sufficient, the old guard would resort to their tried and true tactics,

absorption into the fold

Amen, Columbo

"There is no official membership," Obama said regarding the CFR. Bullshit. "I opposed NAFTA" he said. Well, then do you want to keep it now or do you vow to withdraw from it?

He wants to vaguely say that he doesn't like it but won't say he'd cancel or renogotiate it.. The press should pin down these candidates on exactly what their position is. "Give 5 specific changes to NAFA that you would make."

He wants to downplay the NAU as if it were some kind of internet rumor. Someone should hand him an "Amero."


Who writes this stuff?

Michelle Obama is a director of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs (formerly named Chicago CFR), just go to the website and look:


Oh, Senator, do you have a problem with the truth? (rhetorical question)

Remember that the good Senator pushes the "global war on terror" at almost every opportunity, wants to increase U.S. military force strength by at least 60,000 troops and when asked about 9/11 truth (WTC 7?) said "I've looked into it, there's nothing there".

Senator Obama also sits on the committee considering S 1959 (HR 1955), which we need to ask him about on camera.

Until the electoral system becomes completely transparent we will have no chance of reforming the system through elections.

Send a message, vote for McKinney.

Keep up the great work, brothers and sisters!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.