Announcing 9/11 Summary

Today, I launched 911 Summary.

Its a one-page list of highly-credible people who question 9/11. What's new about it?

Mainly the easy-to-remember address:

Take a look.

And see this for one way to use such a list.

grammatical error

under the Ellsberg section, you write:

"He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11..."

Who does "her" refer to in this sentence? Otherwise, good job!


I think "her" refers to the whistleblower mentioned in the previous sentence.


One small recommendation which I believe would go a long way: think tabloids --bold the names and/or titles, whichever appears more prominent.

Impressive resource, George.

Impressive resource, George. Thank you.

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

The most "credible" people are ordinary people

A reliance on "credible" people is an abdication of one's own ability to think clearly.
The people who are likely to be the most credible are ordinary people who have no positions to defend. People in governments, the military, or hierarchical organizations - can certainly be credible - but my guess is that statistically they are far less likely to be credible than people who are not dependent on these hierarchies.

Once the credible people in hierarchies get "out of line" they tone down their rhetoric, back-pedal, hedge, or get expelled from the hierarchies.

The best gift one can give to a child is faith in their own ability to think. The best gift that one can give to an adult, is supporting them in recovering their own lost ability to think for themselves.

Perhaps that is what this 911 disaster is all about ---- recovering our abiity to think for ourselves ---after reaping the very bitter fruit of trusting "credible" people.

All the above having been said - I love and admire David, and Steven and Richard and Dylan and Barry and Kevin etc. etc. etc.

Much overlooked, good point.

People are less interested in telling the truth when they might loose their jobs over it.

Yes, But...

... having an impressive list of institution-figures backing you up helps you keep it...

A Missing Category?

Excellent list. But I can think of another category of highly trained (and highly credible) professionals that could be included here: Philosophers. They receive training in logic, reason, theory construction, evaluation of evidence, and many are highly trained in science too. They are at least as credible as psychiatrists and psychologists!

And David Ray Griffin is not the only one (just the best).



My list of people with demolition expertise

You might want to check it out.

Jesse Ventura


You can add Jesse Ventura to that list. He was a demolitions guy when he was a Navy Seal.

Great list

Powerful resource GW! Not that it excuses us from thinking for ourselves and expressing our own knowledge and wisdom, but this is a great paper to take on any truth squad. Say your piece, speak your facts and then say here's a list of credible people from around the world and from many different backgrounds, and areas of competence and experience. I'mma print me up one. Thanks for it.

“Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.” –Plato

"We must speak the truth about terror." --George W. Bush

Some suggestions.

Consider improving the visual appeal of your site.

People tend to see things "Visually".

So consider adding photos of people mentioned, photos and diagrams to illustrate your points.

Its very good info but may not be "visually appealing" to a large number of graphic oriented web users.

A picture after all is worth a thousand words......

White background with light blue hyperlinks not the most readable format.

Also seems very crowded with just text and little layout.

So if you have time pls consider spicing it up with some good visuals.

Embedded Video Clips, Audio links etc.

It will make a definite impact as the message is rock solid. and may be a good guide.

Lots of photos etc.

All the Best.

And thanks for your efforts.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it


I totally agree. However, I'm the world's worst in html.

If anyone wants to help me out :)

I could give some simple suggestions,

Use embedded photos of key people your refer to from the Photo Database from


I believe you are using the Google Blooger as your format.

Instructions should be there to show you how to embed photos and videos.

It should be pretty straightforward.

I wish I had more time to help. When I do , I will contact you.

However you can try StopLying -

He is a web guy , truth seeker and has offered to host websites on occassion.

So I am sure he knows his stuff and may give you some good pointers.

Also take a look at this website -

Black Background, White and Yellow Text - VERY READABLE.

Lots of Video / Pictures- Visual Appeal.

So it does not have to have a COMPLEX LAYOUT (which will require HTML Coding).

Just use the applicaton provided - like a Word Processor - and add images , embedded video clips to Ilustrate Key points.

Of Course a Pure Text Version should still be preserved as A PRINTOUT OPTION - so people can quickly print it out in a 1-2 pg format and MASS DISTRIBUTE.

We can have the best of both worlds.

Thanks for all your efforts.

Keep us posted on your web development and if you need help let us know.

There are enough of us who can pool our time resources and help make your Web-Site State of the Art.

Start Simple and Build on it, revising it as time goes. We can help.

I believe the embedded Google Blogger Application is quite simple to use.

Use the application provided and avoide direct HTML coding unless it is for complex scripts / php which you don't need.

Just look at infowars - such a tremendous improvement this year since it started almost a decade ago.

We are the NEW MEDIA NOW. So let's give the CNNs and FAUX newses a BIG SCARE.


It will go far. Keep it simple, attractive and short.

Keep in Touch and God Bless.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Something to add, perhaps...

I don't know if they were excluded for one reason or another, but the following are to be found at

Kamal S. Obeid, SE, PE
Lic: Structural Engineer 2826 CA, Civil Engineer 35214
MSCE, UC Berkeley
Fremont, CA

Ronald H. Brookman, Structural Engineer
Lic: Structural Engineer 3653 CA Civil Engineer 44654 C
B.S. & M.S. Engineering, U.C. Davis
Novato, CA

Mills M. Kay Mackey, P. E.
Structural Engineering
Denver, CO

Rich Reed, B.S. Structural Engineering, UC San Diego, Structural /
San Diego, CA

Graham John Inman
Civil & Structural Engineering
London, UK

Paul W. Mason, Structural Engineer
Bachelor of Engineering
Melbourne, VIC – Australia

Great new website, by the way.

Keep up the outstanding work.

All that is required for evil to fail is for good men and women to do something.