911 Truth - Tom Hayden Asks For Continual Media And Congressional Hearings

911 Truth - Tom Hayden Asks For Continual Media And Congressional Hearings




Thomas Emmett Hayden (born December 11, 1939) is an American social and political activist and politician, most famous for his involvement in the anti-war and civil rights movements of the 1960s. He is the former husband of actress Jane Fonda and the father of actor Troy Garity.

Hayden serves as a member of the advisory board for the Progressive Democrats of America, an influential “grass roots” organization created to expand “progressive” political cooperation within the Democratic Party
In January 2008, Hayden wrote an oped piece for The Huffington Post supporting Barack Obama’s presidential bid in the Democratic primaries.

Here is a video of Tom Hayden at the UCLA LA Times Book Festival answering questions about his thoughts on 911 truth.

And he said to keep pounding it and he says that he agrees we need continual media and congressional hearings.

(EDIT: two lines regarding David Frum removed at request of garkoblog)

David Frum

is reputed for the Infamous Axis-of-Evil Bush term



A Neo-Con's Neocon.

Everybody, pls keep an eye out for the video.

I believe WeAreChange LA is possibly involved with this and should be out in a few days,

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

that's cool

Not a deep committal, but a nice gesture in the right direction. I think few people nowadays are familar with Tom Hayden the way they would have been some decades ago.

I don't accept Tom's negativity about 9/11. This isn't like the JFK or Lincoln assassination for two main reasons. One is the internet, which helps our research and networking immeasurably, and the other is the fact that these were massive events incorporating far, far more layers of action and coverup. The JFK assassination was a relatively singular event, and the trail of evidence is nowhere near as deep as what we have with 9/11, with its multiple attacks on a monumental scale.

Very interested in hearing the David Frum report. :-)

My understanding is that is currently being prepared.

Hopefully we will get to see it soon.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

How They Killed Kennedy

Bearcat,the evidence for the Kennedy assassination being an inside job is now on the internet in the form of a video,2:55 seconds long,called "How They Killed Kennedy".It's on youtube.com.Much like the stand down of the air defenses of our country on 9/11,the Secret Service was stood down in '63,enabling the plot to proceed.

I'd like to add a little to that

The JFK assassination did have very deep roots, but they were and remain elusive. It was a much more "surgical" operation than 9/11, and consequently the range of evidence was much narrower and thereby harder to interest in and educate about to large numbers of people.

Moreover, there was no obvious military fallout from the assassination. (I know many suspect it led to the massive escallation of U.S. intervention in Vietnam, but that isn't self-evident and was never offered by the government as a justification.) 9/11 was almost immediately, and completely openly, seized upon to justify military invasions of foreign lands, bringing us military occupations that persist to this day in the face of protracted resistance movements.

In other words, the motivation to make 9/11 happen is quite apparent, not murky as with the assassination, and the consequences of 9/11 are dire and ceaseless. This can't help but make more people suspicious about the whole thing and motivated to look closely at the evidence.

Cool as in Lukewarm

Sorry but I wasn't impressed, I saw Hayden back in the day and He inspired me etc.

Yes I go back all the way to the JFK murder when our country was made dysfunctional! Your right about the difference being the internet, something the criminals didn't plan enough for. In the past you had to wait years for the JFK documentaries to come around on network TV, you would wait between 90-100 minutes into the program almost falling asleep on a sunday nite when during the last few minutes the Zapruder tape would be played for 6 seconds, sometimes twice, you would wake up and think : wait a minute The president's head went backward it looks like he was hit by a bullet from the front not the book depository in the rear. But alas the special was over and you might have to wait a year or two to see it again. No VCR's weren't available. Anyway now with the internet things are different and it's the best chance we may ever have to get our country back.

Hayden's a survivor now and he knows even great work by the heroes of the Church investigation couldn't bring us back to life with the truth. That's why the true 911 heroes like Barret , Scott, Griffin Jones, and Gage, and the rest get my respect. The others who won't stand up for the truth but watch from the bench, or the cheap seats, aren't much help right now. He was right time may be not be on our side.

Tom Hatden's experience...and one question too many

Tom Hayden is well grounded in the battles of "the people" versus "The US Government"...and his words are very helpful. ..basically he argues that we should..." just keep on truckin...".

Slowly, many of us from the 60s-70s are getting involved in this centuriy's BIG LIE, 9/11, and are bringing this battle experience forward. I, although spiritual and not religious, I sorta "pray" that some light bulbs will soon come on within the peace movements allowing them to see the long lasting and positive results that the 9/11 Truth Movement brings to the struggling movement of peace and justice in our collective world.

In the end, we are fighting the BIG KAUHUNA of all the world's "city halls"...one who has an intergelactic police force HQd in a five sided bulding. This is not an easy task under even ideal circumstances, the HI PERPS do know how to obfuscate much of what they are hiding, and they effectively control the corporate media. BUT, we are getting better and better at pulling out important facts and influential statements, and as of now, its almost an "art" of conversation that few of us have been trained to accomplish.

This video interview is a real good one, and the tone was really well set up and documented. But, one cannot help but notice that the interview was brought quickly to an end as soon as a truther tried to get Hayden to "buy into" [bad word choice 9/11 Truthseekers] the word TREASON.

Now, we all KNOW that this indeed is the appropriate word choice in many ways, but, HAYDEN KNOWS that the approach in public of getting dignitaries to accept such terminology will result in the loss of: "HALF YOUR SUPPORT". His message should not be ignored.

The 9/11TM will get better and better at understanding these street realities, and at getting more and more average and high level people behind our goals. Its just best not to corner such helpful people as Tom Hayden by asking what may be too "big" of a question at that moment. At least I knew when watching this video that it was mostly great, yet, I knew that in every such an interview, there are certain questions that if asked will corner the person being interviewed and skew the conversation.

The best example is the comparison between the "answers" given by Amy Goodman when Barrett "confronted her", and when Rudowski "asked" her about the need for another investigation into 9/11. Same goes here...the interview was on a great roll, and then a "cornering question" was asked.

Hayden is very helpful to many, many elements in our society, and even wiser to boot. We should consider this wisdom, and his words to keep on moving ahead...and his actions to end an interview when it starts getting to the wrong areas that serve to alienate "half the support".

This is not an easy task...and I'm glad that Tom is on our side, and thankful that this piece has been posted.

Robin Hordon

Frame the Debate

good points about considering the possible approaches to proposing questions and info to public personalities- especially public servants.

I agree with the interviewer's sentiment that there's a mile-wide trail of evidence, the official story falls apart with minimal questioning of any aspect- though "80%'s on the table, 20%'s hidden" sounds like he made it up on the spot- source?

researching the interview subject before to know how they'll react is good when possible- friendly or hostile? Shill or clueless? Integrity or corrupt? What specific questions are appropriate- ask Commissioner's about conflicts of interest. Ask Zelikow why he didn't resign, how does he expect people to believe there wasn't undue influence- doesn't he admit the whole Report is under a cloud? Even Phil Shillnon's book has some things to zing him with, forget now.

Possible friendlies- How are reasonable people expected to believe the 9/11 Commission when they gave Giulani, Bush and Cheney blowjobs, and essentially left Sibel Edmonds, Coleen Rowley, Robert Wright and the war games out of their report? The Jersey Girl's have repeatedly called for the release of the 28 redacted pages of the JICI 9/!1 report; what are they doing to make that happen; Sen. Phil Graham said they saw significant evidence Saudi Arabia and other nations assisted the hijackers and said making it public was important for national security. What about the WHOLE CIA 9/11 report and the July 10 meeting materials? Have they heard of the 9/11 Truth Movement? Are they aware Zogby poll last year- 67% fault the Commission for not investigating the collapse of WTC7, NIST still hasn't released their report, and FEMA admitted their theory about diesel tanks had only a "low probability" of occurence.

WTC 7 is Point 1 of the 14 points of agreement- this "letter" is a great issue to use.

Point 5 is mindblowing; NIST admits the towers came down essentially in free fall- yet spends $20 million and 10,000 pages to erect a fantasy of "global collapse"

If Fourteen Points stands up to the peer-review of the scientific community at large, it's proof of fraud on the part of NIST and FEMA; criminal investigations appropriate.

The Top 40

Thanks Rep for editing the blog.

(EDIT: two lines regarding David Frum removed at request of garkoblog)

I believe some sort of mistake / miscommunicaiton was made regarding this.

I myself just saw the message from garkoblog regarding editing the blog (which I can't do myself once it is posted up).

Sorry garkoblog for reading your message late. I normally only check the forum posts and only just noticed that there were private msgs waiting for me.

Sorry for the late response.

Glad Reprehensor made the edit.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it