Yukihisa Fujita back for another round - April 24th, 2008

UPDATE: Part 2 added:


Part 1:


"Councilor Yukihisa Fujita of the Democratic Party of Japan, the main opposition party questions 9/11 in parliament again on April 24, 2008."

(This blog indicates it may have been April 23rd:
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=32944998 )


A New Definition for the Word


Pls keep us posted on the continuation of the video.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

MP3 Audio Clip - Alex Jones & Yukihisa Fujita

Sunday March 30, 2008

Alex Jones interviews Japanese MP Yukihisa Fujita of the Democratic Party of Japan, a member of the House of Councillors in the Diet of Japan (national legislature), who questions the official 9/11 narrative/myth and the endless "war on terror." Mr Fujita may be the single most important person to step forward so far this year and ask hard questions about the catalyzing event that changed the shape of world history.

(17 Minutes - 5.3 Meg)



The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

I'm starting...

To like this man. He's the Cynthia McKinney of Japan.

Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?


although honor , and integrity seemed to always mean more in Japan. Thank you Mr. Fujita !

One of our weakest

One of our weakest arguments... But good for him, he is hitting every angle.

By the way, its Rex Tomb who reportedly received the aforementioned answer from the FBI: http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id267.html .

How so?

Shouldn't he have been indicted for the 9/11 attacks just as he was indicted for the U.S. Embassy bombings? Don't they have the evidence to convict him for the 9/11 attacks? If not, why not?

Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

A chain

is as strong as its weakest link.

These chain of lies has to break somewhere.

Someone in the FBI is leaving this door open for us.

They don't have the evidence.

Because there is evidence for something else.

Let's use it.
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Where is the tape ?

This is what Rex Tomb said, according to the Muckraker Report :
"On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” "

I have a problem with this story : EVERYBODY is using the Muckraker Report as source.
Where is the documentation that Rex Tomb ever said that ? I want to hear the tape and see the phone-bill proving the call was made .
Please tell me the Muckraker Report has this on tape !
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya



I do think that if Ed Haas has a tape, he should post it.

Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

"There's no mystery here,"

"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb.
"They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. . . . There is a logic to it."

"Staff writer Sari Horwitz contributed to this report."
She's a 2 times Pulitzer-winner ! That's some heavy artillery the Washington Post has on staff to contribute .
Just the fact that they ran this story makes me a bit suspicious. Could it just be some sort of psy-op/dis-info ?
"Listen carefully now : DO NOT DESTROY OIL-WELLS" Dubya

Eleanor Hill...


"Within two weeks after the September 11 attacks, the FBI prepared an analysis of Bin Ladin's responsibility as part of the State Department's development of a "White Paper" that could be shared with foreign governments. That analysis relied, at least in part, on the connection between the attack on the USS Cole investigation and al-Mihdbar and al-Hazmi:

"Even at this early stage of the investigation, the FBI has developed compelling evidence which points to Usama Bin Ladin and al-Qa'ida as the perpetrators of this attack. By way of illustration, at least two of the hijackers met with a senior al-Qa'ida terrorist, the same al-Qa'ida terrorist which reliable information demonstrated orchestrated the attack on the USS Cole and who was involved in the planning of the East Africa Embassy Bombings."

The two hijackers referred to were al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi. The senior al-Qa'ida terrorist was Khallad. The place that they met was Malaysia. Thus, the facts linking these two individuals to Khallad and therefore to Usama Bin Ladin formed the crux of the case made by the State Department to governments around the world that Usama Bin Ladin should be held accountable for the September 11 attacks."

October 4, 2001: British Prime Minister Tony Blair Presents Case for Al-Qaeda 9/11 Involvement
British Prime Minister Tony Blair publicly presents a paper containing evidence that al-Qaeda is responsible for the 9/11 attacks. [Los Angeles Times, 10/4/2001; Los Angeles Times, 10/5/2001] Secretary of State Powell and other US officials had promised on September 23 that the US would present a paper containing such evidence. [Los Angeles Times, 9/24/2001] However, the US paper is never released (see September 23-24, 2001). Apparently, the British paper is meant to serve as a substitute. [New Yorker, 5/27/2002] It begins, “This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law.” Nevertheless, it continues, “on the basis of all the information available [Her Majesty’s Government] is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.” [BBC, 10/4/2001] In his speech, Blair claims, “One of bin Laden’s closest lieutenants has said clearly that he helped with the planning of the September 11 attacks and admitted the involvement of the al-Qaeda organization” and that “there is other intelligence, we cannot disclose, of an even more direct nature indicating guilt” of al-Qaeda in the attacks. [CNN, 10/4/2001; Time, 10/5/2001] There has been no confirmation or details since of these claims. Even though most of the evidence in the British paper comes from the US, pre-attack warnings, such as the August 6, 2001 memo (see August 6, 2001) to Bush titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US,” are not included. In fact, Blair’s paper states, “incorrectly, that no such information had been available before the attacks: ‘After 11 September we learned that, not long before, bin Laden had indicated he was about to launch a major attack on America.’” [New Yorker, 5/27/2002]

Have the Bin Laden tapes purported to take responsibility for the 9/11 attacks ever been authenticated? By the CIA, or others? As Blair's document states, the evidence they have "does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama bin Laden in a court of law."

I would like to see the evidence.

This also helps.

Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Translation fine

It gets the point across. The only significant error is at 1:22, "last year on July 5." He said "the year before last on June 5." That's when Ed Haas' report appeared.

At the end, Foreign Affairs Minister Koumura says he is aware that 9/11 is not mentioned in the FBI "Mosty Wanted" webpage for Bn Laden.


This is just the Beginning.

Truth is a Universal Language.

So is.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it


Vice-Minister Kimura, not Minister Koumura.

I admire what Fujita's doing

but my problem with using the FBI comments and wanted poster is this: there is no reason - legally or historically - to expect the FBI to take a bold stand outside the demands of the executive branch of government. If the 9/11 Truth movement leans on this too much, the FBI will change its tune tomorrow, act as if it is of course obvious that Osama bin Laden is the chief suspect for the 9/11 attacks, and those 'crazy 9/11 conspiracy theorists' are building their case on a minor and ultimately insignificant oversight on the FBI's part.

The MSM will then pick this up as further evidence that 9/11 Truth is now discredited, etc., etc..

We should not let ourselves get set up for this.

I believe

he is trying to engage in the dialogue for 911 Truth to draw open a discussion in the DIET.

I am sure he has a multitude of attack points he can use. This is just a taste.

He is a Senior Politician, he knows what he is going up against.

The MSM is NEVER going to be on our side.

We will have to CIRCLE them and FORCE the issue.

No matter what we say or do - MSM smear and discredit campaigns are part of their marching orders from their Neo-Con masters. They will never give us an inch until they face the FURY of the General Population.

The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Thank you for the post

Thank you for the post Reprehensor..we look forward to a complete interpretation of Councilor Yukihisa Fujita words. Another courageous man who has bravely questioned 911 and I hope our politicians here in Canada are taking note "we hear their silence". Canadians are becoming more in tune to the questions surrounding the events of 911...no thanks to our mainstream media...but to alternative and citizen media that comes by way of the 911 truth groups and courageous citizens from coast to coast who share news like this...Without individual commitment and courage to get out in the streets and share these news stories, many would still have no clue to WTC7, and as Councilor Yukihisa Fujita points out from this video the questionable FBI list found at http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm .

Councilor Fujita should know

Councilor Fujita should know that Sec. of State Colin Powell inferred Sep 23, 2001 that a white paper would be forthcoming from the government detailing Bin Laden's involvement in 9/11. However, the government never produced the paper and instead backtracked on his statement.


The fact remains the FBI has no hard evidence implicating Bin Laden with 9/11, only bogus Bin Laden videos.

Seven virtues of Bushido

Seven virtues of Bushido:

Rectitude (義, gi?)
Courage (勇, yū?)
Benevolence (仁, jin?)
Respect (礼, rei?)
Honesty (誠, makoto or 信 shin?)
Honour, Glory (名誉, meiyo?)
Loyalty (忠義, chūgi?)
- Translations from: Random House's Japanese-English, English-Japanese Dictionary

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

That is



The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it



... the irony!

Cliffhanger video!


I love this guy!

I really love this guy! It is so cool to see him in his dark conservative suit talking in front of all these other cats in their dark conservative suits with a great air of serious business and no small talk allowed etc, and what he is saying is 911 is a lie! The war is a lie! We've been lied to! Yeah go get them, Get Them all! I love this post, I'd like to shake his hand.

Part 2 is even better!

Thanks for posting this!
I just watched video # 2 and found it awesome.

Some background information about the Afghanistan issue in Japan.
Mr. Fujita's party (the Democratic Party Japan (DPJ)) is opposed to any support from Japan to the U.S. Afghanistan military mission, and they use every opportunity to make this clear to the Japanese government. A few months or so ago they managed to vote down the refueling support by the Japanese Navy to the U.S. Navy and this posed the Japanese government for a huge problem. So the government forced a vote to reinstall the refueling mission (I will not go in details why this is possible in the Japanese political system), in which they succeeded.
Now, Mr. Fujita (supported by his party) wants to know the rationale for the Afghan war, and he rightly points out some contradictions in the official US government 911 story. Unfortunately, there is not much about this stuff in the media in Japan, though by keeping hammering on this issue, he might eventually get through to the wider public.

This time he focuses on the engines of the four planes and poses the question why there is not much left of them, even though engines tend not to be destroyed by mere fires. The Minister of Defense replies at the end of the video that he is not in the position to give an answer to his question, And then the video ends, which is a pity, because I would have liked to hear the follow-up on this.

Anyway, I would like to thank Mr. Fujita for his tenacity, and Reprehensor for keeping us updated about these developments!