Neocons ADMIT that “War On Terror” is a Hoax

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/05/neocons-admit-that-war-on-terror-was.html

Key war on terror architect Douglas Feith has now confirmed Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Wesley Clark in admitting that the so-called War on Terror is a hoax.

In fact, starting right after 9/11 -- at the latest -- the goal has always been to create "regime change" and instability in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Lebanon so as to protect Israel. And the goal was never really to destroy Al Qaeda.

As stated in an article in Asia Times:

Three weeks after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, former US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld established an official military objective of not only removing the Saddam Hussein regime by force but overturning the regime in Iran, as well as in Syria and four other countries in the Middle East, according to a document quoted extensively in then-under secretary of defense for policy Douglas Feith's recently published account of the Iraq war decisions. Feith's account further indicates that this aggressive aim of remaking the map of the Middle East by military force and the threat of force was supported explicitly by the country's top military leaders.

Feith's book, War and Decision, released last month, provides excerpts of the paper Rumsfeld sent to President George W Bush on September 30, 2001, calling for the administration to focus not on taking down Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network but on the aim of establishing "new regimes" in a series of states...

***

General Wesley Clark, who commanded the North Atlantic Treaty Organization bombing campaign in the Kosovo war, recalls in his 2003 book Winning Modern Wars being told by a friend in the Pentagon in November 2001 that the list of states that Rumsfeld and deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz wanted to take down included Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan and Somalia [and Lebanon].

***

When this writer asked Feith . . . which of the six regimes on the Clark list were included in the Rumsfeld paper, he replied, "All of them."

***

The Defense Department guidance document made it clear that US military aims in regard to those states would go well beyond any ties to terrorism. The document said the Defense Department would also seek to isolate and weaken those states and to "disrupt, damage or destroy" their military capacities - not necessarily limited to weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Where does Israel come in?

Well, the Asia Times article continues:

Rumsfeld's paper was given to the White House only two weeks after Bush had approved a US military operation in Afghanistan directed against bin Laden and the Taliban regime. Despite that decision, Rumsfeld's proposal called explicitly for postponing indefinitely US airstrikes and the use of ground forces in support of the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in order to try to catch bin Laden.

Instead, the Rumsfeld paper argued that the US should target states that had supported anti-Israel forces such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

***
After the bombing of two US embassies in East Africa [in 1988] by al-Qaeda operatives, State Department counter-terrorism official Michael Sheehan proposed supporting the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance in Afghanistan against bin Laden's sponsor, the Taliban regime. However, senior US military leaders "refused to consider it", according to a 2004 account by Richard H Shultz, Junior, a military specialist at Tufts University.

A senior officer on the Joint Staff told State Department counter-terrorism director Sheehan he had heard terrorist strikes characterized more than once by colleagues as a "small price to pay for being a superpower".

And if "terrorist strikes" were a "small price to pay for being a superpower", and if that is the reason that the U.S. government refused to disrupt the alleged planners of the 9/11 attacks, doesn't that point to the fact that the U.S. government intentionally allowed the 9/11 attacks to occur? In other words, isn't this statement by the Joint Staff senior officer tend to prove that 9/11 was intentionally allowed to occur as the "New Pearl Harbor" which would allow America to act like "a superpower" and re-make the Middle East in its own (and Israel's) image?

This is not an unreasonable question, especially given that Feith, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and most of the other key architects of the "war on terror" were part of the Project for a New American Century and its plea for a "New Pearl Harbor" to justify expansion of American militarism and regime change in the Middle East.

And remember that many of the key members of PNAC and architects of the "war on terror" had previously created the "Clean Break" strategy for Israel, which called for a policy of war and regime change against Israel's enemies.

The war on terror is a hoax (indeed, even Newsweek has now admitted that).

K-Tel Presents Al Kida's Greatest Hits!

Wednesday December 12, 2007

Senator Richard Durbin questions Brigadier General Thomas Hartman about Guantanamo Prisoners and asks him how many terrorists have been convicted. The answer is 1 and that was a plea bargain and the sentence was for nine months.

(5 Minutes - 3 Meg)

http://www.c-span.org


Wednesday December 12, 2007
Caller Asks Air America's Randi Rhodes "Where Are The Terrorists?" And She Says There Are None

(3 Minutes - 2 Meg)

http://www.therandirhodesshow.com/live/


Monday December 3, 2007

ABC Good Morning America Finds Out That Pakistani Kids Believe Osama Works For The CIA

(2 Minutes - 1.75 Meg)

http://abcnews.go.com/gma


Wednesday March 12, 2008

One of Sandy Berger's greatest Freudian slips enhanced with classic spy music for your listening pleasure

(2 Minutes - 1.68 Meg)

http://www.gunsandbutter.net

The War

ON the "War on Terror - the Hoax" is NOT A HOAX.

It is called 911 Truth.

Get Ready.

The real task still lies ahead and I have strange feeling when the strong arm of Jusice reaches these criminals, they are not going to know what hit them.

Tyrants and Victims.

JUSTICE overturns the Balance.

Inevitable as the Changing of the Tides.

That Cry for Freedom and Truth as Old as Time.

Yet as New & Renewed as the Coming Sunrise.

Get Ready.

Feith meets Faith and the Faithful.

The Faithful who understand the Pillars on which the Republic was built on.

The Faith On A Bedrock for the Land of the Free

Home of the Brave

Against the Feith and his Neo-Connivers' "Bankrupt Empire"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Looks interesting indeed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Israel's "Clean Break" + PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses"

= 9/11

http://www.911blogger.com/node/2617

____________________
"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening