ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11 DVD Now Available for Pre-Order

 An Investigation Into 9/11" at the Mean More Market!

The Italian 9/11 documentary, ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11, is now available for pre-order from Mean More marketing. If you purchase the DVD through our affiliate link directly above, or on the left hand sidebar, 50% of our profits from the affiliate sales will be donated to the FealGood Foundation to help the 9/11 First Responders, who have been abandoned by the Bush administration. The other 50% will pay for 911blogger server costs.

On our affiliate page, you can also order Loose Change Final Cut, 9/11 Press for Truth, and the same deal applies to any product that you purchase through our affiliate link.

So if you have some spending money, buy a DVD, and FealGood about it.

Zero website:

Big Mistake - Surrender?

This film was supposed to get distribution through theaters only. I'm guessing that strategy has failed. This is just sad news. There are so many people to wake up it's not even funny. People who don't use the internet. Actual people who walk around outside. I'm sorry, but this is very bad news...very bad.


Do you know any theater distribution markets that will touch this subject matter? Or are you just another keyboard commando? You don't just flip a switch and your movie is in theaters. It's a very long, complicated, and controlled process.

Take it from me.

EDIT: To Cornelius.

Well maybe they can in

Well maybe they can in Europe. The Japanese MP, Fujita I believe, was adamant that this film must be only shown in theaters. Perhaps he just meant Europe? It's just very frustrating that we can't get these films to theater. Have you had any luck on the Festival Circuit? Even Uber Independent theaters, art colleges, universities? I agree with Fujita's assessment that this info has to migrate away from the Internet.

Subject matter

especially when your movie isn't about beautiful people either chasing each other in cars, shooting at each other or making love.


They should submit this film to the Telluride Film Festival -
There's still time for the upcoming festival.

Looks super great! Must see

I wonder what M. Moor could ever add, unless he has the pentagon footage:

I just watched the 14 minute trailer, it is on the front page of the site. Its a QUALITY production.

I dont think the dvd release is a defeat, it is turning point. Local Truth groups around the world can still organise screenings with debates.

I pre-ordered it today, but...

Off-The-Subject: I listened to the last half of Richard Greene's 3rd Week Of Truth tonight. He had a defender of the official story on and they were talking about the Pentagon crash (Sorry, the guy's name escapes me now, but he said he was a poster on JREF and such).

The subject came up again of the 16 foot hole in the Pentagon's exterior. The defender, as usual, denied the 16 foot hole claiming it was actually a 90 foot hole. My question: Why is this still a contested issue? And why is it not easily put to bed? For example, why couldn't Richard Greene as host/moderator simply say, "Wait a second, I've seen the photos, there was a 16 foot hole - not a 90 foot hole.

My understanding of this issue is that the hole was originally about 16 feet wide and then the structure collapsed and the area became much wider. Why couldn't Richard Greene simply say this as moderator? Why is this still debated? Am I missing something about the Pentagon hole debate? How would a defender reply to this question?

It seems to me that the host of a radio show like Clout could be a little bit more informed on the basics of ancient, debated issues like this. He/she could educate everyone about the nature of the Pentagon hole and its true size. But, instead, Richard Greene simply let the issue ride as a debatable subject.

Issues like the Pentagon hole size should be settled by now. We should not have to hear a 6-year-old debate about the Pentagon exterior hole size yet again. Or am I misinformed about the hole myself?

Also, defenders always point to the photos located at of aircraft engine and other wreckage at the Pentagon crash. What is the provenance of these photos? Have they been validated? Who took them? Has anyone interviewed the photographer? I have only ever seen these photos at I have never seen them as part of any official literature. What is the straight poop on Pentagon wreckage photos and other evidence?

Check out the tesimony of LT. Col Karen Kwiakowski

at Patriots Question 9/11:

Contributor to 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out 8/23/06: Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...

It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...

There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...

I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ...

More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day."

Does anyone know

what happened to the collection of mainstream broadcasts from 9/11 that was posted here the other day (from TommyThong or a name in that direction?)


check in the blogs section