McClellan Would Be Skeptical Of White House On Iran

Source: Rawstory

Indications they wanted to go to war:

IASPSA's Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
1998 PNAC Letter To Clinton
1998 PNAC Letter To Lott & Gingrich
2001 PNAC Letter To Bush
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?
O'Neill: Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11
The Great Iraq Oil Grab

RAW STORY
Published: Thursday May 29, 2008

Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan told MSNBC's Keith Olbermann in his first prime time interview since the release of his book, What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and What's Wrong with Washington, that he was disillusioned by his realization of his role in the White House's outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

The President's admission of responsibility for the leak during a trip on Air Force One, McClellan said, was the turning point. He further said that he wanted to know what happened to the man that promised to "restore honor and integrity in the White House."

"When I went to work for the President, I had all this great hope, like a lot of people, that he was going to come to Washington and change Washington as he had governed in Texas," he continued. McClellan put his faith, like many Americans, in the President and the foreign policy team after 9/11.

"Did you lie, as White House press secretary, at any point?" Olbermann asked.

"I did when it came to the issue of the Valerie Plame leak episode, when I unknowingly did so. I passed along false information. I'd been given assurances by Karl Rove and Scooter Libby that they were not involved in the leak. And it turned out later that they were, but they both unequivocally told me, when I asked them, 'Were you involved in this in any way?' they said no."

McClellan went on to say that the 9/11 attacks were used to further a "broad view" of what would become the War on Terror, with Iraq being incorporated as part of such a view. 9/11 was seemingly as much of an opportunity as it was a disaster, McClellan insinuated, for members of the Bush administration, including Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, to fulfill desires they may even have had before 9/11.

"What happened was that the intelligence was packaged together in a way to make it sound more ominous, and more grave, and more urgent, than it really was."

"Coercive democracy," McClellan went on, was part of the Bush administration's strategy in the Middle East. On the selling of the war, the Bush administration was perhaps zealous, but didn't actively lie, McClellan opined. "I don't think that that this was some deliberate, conscious effort to go and mislead the American people," he said, "but it was part of this 'permanent campaign' mentality that existed in Washington too often today (sic), and it was taken from other policies and brought into the issue of war and peace, where it becomes especially problematic and especially troubling."

"This White House," McClellan went on, "was too secretive, or has been too secretive--too compartmentalized--and...you know, too willing to embrace the unsavory political tactics that are at the heart of the excesses of the 'permanent campaign.'"

"They are still in this permanent campaign mode," McClellan added, on being questioned on whether or not the White House is making preparations to invade Iran. "They haven't backed away from that. I can't speak specifically to what the intent is in some of the people's heads there. I think that our options are certainly limited with all of our commitments right now, but I hope that when people look and read this book, that they will learn some of the lessons from Iraq and that we won't make some of the mistakes that we've made elsewhere."

"So knowing what you know," Olbermann inquired, "if Dana Perino starts making noises similar to what you heard from Ari Fleischer in 2002 and other members of the cabinet, you would be suspicious?"

"I would be," McClellan said. "I think that you would need to take the comments seriously and be skeptical."

The entire interview, as aired on May 29, 2008 on MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann, is available to view in five parts below:

Video At Source

Which debunker...

Wants to tell me there is no indication they wanted to go to war prior to 9/11?

How did Donald Rumsfeld know "UBL" was "responsible" 5 hours after it happened I wonder?

BTW... On September 11th, 2005, the PNAC AGAIN made the Pearl Harbor comparison to 9/11.

Are we as a nation safer for having invaded Iraq? Was the decision to remove Saddam from power after 9-11 a step forward in the war on terror, or not? The answer is yes.

Is the answer absolutely, yes? Of course not. Wars don't work that way. Did the decision by the country to wage war on both Japan and Germany in the wake of Pearl Harbor make the U.S. safer at first? No. Even after critical successes at Midway, in North Africa and Italy, thousands of Americans still lost their lives. The war had to be won, and the cost was high precisely because our enemies knew it was going to be a fight to the death. And Americans understood that security could not be had in a piecemeal fashion given the nature of the enemies we faced.

Edit: I posted those indications above, not Rawstory.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

PNAC in 2000 Wanted "a New Pearl Harbor" as Pretext for Empire

Jon Gold, below is an exceedingly important Project for the New American Century document which you left off from your list:

Prior to the 9/11 attacks, high-level U.S. government officials stated their desire for a massive attack upon the U.S. in order to serve as a pretext for global domination and tyranny. Such as the Bush, Jr. administration stating in their own official policy report in September 2000 (i.e., before the elections and so before they even came into presidential office), commenting on what will be needed for the U.S. government in order to take over the Middle East,

""
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor.
""

From pg. 51 of "Rebuilding America's Defenses--Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century: A Report of The Project for the New American Century," Project for the New American Century, September 2000 http://web.archive.org/web/20020923154604/http://www.newamericancentury.... .

Here we see that the U.S. government wanted "a new Pearl Harbor" in which to terrorize the U.S. population in order to get them worked up into a war-fervor. And the U.S. government got its desired "new Pearl Harbor" twelve months later. How very fortunate for it.

In this same document the Bush, Jr. administration state their intent to invade Iraq even if Saddam and his regime no longer existed. So this invasion had not the slightest thing in the world to do with Saddam or whatever political system was in operation in that country--the U.S. was going to invade Iraq no matter what. From pg. 14:

""
While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.
""

And from pg. 17:

""
From an American perspective, the value of such bases would endure even should Saddam pass from the scene.
""

Also quite interesting--and horrifying--the the Bush, Jr. administration state on pg. 60 that the use of biological warfare in order to genocidally control populations would come in handy for them:

""
And advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.
""

Below are the June 3, 1997 signers of the Project for the New American Century's Statement of Principles ( http://web.archive.org/web/20020407145529/http://www.newamericancentury.... ):

Elliott Abrams
Gary Bauer
William J. Bennett
Jeb Bush
Dick Cheney
Eliot A. Cohen
Midge Decter
Paula Dobriansky
Steve Forbes
Aaron Friedberg
Francis Fukuyama
Frank Gaffney
Fred C. Ikle
Donald Kagan
Zalmay Khalilzad
I. Lewis Libby
Norman Podhoretz
Dan Quayle
Peter W. Rodman
Stephen P. Rosen
Henry S. Rowen
Donald Rumsfeld
Vin Weber
George Weigel
Paul Wolfowitz

____________
"Terrorism is the health of the State."--James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," June 1, 2006 http://praxeology.net/anarchist-jesus.pdf

Theophysics http://geocities.com/theophysics/

Sorry about that James...

Have you ever read page 60?

"Although it may take several decades for the process of transformation to unfold, in time, the art of warfare on air, land, and sea will be vastly different than it is today, and “combat” likely will take place in new dimensions: in space, “cyber-space,” and perhaps the world of microbes. Air warfare may no longer be fought by pilots manning tactical fighter aircraft sweeping the skies of opposing fighters, but a regime dominated by long-range, stealthy unmanned craft. On land, the clash of massive, combined-arms armored forces may be replaced by the dashes of much lighter, stealthier and information-intensive forces, augmented by fleets of robots, some small enough to fit in soldiers’ pockets. Control of the sea could be largely determined not by fleets of surface combatants and aircraft carriers, but from land - and space-based systems, forcing navies to maneuver and fight underwater. Space itself will become a theater of war, as nations gain access to space capabilities and come to rely on them; further, the distinction between military and commercial space systems – combatants and noncombatants – will become blurred. Information systems will become an important focus of attack, particularly for U.S. enemies seeking to short-circuit sophisticated American forces. And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."

Being able to kill by race is a "politically useful tool"?

I think not.


Why isn't Dick Cheney in prison?

Open Endorsement of Genocide

Hi, Jon. Yes, I read that. I included the most horrific sentence of it in my previous post, of which the below is an excerpt from said post:

""
Also quite interesting--and horrifying--the the Bush, Jr. administration state on pg. 60 that the use of biological warfare in order to genocidally control populations would come in handy for them:

""
And advanced forms of biological warfare that can "target" specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.
""
""

That is nothing less than an open endorsement of genocide for political ends. And to think that some individuals doubt that the people in power would have no compunction about mass-murdering circa 3000 of their own subjects in a duplicitous pretext event.

____________
"Terrorism is the health of the State."--James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist," June 1, 2006 http://praxeology.net/anarchist-jesus.pdf

Theophysics http://geocities.com/theophysics/