However, I thought it was my postings on the HSBB that got you here. :)

Fred has always been a "know it all", and when it comes to useless facts, Fred knows them all. However, to me, he is no different than Jim Norton of the Opie & Anthony Show. They seem to be making the argument, "How did the towers come down?" as if that's the only problem with the official account of 9/11. Completely disregarding the fact that this Administration DID NOT WANT TO investigate the 9/11 attacks. Completely disregarding the fact that the families had to beg and plead for there to BE an investigation. Completely disregarding the ridiculousness of the 9/11 Commission (it was underfunded, limited in time, they hardly used their subpoena power, they had people loyal to the Administration put in charge, Philip Zelikow tried to insert false, incriminating information against Iraq concerning the 9/11 attacks into the report and may have taken direction from Karl Rove, a 9/11 Commissioner, Max Cleland, called it a "sham", they didn't put people under oath until it was shamed into doing so, each and every chapter of the 9/11 Report was vetted by the White House even though it was supposed to be an "independent bi-partisan" report, they wrote lies, and omitted important, incriminating information in its final conclusion like whistle-blowers for instance, and no one was held accountable for incompetence, or possible criminality). Completely disregarding the Administration's unwillingness to cooperate with the 9/11 Commission. Completely disregarding the fact that this Administration wanted to go to war prior to 9/11, and then used 9/11 to do just that.

Basically what I'm trying to say is there is more to 9/11 than how those buildings came down.

We always hear, "show me one thing the 9/11 Report got wrong"... Here's a very simple one for starters...

The threat of terrorists hijacking commercial airliners within the United States—and using them as guided missiles—was not recognized by NORAD before 9/11.

p17 - 9/11 Report

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm

In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.

One of the imagined targets was the World Trade Center. In another exercise, jets performed a mock shootdown over the Atlantic Ocean of a jet supposedly laden with chemical poisons headed toward a target in the United States. In a third scenario, the target was the Pentagon — but that drill was not run after Defense officials said it was unrealistic, NORAD and Defense officials say.

---

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?