According to journalist Richard Labeviere;

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a1980syousefcia

"Al-Qaeda bomber Ramzi Yousef is said to be recruited by the CIA, though details are not known. Author Richard Labeviere reported without elaboration in a 1999 book, “A classified FBI file indicates that [Yousef] was recruited by the local branch of the CIA.”

I would not be surprised if it had been written, printed and given to the jihadi terrorists by the CIA. Remember all those war mongering, jihad preaching, fanatical school textbooks (as were often described to us in shocked tones in MSM news reports) that the Taliban used in Afghan schools to brainwash the minds of young Afghan students? They were all printed and shipped to Afghanistan courtesy of Uncle Sam and the US taxpayer.

See the Jihad Schoolbook Scandal:

Why has the US been Shipping Muslim Extremist Schoolbooks into Afghanistan...for 20 Years?

And why is President Bush hiding it?

By Jared Israel
[Posted 9 April 2002]

=======================================

Have you heard about the Afghan Jihad schoolbook scandal?

Or perhaps I should say, "Have you heard about the Afghan Jihad schoolbook scandal that's waiting to happen?"

Because it has been almost unreported in the Western media that the US government shipped, and continues to ship, millions of Islamist textbooks into Afghanistan.

Only one English-speaking newspaper we could find has investigated this issue: the Washington Post. The story appeared March 23rd. (1)

Washington Post investigators report that during the past twenty years the US has spent millions of dollars producing fanatical schoolbooks, which were then distributed in Afghanistan.

"The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then [i.e., since the violent destruction of the Afghan secular government in the early 1990s] as the Afghan school system's core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books..." -- Washington Post, 23 March 2002 (1)

According to the Post the U.S. is now "...wrestling with the unintended consequences of its successful strategy of stirring Islamic fervor to fight communism."

So the books made up the core curriculum in Afghan schools. And what were the unintended consequences? The Post reports that according to unnamed officials the schoolbooks "steeped a generation in [Islamist] violence."

How could this result have been unintended? Did they expect that giving fundamentalist schoolbooks to schoolchildren would make them moderate Muslims?

http://www.emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm

Ah, Judith Miller. You warmongering bitch. Spreading more scary details about the Moos-lems.

Showing that this Government was WELL AWARE of the idea. I had correspondence once with the author of a report entitled, "Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why?"

Here is that correspondence:

To whom it may concern,

I have a few questions for the author of this document, Rex A. Hudson. This was written in September 1999.

It is available here:
http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/pdf-files/Soc_Psych_of_Terrorism.pdf

On page 15 of 186, it says the following:

"Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al-Qaida’s Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and semtex) into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or the White House."

My questions are, was this document:

1) Known throughout the intelligence community? (Before 9/11)
2) Known to the Congress? (Before 9/11)
3) Known to the Bush Administration? (Before 9/11)
4) Known in particular to ex-National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice? (Before 9/11)
5) Known to the FAA/NORAD? (Before 9/11)
6) Presented to the 9/11 Commission?

Any information you have about public knowledge of this document would be greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Gold

First response...

Dear Mr. Gold:

Thank you for your inquiry to the Federal Research Division, the fee-for-service research unit of the Library of Congress. In response to your questions, all of those entities in your list eventually became aware of the report. The report was mounted on the Library of Congress public website on December 14, 2001. It reported the findings of FRD's research of then-current literature written by experts on terrorism, inside and outside government, and was commissioned in June 1999 by the National Intelligence Council (http://www.cia.gov/nic/) and delivered in September 1999. We do not know, nor have any way of gauging, to what extent each of the listed entities were aware of the report prior to September 11, 2001.

Best wishes,

Robert L. Worden, PhD
Chief, Federal Research Division
Library of Congress ... 101 Independence Ave SE, LA-5282
Washington, DC 20540-4840
Phone: 202-707-3909 ... Fax: 202-707-3920
URL: http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd

Then I got an email from the author, Rex Hudson...

Dear Mr. Gold,

Thank you for your inquiry and pertinent questions regarding my 1999 study. With regard to the 9/11 Commission, I have yet to come across any evidence that it cited my report. No one from the Commission contacted me about it in general or the origins of the cited scenario in particular.

Sincerely,
Rex Hudson

My response...

Mr. Hudson,

I thank you for getting back to me in regards to this. Obviously you understand my reasoning for this inquiry. According to people within the Bush Administration, "no one could have imagined them taking airplanes, and using them as missiles". I've heard that quote countless times, and thanks to your report, I now know that at least someone "imagined" it. Just out of curiosity, do you know if this report was the reason why in November 2000, the Pentagon had drills referred to as MASCAL. Drills which planned for the very event that occurred on 9/11?

Thank you for your time,

Jonathan Gold

His response...

Mr. Gold,

Thank you for the MASCAL reference. Very interesting. I hadn't heard about it. It would be nice to think that they read my 1999 report over at the Pentagon, but I don't know of any connection. It's appropriate that you put "imagined" in quotes. Now, back to work...

Rex Hudson

SBG was actually the one to make me aware of that report.

---

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Thanks to all who responded to and to strengthen the premise with the insightful links and posts about the lie of planes as weapons like WWII kamikazes . Once in a while in some form it should be said, (at least according to me), the reason people research 9/11 and are unwavering for the truth for a real criminal investigation is not for themselves, but for others. The victims of 9/11, the causalities and injured of the resulting wars, the families of all affected, the 1st responders, and for each and every fellow 9/11 Truther, the researchers, authors, film producers, grassroots activists, and patriots for a society that we should have to resonate loud and clear to be heard everywhere the mantra Never Again, Never Forget, Speaking for the Victims, 9/11 Truth!