7/7 Memory Holes in the Floor

On 7/7, a reminder of this startling memory-holed article about Bruce Lait from the Cambridge News:


"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said."

And then there is this:


"John was injured in the explosion in his carriage and describes how he and another passenger called Jason tried to help a man called Stan who was trapped in a hole in the floor.

The metal all around it [the hole] was all jagged and bent from the explosion. Parts of the metal were covered in blood."

The modus operandi:

The inconsistencies of the 7/7 London bombings

Here is the little-known list of inconsistencies:

1. The train that the four bombers allegedly caught from Luton station was cancelled, making it physically impossible that they were in London in time to carry out the attacks, as reported by the official story.

2. Former senior police officer, Peter Power, and his company, Visor Consutants, were employed by an as yet unnamed company to run a fake terrorist attack at exactly the same time, at exactly the same stations. Their simulation mirrored the alleged attacks to the letter.

3. The only CCTV footage of the alleged bombers that has reached the public domain are a clearly doctored still image at the entrance to Luton station, and two stills of Hasib Hussein, apparently visiting WH Smith and Macdonalds in Kings Cross. All other cameras on their journey into the transport network of central London, according to the Metropolitan Police, failed to record that morning. As did the cameras on the number 30 bus.

4. Several survivors of the tube attacks reported to the media in the mayhem of the initial aftermath that the explosions were detonated under the carriages, rather than in rucksacks. Survivors of the bus bombing saw no Asian men on the bottom floor of the number 30 bus.

5. The number 30 bus was unexpectedly rerouted that morning. Several eye witnesses on the scheduled route have said that the bus was re-directed to Tavistock Square by undercover police officers who got out of a black BMW.

6. Israeli minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was pre-warned of the iminence of the first explosion and told not to leave his hotel, allegedly by Scotland Yard. Despite this, the police initially claimed that there had been a series of electrical explosions on the tube lines.

7. No credible witnesses have identified any of the alleged bombers, or reported seeing anybody, on the tubes or the bus, carrying a rucksack.

8. None of the families and friends of the alleged bombers believe that the men were radical Islamic terrorists. The two jihadi videos cited as evidence of Khan and Tanweer's murderous intent, even if authentic, were filmed a long time before 07/07/05, and there was no mention about any plans to martyr themselves. These videos cannot seriously be considered suicidal confessions.

As the anonymous British citizen who made LUDICROUS DIVERSION said, "that July 7th was a False Flag Terrorist Operation is not the unsustainable conspiracy theory". It is the government's official version of events that simply does not stand up to objective analysis.

It is time for the British people to take inspiration from the 9/11 Truth Movement and demand answers. But the kind of answers that would be given by a government appointed 'independent inquiry' would almost certainly protect those who have the most to lose. Therefore, it is our moral responsibility as vigilant citizens to research the events of July 7th 2005 for ourselves, so that together, we might construct a facts-based argument that could be proven in a court of law, should that prove necessary.

The alternative is to believe the official version of events, which might condemn us to future False Flags, as well as further the erosion of our alrerady dwindling civil liberties, every one stolen from us in the name of keeping us free from invsible enemies. The very least we can do is ask the questions that the mainstream media has so shamefully failed to, then make up our own minds.

"The bombers are certain to have been caught on many cameras during their journey... we will end up with very good pictures that identify them."

Andy Hayman, Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner, July 7th 2005.

"Two weeks before he disappeared he called my mother to his room. He was sitting on the bed and asked her to get rid of the spider in there. He was so gentle...

We've not been shown any other forensic evidence to link him. It's just the credit card. I still think there will be evidence to prove he is innocent."

Hasib Hussein's brother, August 2nd 2005.

“I don’t know whether that was my son. Neither I nor his wife have been able to identify him.”

Jamal Lindsay's mother, quoted in The Times, in late July 2005.

It's not the truth that hurts, it's the lies that come before.

Citizen Zeitgeist.

What about these reports?


"A New Zealander working for Reuters in London says two colleagues witnessed the unconfirmed shooting by police of two apparent suicide bombers outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf in London."


"The Internet in his office had just gone done down when Mr. Spinks, an investment banker at HSBC, saw a flurry of police cars and yellow-vested men outside."

Is this what became of the terror drill actors?

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson