Infowars: Wolfowitz: U.S. Confidence Hinges on Another ‘Crisis’

Wolfowitz: U.S. Confidence Hinges on Another ‘Crisis’

Former Deputy Secretary of Defense argues that America’s leadership role in the post-Bush world may depend upon ‘how threatening the world appears’

Aaron Dykes - - July 15, 2008

In a response to PNAC associate Robert Kagan, former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz has suggested that a ‘compelling crisis’ such as Pearl Harbor or 9/11 may help bolster America’s stature in the world, which, Wolfowitz clearly hints, has been damaged by the Bush administration:

America’s future leadership role may depend even more on how threatening the world appears. Historically, that leadership role has often emerged out of a compelling crisis: Pearl Harbour, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the Iran hostage crisis, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, or the attacks of 9/11.

Such a role would imply even more U.S. troops around the world and the need to maintain and even expand the state of crisis. In other words, it would be a continuation of the so-called ‘Wolfowitz Doctrine,’ a military-first approach to world dominance where the U.S. would function unilaterally as a pre-emptive security arm for world conflicts. However, despite Wolfowitz’s pre-war boast that Iraqis would "greet us as liberators," the phony WMDs episode has likely soured public support for such pre-emptive action.


Obama is LYING about 9/11

I just reached a new level of disgust listening to Obama's speech on terrorism this morning. Well, the kind of disgust I usually only feel when listening to Bush. The kind of disgust that has me yelling: " You lying sack of s**t!". The speech was dripping with references to "that September morning; dark clouds of smoke; looking up at the Sears Tower in Chicago; global terrorist threat", yada, yada, yada. It is deserving of a blog post of it's own. I already knew this man was not to be trusted, but if there was ever any doubt ... How stupid does he think we are?!? I pray that all the brothas and sistas out there aren't so, because I know they aren't. Oh God, I just thought about all the white yuppies that are! Cynthia McKinney for President. 9/11 Truth NOW!

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Ya Randi,

I know how you feel. Obama is just another tool of the NWO boys. I also find him quite disgusting.


Is the Obama speech available on the web?

Obama transcript 7/16/08, "Fighting the Last War"

"Then, one Tuesday morning in 2001, everything changed. I remember hearing the news on my car radio in downtown in Chicago: a plane had hit the World Trade Center. By the time I got to my meeting, the second plane had hit, and we were told to evacuate. People gathered in the streets and looked up at the sky and the Sears Tower. We feared for our families and our country. We mourned the terrible loss suffered by our fellow citizens in those two office towers, at the Pentagon, and in a simple field in Pennsylvania. Back at my office, I watched the images from New York: a plane vanishing into glass and steel; men and women clinging to windowsills, then letting go; tall towers crumbling to dust. It seemed all of the misery and all of the evil in the world were in that rolling black cloud, blocking out the September sun.

... Since then, we have taken many steps to strengthen our defense. Some of the most visible address the attacks -- or failed attacks -- that have already taken place. So after 9/11, airline security tightened and plastic knives replaced metal ones. After the so-called shoe bomber, we started having our shoes screened. After a plot detected in London to ignite dangerous liquids, we started to check our gels and shampoos."

complete transcript and video:

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

Wolfowtiz is one of the first

that I want to see charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity.

On 9/11, Paul Wolfowitz was in a meeting in the Pentagon, with Sec of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Both men watched the news on CNN and Wolfwitz's response to the ongoing attack was 'There didn't seem to be much to do about it immediately and we went on with whatever the meeting was.'

Excuse me, the two top Civilian Defense Dept Officials, watched the attack and did NOTHING. That's treason.


Paul Wolfowitz

Q: One is, where were you on September 11th? Were you at the Pentagon when --

Wolfowitz: I was in my office. We'd just had a breakfast with some congressmen in which one of the subjects had been missile defense. And we commented to them that based on what Rumsfeld and I had both seen and worked on the Ballistic Missile Threat Commission, that we were probably in for some nasty surprises over the next ten years.

Q: Oh, my gosh.

Wolfowitz: I can't remember, then there was the sort of question of what kind of nasty surprises? I don't remember exactly which ones we came up with. The point was more just that it's in the nature of surprise that you can't predict what it's going to be.

Q: Do you remember then the impact of the plane into the Pentagon? Or had you first heard stories about New York? What was --

Wolfowitz: [b]We were having a meeting in my office. Someone said a plane had hit the World Trade Center. Then we turned on the television and we started seeing the shots of the second plane hitting, and this is the way I remember it. It's a little fuzzy.[/b]

Q: Right.

Wolfowitz: There didn't seem to be much to do about it immediately and we went on with whatever the meeting was. Then the whole building shook. I have to confess my first reaction was an earthquake. I didn't put the two things together in my mind. Rumsfeld did instantly.

Q: Did he really?

Wolfowitz: Yeah. He went charging out and down to the site where the plane had hit, which is what I would have done if I'd had my wits about me, which may or may not have been a smart thing to do. But it was, instead the next thing we heard was that there'd been a bomb and the building had to be evacuated. Everyone started streaming out of the building in a quite orderly way. Congregated on the parade ground basically right in front of the Pentagon which would have been about the worst place to have a crowd of a couple of thousand people in that moment if we'd again had our wits about us. But we were out of the building anyway.

Q: Let me ask you then about the next couple of days. There is --

Wolfowitz: Just to complete it. We went back into the building and that was an experience I won't ever forget. There was a huge fire, there was smoke gradually filling -- not all, just the small number of us who were basically in the command group. Rumsfeld was there and General Myers who was still the Vice Chairman at that point. The Chairman was on his way back from overseas and I was there. We were in the National Military Command Center and there was this acrid smoke gradually seeping into the place. Rumsfeld simply refused to leave. He finally made me leave, which I was not happy about.

I went up to this bizarre location that was prepared to survive nuclear war.

Q: Really?

Wolfowitz: Yes.

Q: In the Pentagon.

Wolfowitz: No, no. Way out of town.

Kellems: That's why he left, was to separate them.

Q: I see.

Kellems: To provide continuity.

Wolfowitz admits foreknowledge

Wolfowitz: " we commented to them that based on what Rumsfeld and I had both seen ..... that we were probably in for some nasty surprises over the next ten years."

Q: Oh, my gosh.

Wolfowitz: "The point was more just that it's in the nature of surprise that you can't predict what it's going to be."

Sooooo---- Wolfowitz is focused on unpredictable nasty surprises. When both towers are hit he says: "There didn't seem to be much to do about it immediately and we went on with whatever the meeting was. " In other words, he was perfectly comfortable with the fact that the two towers having been hit, was the beginning and end of a finite "incident" and that there were no "nasty surprises"
like an unknowable number or combination of other attacks underway.

How - without foreknowledge of the planned extent of the attacks - would he know that the attacks were limited and that there was nothing for him or Rumsfeld to do - but "go on with the meeting?"

The statement "there didn't seem to be much to do about it immediately and we went on with whatever the meeting was" is an admission of foreknowledge and is also an admission of a stand down. He and Rumsfeld stood down. No question about it.

The claim by the Deputy

The claim by the Deputy Secretary of Defense that "we went on with whatever the meeting was" is absurd to the point of being a deliberate insult to the intelligence of his audience. It is a taunt. Like Rumsfeld and Cheney, Wolfowitz can barely conceal his contempt for the American public.

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Wolfowitz at Westpoint Summer 01'

Quite telling.

A sixty year anniversary is not a rather significant one, especially when it is not even close to the anniversary month (December), let alone day. So he decides to dedicate his speech to the topic of Pearl Harbor-like surprises, including the prospect of more, when there has not been any surprise attacks on our nation for quite some time, even though just by chance the "unexpected" attack of September 11th is only a few months away.

The most important thing he left out of his speech is how this type of surprise attack would only benefit himself and his PNAC (Project for a New American Century) buddies who co-signatured PNAC and thus the PNAC Rebuilding America's Defenses document that came out only a year earlier which stated "the process of transformation (a transformation that PNAC desired), even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor". But the attack dogs would say I'm a conspiracy theorist for noting these connections.

America, wake up, it's time to smell the coffee!

He's a real prophet

He knew exactly what was coming and he helped prepare the way.

This is profound. Intensely profound.

This is my opinion... ...but first I want to bring up a sample:

As an Adult, have we ever played a game as a player with a bunch of enthusiastic 1st graders? We "pretend" to be slightly unaware, to be slightly handicapped, to be inept when in fact we could whoop everyone if we tried. Our intentions are good and so we want kids to experience the joy of the game.

If we were playing a game for high stakes $, we may employ the same 'pretense' ruse of "being unaware". But here our intention would be to grab the money and beat everyone. We would be "playing everyone". If we felt so confident in our skills, we would have our own "inside jokes", our own hints to everyone on actually how clever we really were.

People like Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush, Silverstein, etc. have won many, many games. Look at where they are. Look at all the dirty nasty crap that they did along the way, but they easily got away with it. These guys are experts at playing the game. Skilled. That is how they arrived to where they are at.

How do you tell others about your tremendous feats of skill? How do you show others hints of your magician like expertise?

It is my contention that these people intentionally leave "riddles" or subtle hints and clues as to their feats.

Wolfowitz speech is part of his game. It is like a statement saying "Look how clever I am. I am telling you stuff about the most impacting event of this century coming in a few months. You will forget most of what I tell you, but I am laying it out for you right now. I am so clever. And you can't even pin this on me."

Silverstein the same thing with his statement.
Bush repeatedly, especially when he talks about the first plane. You can even catch some startling phrases in his speeches.
Cheney is so wrought with hatred and vitriol that his "clues" are an attitude of " I will just smash you like a bug."
Rumsfeld has been Cheney's cohort since the 70's. He has gotten away with so many crimes over the past 40 years that he is immune to exposure.

These guys are in a club. Club rules say that you "openly and intentionally expose a liability, a criminal act."
These guys have a perception of the public as stupid little people with narrow mindless awareness and useless morals...The public are neanthro-children to be played with like chess board pieces...that the public are animals.


The Law of Karma is inviolate. It dispenses Justice. No one escapes.

Or - in Western religious terms:

"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."

Would you want to BE Wolfowitz or Cheney or Rumsfeld or Bush?

Thank God, Nature, or blind chance that you are not one of these pitiful souls.


That is correct Zm

This universe is in perfect balance. The law of retribution is constant. These people will pay the price someday. They cannot avoid it. I would sure hate to be in their shoes. Actually they need our prayers as strange as that sounds.

"This universe is in perfect balance"

Are you sure its not way out of whack and needing major correction? A Karmic Correction

Rumsfeld was also obsessed with Pearl Harbor.

"[Meyer calls] attention to Donald Rumsfeld's bizarre Pearl-Harbor-propaganda campaign that had begun even before the Bush Administration took office. Rumsfeld spent 2000 and 2001 carrying around extra copies of Roberta Wohlstetter's Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision, praising the book to the skies, and offering free copies to all and sundry. Wohlstetter's book, while it ostensibly supports the official myth that Pearl Harbor was a perfidious surprise attack, includes enough information to the contrary to enlighten the discerning reader to the unspeakable but implicitly acknowledged truth: The Roosevelt Administration provoked the attacks, knew they were coming, and left thousands of sailors in harm's way as an offering to the gods of war. Wohlstetter's book is a perfect illustration of neocon doublespeak: Tell a vivid, simplistic, emotionally-charged lie to the masses ('Perfidious surprise attack! Heroic purple-fury response!') yet include as a subtle subtext the unspeakable truth that only the elite are smart enough to discern and strong enough to handle: 'Roosevelt sacrificed thousands of American lives to the greater good of getting the US into the war."

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Rumsfeld borders on the criminally insane....

I see it much as you do. It's no coincidence Rumsfeld blatantly pushed his Pearl Harbor propaganda at around the time of the PNAC document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses." In review, Rumsfeld is the most obviously sick and twisted of the bunch from the Bush administrations.

A Russert interview from 2001 really hits a nerve at this point:

"Russert: The search for Osama bin Laden. There is constant discussion about him hiding out in caves, and I think many times the American people have a perception that it's a little hole dug out of a side of a mountain.

Rumsfeld: Oh, no.

Russert: The Times of London did a graphic, which I want to put on the screen for you and our viewers. This is it. This is a fortress. This is a very much a complex, multi-tiered, bedrooms and offices on the top, as you can see, secret exits on the side and on the bottom, cut deep to avoid thermal detection so when our planes fly to try to determine if any human beings are in there, it's built so deeply down and embedded in the mountain and the rock it's hard to detect. And over here, valleys guarded, as you can see, by some Taliban soldiers. A ventilation system to allow people to breathe and to carry on. An arms and ammunition depot. And you can see here the exits leading into it and the entrances large enough to drive trucks and cars and even tanks. And it's own hydroelectric power to help keep lights on, even computer systems and telephone systems. It's a very sophisticated operation.

Rumsfeld: Oh, you bet. This is serious business. And there's not one of those. There are many of those. And they have been used very effectively. And I might add, Afghanistan is not the only country that has gone underground. Any number of countries have gone underground. The tunneling equipment that exists today is very powerful. It's dual use. It's available across the globe. And people have recognized the advantages of using underground protection for themselves."

Rumsfeld et al. probably belly-laughed after putting these lies about sophisticated underground facilities out in public. It's such outrageous stuff, at this point, in my view!

Dec. 2, 2001 Rumsfeld interview on Meet te Press

...don't believe them!

Who can forget Osama's Tora Bora Fortress

Turned out the place was a real hole in the wall.

If want to read interview punch in 2585.... search at the defense website. Sorry!

Rumsfeld and Cheney...underground dwellers=Morlocks
...don't believe them!