Jack Blood: The Last Nail in the Coffin of the 911 Myth - Mohammed Atta in OKC September 2001

(Emery & Co. continued their discussion of the Atta in OKC story on George Butler's WTPRN show last night, Sun., July 20, 2008. Part of the discussion revolved around CIA agent David Edger, who monitored Atta in Germany, and the longest serving Senator on the Senate Intelligence Committee, David Boren, a Skull and Bones man who was having breakfast with George Tenet on 9/11. Very interesting discussion of all of these links revolving around OKC. See also: Andrew W. Griffin's reports on Red Dirt Report. -rep.)


By Jack Blood - www.jackblood.com - July 20th 2008

For almost a year and a half I have been in the loop on a most fantastic story involving the Herculean investigative reporting of Chris Emery, Holland Van den Nieuwenhof and crew from www.okcbombing.net

As hard as it was, I kept quiet and off the record, as the team investigated an angle of the 911 terrorist attack of 2001 which had Mohamed Atta (pictured right) and five of his alleged hijackers in Oklahoma City just days before 911, drunk, boisterous and brawling. Not a Koran, or prayer rug in site.

Last week - July 2008, they had reached the end of their investigation, and impenetrable walls of resistance prohibited them from going any further. Last Friday July 19th 2008 the Emery team decided to go public on my syndicated radio show, DEADLINE LIVE w/ Jack Blood. The result of which has sent shockwaves throughout the 911 truth community.

For the safety of all involved, the witnesses wish to remain anonymous until such time they can be guaranteed protection. All of the witnesses have given signed affidavits to Chris Emery. Documentation of the facts and evidence has been tucked away in safe houses in the USA and Canada. The evidence will later be released to Network Media, and the proper authorities...


David Boren...

(8:50 a.m.) September 11, 2001: CIA Director Tenet Told of Attack, Immediately Suspects Bin Laden
CIA Director George Tenet is told of the first WTC crash while he is eating breakfast with his mentor, former Senator David Boren (D), at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, DC. They are interrupted when CIA bodyguards converge on the table to hand Tenet a cell phone. Tenet is told that the WTC has been attacked by an airplane. Boren later says, “I was struck by the fact that [the messenger] used the word ‘attacked.’” Tenet then hands the cell phone back to an aide and says to Boren, “You know, this has bin Laden’s fingerprints all over it.” “‘He was very collected,’ Boren recalls. ‘He said he would be at the CIA in 15 minutes, what people he needed in the room and what he needed to talk about.’” [USA Today, 9/24/2001; ABC News, 9/14/2002] According to other accounts, Tenet responds to the caller, “They steered the plane directly into the building?” Tenet then says to Boren, “That looks like bin Laden.” Tenet muses aloud, “I wonder if this has something to do with the guy [Zacarias Moussaoui] who trained for a pilot’s license.” (Moussaoui had been arrested several weeks earlier.) [St. Paul Pioneer Press, 5/29/2002; Stern, 8/13/2003] According to another account, Tenet pauses while on the phone to tell Boren, “The World Trade Center has been hit. We’re pretty sure it wasn’t an accident. It looks like a terrorist act,” then returns to the phone to identify who should be summoned to the CIA situation room. [Time, 9/14/2001] Tenet later tells author Ronald Kessler, “There was no doubt that al-Qaeda was going to come here eventually, and that something spectacular was planned. I knew immediately who it was [behind the attack].” [Kessler, 2003, pp. 196] In his own 2007 book, Tenet will largely confirm the above accounts. He will add, “Most people, I understand, assumed that the first crash was a tragic accident. It took the second plane hitting the second tower to show them that something far worse was going on. That wasn’t the case for me. We had been living too intimately with the possibility of a terrorist attack on the United States. I instantly thought that this had to be al-Qaeda.” He also mentions thinking aloud about Moussaoui. [Tenet, 2007, pp. 161] Tenet will subsequently hurry back to CIA headquarters in his car (see (8:55 a.m.-9:15 a.m.) September 11, 2001).

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Yes! If Tenet "guessed" that the WTC was "attacked" by "bin-

Laden" as soon as the first plane hit, then bin Laden & his lackeys should already have been under extraordinary surveillance from every intelligence agency in this country & the world!

How could Tenet make a wild guess like that without knowing it was going to happen or was at least planned to happen that way?

Consider mass emailing truth messages. More info here: http://www.911blogger.com/node/13321

'Blinking red'

But of course--over the summer of '01, the system was 'blinking red', remember?. And Tenet was going around with his 'hair on fire,' so worried was he that a major attack was imminent.

But from where? From whom? Gosh--what's a poor, helpless CIA director to do?

To borrow a phrase from alllans2k:

Tenet--Don't believe him!

Complex Patsy patterns

are a recurring theme with any events that tangle intelligence agencies with major events, like JFK, MLK, or 9/11.

Consider Oswald's training in Russian from the U.S. military, his "defection" to the USSR, his allowance back into the U.S. despite his "defection", his distribution of Commie pamphlets from an FBI home base, his handling by CIA assets, it goes on and on. The more you peel that onion, the more peels you find, just waiting.

James Earl Ray, another "lone nut", discharged from the Army, who was handled and spectacularly set-up by some sort of intelligence asset named "Raoul". Military intelligence assets figure heavily, primarily in William Pepper's account of MLK.

The actual histories of these people are threaded together with staged events to build their "legends". Along the way, the various handlers and targets don't know the endgame, they are just grooming assets.

In the case of Oswald, at least one person was posing as him, forging his signature and entering into fraudulent contracts that built up his legend.

It's obviously not the first time that alleged 9/11 hijackers have been reported alive after the event. One alleged hijacker (reported as such by CNN) turned up alive on 9/12 right here in the U.S.:

Ameer Bukhari was also reported to be a 9/11 hijacker, but he's dead, alright. He died on 9/11/2000. Both Bukhari's were Arab pilots.

If Adnan had not turned up alive, would the Bukhari's be seamlessly woven into the 9/11 myth? As brothers, even? Suicidal, radical, hijacker muslims, perhaps?

Somewhere, there is a shredder that knows the truth.

Regarding the Oswald "legend", the complexity of the information management is almost too complex to believe, but it happened.

Here, Peter Dale Scott tries to unravel just one aspect of the Oswald legend, his alleged trips and communications to Mexico;


There is nothing wrong with unpeeling these layers, because as Scott and Holland show in their reports, this can lead directly to their handlers, which tears down the myth that these people acted all alone.

The trick is sorting out False Sponsorship that is planted in, and propagated by, the corporate press, and real sponsorship that is uncovered by independent research.

I think that sometimes though, independent researchers may stake too much on mainstream media reports... but they should still be unraveled, for clarity down the road. Particularly, mainstream media in the U.S. ... but of course, the UK has major problems with their BBC, too, which we see over and over again. Adam Curtis excepted.

Chicago JFK Patsy: Thomas Arthur Valle

by Nathaniel Heidenheimer:

Just received my copy of JFK and the Unspeakable by James W. Douglass.

It does seem to have quite a bit more on the Chicago plot than most other books.

Thomas Arthur valle was quickly identified from intelligence sources as an ex-Marine who was a "disaffiliated member of the John
Birch Society,"....Vallee was also descirbed as a loner, a paranoind schizophrenic, and a gun collector. He fit perfectly the 'lone nut'
profile that would late be used fo characterize ex-Marine Lee Harvey Oswald.

Only after two secret service agents surveilling Vallee found an M1 rifle, a carbine rifle, and twenty-five hundred rounds of ammunition, were
Chicago police officers Daniel Groth and Peter Schurla assigned the task of surveilling Vallee on Novermber 2nd. Interestingly, Douglass notes that
both of these officers were destined for

prominanat roles in police intelligence activites. In 1975, when a reporter tried unsuccessfully to interview Peter Schurla
about Vallee's arrest,
Schurla was a high-level intelligence official at Chicago police headquarters. His companion, Daniel Groth's career on intellignec had by then
become more public and more notorious tha Schurla's

At 4:30 A.M. on december 4, 1969, six years after the arrest of Thomas Arthur Vallee, Sergeant Daniel Groth commanded the police team that broke
into the the Chicago aprtment of Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and Mark Clark. The heavily armed officers shot both men to death. ...Groth
(later) acknowledged under oath that his team of officers had carried out the assault of Fred Hampton and Mark Clark at the specific request of the
FBI (JFK and the Unspeakable, p. 203-204)

Douglass goes on to note, however that Northeastern Illinois Prof. dan Stern researched Daniel groths background and found that Groth had taken
several "training leaves" from the Chicago Police department to go to Washington D.C. where Groth' underwent speacialized counterintelligence
training under the auspices of both the FBI and the CIA.

The Chicago Police Department and the Los Angeles Police department seem to have had the closest ties with the CIA. They were pioneer members of the Law Enforcemnt Intelligence Union, a CIA -police liason program that was seen as a rival to similar and older liason-programs that the FBI had
established with most other police departments. The LEIU was formed in 1956. This, of course, does not preclude other CIA-Police programs, but Los Angeles and Chicago seem to stand out as the oldest and largest.

There's lots more on this in Douglass' book. Not bad for the first page I flipped open!

One has to wonder if Groth and Schurla knew about Vallee before they were tipped off by the Secret Service. It might sound like too little compartmentalization if they did, but given their earlier involvement with the CIA, and Schurla's later involvement in polical murder, it
seems at least a possiblility.

This post has been edited by Nathaniel Heidenheimer:

Beltway Sniper Also Seems To Fit Patsy Pattern

- Claiming to be a CIA sharpshooter after his arrest.
- The longest pause in his shooting spree happening after 9 were killed, 11 were hit and 1 was missed. (09 11 01)
- Being arrested in a decommisioned police vehicle purchased at a "Sure Shot" auto sales in NJ.
- Being accused of carrying out sniper attacks that surrounded Washington, DC during a Capitol Hill debate on going to war with Iraq.
- Being tied to a so called terrorist training camp in the U.S.
- Said to be suffering from brain damage following a career in the U.S. army and serving in Gulf War I. (Tim McVeigh also a U.S. Army Gulf War I vet.)
- Making odd out of the country journeys.

Good points, Beltway Sniper Story reeks!

Good points, Aidan.

We've not heard the true Beltway Sniper Story?.

I agree, all the evidence stinks! It's amazing how these stories fade and it's just not right! It fits the fear mongering campaign subsequent to 9/11. An installment Psyop meant to bolster an infantile--"government security"--response?

I can just imagine Cheney and Rumsfeld making their rounds, warning Congress of the terror threat muslims present--beforehand? Beltway Sniper event provides Congress then with the less-than-subtle hint--endorse our war?

Beltway Sniper Story..
...don't believe it!


What was discovered in the end, was that the sequence of numbers on Atta's credit card revealed a unique application only found on U.S. Government Credit cards. (Arranged such as to simplify accounting structures) Unfortunately, at this time� Any further search for information about the card was halted, mainly through a lack of resources to continue the investigation.

What is the "unique application only found on U.S. Government credit cards?" Where can this "unique application" be verified? What were the card numbers on the cards? If the cards had a "unique application only found on U.S. Government credit cards," then it should be something easily verifiable by anyone.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

I'm wondering the same

I'm wondering the same thing.
If this is the nail in the coffin, those numbers should take nothing more than a Google search to find.

Mark in Philly