Do You Feel Safe Now?

Do You Feel Safe Now?
by Paul Craig Roberts
August 7, 2008

Now that military officers selected by the Bush Pentagon have reached a split verdict convicting Salim Hamdan, a onetime driver for Osama bin Laden, of supporting terrorism, but innocent of terrorist conspiracy, do you feel safe?

Or are we superpower Americans still at risk until we capture bin Laden’s dentist, barber, and the person who installed the carpet in his living room?

The Bush Regime with its comic huffings and puffings is unaware that it has made itself the laughing stock of the world, a comedy version of the Third Reich.

Hamdan was not defended by the slick lawyers that got O.J. Simpson off, and he most certainly did not have a jury of his peers. Hamdan was defended by a Pentagon appointed US Navy officer, and his jurors were all Pentagon appointed US military officers with an eye on their careers. Even in this Kangaroo Court, Hamdan was cleared of the main charge.

The US Navy officer who was Hamdan’s appointed attorney is certainly no terrorist sympathizer. Yet even this United States officer said that the rules Bush designed for the military tribunals were designed to achieve convictions. He also said that the judge allowed evidence that would not have been admitted by any civilian or military US court. He said that the interrogations of Hamdan, which comprised the basis of the Bush Regime’s case, were tainted by coercive tactics, including sleep deprivation and solitary confinement.

Does this make you a proud American?

Do you think you are made more safe when you stand there while “your” government implements its own version of Joseph Stalin’s show trials?

The trial and conviction of Hamdan has made every American very unsafe.

The one certain fact about US law is that it is expanded until it applies to everyone. Consider RICO, for example, the asset freeze law that was intended only in criminal cases involving the Mafia; it wasn’t long before RICO found its way into civil divorce proceedings.

Bush’s multi-year, multi-billion dollar “war on terror” has been reduced to railroading a low level employee, a driver, for “terrorism.”

One would hope that the Hamdan verdict would be enough shame and ridicule for the US in one day. But no, Bush didn’t stop there. On his way to the Beijing Olympics, President Bush expressed “deep concerns” for the state of human rights in China.

But not in Guantanamo, nor in Abu Ghraib, nor in the CIA’s torture dungeons used for “renditions,” nor in Iraq and Afghanistan where the US is expert at bombing weddings, funerals, children’s soccer games, and every assortment of civilians imaginable.

As the good book says, clean the beam from your own eye before pointing to the mote in your brother’s eye.

But Americans, the salt of the earth, have neither beams nor motes. We are the virtuous few, ordained by God to impose our hegemony on the world. It is written, or so say the neocons.

What would President Bush say if, heaven forbid, the Chinese were as rude as he is and asked Mr. Superpower why the land of “freedom and democracy” has one million names on a watch list. China with a population four times as large doesn’t have a watch list with one million names.

What would President Bush say if China asked him why the US, with a population one-fourth the size of China’s has hundreds of thousands more of its citizens in prison? The percentage of Americans in prison is far higher than in China and is a larger absolute number.

What would President Bush say if China asked him why he used lies and deception to justify his invasion of Iraq. China, unlike Bush, is not responsible for 1.2 million dead Iraqis and 4 million displaced Iraqis.

China’s human rights policy is not perfect. China’s greatest human rights failing is that China is the Bush Regime’s prime enabler of its war crimes and human rights abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan. By financing Bush’s budget deficit, China is financing Bush’s gratuitous wars. Indeed, China can be said to finance the weaponry that the US gives Israel to enable the suppression of the Palestinians and with which to bomb the civilian population of Lebanon.

China is a serious human rights abuser, because China is complicit in Bush’s human rights abuses.

If we are honest about who is actually murdering and abusing people, it is the US, Israel, and the UK. There’s your “axis of evil.”

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at:

Survey says . . .


US, Israel, and the UK

“axis of evil." Boy do I agree with that. China is just a wanna-be next to us. Who would have believed it just a few short years ago.

Excellent exposure of Bush Hypocrisy

These Gitmo trials are an embarrassing charade. Their soul purpose is to attempt to perpetuate the myth that OBL and Al CIAda members were the perpetrators of the 911 attacks. Every day it becomes even more apparent that the attacks on 9/11/01 were a false flag psyop perpetrated by factions of the criminal Bush Administration.

Thank you Paul Craig Roberts for skinning it back. Your no bullshit approach is refreshing.

Great post Lullaby Academy. Thanks.

I think it was on Rachael Maddow's show

Where it was pointed out that this is a bad precedent for Bush's Secret Service drivers and guards. Not to mention you NSA types supporting the war on terra by reading this blog.
Sad to say, but international agencies with lots of clout have already identified many, many war crimes in the post-false flag wars of empire we're stuck in today.
Already Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld and a few others have to cross significant US allies off of their travel schedules.
But, if the empire falls soon (and it looks like there's almost no saving it), and this precedent of drivers, gardeners and dog-walkers is upheld ... well, sorry about the life sentence. You hung up your conscience at the door, right?

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
~George Orwell

War on Terror tied to COG

I suspect many of the absurd allegations are used to perpetrate the "war on terror". The war is used on paper as justification for substantiating a heightened state of emergency. This criteria may very well lead to martial law. This may what's be happening in our country? It's a paper war justified by contrived or produced events.

...don't believe them!