Same As the Old Boss: Both McCain and Obama's Advisors Want War in Georgia

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/08/us-following-brzezinskis-playbook-for.html

Georgia is located in Eurasia, is a gateway to other Eurasian countries, and possesses important oil pipelines.

For months previous to the start of hostilities in the Georgia-Russian war, American trainers have been getting the Georgians ready for war.

As revealed in a July article in the Atlanta Journal Constitution: "A large contingent of Georgia Army National Guard soldiers flew to the Republic of Georgia on Sunday for joint military exercises at a time when tension is brewing in the region".

And you won't hear it on the tv news, but Georgia started the war.

It is clear that the U.S. has been behind Georgia's military adventures.

McCain

McCain's top foreign affairs advisor was until very recently a high-level Georgian lobbyist , a neocon, and a key player in pushing fake intelligence and the Iraq war. He is a hawk who is very good at starting wars.

Former LA Times' journalist Robert Scheer thinks the war was started to boost McCain's election chances.

Obama

Obama's top foreign policy advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in his book The Grand Chessboard, that the top priority for the U.S. was seizing control of Eurasia and its rich oil resources.

Here are some sample quotes:

  • "Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power."- (p. xiii)
  • "It is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.” (p. xiv)
  • "How America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)

It is clear that the US is following Brzezinski's playbook for Eurasia.

Indeed, this is exactly what Mikhail Gorbachev was referring to in writing:

"By declaring the Caucasus, a region that is thousands of miles from the American continent, a sphere of its 'national interest,' the United States made a serious blunder."

Bottom line: Both McCain and Obama's top foreign policy advisors wanted a war. And, obviously, the other neocons and assorted hawks want one also. Indeed, the U.S. is sending troops into Georgia under the pretense of giving "humanitarian aid".

See also this and this (which provides some insights, but may be over-the-top).

With all respect

Your post seems to confuse the meaning of Eurasia. Brzezinski is clearly talking about Eurasia as the entire landmass of Europe and Asia, from Ireland to Japan, from Indonesia to Norway, which is really the clearest use of the term.

Occasionally, Eurasia can take on other meanings, such as nations or regions that have a history linked closely with both that of Europe and Asia (note that the demarcation between Europe and Asia is more political/cultural/historical/ethnic than geographic). This would include the southern Caucasus states, such as Georgia.

Another meaning worth bringing up is the state of Eurasia in Orwell's 1984. :-)

I like your posts, and I loathe both Brzezinski and the big phony Obama. But your quotes really don't lead to an assumption that Brzezinski would support war in Georgia, even if he does.

Totally re-written

to clarify that Zbig was talking about the "Eurasian Balkans", and not Eurasia as a whole. Please read new version http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/08/us-following-brzezinskis-p...

yes, much better :-)

That makes a lot more sense. I was just trying to head off some blind criticism here. :-)

Thank you for this, and for all of your excellent blog posts.

zbig

Brzyzinski also called Putin "Hitler" the other day.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.

Grand Chessboard....West gets checkmated

The desperation of the West seems apparent? Rumor is the attack by Georgian forces represents an attempt to mitigate any logistical support Russia may provide Iran?

Will the West be so stupid as to launch a missile and special forces attack on Iran? Iran is a mountain fortress and one of the oldest civilizations on Earth? Will we attempt to acquire possession of the oil fields in the southwest of Iran and stop there?

I believe, even if the oligarchs succeed in securing the oil fields, it's of little consequence. The West has lost credibility to a large degree and will not soon recover. It's checkmate no matter just the how awaits in the balance, i.e., by McCain or OBama.

Great Title: Same as the Old Boss

Same Old BS (SOBS)...
...don't believe them!

Radio Interviews - Archives

August 11, 2008
Alex Jones talks with professor Michel Chossudovsky about the unfolding conflict in Georgia which according to Chossudovsky was carried out using aerial bombardments and ground attacks largely directed against civilian targets including residential areas, hospitals and the university resulting in the destruction of the provincial capital Tskhinvali and in some 1500 civilian deaths.
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/chossudovsky_michel/

July 30, 2008
In Obama - The Postmodern Coup author Webster Tarpley reveals how Barack Obama is really the megalomaniac front man for a postmodern coup by the intelligence agencies, using fake polls, mobs of swarming adolescents, super-rich contributors, and orchestrated media hysteria to short-circuit normal politics and seize power.
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/tarpley_webster/

Radio Interviews - Webster Tarpley interviews Nico Haupt

Webster Tarpley interviews Nico Haupt and Jeff King: TV Fakery

"Nico Haupt… is one of the leading researchers in the 9/11 truth movement. "

Webster Tarpley Radio Interview

"The leading poison pen seems to be an individual called Cosmos... Anonymous slanders are his stock and trade. He wants to slander you and vilify you from the shadows, spread disinformation, distortions. These are the venom-mongers, the merchants of pus who like to operate from behind the scenes. These are the wreckers and saboteurs... Cosmos who shows you he looks like he's trying to imitate Che Guavara or a member of the Sons of David baseball team. He's hiding behind a huge beard, looks like the Italian aviators in A Night at the Opera... "

The Kennebunkport Warning Controversy: A Study in Divisive Accusations, Insults, and Ad-Hominem Attacks

"Some of the signers, under the obvious threats of totalitarian forces, are lying in appalling fashion about what they signed and if they signed. You can see for yourself from the facsimile who signed. We need to move beyond these wretched individuals.[sic]"
_______________
Arabesque: 911 Truth

Am I on the right track here?

I don't know the subject much, but isn't Tarpley a front man for Lyndon LaRouche? LaRouche's foot-in-the-door, so to speak, to the 9/11 truth movement?

(Not that I see any reason to think that LaRouche and Tarpley are cointelpro agents. It seems to me, from what I can make out, that LaRouche is an independent megalomaniacal neofascist, and his acolytes like Tarpley and Haupt are simply carrying out the bidding of their strongman leader.)

It's the media

Russ Hallberg
Obomba and McCain are products of the deluded public. Our primary adversary is the media that made the lie of 9/11 possible.

From Lyndon LaRouuche

LaRouche: Putin Was Right,
He Acted To Prevent World War III

August 12, 2008 (LPAC)—By acting to defend Russian citizens against a terrorist-type attack by the Soros government of Georgia, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has delivered a decisive defeat to the British Empire, said Lyndon LaRouche today. Any capitulation by Russia to the criminal aggression by the Soros puppet government of Mikheil Saakashvili would have been tragic for civilization.

Putin's action was objectively required, LaRouche continued. He was absolutely correct. He and President Medvedev could see that the British Empire, with its U.S. appendages, and its tool George Soros, was heading to consolidate its world empire. The British, and Putin, knew that the only obstacle to their plan at this time, is Russia, with its thermonuclear capability. If Russia had submitted to the terms being dictated by the British, the world would have been on the road to World War III.

Thus, Putin decided he had to draw the line. He acted decisively, and backed the British and the U.S. down. As a result, the Georgian puppet government has been destroyed, and a message has been delivered to the entire world.

Some British thinkers got that message, LaRouche said, pointing to an article in the London Daily Telegraph of today by diplomatic editor David Blair. Blair writes that "by seizing the opportunity to pound Georgia with air strikes and military incursions, Vladimir Putin, Russia's Prime Minister, is sending an emphatic message with global consequences. The curtain has fallen on the era when NATO steadily expanded into Eastern Europe and onwards to embrace the former republics of the Soviet Union—and Russia was able to respond with nothing more than bluster.... The balance of power in Europe has fundamentally changed...."

What Russia faced was a Pearl Harbor-like sneak attack by the Soros administration of Georgia, an attack carried out by the tool of the Hitler-like Soros, with the aim of Hitler-like ethnic cleansing, LaRouche said. Putin saw the existential threat to Russia, and where it was leading, and he acted, as FDR did against Pearl Harbor. He knew that if he did not, the British Empire—faced with the dissolution of its world financial system—would have pressed on toward world war.

The silly screams from the Bush Administration only testify to the effectiveness of the Putin action, LaRouche said. As for the Presidential candidates, the fact that Barack Obama is a bought-and-paid-for stooge for George Soros makes it hopeless that he could come to his senses. In the case of McCain, LaRouche said that he should stop being silly, and sit down and think, rather than shooting off his mouth.

The Russian action against the Georgian provocation is a crucial turning point, LaRouche concluded. It reverses almost 20 years of history, during which the British Empire, through Soros and other agencies, moved to take advantage of the collapse of the Soviet Union, to consolidate world empire. Through this entire period, the American people—the only other significant point of resistance—tragically capitulated, negotiating their own destruction, refusing to take the threat to their nation, and the world, seriously. How could Americans be so stupid as to tolerate Bush? How could they let Soros choose the Democratic Party presidential candidate?

The key to victory over the enemy of mankind, the British Empire, is to refuse to compromise on fundamentals, to turn over the rules of the game, LaRouche said. That is the decision which Prime Minister Putin made, for the benefit of all mankind.

Some people in Britain have gotten the message, LaRouche said. Now, it's time the American people did as well. It's time to destroy everything associated with the British Empire, especially its leading agents, the Hitler-like Soros, and Al Gore. Either this is done between now and the November election, or there won't be a United States.

LaRouche might be right about all that.

But I'm not so sure he's the guy I want on my side.