Why People Who Question the Anthrax Attacks Won't Question 9/11


I think I've figure out why many people who question the government's explanation for the anthrax attacks don't question the official story about 9/11.


  • 9/11 involved much greater loss of life - while 5 people died in the anthrax attacks, close to 3,000 died on 9/11
  • While none of us have seen gruesome images of the victims of the anthax attacks, we watched horrific images of 9/11: planes slamming into buildings, people jumping out of the Twin Towers, the Towers collapsing . . .
  • 9/11 was the first attack on the U.S. by "foreign terrorists". As such, it was the point at which America took the fork in the road away from traditional notions of liberty, justice and the Geneva Convention and towards the "war on terror"

9/11 and the anthrax attacks - and the government's "investigation" into both - were actually very similar in many ways, as I will show in my next essay.

However, while many people can see how ridiculous the government's case against Dr. Bruce Ivins as the "sole culprit" is, they are so traumatized by the 3,000 dead, the horrible images, and the status of 9/11 as the "day when everything changed", that they simply will not allow themselves to honestly and fully investigate 9/11.

The Scarlet A: Links between the Anthrax Attacks and 9/11

The Scarlet A: Links between the Anthrax Attacks and 9/11

By Barbara Honegger

(The author is a senior military affairs journalist, and former White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the President in the first Reagan Administration. She is the author of the 9/11 expose “The Pentagon Attack Papers” http://physics911.net/pdf/honegger.pdf and October Surprise (Tudor, 1989), the first book to reveal the true origins of the Iran side of the Iran/Contra scandal.)

With the Government’s claim that Bruce Ivins, a bio-warfare scientist at the Army’s Ft. Detrick bio-laboratory, is behind the anthrax attacks, the Bush Administration has now officially acknowledged the attacks were not perpetrated by ‘Al Qaeda’ – or by Iraq — but were their own false flag inside job.

We already know from the evidence compiled by the 9/11 Truth movement that the 9/11 attacks were also a false flag inside job, and the FBI itself has said ‘Al Qaeda’ didn’t do it: Both Director Mueller and the FBI's top investigative spokesman have stated publicly for the record that “There is no hard evidence” linking bin Laden – and thus Al Qaeda – to 9/11, and bin Laden has never been wanted for 9/11 on the FBI’s ‘Most Wanted Terrorists’ page. http://www.twf.org/News/Y2006/0608-BinLaden.html

As both the anthrax attacks and 9/11 were inside jobs – now admitted by the Bush Administration for the anthrax — any evidence directly linking the acknowledged-inside-job anthrax attacks to 9/11 would be an effective official admission that Sept. 11 itself was also an inside job. And if there is evidence linking the anthrax to 9/11, we can infer that the Government/military individuals who planned and perpetrated the anthrax attacks also planned and perpetrated 9/11.

The hand-written date on the letters mailed with the anthrax is Sept. 11, 2001. Though the official story that the ‘first’ anthrax attack — on Florida photo journalist Bob Stevens, from which he died — wasn’t mailed until at least a week after 9/11 (though the FBI claims that letter has never been found) and therefore that the anthrax is not directly linked to 9/11, it’s clear from the date on the letters that whoever wrote and mailed them and added the super-weaponized US military anthrax wants you to believe there was a direct connection.

So is there any evidence that there actually is a direct connection between anthrax and 9/11 itself? Yes, there is:

The day before 9/11, Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld announced that Project Jefferson, a secret and illegal U.S. Gov’t offensive bio-weaponization program begun in 1999, had achieved ‘success’ in creating hyper-weapon-grade anthrax. In early Sept. 2001, a classified dispersal test of the anthrax had been run in the Nevada desert.

Mayor Giuliani's New York City Office of Emergency Management (OEM) had a pre-planned bio-chem-terrorism emergency response exercise called TRIPOD II scheduled, he testified to the 9/11 Commission, to begin the day after 9/11. But the special personnel, including from FEMA and the National Guard, who were to take part in the exercise were already in NYC on Sept. 10th — the day before 9/11 — and OEM personnel had been cleared out of their offices on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 on Sept. 11 and moved to the command and communications center for the bio-chem-terrorism exercise on a New York pier, and so were out of the bldg. that was brought down by controlled demolition on 9/11 using preplaced charges later that day. An Army base just across the water from NYC, New Jersey’s Ft. Monmouth, also, held a ‘II’ exercise on the morning of 9/11 called TIMELY ALERT II (like Giuliani’s TRIPOD II). http://www.amc.army.mil/amc/pa/oct01.html

Jerome “Jerry” Hauer – a bio-warfare expert and one of the signers of the pre-9/11 PNAC Manifesto calling for a "new Pearl Harbor” (such as 9/11) who had been director of Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management conveniently moved to the pier on 9/11 just before its offices were destroyed by pre-placed demolition charges — had been a central player in creating the bio/chem attack scenario for TRIPOD II; became a National Security adviser to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) beginning on Sept. 10, the very day TRIPOD II personnel began amassing in New York City, from which new NIH post he managed the government’s ‘response’ to the imminent anthrax attacks and the initial cover up of the true anthrax killers; zealously pushed the ‘bin Laden did it and planes brought down the towers’ official story on CBS News on 9/11 in the immediate aftermath of the attacks before anyone could have possibly determined the actual cause of the collapses,taking pains to state that explosives were not involved, when they were; and according to reports personally advised White House officials and staff to take anti-anthrax Cipro on 9/11. http://www.judicialwatch.org/1967.shtml

Did Hauer recommend that the White House be put on an anti-anthrax antibiotics on 9/11 because he had reason to believe 9/11 would also involve an anthrax attack and/or because he had advance knowledge that there would be an actual anthrax attack – against Bob Stevens in Florida – just one week later?

It was Hauer, also an expert in the response to building collapses (New York Times, July 27, 1999) http://truthmovecom.blogspot.com/2008/07/jerome-hauer-911-suspect-awaiti..., who insisted, despite the 1993 terrorist attack on WTC1, that Giuliani still locate his Office of Emergency Management, from which a response to another terrorist attack would have to be orchestrated, in WTC7 — which collapsed on 9/11 from pre-placed controlled demolition charges — next door. The OEM opened on the 23rd floor of WTC7 in June 1999, where Hauer, its director, had his office. Hauer was also managing director of Kroll Associates before and on 9/11, the company that provided ‘security’ for the World Trade Center, including all three buildings brought down by controlled demolition that morning, and thus had complete access to pre-place the explosive charges he adamantly insisted on national TV on 9/11 were not involved.

Is it possible that the 9/11-period TRIPOD II bio/chem-terrorism-attackexercise scenario involved anthrax? Yes, it is:

On Sept. 11, Janette MacKinlay lived in a fourth floor apartment overlooking what was soon to become the ‘pit’ of the WTC. Her neighbor and close friend Bruno told her that he was pulled into a bank lobby off the street next to the WTC towers by an FBI agent on the morning of Sept. 11 to protect them from the dust cloud from the collapsing tower, and was told by the agent that “We were told this was going to happen and that it would involve anthrax.” Another FBI agent told a woman about to enter the NBC Bldg. that she should leave because “there are explosives in the bldg as well as in the WTC.” The FBI clearly was pre-alerted because their offices were in WTC 7, which was pre-wired for a controlled demolition take down that day. MacKinlay had the presence of mind to collect the dust from the cloud that poured into her 4th floor apartment, and it is this dust that physicist Steven Jones has analyzed and in which he found military-grade thermate as well as other high explosives, proving the presence of controlled demolition charges throughout the towers to which ‘Al Qaeda’ could not have had access to place. Though no anthrax has been reported in the dust – though it may not yet have been tested for – if TRIPOD II were at least in part on an anthrax attack scenario, it wouldn’t have used actual anthrax, but an anthrax simulant – an anthrax-like powder that would disperse through the air in a similar way to the real thing. Experts should be consulted for the chemical composition of anthrax simulants and the dust from the WTC collapses tested for these simulants.

In the minds of the script writers for the TRIPOD II emergency response exercise of Sept. 2001, an attack on the World Trade Center was already associated with bio/chem terrorism. According to respected New York Times science writer William Broad, the plan for the 1993 attack on WTC1, for which alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheihk Mohammed’s nephew Ramzi Yousef is in prison for life, involved a plot to push cyanide out into New York City. This is reported in Germs, Broad’s book co-authored with Judith Miller. Though the latter’s credibility has been seriously compromised, Broad remains a respected journalist.

There are additional reasons to believe the TRIPOD II bio/chem-terrorism exercise was at least in part on an anthrax attack scenario, using an anthrax simulant, and that the letters that ended up being mailed slightly later with real anthrax may have been written for that exercise.

According to mainstream press reports on Ivins’ alleged involvement in the anthrax attacks, the anthrax in the mailed letters — but not the ‘first’ anthrax allegedly mailed to Florida photo journalist Bob Stevens — was traced back to a flask in his laboratory. In fact, the FBI claims that no letter was found in connection with the anthrax found on Stevens’ computer, though a ‘missing’ letter is assumed.

The Stevens Florida anthrax is therefore critical, both to proving that Ivins, if he was involved at all, did not act alone, as the Florida anthrax doesn’t trace back to his lab, and because it’s the 'first' known anthrax and therefore the closest in time to 9/11 and so most likely to be directly linked to 9/11.

Contrary to the FBI's claims, anthrax was found throughout the American Media building in Florida — I have interviewed America Media workers whose desks were nearest Stevens'; the bldg. was therefore condemned, and the FBI — who, remember, “were told 9/11 was coming and that it would involve anthrax”— told the publisher that they, not the taxpayers, would have to clean it up, at a huge expense. According to the New York Times, this same American Media building – the first anthrax attack crime scene with its evidence still in place – was then bought at an anthrax sale price by former NYC Mayor Giuliani, overseer of the reported Sept. 12 (really Sept. 11?) TRIPOD bio/chem-terrorism (anthrax?) exercise, who had just formed a partnership with a decontamination expert qualified to decontaminate the building. Giuliani, who oversaw the TRIPOD II bio-chem terrorism exercise of Sept. 10-12 thus oversaw the destruction of evidence at ‘the’ crime scene of the 9/11 attacks, the WTC, ordering the steel that containedtraces of controlled demolition explosives to be removed, and the destruction of evidence at ‘the’ anthrax attack crime scene, America Media, Inc. in Florida.

There have also been reports that, prior to 9/11, official story ‘lead hijacker’ Mohammed Atta was treated in Florida for what could have been anthrax; that Atta had an apartment in Boca Raton, Florida, where Amerian Media was located; and even that there was a landlord-tenant relationship between Atta and an employee of American Media.

A reasonable case can therefore be made that there is a direct link between Sept. 11 and at least the ‘first’ anthrax attack in Florida; that Giuliani is complicit in both, which is why he bought and therefore controlled the FBI-sealed Florida anthrax attack crime scene and ordered the destruction of evidence at the NYC 9/11 crime scene as well; that Giuliani’s close friend and colleague Jerome Hauer — former head of Giuliani's OEM who became a National Security adviser to the NIH the day before 9/11 just as TRIPOD II personnel were arriving in NYC for a probable anthrax-scenario exercise — advised, or even personally took, anti-anthrax Cipro to Cheney and his White House staff on 9/11 because they were afraid the anthrax attack exercise scenario might ‘go live’, just as both the NORAD hijacked-plane ‘exercise’ and the NRO plane-crashing-into-tower ‘exercise’ had already just ‘gone live’ earlier the morning of Sept. 11 as their 'game' scenarios suddenly turned horribly real.

If the Florida anthrax doesn’t link back to Ivins’ Ft. Detrick flask and Ivins, who worked on anthrax vaccines — bio-defense – and not its weaponization — bio-offense – wasn’t behind the attacks, and neither was Hatfill, whom the FBI just paid $5 million to settle his case for publicly naming him a ‘person of interest,’ then who was?

Battelle Memorial Institute, a bio-defense contractor located in West Jefferson, Ohio, has exclusive control of the Ames strain contained in the mailed anthrax letters http://alexconstantine.blogspot.com/2008/08/project-anthrax-cover-up-par... and, in partnership with the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, ran Project (Operation) Jefferson, the government’s covert and illegal offensive bio-weapons program whose goal was to develop a hyper-weaponized form of the anthrax Ames strain found in the letters.

William Patrick, a former top scientist at Ft. Detrick, a close colleague of former Giuliani OEM Director Jerry Hauer and mentor of initial FBI ‘person of interest’ in the anthrax attacks Steven Hatfill, personally holds five classified patents on weaponizing anthrax, including one that produces the 1 trillion spores per gramcontained in the anthrax letters mailed to Democratic Congressional leaders Daschle and Leahy. After leaving Ft. Detrick, Patrick was contracted by Battelle to research and write a special report on how the mails could be used as the ‘vector’ for targeting the hyper-weaponized milled spores of the anthrax Ames strain produced by Project Jefferson. In early Sept. 2001 the super-weaponized Ames strain was tested in the Nevada desert, and on Sept. 10, the day before 9/11, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld announced the ‘success’ of Battelle’s anthrax weaponization Jefferson Project. Patrick worked with his close friend and colleague, former Soviet bio-weapons expert Ken Alibek, at Battelle, which also ran Project Clear Vision, a secret program to reverse engineer dry powder anthrax bombs produced by the former Soviet Union. Patrick and Alibek were the FBI’s first suspects in the anthrax attacks, and rightly so. But the initial FBI investigative team was taken off the case and replaced by a new team headed by Richard Lambert that refocused attention on intentional diversions Hatfill and Ivins. Director Mueller himself assured a Senator that the FBI “was not investigating, nor intending to investigate, anyone with, or formerly with, BMI (Battelle).” http://www.worldnewsstand.net/news/anthrax.htm Battelle, a contractual partner with BioPort and Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), also directs the anthrax experimentation at the U.S. military’s Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, the second ‘home’ in addition to Ft. Detrick of the Ames strain contained in the anthrax letters. Hauer and Hatfill had worked together at SAIC. www.tetrahedron.org/articles/anthrax/open_letter_mueller.html www.tetrahedron.org/articles/anthrax/anthrax_espionage.html

Another top candidate is Thomas Monath, former head of Ft. Detrick’s Virology Division and the chief scientist and vice president of BioVax, since renamed Acimbis. A friend of Hatfill’s, he was introduced to Giuliani by Hauer to Giuliani. Project Jefferson, in fact, began at a 1998 meeting attended by William Patrick, Hauer, Monath and then Secretary of Defense William Cohen.

Yet another top candidate for the team behind the anthrax latter attacks is Battelle’s former Chief Scientist for Special Programs, Dr. Barry Erlick, who also served as Chief Scientist for Biological and Chemical Warfare at the Defense Intelligence Agency, a Battelle partner in Project Jefferson, until June 2001 — shortly before 9/11. In the summer of 2001 leading up to 9/11 and on Sept. 10, the day before 9/11, top U.S. military and military contractor bio-defense experts held a series of terror response planning meetings and exercises in connection with the U.S. Marine Corps Systems Command’s Nuclear, Biological and Chemical (NBC) Consequence Management Interoperability System (CMIS) — renamed the Disaster Management Interoperability Services (DMIS) after 9/11 — in which Erlick and Battelle’s then Director of Department of Defense Operations Richard D. Munnikhuysen played key roles. Many of the summer 2001 ‘terror planning meetings’ were held in Johnstown, Penn., near Shanksville, site of the ‘crash’ of one of the four 9/11 planes. A terror workshop involving Erlick and the head of CMIS, Dr. Scott Eyestone, was held in Johnstown on July 9, 2001, and another was held there on Sept. 10, the day TRIPOD II bio/chem-terror attack exercise personnel arrived in another 9/11 attack target, New York City.Between 1978 and 1982, Erlick was a Principal Research Investigator and Deputy Chief of Viral Biology at Ft. Detrick. In 1982 he joined the U.S. Army Medical Information and Intelligence Agency, renamed the Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center (AFMIC) in 1986. After 1982, Erlick served in numerous senior level positions for AFMIC and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), including Chief of the Scientific and Technical Division and Chief Scientist, AFMIC; Chief of the Department of Defense Biological Threat Analysis Center; Chairman of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Subcommittee of the Weapons and Space Systems Intelligence Committee of the Director of Central Intelligence; and Senior Scientist and Deputy Chief of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Analysis Division of the Defense Intelligence Agency, as well as Battelle’s Chief Scientist for Special Programs.

Given the timing, is almost certain that the false flag anthrax attacks were the engineered pretext for the still secret warrantless domestic wiretap program that Bush signed the first ‘authorization’ for on Oct. 23, 2001 – right in the middle of the anthrax scare. Senator McCain had just gone on ABC on Oct. 18, 2001, to push the intentional disinformation that a nonexistent additive bentonite, purportedly marking the anthrax as having come from Saddam Hussen, meant that Iraq was behind the attacks. The White House still refuses to provide this alleged 'first' presidential authorization for the warrantless inside-the-U.S. taps program to Congress, and for obvious reason. This is the alleged authorization that we now know claims that 4th Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures do not apply to U.S. military operations inside the U.S. The fact that the Bush Administration continuedthis secret domestic spying program long after its was publicly known that the anthrax attacks were an inside job is strong evidence the attacks were perpetrated by the same individualswho then used them to justify the illegal taps program – the White House. Exposing the links between the inside job anthrax attacks and the false pretext for the domestic warrantless wiretap program is thus critical to bringing the Administration to full accountability for its attacks against thousands of innocent American civilians as well as its ‘Reichtag (Parliament) Fire’attack on Congress via the anthrax letters to Senators Daschle and Leahy, then resisting the Administration’s railroading of the Patriot Act – the analog to Hitler’s Enabling Act passed in the wake of the Reichtag Fire – through Congress.

The anthrax attacks and Sept. 11 were both inside jobs. ‘Al Qaeda’ didn’t do either.Anthrax was part of a bio-terrorism attack ‘exercise’ scenario planned for 9/11 itself or at the very latest the next day. We have seen the terrorists, and they are U.S. It’s time for ‘pre-impeachment’ hearings to interrogate these suspects, and others who worked with them, under oath to expose who among them wears The Scarlet A.

Francis A. Boyle

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Alex Jones was joined on air by Francis A. Boyle, a leading American professor, practitioner of and expert on international law to discuss his detailed knowledge of the cover up of the 2001 anthrax attacks, which he believes were perpetrated by criminal elements of the US government in an attempt to foment a police state by killing off opposition to hardline post 9/11 legislation.


Barbara Honegger - Interview (8/17)

August 17, 2008

Kevin Barrett talks with Barbara Honegger about the government’s claim that Bruce Ivins, a bio-warfare scientist at the Army’s Ft. Detrick bio-laboratory, is behind the anthrax attacks, the Bush Administration has now officially acknowledged the attacks were not perpetrated by "Al Qaeda" – or by Iraq — but were their own false flag inside job.


Pentagon Attack Papers

9/11TRIPOD II bio-terror exercise involved anthrax!

Barbara Honegger's assertion Tripod II, may have involved anthrax is pretty interesting!

Honegger does some first rate research and this article is a fine contribution to 9/11 Truth.

I'm looking forward to the next issue of the Rock Creek Press dedicated to anthrax.

Thanks AJFan for the heads up.

...don't believe them!

Last night

I was watching a documentary on the boob tube pushing the official story. Some New York cop was interviewed and stated "Fuck You Osama". It was filmed right after the attacks. I had to turn the TV off else I would have kicked it in. They are STILL PUSHING THE OFFICIAL BULL SHIT STORY! I couldn't believe it. Instead I watched the Alex Jones, David Icke interview that was just posted here. (My two favorite truthers along with Tarpley and Griffin.) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-397495977395954314&ei=C32pSJzKM... As far as the anthrax attacks go, only a complete brainless fool would believe that one. I figured that one out the day it was reported. I still believed the official "Osama and his cave dwellers" story then." (I hang my head in shame when I look back and see how brain washed I was then.)

Add these

We have had the "Myth of 9/11" reinforced almost daily by the complicit mainstream media.

Americans were not told anything final on the Anthrax attacks. Nothing to accept or reject. Nothing to later come back and admit to oneself that they were conned.

The 9/11 Psy-op had visuals repeated, repeated, repeated while coupled with who done it, who done it, who done it.

We have been told repeatedly; "Case Closed".

To even look at an alternative you have to risk being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

The majority believe ONE thing, I dare not deviate.

and then the usual rationales:

"Someone would have talked"

"They are too incompetent to have pulled it off"

"They would never hurt their own people"

"Bin Laden confessed"


The last Nova episode had a segment how they crossed the deadly 1917 flu virus (that they dug up) with the Avian Flu virus to "study it" so they can learn more about it.

"We're going to open the doors to hell so that we can study the heat."

1918 Flu
A virus that killed up to 50 million people is brought back to life to decipher its deadliness.

a half a million plastic coffins for the CDC?

Some thoughts

As I see it, the question raised here is why some intelligent people are willing to seriously examine the evidence of mid-scale false flag actions (or what David MacGregor calls "Machiavellian state terror," which I prefer, because it [1] does more to historically contextualize the phenomena and [2] takes into account that most of the alleged foreign terrorists aren't operating under a national flag but as part of an international network) but not grand scale ones.

As examples, it's considered basically respectable in mainstream discourse -- even if it's generally blacked out as though of little significance -- to suggest Machiavellian state terror was behind the anthrax scare, both 9/11 and '93 WTC bombing LIHOP, or the supposed revolutionary terrorism in Italy during the '70s and '80s.

Conversely, some analogous theories, which are at least as well supported by the empirical evidence, are simply beyond the pale: 9/11 MIHOP, of course; the London subway bombing; the destruction of the Murrah Building; or the American political assassinations of the '60s.

Putting aside some disinformation agents who figure that affirming some level of government conspiracy makes them more credible when it comes time to deny the conspiracy whose exposure really could take down the system (I'm always quite amused at how Alexander Cockburn keeps reminding us how he believes FDR deliberately provoked, had foreknowledge of, and placed a standdown order regarding the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the idea being that then we should then really trust him when he proceeds to dismiss ad hominem those who reject the OCT of 9/11 and the JFK assassination -- not that Cockburn is necessarily a planted agent: he may be just a sincere jerk), there is a real mental block for many around taking in the abundant evidence of the grand scale theories.

I think there two basic causes of this block, one or both of which may be present in people exhibiting this denial behavior (#2 can be seen as a special case of #1):

1) It's too emotionally painful or cognitively disturbing to absorb and integrate the fact that such coordinated sociopathic evil runs so deep and reaches so wide throughout our system of politics and mass communications.

2) The profundity of these horrors is so overwhelming that it threatens to undo the intellectual investments people have in studying and interpreting the world. If one accepts the truth of these Machiavellian state mega-terrors, it becomes awkward and foolish to resume one's old concerns and interests.

I want to talk about (2) a bit more in the context of my being a libertarian. At some point I recognized that if MIHOP is correct -- and my preliminary examination of the evidence wasn't leading me to any other conclusion -- then so many other interests with which I spent my spare time began to pale in comparison. How could I justify spending much time exploring questions of, say, intellectual property law when there's prima facie evidence that a well-situated elite faked passenger jetliner hijackings as a cover for blowing up occupied mega-skyscrapers, itself a cover for launching military invasions and occupations of large countries halfway round the world? Obviously my priorities needed adjusting.

In that vein, I've noticed that there are many people out there with some political or intellectual shtick, some old ax to grind, and 9/11 seems to threaten them because it suggests they need to let go of what's most comfortable and appealing to their predilections. They've got this old shoe that fits so cozily, and one of the last things they want is to be distracted by something profoundly new and unfamiliar that, by its very nature, threatens to dominate their political and intellectual thought and communications. And not just for a day or a week, but far into the future -- until the sociopathic super-elite is vanquished.

That's an important reason, I think, why younger people tend to be more receptive to 9/11 truth: They haven't invested themselves so much yet in some system for thinking about politics and the world generally.

In my mind, 9/11 and the

In my mind, 9/11 and the anthrax case are inextricably linked. .They were a one-two punch designed to drive fear in the American people so the neocon agenda could move forward without meaningful resistance. I think a lot of people are questioning the anthrax case, even in they haven't questioned 9/11, because the FBI screwed this up so badly that the official story strains credulity.

I see this as a huge opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. The anthrax case will open more people's minds to the possibility that the official 9/11 story is just as flimsy. We need to take advantage.

Clear Cut Case

I agree