AE911Truth Press Conference - Thursday 8/21/08 9am PDT / 12pm EDT

AE911Truth Press Conference
Thursday 8/21/08 9am PDT / 12pm EDT
Critical Response to NIST Final Report
on the Mysterious Collapse of WTC Building 7

Join the 430 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth for an important live (audio) Press Conference. The subject is the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 which was a 47-story, steel-framed, fire-proofed high-rise — the 3rd tower to fall straight down symmetrically at nearly free-fall speed on 9/11/01 with numerous reports of explosions and several tons of molten metal found in the basement carrying the "thermite fingerprint".

The AE911Truth tele-conference will follow immediately after the NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology) slide presentation and Q&A of their WTC 7 Final Report which will be Webcast beginning at 8am PDT / 11am EDT. See the NIST webcast announcement & details here.

In our AE911Truth response we will be documenting major flaws in the NIST report as well as the most serious omissions such as the collapse features of WTC 7 and the scientific forensic evidence of its explosive controlled demolition.

The Tele-Conference Dial-in # for listeners is (712) 432-1001
and the access code is: 442-618-649#
Call in at 12pm EDT

(Note that you will not be able to speak during the call)

(Panelists — you have been given a different access code)

You may also listen live to both press conferences at and possibly at WBAI Radio — NY.

Richard Gage - Media

Friday March 14, 2008

Richard Gage, AIA broke into mainstream radio last Friday morning March 7th at midnight in a one-hour interview on the Christine Craft show on KGO-810(San Francisco ABC)

Listening to it now

"The girder bone connects to the shin bone, the shin bone connects to the floor failures".

Listening to it. [NIST ~ Sham Sunder presentation]

Not impressed so far.

Edit: I was referring to the NIST call. They basically said office furniture fires brought down Building 7. Of course I'm impressed with Richard Gage and Kevin Ryan. Some good questions though from the press. For instance: Can office fires burn to a point that the floors released from the columns simultaneously etc. Hopefully AJFan or someone can post the audio archive here. Peace.

Do what you can. Spread to any architects and engineers in your area.

Sham Sunder... Damn Right... also a GROSS injustice !!!

Well I hope that NIST's report can explain...

These neatly and uniform cut columns from the lower west face of WTC7...

Looking at the second picture I can't help notice that many of the flanges look intact.

Free Image Hosting at     Free Image Hosting at


The below two pictures were taken from inside the Verizon building, they show a fish-eye lens close-up of a column that has rested against the wall, note the heat marks.

Free Image Hosting at     Free Image Hosting at


I also hope that the REAL inquiry covers the VERY suspicious ARSON like fires in the Securities and Exchange Commission offices and the resultant loss of evidence.

Free Image Hosting at


Good luck and best wishes

Photos of heat affected girders

I hadn't seen those photos of the WTC7 girders before. The ends look like they have been cut with something like termate. Were the photos taken before any demolition work started?

Based on the following two pictures of WTC7...

Both taken on the 13-Sep-2001 by WTC Transit Police (watermarked)... and clearly prior to the commencement of WTC7's clean-up.

Free Image Hosting at     Free Image Hosting at


In the first picture above, the WTC7 west wall columns are positioned the same as the photos I posted earlier.

To me they don't look like thermate burns, they look like the result of standard shaped cutter charges.

Personally, I believe that thermate (TH-3) was only used in WTC7 as a tool of arson and to create smoke.

Best wishes

Debunkers are all over the

Debunkers are all over the comments on the NYT's article on this --

bad reporting or writing or purposeful?

Quote from beginning of article: (emphasis mine to show my point)

"as they attempted to curb still-rampant speculation that explosives or fuel fires were responsible for the building’s collapse of Sept. 11, 2001."

Who has "rampant speculation that fuel fires were responsible"?

They already said that the fuel played no part, which is what many of us already said before them.

I just found that odd.

And what about this quote?: "It is the first skyscraper in modern times to collapse primarily as a result of a fire."

And this quote:

“Our take-home message today is the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” Dr. Sunder said. “It did not collapse from explosives or fuel oil fires.”

They ARBITRARILY ruled out explosives to start with and didn't even look into the possibility.

btw --- that Shyam Sunder scientist guy is the one who is going to burn --- in HELL

I think this is a BIG LIE

"The investigators said that if the city water main had not been broken during the collapse of the twin towers, the sprinkler system would likely have put out the fires at 7 World Trade Center, and the building would not have fallen."

Aren't there photos and video of fire fighters hosing down around WTC 7 with the hoses hooked up to hydrants???

The dog ate my diesel storage tanks

the lie started when they hoisted an emergency management bunker into a high rise building rather than putting it under ground out of the city . . . its all insane . . . explaining insanity can be so exhausting.


At 2:05 into this clip ~

It shows water pressure being available. Not sure if it is from the city water mains or the fire trucks, but it is noteworthy I think.

It's quite telling that...

... the following post was the Editor's Choice:

* * * * *

To any conspiracy theorists that doubt planes were used: I was on the street in lower Manhattan on 9/11. I missed seeing the first explosion, and saw the second one from an angle where I couldn't see the plane, just fire bursting from the side of the building. Naturally, seeing just an explosion I assumed it was a bomb for a few minutes. But many other horrified witnesses, some crying, had seen the plane and were telling the other watchers what had happened. Either the many thousands of people in lower Manhattan were all government agents, or you can believe them, and the many video recordings from many individual sources that show a plane hit the building. If you're going to imagine a government conspiracy please make it one that doesn't paint thousands upon thousands of New Yorkers as liars.

Second, some people on the ground suspected the buildings were going to fall. After ten minutes of stunned staring people began debating if the buildings were going to collapse. One man in front of me gave me the impression he was an architect, telling his friend that a fire like that could weaken steel beams and might collapse the building. Everyone began to retreat north, a smart move because the people that left then weren't coated in ash. If a bunch of random people on the ground can predict the obvious I'm not surprised the BBC can.

Third, regarding WTC 7. What was accomplished by destroying a much smaller, not famous, empty evacuated building after the Twin Towers had been destroyed? Arguing that 9/11 is an elaborate plot to destroy the small building next to the World Trade Center is like claiming John Wilkes Booth was actually hoping to damage the armrest of Lincoln's chair.

Thanks for the chuckle ...

It helped to cool me down after listening to the NIST parody this morning. The same thing was going on in my mind too about your comparative between Ivin's case and Bldg. 7 assessment. The same investigating M.O..


Agreed. What someone said in another thread, 'After 7 years, this is the best they could come up with?', applies equally to the FBI re Ivins as to NIST re Building 7.



does one get to those comments on the NYT story?

You must...

...scroll to the bottom of the comments page and then,

"Log In to Post a Comment "

Of course, you will have to create an account with the old whore if you don't have one already.

"But truthfully, I [still] don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Dir. Bldg. & Fire Research Lab. (NIST)
"We are [still] unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (NIST)

I Posted this at NYTimes


the FULL and UNCUT interview with Barry Jennings (office of Emergency Management)

Barry was in WTC7 on the morning of 9/11 and puts his account on the record.


— Joe, Dallas

I posted it. NYTimes removed it.

North Texans for 911 Truth (new site)
North Texans for 911 Truth Meetup Site

EMAIL every architect & engineer that you can find !

Email every Architect and Engineer that you can find with the website. You can also attach the "Hard Evidence Letter" --> (or even mail it to them). {{I have emailed over 300 as of today. And I have mailed out more than 170 DVDs/info to firms.}}

Here is a source of architects --->
Your state has a source for engineers ---> and...

One Minute Video

BELOW - The first 2 minutes tell the story.