Nist Final Report Uses Fire/ Single Column Failure(column 79)/Thermal Expansion?

Hello Truthseekers & Truthtellers,

Nist Final Report WTC7 Uses Fire/ Single Column Failure (column 79)/ Thermal Expansion as the reason for the collapse of WTC7. So here we are again repeating history. We went from the single bullet (Kennedy Assassination) to the single column. I guess if the "single theory" worked in the past they figured it could work again. NOT!

Take Care Matt

Are you saying WTC 7 was a

Are you saying WTC 7 was a house of cards??/ AAAAAHHHH!!!

"Neither explosives nor fuel oil fires

"Neither explosives nor fuel oil fires played a role in the collapse of WTC 7"

Do they really think we're this stupid?

I suppose we won't need demolition companies anymore? Just find the right column and the whole building will suffer a global collapse. Look at the money people could save?

NIST debunked itself.

A thermal analysis was conducted of Column 79 typical of lower floors (W14x730 section with 2 in. x 26 in. cover plates) and 7/8 in. of thermal insulation (see Chapter 9). Based on the knowledge that the yield strength of steel is reduced to 50 percent of its room temperature value at approximately 500 ºC to 600 ºC, it was found that it would take roughly 6 h of continuous exposure from a fully developed fire to
reach these temperatures.
Heating of a column could occur as a result of a building contents fire, or as had been suggested, from a fuel oil fire resulting from rupture of a fuel line supplying one of several emergency generators in the building. Prediction of growth and spread of building contents fires (Chapter 9) indicated that such fires did not persist at any one location for more than about 20 min to 30 min, which is consistent with observations of fires in windows (Chapter 5).

Therefore, it would not have been possible for a building contents fire to have heated a massive, insulated column such as Column 79 to the point of failure.