I love how official story enthusiasts immediately latch on to each and every theory that the government releases, even before it has been thoroughly tested independently. Debunkers have already been caught previously supporting the now defunct pancake theory for explaining the collapse of the twin towers which the government once supported but then later abandoned. 9/11 truthers were called conspiracy theorists by debunkers for challenging this theory until of course they were eventually vindicated. NIST in fact has changed their minds many times over the years as their claims have repeatedly failed to hold up to scrutiny. You see, debunkers don’t care about the actual details or feasibility of such theories so long as they come directly from the government. Yet it has been the government itself which has gotten it wrong time and time again. The brainwashed debunkers have been trained to look beyond this. Their deeply ingrained desire to believe all that they are told by big brother outstrips any need to be objective and analyze alternative explanations. They’ll believe any lie, so long as it happens to be the newest lie and it's presented in a convincing official package. It's the same rationale that has allowed so many Americans to blindly believe the lies about WMDs. As you can probably tell, many naive debunkers have not hesitated for a second to hop on to this latest bandwagon of manipulation.

Breakdown:

Whatever happened to the “giant scoop mark” on the south side of building seven that was supposed to have been the primary cause of the collapse? Yet another abandoned theory once readily accepted as reality by debunkers?

"...But the structural damage from the falling debris was not significant enough to threaten the tower’s stability, Dr. Sunder said..."

I was called a conspiracy theorist by many for questioning the debris theory and now I have been vindicated, at least according to this recent study for what it's worth.

We were also initially told that the collapse was caused by fires resulting from the building's diesel tanks. The debunkers gladly accepted that explanation as well at the time. Too bad that theory once accepted as gospel has been rescinded as well.

"...A separate, preliminary report issued in 2002 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency questioned whether diesel fuel tanks installed in the tower to supply backup generators — including one that powered the Giuliani administration’s emergency “bunker” — might have been to blame.
But S. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, based here in the suburbs of Washington, also rejected that theory on Thursday, even as he acknowledged that the collapse had been something of a puzzle.
“Our take-home message today is the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” Dr. Sunder said at a news conference at the institute’s headquarters. “It did not collapse from explosives or fuel oil fires...”

I was called a conspiracy theorist by many for questioning the diesel theory and now I have been vindicated, at least according to this recent study for what it's worth.

I guess the next logical question is, how long before this latest theory is abandoned too? The debunkers will just have to sit tight and hope with their fingers crossed that this one isn't eventually discarded along with the rest. No doubt I will once again be called a conspiracy theorist for questioning this latest theory. Unfortunately for the critics though, my track record so far has been much better than theirs.

Other questions:

Will NIST address questions involving the existence of molten steel in the basement as described by numerous eyewitnesses?

Will NIST interview the numerous eyewitness and first responders who saw and heard explosions who inevitably will not accept this most recent explanation?

Will NIST explain why buildings 5 and 6 didn't also fall as a result of burning office supplies and furnishings seeing as how they suffered much more damage and were completely gutted?

Will NIST address the issue of free-fall speed?

These and many other questions soon to follow will most certainly be ignored just as they've always been because apparently the easy answers just don't exist? One thing is for sure, we can't expect the debunkers to look any deeper in to this. If the government says so, it must be true because politicians and imperialist war mongers never lie. That's the damaged belief system that allows psychos to get away with murder.

You’re considered a wacky conspiracy theorist when you point any of this out. It’s much easier for debunkers to avoid meaningful debate and attack you personally rather than having to admit that they have been duped once again. They must protect their fragile egos. With so much propaganda being disseminated, it's clearly difficult for the debunkers to keep track of which theory they're supposed to believe and which to ignore at any given time. Who would've thought that being mislead would require so much effort?