Here are some other links of interest here;
http://911blogger.com/taxonomy/term/2891

Benton Partin's position is that there were multiple charges;

"To cause the damage pattern that occurred to the Murrah building, there would have to have been demolition charges at several supporting column bases, at locations not accessible from the street, to supplement the truck bomb damage. Indeed, a careful examination of photographs showing the collapsed column bases reveals a failure mode produced by demolition charges and not by a blast from the truck bomb. To understand what caused the damage to the Murrah Building, one needs to understand some basics about the use and nature of explosives. First, blast through air is a very inefficient energy coupling mechanism against heavily reinforced concrete beams and columns. Second, blast damage potential initially falls off more rapidly than an inverse function of the distance cubed. That is why in conventional weapons development, one seeks accuracy over yield for hard targets. That is also why in the World Trade Center bombing (where the only source of blast damage was a truck bomb) the column in the middle of the bombed-out cavity was relatively untouched, although reinforced concrete floors were completely stripped away for several floors above and below the point of the bomb’s detonation (see Time Magazine, 3-8-93, p 35). By contrast, heavily reinforced concrete structures can be destroyed effectively through detonation of explosives in contact with the reinforced concrete beams and columns. For example, the entire building remains in Oklahoma City were collapsed with 100-plus relatively small charges inserted into drilled holes in the columns. The total weight of all charges was on the order of 200 pounds."

http://www.physics911.net/generalpartinreport

The Elgin blast effects study is here;

http://911blogger.com/node/15154

"This study has been undertaken and this report has been prepared in order to develop parametric data for use in analyzing the event of April 19, 1995 in which the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was destroyed by a terrorist attack utilizing explosive compounds.

Due to a limited amount of information in the public domain regarding blast effects against structures, a study was undertaken in which photographic data combined with known test parameters was analyzed to provide baseline data for estimating the effectiveness of explosive devices against reinforced concrete structures. The maximum potential blast pressure is used as the determinate factor in establishing resistance to blast and overall blast effect.

A study was conducted to map the pressure regions on a vertical face wall of a reinforced concrete test structure to provide baseline data. Data for the study was obtained from General Benton K. Partin, USAF (Ret). This information was supplied to him at his request by the Armament Directorate, Wright Laboratory, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. A copy of this memorandum can be found in Appendix B.

Utilizing data from this study various conclusions can be drawn about the nature and components of the event of April 19, 1995 at the Murrah Federal Building.

This report is limited in scope to providing basic data and furnishing certain limited conclusions about the events in Oklahoma City and is being produced as part of a larger more detailed study of the events which occurred there."

The ANFO bomb itself can be argued against very strongly and logically as the sole source of destruction, but the demolition itself may not have needed the use of more exotic bombs, as Partin seems to indicate. Just moles on the inside to locate the support columns and get 'er done.

--------------------------------------------

Incidentally, Bill Deagle lectured last year at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth conference that OKC and the WTC were demolished by nukes;

This caught the attention of quite a few people, including Steven Jones, who confronted Deagle about the evidence that Deagle was basing his conclusions upon;

The lobby was no place for a debate, so the organizers of the conference secured a quiet room for Jones and Deagle to meet (you'll need to turn up the volume for this, I didn't know how to amp the audio when I posted this);

Deagle promised evidence of his claims back in July of 2007, and said he would have it in weeks.

So far, nothing has emerged. I suspect this is because nukes were NOT used at WTC.

However, Jones and Deagle did agree that proper protocols need to be followed with any future collection of evidence (turn your audio back down!);

I don't know about you but to me there is resemblance between these two buildings, how they looked after the blasts. See link below:
http://investigate911.se/images/Miscellaneous/Oklahoma_City_vs_World_Tra...