The Questionable Timing of the Pakistan Blast

by Scott Creighton

(I wonder how long it takes to build a truck bomb.)

Let me see if I got this straight now.

Over the past 7 years we have dumped billions and billions of dollars into Pakistan to help with the Global War on Terror™. Yet, we know that former President Musharraf spent much of that money beefing up his military presence on the border of India, while another large part of that money, just went missing. Some of that money was traced to election fraud attempts. All of this, and the accepted wisdom is that the Taliban and bin Laden, are in Pakistan (of course I think he is dead, but that is beside the point).

When Musharraf lost the election, he shut down the democracy in Pakistan and arrested judges and opposition party leaders. Eventually, Pakistan shamed us by actually impeaching their president for corruption, while ours gets off Scott-Free thanks to Nancy Pelosi and a complicit congress.

Along comes a new President, President Asif Zardari, one that isn’t in the pocket of BushCo and low and behold, we start ramping up the rhetoric about needing to attack inside Pakistan “when ever we feel like it“.

They even get the leading “progressive” man-god, Obama, to spin the same bullshit story.

Now, after several weeks of international bad press because of drone planes being piloted by 19 year olds with joy-sticks in California, blowing up families in Pakistan willy-nilly, after all that, the “terrorists” in Pakistan decide to blow up a second rate hotel there, killing civilians, and making them the bad guys once again? How’s that for the worst timing ever, huh? Well, the worst timing for them and the best possible timing for those troubled U.S. Military PR guys and all the politicians who had been saying just a month ago we need to step up military action in Pakistan.

Let’s face it, the Global War on Terror™ is the biggest thing since sliced bread for making serious cash, removing those troubling restrictions, and undermining the constitution at every turn.

This morning the spin is that the “terrorist” organizations did this too send a message that they want the government of Pakistan to quit cooperating with the U.S.War on Terror™. Nevermind that just a few days ago, President Zardari came out saying that Pakistan’s sovereignty was more important than America’s War on Terror™.

That’s right. Just one week ago, Pakistan was threatening to pull out of Bush’s War on Terror and today they have more reason than ever to stay put.

I wonder how long it takes to build a truck bomb.

The end result of this attack is to give the U.S. Army and the American politicians all the reason in the world that they would need to continue attacking Pakistan’s population, and taking the international pressure off the Americans to stop bombing their country.

This is what we are supposed to believe?

We are supposed to believe that these “terrorists”, when they finally have the sympathy of the world and the eyes of the world are watching Pakistan’s plight very closely, not to mention the fact that Pakistan’s president just announced his intentions to pull out of the Global War on Terror™, they all of a sudden decide to blow up a hotel, for no apparent reason, giving Pakistan every reason to remain an alley in the war? Are you kidding?

If you aren’t familiar with the CIA’s history of false-flag operations in the rest of the world, now might be a good time to Google it.

This has the markings of that type of operation written all over it.

You have a newly elected regime that isn’t as inclined to hand over control of their country to the U.S. when all of a sudden, out of now-where, the “leftist” terrorist start bombing the people of the country in order to create chaos and fear in the population. This is either blamed on the President or the regime that U.S. companies don’t like, or they start to foster the idea that the new anti-American leadership can’t provide the protection the people need. And thus, the CIA’s actions change the course of that country by covert, terrorist means.

It’s on record; it’s been done many times by the CIA. Not just in the Middle East, but also, Central America, South American, Italy, Cuba, and many others.

So, the recent attack in Pakistan takes place just in time to salvage BushCo’s all important Global War on Terror™. I mean, how do you think it would look if the U.S.’s main alley were to just pack up and take off? Some terrorist cell leader somewhere is getting called on the carpet for this one. Or, maybe not. You decide.

I was thinking the same

I was thinking the same thing, but certainly couldn't express it as well as Creighton did.

Thanks, Willy L. for posting this.

Don't we recognize the pattern here?

This seems to be a pseudo false flag attack.

And yesterday morning, when I first heard of the Marriott bombing in Pakistan, I wondered aloud about how long would it take for the media to associate al Qaeda with this. First it was an "al-Qaeda-like bombing" - now it's "presumably al Qaeda" maybe to grandfather in legitimacy for the U.S. raids into Pakistan this last month without Pakistan's (yet another sovereign nation) permission?

Also, strangely enough (**sarcasm**), many of the photos showing the burned-out/bombed wreckage of cars there outside the Marriott hotel looked very similar to the photos of the cars in NYC on 9/11/01.

I kept waiting for the building to "collapse"...

...into it's own footprint. I mean, after all, isn't that what fire does to buildings these days? Or is that just ones owned by Larry Silverstein? Did you know he is the only building owner in history that that has happened to? It's a good thing for those people in the hotel that Lucky Larry didn't own that one, huh?

US Marines were seen...

US Marines were seen transporting metal crates inside the Marriot Hotel the day before, security personnel was not allowed to know for what purpose

Don't forget about Yemen...

We have seen not one but two "terrorist" attacks in the last week. The other being a twin car bombing attack on the US embassy in Yemen, the country of the USS Cole attack:

"Security analysts say the sophistication of the attack, in which the assailants were disguised in military uniforms and cars, ..."

I think we can easily conclude that both attacks last week were staged to put the fear of "al-Qaeda" (whatever that may be) back into people during the election cycle. The timing and the targets make it obvious.

We could also view this as being a ramp-up of false flags designed to create creditability for some "October surprise" attack in the US or allied countries. I mean, we know that 9/11 did not come out of nowhere, they spent years bombing US embassies and such to make the big lie appear credible. The same plan could be in effect here.

As the US economy is imploded, this sort of distraction will increasingly be necessary to keep the population under control.

Why Has The U.S. Tolerated Pakistani Nukes?

Our Council on Foreign Relations dominated government tolerates a nuclear Pakistan.

And Pakistan is the alleged home of Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. (Whoever they are)

Yet our friends at the Council on Foreign Relations have oddly "warned" us all of the threat of nuclear terrorism:

"This film is based on facts. Some events depicted may have already happened. Some may be happening now. All may happen in the near future if we don't act now to prevent them."

Expect anything.


One more big timing problem here... Ramadan. This year, Ramadan is observed from September 1 to September 30.

It highly unlikely that bona fide Islamicists would bomb during their holy month, this is like Mohamed Atta drinking alcohol while preparing to meet Allah. It is ridiculous..

Great point. The U.S.

Great point.

The U.S. Marines were probably the unwitting Trojan horse.

This is going to help our French president !

Herblay FRANCE

bonjour ,

today the 22th of September the French Government will ask the Parliament the autorization to prolonge the intervention of the French armed forces in Afghanistan.

You can imagine how this criminal act against the Pakistani will help sway the vote.

This criminal act has the hallmark of 911.
Massive number of dead, lots of fire, concerning lots of civils, no immediate revendication of the act, and a good scene setting. The trucks were filmed this time so there can be no doubt ....... "Shock and awe" treatment all the way !
( Please see the film "wag the dog" as it is very instructive on how to hoolywoodise a fiction war for political reasons." )

As the French television said last night this is a Pakistani "11th of September" ( 911 ) so you see guys why the 911 truth must come out. The criminals will not stop untill they are put behind bars ! The criminals which did this act are likely to be the same that did the 11 september 2001 attacks.



PS I can imagine that our president will shoot up in the public opinion polls like George Bush does every time that Ben Ladin comes to his help.

More questions...

Why Would “Terrorists” Want To Decapitate Anti-US Leadership In Pakistan?

Foreign Press Reports “Marriott Marines Mystery”

And more...

Because You’ll Believe Anything: Unknown Terrorist Group Claims Responsibility For Marriot Bombing

US has been implicated in false flag terrorism in Iraq!

Given the following, US or one of its dodgy allies is a likely culprit in the bombings in Pakistan.

'The former collaborator went on: "the unit that I was with settled in the presidential palace in the al-A'zamiyah district. We were allowed to visit our relatives and relations in Baghdad once a month, and so I would go visit my family in 'Madinat as-Sadr’ in eastern Baghdad. But after things began to get worse and the armed men began to shoot at everyone leaving the palace, I asked my family to come to the palace every now and then so I could see them. My job was being a guard, but after a time that situation changed and the American occupation forces put me in charge of a group of a unit that carried out assassinations in the streets of Baghdad," he said.

"Our task was to carry out assassinations of individuals. The US occupation army would supply us with their names, pictures, and maps of their daily movements to and from their place of residence and we were supposed to kill the Shi'i, for example, in the al-A'zamiyah, and kill the Sunni in the of 'Madinat as-Sadr’, and so on."

"Anyone in the unit who made a mistake was killed. Three members of my team were killed by US occupation forces after they failed to assassinate Sunni political figures in Baghdad. A US force that had been so-ordered eliminated them. That took place two years ago," the former collaborator recalled.

The former collaborator said that the Americans have a unit for "dirty jobs." That unit is a mix of Iraqis, Americans, and foreigners and of the security detachments that are deployed in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities. This unit doesn’t only carry out assassinations, but some of them specialize in planting bombs and car bombs in neighborhoods and markets. This unit carries out operations in which wanted people whom the American army does not want killed are arrested.

The former collaborator said that "operations of planting car bombs and blowing up explosives in markets are carried out in various ways, the best-known and most famous among the US troops is placing a bomb inside cars as they are being searched at checkpoints. Another way is to put bombs in the cars during interrogations. After the desired person is summoned to one of the US bases, a bomb is place in his car and he is asked to drive to a police station or a marked for some purpose and there his car blows up."

The testimony of the former collaborator is consistent with some western reports that have disclosed the involvement of US military personnel in bombings that target Iraqi civilians. The British reporter Robert Fisk, AMSI noted, had recently met with Iraqis in Syria concerning such "black operations" carried out by the Americans.'