Support 911Blogger


The Anthrax Case Reopens: Why Did the FBI Let the Fort Detrick Scientists Investigate Themselves?

The Anthrax Case Reopens: Why Did the FBI Let the Fort Detrick Scientists Investigate Themselves?

Tuesday 30 September 2008

by: Bill Simpich, t r u t h o u t

The past week's Congressional anthrax hearings revealed that public pressure is keeping the doors open in the anthrax case. FBI Director Robert Mueller promised that the FBI will provide their evidence to a panel of experts for scientific evaluation. The battle will now turn to the independence of this panel, and whether "all evidence" or merely "scientific evidence" will be under review.

During the hearing, Mueller found himself under fire by Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman John Conyers for not having answers to their questions. Republican Arlen Specter was furious at Mueller for his unwillingness to assure them that Congress would have a role in determining the panel's composition.

Meanwhile, new evidence shows just how deeply wrong ABC and Washington Post reporters have been over the years on their coverage of the anthrax attacks. They can't have it both ways: Either they made repeated "mistakes" by relying on their sources, or several people deliberately lied in order to advance war on Iraq.

In his recent book Taking Heat, former White House secretary Ari Fleischer wrote that Bush was more shook up by the anthrax attacks than by any other event. White House officials repeatedly pressed Mueller to prove it was a second-wave assault by al-Qaeda or Iraq. After days of provocative statements designed to scare the American people, Cheney himself believed that he had been exposed to anthrax. Although the test results were negative, October 18, 2001, was the moment when Cheney decided to withdraw to an "undisclosed location" and carry biodefense protection during all of his mysterious travels.

More: http://www.truthout.org/093008A

The True Story Is Emerging....

Francis A Boyle - Alex Jones Show - 8/21/2008

August 21, 2008

Alex Jones talks with Francis A. Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law and bioweapons advisor for the Bush Senior administration about his belief the anthrax attacks were orchestrated to frighten Senators into supporting the USA Patriot Act.

http://www.radiodujour.com/people/boyle_francis/

Bush was shaken up?

I don't trust Ari Fleischer to tell the truth about this. He is a propagandist by profession and he has shown himself to be a promoter of war with Iran. He has an agenda that won't be hindered by having to tell the truth.

Shaken not stirred.

North Texans for 911 Truth (new site)
http://tellstruth.webs.com/index.htm
North Texans for 911 Truth Meetup Site
http://9-11.meetup.com/249/

First responders need our help

I've set up a group here: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Helpdyingfirstresponderssurvive/?y... the fealgoodfoundation is there and here
http://www.fealgoodfoundation.com/ I'm using Mammoth List as a tool to raise funds here: http://www.mammothlist.net/?r=12241 I thought that instead of just giving donations if people went to the trouble to do a little more it could be a huge windfall for these men and women. the gift that keeps giving so to speak. Either way please help these 1st rresponders they are us and we are them.

Great article. It pretty

Great article. It pretty much summarizes everything that has been going on regarding the anthrax attacks investigation. Thanks for posting.

Bullshit Alert

"Everyone was stunned by what they saw: The silicon was growing naturally within the anthrax spores - it was not artificially added, and there was no coating or residue of silicon anywhere outside the anthrax."

Silicon is an element. It does not "grow." It certainly doesn't magically "grow naturally" in the perfect manner to weaponize tthe anthrax. However it got there, it was not "naturally."

This is an absurd leap of logic that they are peddling. In a case that is already highly suspicious, for dozens of reasons, this is one more highly, highly, highly suspicious claim. It should be called out and met with disbelief and derision.

" In February 2002, Sandia materials scientist Joe Michael and his team found that silicon was indeed present in the anthrax. Then the team stepped it up a notch with the use of highly sensitive microscopes not available to earlier researchers. Everyone was stunned by what they saw: The silicon was growing naturally within the anthrax spores - it was not artificially added, and there was no coating or residue of silicon anywhere outside the anthrax. The team could find no way for the silicon to enter the spores without leaving any residue.

By March of 2002, Michael was convinced that there was no additive or coating in the anthrax. However, Michael and his team were forced to keep silent until last month, when their promise to keep silent was lifted. Even when the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology mistakenly identified a finding of silicon and water in the anthrax as "silica" (silicon dioxide) in late 2002, and Matsumoto used this story as the centerpiece of his Washington Post article on the anniversary of the attacks, Michael had to maintain silence."

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

John Doraemi publishes Crimes of the State Blog
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/

johndoraemi --at-- yahoo.com.