The world is ruled by a Satanic cult

http://www.sheilacasey.com/2008/11/the-world-is-ruled-by-a-satanic-cult.html

I think you will find this woman's experiences interesting. Interesting and horrifying. Evidently the New World Order is already in place and ruling -- just not out in the open yet.

Svali escaped from the Satanic Illuminati cult.

They will force a two year old child to kill a kitten -- or else be shocked mercilessly. As they get older they are forced to kill larger things, even human babies.

This corroborates a book I've been reading by researcher Dave McGowan, "Programmed to Kill." It's the worst thing I've ever read. The evil of 9/11 is nothing compared to this: the ritual rape, torture and murder of children, while nations everywhere refuse to prosecute the murderers, despite abundant evidence of their crimes.

The sadists doing this are the same ones who control our planet from behind the scenes. Through their centuries-old control of banking, they have made vast amounts of money out of nothing, thanks to the sleight of hand known as fractional reserve banking, and now control governments, education, and the media.

There is a reason why you never learned in school exactly where money comes from.

questions

from this article on your site:
Quotes from Carroll Quigley, Bill Clinton's prof at Georgetown University
http://www.sheilacasey.com/2008/11/quotes-from-carroll-quigley-bill-clin...

How can the following quote be from Quigley's book? Was it in an edition after the first one? What page?

"I am now quite sure that 'Tragedy and Hope' was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom."

This one sounds weird; Quigley's book is sympathetic to the power elite's rule- what page is it on?

"For the first time in its history, Western civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century."

Do the Rockefeller, Morgan and other bankers worship "Satan" or evil spirits? It seems they do love money and power, are ambitious, may have an ideology, and can be ruthless.

The CIA, DoD, KGB, Mossad and other intel/spy agencies have used sex (and money, drugs, promotions/prestige, "white" or black lies, whatever works) to control and/or blackmail people who are susceptible to these things. Someone who films a married Congressman cheating with another woman now has power over him. If the Congressman likes little boys or girls, even more power, as this would be even more scandalous than being caught with an adult.

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

letter to a friend

All the others were from T&H, that quote about suppression was in a letter to a friend.

http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quotes_by/carroll+quigley

The power elite were not happy with Quigley's book.

If you go to the link I supplied for essays by Svali you can form your own conclusions about who this secret cabal is that rules the world from behind the scenes and practices satanic rituals.

Didn't get what point you're trying to make with the links you posted. I clicked on them, but found nothing related to this topic.

the 2 links at the bottom of

the 2 links at the bottom of my comments are my "signature".

"letter to a friend" about the suppression makes more sense than his book. For some reason, liberty-tree.ca provides no info about who they are, their site or how they verify the quotes they publish are accurate.

{p. 950} "This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected , both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe) , but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:re5V91DSZkIJ:www.questionsquestions...

http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/quigley_carroll.tragedy_hope_banking...

"I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments."

His statement above about "no aversion" seems to contradict the sentiment here:

"For the first time in its history, Western civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century."

Unless the Rockefeller, Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb corrupt, criminal ruling cabal was not a part of the "conspiracy" that Quigley approved of?

I'm not a Quigley expert and i doubt i'll get interested enough to dig thru 1348 pages, but the latter quote still seems unlikely to have Quigley as the source.

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

W. Cleon Skousen wonders the same thing...

...in his book "The Naked Capitalist." On page 4 he explains this seeming contradiction, ie, why Quiqley would expose the conspiracy if he supports it, by writing:

"He (Quigley) says, in effect, (on pages 979-980) that it is now too late for the little people to turn back the tide. In a spirit of kindness he is therefore urging them not to fight the noose which is already around their necks. He feels certain that those who do will only choke themselves to death."

It seems that Quiqley somehow beleived that if we can only give up our desire for autonomy and self-determination, that the NWO will usher in a "millennium of peace and prosperity."

I haven't read his 1,348 page book, so cannot proffer by own opinion of what his motivations were.

However, even in this, there is contradiction. If it's going to be nothing but "peace and prosperity," then why refer to it as a "noose?"

One possibility is that this is the only way that Quigley felt he could get the info out and live. Since he lived another 11 years after the book was published in 1966, it seems his strategy worked. Regardless of his motivations, I am grateful to him for writing the book. The fact that it was suppressed says alot about the veracity of his claims.

clarification; i said

clarification; i said "letter to a friend" makes more sense than inclusion in his book (your words at your blog), in the context of his remark about suppression; i don't know if it's a genuine quote. The "friend" was not named at liberty-tree.ca, and if the friend wanted anonymity, it would help if more info was given on how the letter came to be made public.

Regarding why he was documenting the hidden history of the "international Anglophile network", Quigley himself said (also quoted above) "I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected , both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe) , but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."

Right, it seems Quigley believed there was nothing We the Sheeple could do about this "network", and should let the benign bankers rule us without complaint or question; he is not averse to what they're doing, which he apparently believes is the best possible order; he objects to their wanting England to be divided from Europe, and he thinks they should rule in the open, not in secret.

Sheila- "If it's going to be nothing but "peace and prosperity," then why refer to it as a "noose?""

Did Quigley refer to it as a "noose"? You're quoting from the Naked Capitalist when you say "noose"; Skousen, by saying "in effect", indicates he's interpreting/paraphrasing Quigley.

If there was anything in Quigley's book about bankers worshipping Satan and raping/sacrificing little boys and girls, i think it would've been made public by now.

And since the following quote doesn't read or sound like Quigley's other stuff, until someone can provide a page number and i check it for myself, i'm not going to assume Quigley said it; rather, it seems more likely to be a hoax intended to distract, discredit and confuse:

"For the first time in its history, Western civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century."

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

I'm starting to doubt your good will in this discussion

Loose Nuke,

What kind of hoax would this be? Who is being discredited inappropriately? That paragraph is very much in line with Quigley's message, as I understand it.

I don't have the book, and it's not available for search in Google books, but your suspicions are misplaced. Entering "This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century." into Google brought up 13 sites that attribute it to Quigley. This is not some aberration.

Yes, of course I know that noose was Skousen's word. The meaning does not hinge on the exact wording.

I never said that Quiqley's book contained anything about satanic rituals. Where did you get that idea?

You seem to be nit-picking, as if trying to discredit me, and I have no idea why. Do you for some reason doubt my honesty or integrity?

In fact, your approach is much like what I've seen at JREF, where they try to find any weakness or error, however trivial, and hammer away at it as if that invalidates the larger point the other person is making.

What is your agenda?

this is eerily similar to a discussion happening at TruthAction

9/11-NEW WORLD ORDER: MEANS, MOTIVE, OPPORTUNITY
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4689

Where i make my views as clear as i can, on the importance of making sure quotes are legit before calling them "quotes"; if they can't be verified, then when citing them it seems more appropriate to refer to them as "statements found on the internet that are attributed to [name]"

Here i will respond to Sheila:

Sheila- "I'm starting to doubt your good will in this discussion- What kind of hoax would this be? Who is being discredited inappropriately? That paragraph is very much in line with Quigley's message, as I understand it."

Loose Nuke- I am interested in the truth about 9/11 and establishing a just economic order; can anyone tell me why banning interest and charging a tax on money is a bad idea?
The NATURAL ECONOMIC ORDER- Silvio Gesell
http://www.appropriate-economics.org/ebooks/neo/neo2.htm

I agreed with Sheila that Quigley said the quote i posted in my comments above; i even provided the ENTIRE quote, where he says he's not "averse" to the activities and plans of the "international Anglophile network", and i provided links to questionsquestions.net (Eric Salter- no problems that i've seen) and for backup reference only, wantoknow.info (Fred Burks- believes in UFOs and dolphins and posts some weird stuff, but love too; weird, not sure what to make of him- i hope everyone has good intentions, but i don't trust anyone or thing on the web)

S- "I don't have the book, and it's not available for search in Google books, but your suspicions are misplaced. Entering "This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century." into Google brought up 13 sites that attribute it to Quigley. This is not some aberration."

LN- I haven't read the book either, but i'm not claiming the "junta" (did Quigley really refer to Rockefeller, et al as a "junta"??? that's not in character) quote is in the book; i'm suggesting that as Salter's site says the other, more complete quote, is in the book on pg. 950, it's probably there; but i haven't posted anything on my site claiming it is.

If it's not in the book, it doesn't matter how many sites it's on; any sites that it is on have discredited themselves.

S- "Yes, of course I know that noose was Skousen's word. The meaning does not hinge on the exact wording."

Quote from S comment above: "However, even in this, there is contradiction. If it's going to be nothing but "peace and prosperity," then why refer to it as a "noose?""

LN- Contradiction where? Skousen said noose; do you have a Quigley quote posted anywhere on the internet where he "refer[s] to it as a "noose?""

S- "I never said that Quiqley's book contained anything about satanic rituals. Where did you get that idea?"

LN- Sheila blogs about bankers controlling the world, and the title of this post is "The world is ruled by a Satanic cult"; the post just before it at her blog is the Quigley one. EDIT: I noted, above, "If there was anything in Quigley's book about bankers worshipping Satan and raping/sacrificing little boys and girls, i think it would've been made public by now."

"You seem to be nit-picking, as if trying to discredit me, and I have no idea why. Do you for some reason doubt my honesty or integrity?"

LS- Sheila, do you agree that when you attribute quotes to a person, they should be things that person said? Especially when they're in writing, in a book, which can be verified- a nearby library or bookstore may have a copy you could flip thru.

S- "In fact, your approach is much like what I've seen at JREF, where they try to find any weakness or error, however trivial, and hammer away at it as if that invalidates the larger point the other person is making."

LN- Sheila is claiming that Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope, "For the first time in its history, Western civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century."

I'm saying this does not sound like Quigley; in fact, it sounds like a hoax. You say you have not checked the book and don't know what page it's on.

S- "What is your agenda?"

LS- In the larger picture, as I said above, I am interested in the truth about 9/11 and establishing a just economic order. Here and on the web, accuracy in blogging and commenting; misinfo and disinfo is used against social movements, wittingly, unwittingly, even accidentally- we should all strive for accuracy. If anyone can find any errors or BS on my blog, please point them out- i don't want to be spreading disinfo and BS:
http://911reports.com

EDIT: What's your agenda, Sheila?

And, everyone- start a blog for truth:
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

I have revised my post

to reflect only those quotes which could be found at:

http://alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org/lp/Hancock/CD-ROMS/GlobalFederatio...

I am surprised that so many sites list quotes for Quigley which are evidently not in the book, and stand corrected on that point. Of course I want my blog to be accurate, my only agenda is the truth.

However your approach, LN, leaves much to be desired. Your misrepresentation, in statements like:

"If there was anything in Quigley's book about bankers worshipping Satan and raping/sacrificing little boys and girls, i think it would've been made public by now"

indicates that truth seeking is not your main priority.

S- "I have revised my post-

S- "I have revised my post- to reflect only those quotes which could be found at:

http://alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org/lp/Hancock/CD-ROMS/GlobalFederatio...

I am surprised that so many sites list quotes for Quigley which are evidently not in the book, and stand corrected on that point. Of course I want my blog to be accurate, my only agenda is the truth."

LN- Personally, i'm not surprised that people are making up bogus quotes that mislead people and posting them all over the web; it's an effective disruption technique, although the nature of the network age seems to be making it less and less effective, as technological improvements keep making it easier and easier to dig up, publicize, find out about and verify facts.

S- "However your approach, LN, leaves much to be desired. Your misrepresentation, in statements like:

"If there was anything in Quigley's book about bankers worshipping Satan and raping/sacrificing little boys and girls, i think it would've been made public by now"

indicates that truth seeking is not your main priority."

LN- Please explain how my statement is "misrepresentation"; it's an observation, (could be construed as sarcasm) and i meant it to be taken at face value- i did not say you had said that Quigley said this- the title and subject of your blog post is "the world is ruled by a satanic cult; do you feel you've sufficiently documented this statement in your blog? I don't see that you have.

Is there anything else I've written here or anywhere else that "indicates that truth seeking is not [my] main priority."?

I expressed skepticism about the legitimacy of one of the Quigley "quotes" and asked for the page number- you admitted you don't know the page number and haven't read the book, and have removed that quote from your blog.

I can't vouch for alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org; Ibrahim/HumanBeingsFirst blog posted a link to it on your article, saying "Hi, "Tragedy and Hope - A History of the World in Our Time" can also be read online, all 1300+ pages of it in volumes 1 - 8, courtesy of GlobalFederation at the alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org"

I looked at it, but didn't see how to access all 1300+ pages at this link:
http://alexanderhamiltoninstitute.org/lp/Hancock/CD-ROMS/GlobalFederatio...

It seems to be "excerpts" at most, not the entire book.

Also, from that page:

"Table of Contents

Introduction [by Michael Chadwick]

Preface

Part One—Introduction: Western Civilization In Its World Setting"

Chadwick:

"Somehow one of the most revealing books ever published slipped through the editorial of offices of one of the major publishing houses in New York and found it way into the bookstores of America in 1966.

Five years later I was meandering through a used bookstore and stumbled upon this giant book. I picked up the book, blew the dust off and opened it to a page where the author stated that:"

LN- Is the introduction by Chadwick really part of Quigley's book, as is implied by this web page? It seems really unlikely; was there another edition, more than 5 years after first publication and Chadwick found Quigley's book, that included an introduction by Chadwick?

By saying, "indicates that truth seeking is not your main priority.", Sheila is suggesting i have some priority other than truth; my posting in this thread has been focused on the source of a quote in Sheila's blog, and she has removed the quote i questioned, as a result of my bringing this to her attention.

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

And I'm starting to doubt your judgment

"Western civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal" -

that's most certainly not how Quigley regarded the group and its aims, and it's something he would definitely not have written. I have the book in pdf on my computer and (unless he has used invisible letters that only people with magic powers can read) it's not in there.

Quigley liked their agenda. He thought they were not going to destroy but to save Western civilization. Don't put words in his mouth.

good point, John

danse quoted that part at truthaction as well, questioning the "for the first time in history" part that introduces it.

http://911reports.com
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-91...

One often wonders

whether someone like Madeline Albright, the Bomber of Belgrade, would have to commit some ruthless act in order to be considered worthy of the position of Secretary of State.