White House: 9/11 Wasn't Foreseeable & Santa Claus is Real

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/12/white-house-911-wasnt-foreseeable-santa.html

The White House is on a blitz to try to persuade Americans that 9/11 wasn't foreseeable.

Yesterday, White House press spokesman Tony Fratto said "No one could have anticipated" terrorists flying planes into buildings before 9/11 :

In an interview broadcast today, Secretary of State Rice said Bush didn't ignore any 9/11 "warning", because there was no "'when, where, how".

Is that believable?

Yes, definitely . . . as long as you disregard the following facts:

Other than that, it is totally believable.

Gee what a coincidence..

"But, Philippine and U.S intelligence officials said, the Bojinka operation called for a second, perhaps even more ambitious phase, as interrogators discovered when they pressed Murad about his pilot's license. All those years in flight school, he confessed, had been in preparation for a suicide mission. He was to buy, rent, or steal -- that part of the plan had not yet been worked out -- a small plane, preferably a Cessna, fill it with explosives and crash it into CIA headquarters."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bust_and_boom.html

"WASHINGTON — In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism -- it was to be a simulated accident."
http://www.boston.com/news/packages/sept11/anniversary/wire_stories/0903...

"Gen. Avelino "Sonny" Razon, one of the lead investigators in the Bojinka case, was so shocked at what he saw on September 11 that he jumped on a plane in Cebu, where he was now police chief, and flew to Manila to convene a hasty press conference. "We told the Americans about the plans to turn planes into flying bombs as far back as 1995," he complained to reporters."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bust_and_boom.html

Yeah no one could have known:

the plane was 50 miles out, no 40 miles out, no 10 miles out !!!!!!!!!!!!!! No one could have known that!!!!!!

Keith Olbermann covered this tonight... 12/18/08

Video of Olbermann's Bushed: 9/11 Could Have Been Prevented

Keith Olbermann knows,

but is this the beginning of the ultimate limited hangout (throwing Bush/Cheney under the bus)?

Time will tell and it won't be too much longer.

Get to know your neighbors if you don't know them already.

Love is a verb, brothers and sisters, let's get busier.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Encourage him...

Email: countdown@msnbc.com

I told him that he and Rachel should agree to expose the cover up in one night. They'd have to fire them both and there's strength in numbers.
I also told him of some good guests to have on. Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, Barrie Zwicker, etc.
If you have good ideas and some idle time consider emailing him as well. Or Rachel.

Email: rachel@msnbc.com

I've wasted worse amounts of time on other things.

E-mail from CIA officer on 30 August 2001

The officer was detailed to the FBI and was involved in the Moussaoui case. Twelve days before 9/11 he wrote:

"If this guy (Moussaoui) is let go, two year from now he will be talking to a control tower while aiming a 747 at the White House."
(Tenet, 2007, pp. 203).

From the DoJ IG report (pp. 153):
On Monday, August 27, in a telephone call between Martin and Gary, the tension surfaced.

According to Gary’s notes of the conversation, Martin told them that “what you have done is couched it in such a way that people get spun up.” Gary told the OIG that after Martin made this statement, Gary said “good” and then stated that Minneapolis was trying to keep Moussaoui from crashing an airplane into the World Trade Center. Gary’s notes of the conversation indicate that Gary stated, “We want to make sure he doesn’t get control of an airplane and crash it into the [World Trade Center] or something like that.” According to Gary’s notes, Martin responded by stating that Minneapolis did not have the evidence to support that Moussaoui was a terrorist. Gary’s notes indicate that Martin also stated, “You have a guy interested in this type of aircraft. That is it.”

Gary is Greg Jones, an FBI agent investigating Moussaoui in Minneapolis, Martin is Michael Maltbie, a headquarters agent who does not want to search Moussaoui's belongings.

These two quotes show that two of the agents investigating one of the hijackers' associates knew damn well that flying an airliner into a building was a highly likely mode of attack.

"investigating one of the hijackers' associates"

Hello Kevin,

Just wanted to point out that the phrase "investigating one of the hijackers' associates" is not neutral.
Considering that the three New-York sky-scrapers were taken down by controlled demolition (this is proven scientifically beyond reasonable doubt in www.AE911Truth.org new 2 hour DVD), AND considering that we do not have formal or legal proof that any of those "hijackers" boarded the specific airplanes, we should better specify "patsy" hijackers. Read here how KSM's "confession" is being spun : www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,468125,00.html by fox news. You can not take this seriously, when there is not a shred of legal proof, and there are mountains of evidence how this whole operation, including the bin-Laden confession videos, are all bought and paid for psychological warfare operations to manipulate western public opinion to fear these barbaric suicidal "fascistic" (hmmmm) Islamic extremists.

Elias Davidsson has long been on record of offering 10.000 Euro for whoever can bring forth evidence that would stand up in court that ONE Muslim was involved in the mass murders in New-York and Washington perpetuated on Sept 11th 2001. Please take notice that NO-ONE has stepped forward to ask for this non negligible compensation for successful (journalistic)detective work.

Until this has been proven, any-one selling the "official" meme of barbaric suicidal Islamists trying pulling-off 9/11 are engaging in racial and religious hate mongering. Let us stick to the facts.

Thank-you !

unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man." (Harold Pinter)

Prove this statement...

"the bin-Laden confession videos, are all bought and paid for psychological warfare operations to manipulate western public opinion to fear these barbaric suicidal "fascistic" (hmmmm) Islamic extremists."

Thanks.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Thank-you Jon Gold for being more specific in your questioning!

I am a medical doctor, and I was intrigued how bin Laden could survive running around for cover in the Tora Bora Mountains with his renal insufficiency and his two electric portable dialysis machines necessating single use filters and other items not easily found out there in the wilderness.

There were first some reports of how bin Laden had claimed responsibility for the attacks, and then came the Sept. 28th 2001 interview of him in the Karachi daily Ummat magazine (validated by the BBC, and available on Robert Fisk’s website here:
www.robert-fisk.com/usama_interview_ummat.htm ) where he denied responsibility for the attacks, and when pushed on naming who he thought could be behind it, he clearly said he did not know, but if we were to ask some-one, the first he would ask would be the shadow-government of the USA: Here is a quote from the interview: "Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till[during] the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks."

It is to be noted that during that same interview, done about 10 days after the attacks, Usama bin Laden predicted how Western Media would react: He said: "The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness."

Later, when Tony Blair was under pressure from his constituents to prove that Al Qaeda and bin Laden were behind the attacks of 9/11 (since otherwise their UK troops had no business in Afghanistan) he said around the 10th of Nov 2001 that his intelligence agency were in the possession of a video where bin Laden clearly boasts that he was behind the attacks. Of-course, the people wanted to see that video, but at first it was not released: it would have been a bit humiliating if, as bin Laden had done in the Karachi Newspaper, the bearded leader would pop up again and say that he did not do it, and that the “fatty bin Laden” was an imposter. Since bin Laden was having a rough time being chased around in the Tora Bora Mountains at the time, the intelligence community must have concluded that it would only be a matter of days before he would die due to natural causes, and be less of a nuisance. They had a pretty good idea of his condition, I think, since they released the “fatty bin Laden” “confession video” on Dec 10th 2001, and the official death notice, published in an Egyptian Newspaper, mentioned that bin Laden died from a pneumonia (secondary to his renal failure) and was buried on Dec 12 or 13th 2001 in the presence of some Taliban dignitaries and a few members of his family. More on bin Laden’s death here: www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/osama_dead.html

In the mean-time, we Westerners kept being treated to a Jack-in-the-Box bearded man who would pop up regularly to scare us, like on Nov 29th 2004 before the US “Who’s your favorite Skull & Bones-man” election. We were also taken on a wild goose hunt for Al-Zarqawi who was representing Al Qaeda here, there and every-where in Iraq, running around with only one leg, according to some, reportedly dead, slitting throats off of Westerners to thoroughly scare us how barbaric them Islamic extremists could be.
Google “Who was Abu Musab al Zarqawi?” by Michel Chossudovsky or, even better, read Nick Possums June 1st 2005 essay: “Whooping it up with the black ops boys ... The Abu Musab al-Zarqawi show” http://www.brushtail.com.au/july_04_on/zarqawi_show.html

The overwhelming “Cui Bono” evidence is leading us straight to our own black-ops department, working on mission from the same people who fine tuned the small text of the Continuity Of Government plan that went into effect before 10 AM on Sept 11th 2001. Any individual holding proof that Muslims participated in the attacks on New-York & Washington may go and ask to be paid out 10.000 Euros from Elias Davidsson.

Any-one still doubting that 9/11 was a psychological warfare operation should sit through the 2 hour video of www.AE911Truth.org and then explain how bin Laden’s men managed to rig the three sky-scrapers with newly developed military grade sol-gel-nano-thermite to bring the buildings down in such a spectacular fashion.

Kind and respectful regards,

Dr Beeth http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html#Beeth

"unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man." (Harold Pinter)

It's a compelling...

Argument, and a lot of what you mentioned appeared in my "Facts" article. However, as logically as it may sound based on what we know, it's still not "proof" of what you stated as fact.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

There was a time I had doubts,

but the cover-up allows us to be more certain who the culprits are. The terror-meme feeds on doubts, and a lot of “miracle making” co-intel-pro has been pumped in to lead us on false paths, towards doubts and incredulity.

Your facts-list is EPIC Jon, and then you sum it up with something like that you have a few good reasons to doubt the official version. This tactic is useful, as it opens a door of possibility towards looking into these things for those who are hermetically closed towards the subject.

Personally, there was a time I had lots of questions, especially wondering by what physical methods and laws of physics the three sky-scrapers came down in New-York.There is a three minute trailer of “9/11 Blueprint for Truth” here: www.ae911truth.org/flashmov12.htm Richard Gage says clearly that (already within the two-hour dvd) we have PROOF beyond reasonable doubt of controlled demolition of the THREE towers in New-York. Richard Gage still has a healthy degree of curiosity about details about how the demolition was done, but a rigorous scientific approach does not require him to doubt that the normal laws of physics were still in effect that day: the case that it WAS a controlled demolition has been proven. WE KNOW IT, it is simply being covered up by government agencies like NIST, not to mention the main-stream media. Like bin-Laden said, the doubts about the terror can lead to “fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States”. We should take head of that warning he gave us 10 days after the surprising and mysterious terror attack on New-York and Washington.

From a collective mental sanity point of view, there is a moment when we are allowed to drop the “doubt” meme, and allow the “we know what good for nothing business you are up to" meme. Nick Possum writing from Australia knew that already back in May 2005 about the Al-Zarqawi myth, perhaps because some Black-Ops boys at the time defected to Australia, sick and tired of the game of dealing out $10.000 right left and center to the baddest boys they could find to whoop up sly mischief and say it was done by the Z-man working for Al-Qaeda. In the end, we just have to ask ourselves who had the means, the lack of moral-integrity, the motive and the opportunity to do this kind of mischief, since, like Nick Possum said, some-one was running the show on the road with some kind of motive involved. Kurt Nimmo wrote an interesting article 1 year later, in May 2006 : “Neocon Academic Glorifies P2OG Terrorism” www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Articles/200605/20060512_Academic_Glor... Today it is the massive barrage of dis-info dished out by our ostrich-media that keeps us from chanting in unison that we all know that the Emperor has no clothes: most of those who have studied the collection of facts around 9/11 and the famous “War on Terror” KNOW what is going on Jon. Same as we don’t know exactly who planted the explosives when and how in WTC I, II & 7, we do not know exactly who killed Nick Berg, and ran the specifics of the Al Zarqawi show. Those acts were so criminal, that one understands the perpetrators worked hard on covering their tracks. But we do know what show it was part of, and WE HAVE ALREADY CALLED BLUFF ON THAT SHOW… Correct me if I’m wrong!

Thank-you Jon, for your high standards of quality you stand for on this site!

Eric Beeth

"unflinching, unswerving, fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves upon us all. It is in fact mandatory. If such a determination is not embodied in our political vision we have no hope of restoring what is so nearly lost to us - the dignity of man." (Harold Pinter)

Nice guys

Frankly I don't think KSM is a very nice guy.

I also don't think people are so upset that I am incredibly free that they will kill themselves just to take me out.

The Warnings...


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?