Richard Gage, AIA Publicly Thanks FBI for Endorsement of "Controlled Demolition" Analysis

Richard Gage, AIA founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth discusses a welcome letter of response from Michael J. Heimbach, Asst. Director in the FBI division of Counterterrorism.

On Nov. 7th the FBI received a registered letter from Harold Saive - founder of Saive referenced evidence presented in Richard Gage's 2008 video release of "9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH".

On Dec 22, 2008, Saive received a letter of response from Michael J. Heimbach thanking Saive for "offering to provide information to the United States Government".

Richard Gage comments during a conference call with Gators911Truth members to offer his vast resources to Heimbach's team in order to help the FBI with their job of investigating the crimes of mass murder on 9/11/2001.

H. Saive letter to FBI - 11/7/2008

Letter of Reply from FBI - 12/22/2008

Brilliant work

This is a breakthrough at the right time:

The sooner this Truth gets out, the sooner we can stop those criminals who killed over two million people since 911.


Sorry but it sounds like a personalized brush off to me.
Now that you have a direct line to this guy, please follow up by asking for specific research or tests they have conducted regarding Mr. Gage's work.
We need to push hard at every opportunity.

Endorsement of Gage's Presentation is no Brush Off

I sent 35 registered letters to members of Congress, Senators. Judges, the Media and more. I recieved only four (4) replies. This means that 31 recipients used the BRUSH OFF option despite the TITLE 18, Misprision challenge that could theoretically land them a jail sentence and/or fine.

Agent Heimbach (THE FBI) is the only recipient who responded appropriately persuant to Title 18. Agent Heimbach therefor, is on my (and Gage's) "pen-pal" list.

The next volley of Registered letters to the new Obama team will include a copy of Heimbach's letter that endorses evidence of a possible FALSE FLAG on 9/11. Let the Rule-Outs begin.


Great move Gators and Gage!

Let's keep the ball rolling! Great opening move, what can we do next, to follow up on this? A follow up letter perhaps. What about John O 'neil a former comrade in arms who died on his first day of work in the twin towers, and his memory along with all the other victims. Sorry but , it's just not OK we all have to draw a line in the dust and say enough is enough we want our country back. There are no excuses! Only high placed traitors with some national security crap who make a mockery of all the dedicated FBI agents and other government employees, etc. who took oaths to protect this country and it's constitution. Let's get our FBI back , let's get our country back. If you know a more important issue for this country I'd like to hear it. " let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories " like the one that's been handed to us! Come on the FBI and the American people are better than that, they are smarter than that. This great country just over 200 years old with so much history to be proud of in the area of human rights, equal opportunity, labor laws, environmental protections, this has been our great experiment for humanity. Let's not let them take it away from us, let's stand brave and tall and with a torch of truth. Most of our representatives are afraid and need to be replaced, but our ranks are filled with true patriots who love this country and want to be proud of our country again. I place the leaders of the 911 truth movement in the highest regard, the names of which are famous in my mind, including the people who make this site. I respect these folks who are not afraid to stand up for the truth, our country and all of us.

I'm confused

At the end of the letter to the FBI, draft legislation to the US Congress is referenced. If I'm not mistaken, this is the proposed legislation being referenced:

Given that this proposed bill is ripe with controversy within the truth movement, not the least of which being a misrepresentation of stj911, why was it highlighted for the FBI? Did Saive not know of the controversy?

Thank you Harold

for the excellent video. Well said, superbly edited.

Chris Sarns

ETA: 911Peacenic, good point. Fortunately, Mr. Heimbach didn't respond to that part, only Richard's "thorough research and analysis". This is a good sign.


Very impressive. This is amazing.

Violence can only be concealed by a lie, and the lie can only be maintained by violence.

~Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

This is very useful in getting people's attention

Image Hosted by


Things you have not been told by the Main Stream Media

The FBI has NOT charged Osama Bin Laden with 9/11 because there is NO hard evidence connecting him to 9/11.

The hijackers left NO paper trail, no mention of any aspect of the 9/11 plot.
Paragraph 14

The official 9/11 story, "Bin Laden and 19 hijackers did it" is a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
Conspiracy: a secret plan between two or more people to commit an illegal or subversive act
Theory: speculation, idea formed by speculation

Michael J. Heimbach; Assistant Director, Counterterrorism Division, National Security Branch, FBI
"Mr. Gage presents an interesting theory, backed by through research and analysis."
Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for 911Truth.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] did NOT explain the collapse of the Trade Towers. They stopped at collapse initiation.
Pg 3 "NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability."
Pg 4 "As we mentioned previously, we are unable to provide a full explanation- of the total collapse."
NIST claims that the failure of a single column resulted in the total collapse of a 47 story building.
" Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse—would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors."

There is proof beyond a reasonable doubt that all three buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions on 9/11.
WTC 7 is the easiest to recognize because it was a classic implosion.

Freefall [David Chandler is a physics teacher]

The fires in the NIST computer simulation do NOT match the photographs
[click on image for full size]
The trade towers were exploded top down as can be seen in these videos
North Tower exploding
South Tower Coming Down