Did really column 79 fail first?

NIST states that the column 79 failed first.It seems that it's not true.Smoke suction suggest that the column 81 failed prior the colum 80 and 79.

Prepare some 3D glasses!

The 10 story gouge in the middle of the south face did not exist

The large area labeled "Approximate Region of Impact Damage by Large WTC1 Debris"
never existed.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Shyam Sunder lied in his interview with Popular Mechanics Magazine when he stated:
"On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately ten stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out,"
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5
He did not mention that there were 2 other statements on the same page* that were in direct conflict with that statement. * NIST L pg 18 [22 on pg counter]
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf

In the Final Draft the gouge depicted in the above graphic is not there because it never existed. Pg 183 - 187 [pg 227 - 231 on pg counter]
http://nasathermalimages.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/NIST_NCSTAR_1-9_...

In the Final report on pg 50 [92] it says:
"The structural damage to WTC 7 was primarily located at the southwest corner and adjacent areas of the west and south faces, on Floors 5 through 17. Severed columns were located between Floors 7 and 17 on the south face (six columns) and the west face (one column) near the southwest corner.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/nasathermalimages/public/images/NCSTAR%201A_unlo...