Two Seconds That Will Live in Infamy by Dwain Deets

Two Seconds That Will Live in Infamy

Dwain Deets - Mar 15, 2009

NIST's Half-Admission of Yet Another 9/11 Smoking Gun

The U.S. Senate will hold a confirmation hearing this week on the nominee for Secretary of Commerce, Gov. Gary Locke. This cabinet position oversees the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency responsible for investigating and reporting on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7. NIST tried to avoid admitting that there was any freefall acceleration when the building came down on September 11, 2001. All the way to their draft final report on August 26, 2008, nearly seven years after the event, the NIST report's lead authors held firmly to their position that freefall did not occur.

Once NIST invited comments on its draft report, it was more or less forced to accept the indisputable explanations based on the publicly available videos proving that freefall had occurred. David Chandler, a high school physics teacher and AE911Truth researcher, provided the most compelling argument in a video seen widely on YouTube.


When does Infamy start?

It could happen any day.
And then again it could continue at this painful snail's pace.

But it is inevitable.

Isn't David Chandler a hero? Doncha just love that guy?


NIST's original Q&A said,

"In videos, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free fall, something that would not occur in the structural collapse that you describe. How can you ignore basic laws of physics?

WTC 7 did not enter free fall. According to NIST analysis of WTC 7 video, the building collapsed 18 stories in 5.3 seconds. If the building exhibited free fall, this process would have taken just 3.9 seconds. The actual collapse time exceeded the free fall time by 40 percent."

So it looks like NIST's change of "opinion" on this matter was their sole concession to empirical evidence. Unfortunately, they still deny the implications of free-fall.

"Unfortunately, ..."

"Unfortunately, they still deny the implications of free-fall."

Criminals regularly "deny" the implications of their crimes through arrest, trial, conviction and incarceration. WTC7 in free-fall is the hard evidence for anyone to see. Our task is to communicate this FACT as widely as possible. From there people will see how all the rest of the pieces fit.

The truth will out.

way to go Dwain. Please come

way to go Dwain. Please come to the AIA Convention at the end of April in San Francisco.

AAI Convention

I plan to be there. It's going to be a time to bring awareness to a whole lot of architects. Also, a time to get together with a lot of us, already eager to help the cause.


On to the NIST appointment

We learned a lot in trying to get our question asked at the Secretary of Commerce hearings. It didn't happen, but it will the next time around. Admittedly, it was a stretch to make our case here. What we wanted was the issue raised at a cabinet-level appointment. But, we have a much stronger case to have our question asked at the Director of NIST hearings. It will come. There is a vacancy at NIST Director, so it will come sooner than otherwise. I'm very encouraged by the combination of what we learned, and the compelling nature of our case.


Way to go Dwain

Way to go Dwain! great stuff.